Conversations with Women

>>127320597
I think you'll find that quite a lot of people you deal with on a daily basis (assuming you're not a NEET) are quite redpilled and/or intelligent but are too afraid to talk about their viewpoints.

File: 1465657436309.jpg (660KB, 887x2141px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 887x2141px

never expect serious female engagement on important issues, they are the fairer and simpler sex. It is not right or natural that they should give you good conversation and debate like a man should.

That being said, redpilled men are fairly hard to find these days (depending on where you are).

>>127320597
If you want to have a deep conversation, better go speak with another man, you´ll hardly find a deep conversation with a woman.

Not saying that you can´t have an interesting conversation with a female, but dont expect alot of it.

Funny, i latched with my gf because she was intelligent and almost too conservative. Plus a calvinist!

File: 1490453419244.jpg (59KB, 453x439px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 453x439px

>>127320597

Your gf sounds like a retard social mongoloid, i would just say go to protests and talk to people around there, that will help train you debating people and defending your ideas.

just use your gf to milk your cows. sounds like thats all shes gonna aspire too anyway

>>127321809

A mentally retarded female can easily pass as a normal woman. Shut up and look pretty is the extent of their daily duties

>>127320597
why do you need live political conversation so badly? most people in the real world don't care much about politics, or don't have very well-formed opinions on anything other than emotional or indoctrinated feelings.

I would never try to get deep into politics with a girlfriend. I'd keep it away from your workplace as well. Try talking to siblings or your dad maybe? Or some friends whom you don't work with?

I have a pretty big social network, lots of friends and acquaintances, and really I only get deep into politics with one of my best friends who I've known for almost 20 years, and we share similar viewpoints on most things so it ends up being sort of a circle jerk anyway.

I've had the most productive and informative political conversations by far

>>127320597
>My girlfriend
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA1!!!
* breaths in *
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHA
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>127320597
>intellectual
>women
Pick one or the other anon , a pussy isn't a brain no matter what the kikes tell you

>>127320597
I have had one once, and it was with one of my neighbors. She's probably in her late 40s and was getting a degree from UVA. We talked about libertarianism and Trump (this was when he first announced his candidacy).

Pretty rare to find women that can even carry an intelligent political conversation, but they're out there. But you probably don't want to bang them. Stick with the dumb QTs

File: 1490274287304.png (190KB, 458x438px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 458x438px

>Not a Jew
>Looks like a Jew

>>127320597

Women don't have depth.

If you have a "deep" conversation with a girl, it's because she's great at parroting interesting men's opinions.

Don't look for "conversation" with a chick. Or else you're her beta bitch boy. Her girlfriend. Her diary.

What'd'ya know, men and women are actually different. Conversation with a girl is not a conversation the way you look at it.

>>127320597
In interpals I used to talk with a Russian qt about literature and philosophy. She couldn't handle politics, although our ideas matched closely. Just wasn't into it.

Every time a girl says she's into politics she's either a lefty, who shills for fags, abortions, and other asinine things, or an attention seeking ho, such as Lauren Southern.
Real political women are few and far between, if she's interested in politics, she's already a politician.

Don't bother with liberal women. They're idealists that are obsessed with peace and love. One time I slightly revealed my power level and told her the Indians weren't peaceful and deserved to be attacked and she told me I was scaring her