Should physically unfit men be allowed to vote?

Dragged out into the field and shot exe style

>>127478398
Why argue about something that will never happen?

>>127478398
More importantly, shouldn't we be allowed to vote for free testosterone boosters if the government is going to put chemicals in the water that turn the frickin' frogs gay?

>tfw listening to local NPR station the other night and they had on an expert to describe that there are in fact chemicals in the water that turn the frickin' frogs gay
Pretty kek timeline

File: 578dc61ed12c0.image.jpg (274KB, 1148x1805px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1148x1805px

>>127478642
This. OP's question is retarded since because guns exist and physically fit men are a minority if this SOMEHOW would get implemented you'd have a revolution almost instantly if the bar isn't low enough to allow 90% of men to vote.

>>127478398
trump would be done for

File: subotai 8.jpg (89KB, 385x580px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 385x580px

Should someone too fat to ride a horse be allowed to be one of the greatest generals ever?

>>127478398
Only if women as a whole lost their right to vote as well.

>>127478398
Should "men" under 6ft be allowed to vote?

>>127478642
can you libtards tolerate a thought experiment for once

File: holy shit.gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x180px

>>127479460
>that picture

>>127478398
>>127479806
Would the world be a better place if only tall muscular men were allowed to vote?

One vote per family

>>127478398
Of course not.

How can someone who can't even take care of their body possibly have the judgement to take care of a nation?

>>127479884
that poster is probably a woman. i've only ever seen women have this aversion to hypotheticals and thought experiments.

>>127479935
By excluding women right away it's an automatic win.

There might be an issue with over-representation of niggers, but they don't usually vote anyway.

>>127478398
I'm skinny as fuck from not training, eating big or doing any labour for 6 months because of uni, but weighing 73kg I can still bench 90kg. Would I be allowed to vote? I am not aesthetic.

>>127480049
Well, taking care of a nation is nothing like taking care of a body, but I see the parallel you are trying to draw.

>>127478398
Yes there are plenty of smart guys who are not in the best shape

The best thing we can do is make it so anyone on welfare cannot vote

>>127480116
>niggers
>taller than whites

Stop watching so much cuckporn and actually look at some statistics

File: smug cheney.jpg (7KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x250px

>>127480049
>How can someone who can't even take care of their body possibly have the judgement to take care of a nation?

>>127478398
LOL @ those manlets for sure both of them are 5'7" or under. They DEFINITELY shouldn't be allowed to vote.

>>127480274
Should beneficiaries of corporate welfare (e.g. officers, employees, and shareholders of defense contractors) be allowed to vote?

>>127480274
This.

Only taxpayers should be able to vote, and people who have retired after paying taxes for x amount of years

>>127480477
>"pension isn't welfare" fag strikes again

You're going to tell me NHS isn't welfare too now, aren't you?

>>127479460
>guns exist
fucking hell, we've been physically training our infantry for nothing. Might as well end that so it can be more inclusive to trannies and women

File: 50.gif (1MB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 240x180px

>>127478398
These two manlets fight at 130 pounds.

>>127480307
Most the the ones near me tend on the whole to be taller and better-built than the whites. So it depends where you draw the fitness lines. If you were to set them somewhat low, you could get in most of the whites while excluding the masses of fat blacks.

>>127480178
If you don't have the judgement, discipline, forethought or self respect to work out, how can you be trusted with anything else?

There's absolutely no excuse at all to have a weak flabby body outside of very extreme medical cases. If you are physically degraded, then you are mentally degraded. Physical health has a big impact on your mental capabilities. It's also a pretty visible showing of how much you respect yourself. Why would I trust you to respect my nation if you can't respect yourself?

I'm not saying you have to be an Olympic athlete. Just be able to do something simple like a PAT.

File: IMG_4672.png (633KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 700x700px

>>127480178
And yet I'm sure you voted for Trump because he's a business man and the country "is like a business".

>>127478398
>have
unfit men shouldn't be allowed to run for president. Remove that orange fat fuck out of office.

>>127478398
yes and all women

>>127480608
If you paid taxes your entire life you should be able to vote. You are paying for your own pension, welfare is paid for by others you innumerate beaner

>>127480809
what's a PAT?

>>127480926
>You are paying for your own pension

Is this seriously what boomers think?

>>127480477
>>127480274
Just use the Starship Troopers model. You only vote if you've done military service or an equivalent civilian contribution. You have to have some sort of actual personal investment in society before you can dictate how society is governed.

>>127478398
Uhh.. Yes. What a weird question. Thats like asking if only britney spears hedonistic bimbos should be allowed to vote, male or female. If that was the case we would basically have a more concentrated form of what we have now, because in general that is what we have now. The social influences fill in the gaps of what would be otherwise.

>>127478398
Should niggers be allowed to vote? Your call.

>>127478398
Why not? You're saying that Trump shouldn't be allowed to vote? You're saying that Milton Friedman shouldn't have been allowed to vote? No, I think land owners/people with a reasonable net worth should be allowed to vote.

File: 1496001104718.jpg (98KB, 1535x177px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1535x177px

>>127480767
Just draw the line at healthy...

>>127480809
That's more clear, and I personally like that explanation and reasoning better than the typical responses to these threads.

>>127480875
Are you okay? Running a country is not at all like running a business, nor did I ever imply that.

>>127480901
I mean no fug

File: 1495126204914.png (262KB, 475x557px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 475x557px

>>127480717
who are they?

>>127481081
best option

>>127481022
In a well-working economy you would. Of course it's not literally the same money, but you get out something proportional to what you paid in. Given that the economic situation changes drastically over just decades these days it will of course be tough to be entirely fair

>>127480969
Physical Aptitude Test. Most North American police forces have a (very roughly) standardized physical fitness test. It's usually just a bit of running up and down stairs, hopping small obstacles, using a push and pull machine, and carrying a heavy sandbag. It's a pass/fail exam.

>>127481320
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5827a2.htm

Forgot the link

>>127481264
The land owner thing is a nice idea in principle. But the problem is we increasingly live in a renter's society, and then you'd have the Jewish landlords making all the rules.

It's kind of dangerous because that situation becomes difficult to reverse. Of course, we could just disallow foreigners from owning land, which of course would exclude all Jews.

>>127481413
I forget their names, hate watching the midgets, but these guys are in the UFC in the midget class.

>>127481618
I don't think a landowner voting policy would work in this time frame. It's good if you have a small population where a majority of landowners are citizens, but in a country of 300+ million that can't own land even if they wanted would not work.
Say we try to implement that now, think of how many left/centrist/right people own land (primarily in cities), and how disproportionate the votes would end up being. And again, as you said, there'd be a problem with foreign investors owning land maybe or maybe not having the right to participate in our elections.

>>127481081

>military service to vote
>equivalent civilian contribution
>(((equivalent civilian contribution)))

File: fat-nazi.jpg (23KB, 423x267px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 423x267px

>sits in front of computer and posts weaponized autism all day
>suggests that his own right to vote be taken away
>not a bad thought

File: 1392266338180.jpg (74KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 900x675px

>>127478398
voting is far to easy in america, its shocking actually.

here are just SOME of the restrictions there should be

raise the voting age to 25 at minimum, 30 would be even better

women should not be allowed to vote, they've proven mentally incapable

there needs to be some kind of political aptitude test as a requirement for voting, people who can't name their state's governor for example have no business voting

3-5 year freeze on anyone receiving government finical assistance

>>127478398
those are some big legs

File: chad nationalism.jpg (105KB, 674x906px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 674x906px

>>127478398

Chad nationalism ftw. Betas weeaboos manlets and ugly losers have no place in society.

File: 1495675403713.jpg (43KB, 535x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 535x600px

>>127478398
A few more months and I'll have that whole look down, beard and all.

>>127482263
It's typically years of hard labor building infrastructure, not (((intellectual contributions))). Things that can be objectively measured.

>>127482345
How about a basic literacy test before receiving your voters registration? I feel like that should be the first thing on your list.

>>127479460
>Untied shoes
I don't get this trend. Why don't people, specifically young blacks, tie their damn shoes? It's so uncomfortable.

>>127479107
>turn the frickin' frogs gay
They grow uteri.

>>127478642
>what are hypothetical thought exercises

none of /pol/ would be able to vote.

Fit men are more likely to be gay so no. Someone explain why is this so.

File: reddit meetup.jpg (204KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1024x768px

>>127483018
t.reddit shill

>>127479460
I take it you don't understand the point of physical fitness. Sure, there are tools to help even the odds in a combat situation but that is not what this is about.

>>127483076
I think it's the other way around, fags are more likely to be fit because of narcissism and competition for the best dick at the fag club.

>>127478398
>one skipped leg day and one didnt

This is the true denominator. Leglets should not vote.

>>127483317
Isn't that what he was saying though?

I have seen men with potbelly's completly wreck this /fit/ faggots.
i'm not against working out, but a lot of these guys who work out think they somehow are gods who can take on everybody in a fight.

>>127483686
See >>127480809 He makes a compelling case.

>>127479806
As a manlet I would be ok with this

>>127478398
no

>>127478398
Have rather tests on current political aspects like mentioned above and basic elementary knowledge. You can't integrate, you don't vote. Studies show, testosterone packed people want to solve issues fast, predisposition to violence. Too costly. Can't build a future on short-sighted actions.

>>127483076
>Someone explain why is this so.
It's called "gay body fascism". Seriously, look it up. It's a version of what OP proposes, that you are only valuable if you look a certain way. OP isn't talking about sexual value but he's still a faggot.

>>127483317
No, /fit/izens say they're becoming tired of women being boring skinnyfat shells while appreciating other men's bodies and effort they put in.
Probably a meme but not so sure anymore.

>>127482935
It's blacks and ONLY blacks who do this

>>127484234
I can appreciate a man's physique and the effort and dedication it takes to get to his level of performance, especially if I am doing the same and am fully aware of the struggle

This doesn't mean I want to put it in his pooper

>>127484181
>studies show
>studies show
>sources say
>unnamed sources inform us
>studies show
>unnamed sources
>sources say
Literally fake news

>>127484563
Until you start mirin too much.

>>127483500
In the way that we both see a correlation, yes, but I think that gayness causes fitness rather than that fitness causes gayness. Although as he said here: >>127484234 when you look at /fit/ you're not so sure any more.

>>127478398
>amount of time doing physical labor
>amount of time reading books
>ability to make informed decision about the policies of a nation

>>127478398
men/women that have not performed military/social service should not be allowed to vote.

service=citizenship

>>127478398
I would fuck the right one, no homo.

>>127479460
that pic though...
>America becomes a libertarian utopia
>Niggers get voted back to Africa

>>127478398
btw, these two are homos

>>127485287
I understand now. I think in general you're more right than he is, but of course it's likely based more off of the individual more than anything. S
As far as /fit/ is concerned I think there's a line between miring someone and their accomplishments (in this case being fit from fat/skinny), and having romantic thoughts about someone because of their attractiveness/accomplishments. Sometimes people can unknowingly cross the line either way.

>>127486417
/fit/ is probably a place where latent faggotry gets drawn out into a safe space where people are ironically being fags at first and then not so ironically any more.

kind of like how people come to /pol/ for memes and shitposting and then gradually morph into a bona fide right winger

>>127487188
/fit/ was my home board when /hm/ was first created. Easily half of the early content was /fit/ making no homo jokes.

And then a surprising number of /fit/izens stayed and were actually homo. That was pretty funny.