Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Convention Thread #2

>>127267993
Who cares? The only party that matters is the Bloc Québécois.

>>127267993
Who's the qt

>>127268266
Surely Burgers are not stupid enough to keep falling for the "Based Quebec" meme?

The province is full of left-wing socialist retards. They delude themselves into thinking they are part of France, demand gibs and special laws, and voted for the very people who destroyed the country while trying to secede from the country.

File: SyrupNiggerMRE.jpg (371KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1024x768px

>>127269154
real quebecois rednecks hate the french from france

Don't forget the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KENJg91lbX4

If I hear the words "openness and inclusion" one more time, I'm going to puke.

Regarding the immigration issue, not only is it clear that the candidates must tread lightly as to not upset the general population, they must tread lightly to just not upset the party. It isn't the time yet, for someone that wants to do away with the majority of immigration, but if we're lucky, a day will come in the future.

I only hope it won't be too late by then.

>>127267993
Dem tits

File: catc.jpg (138KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 660x495px

>>127268509
>>127270894
this desu

>>127270313
this chris alexander seems like those nu-realist types who went overboard with his geopolitical larping...

what a delusional fuckhead

>>127269154

>The province is full of left-wing socialist retards. They delude themselves into thinking they are part of France, [...], and voted for the very people who destroyed the country

None of this is true

>>127271015
Julie Couillard. You'll hear her name often if he wins party leadership.

>>127270313
>holy fuck... they are playing their commentary over andrew saxtons speech

wtf is this shit...who do these niggers think they are

>>127267993
disappointed that he voted for C16, but glad he at least regrets it (I dont see why he supported a bill that restricts free speech when he is libertarian):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFNxZnNjb5U&feature=youtu.be&t=9m25s

I like his stance on firearms, but what is his stance on china investing in our housing market and exporting our oil?

I know nothing about economics, but if I were a leader of canada that had unlimited power, I would:
>end humanitarian aid
>stop foreign investments in housing market
>Invest in nuclear power and thorium reactors (we have a shittonne of both supplies)
>Implement reactors in many cities, creating jobs and making more developed cities in the north (increase northern presence for the resource wars)

help me out leafs, what would be good if you had all the power?

>>127271791
>I dont see why he supported a bill that restricts free speech when he is libertarian.

Well, the vast majority of people considered the bill, and it's previous iterations as harmless. He actually changed his tune once Jordan Peterson spoke to him about it, and without knowing about how an amendment to the human rights act affects all the provincial human rights commission and tribunals, I would consider it harmless.

Since the conservative party supported the bills, he probably got his marching orders from them. He must have known to choose his battles and not make a sticking point over a bill that was practically impossible to stop.

>>127267993
how does the voting work?

It it only one ballot? what happens if no one gets a majority?

>>127272795
>how does the voting work?
Every Kindergartener knows how voting works man
>It it only one ballot? what happens if no one gets a majority?
If no one gets the majority that means the same number of people voted for each candidate. Such an occurrence is highly unlikely

>>127267993

Who does those massive mamaries belong to again?

>>127273528

Hell's Angels