Can you see what I see?

Ok I'll bite, what is it?

>>127126275
It's plagiarism

Wait, holy shit are you telling me the media are a bunch of cunts? No way.

Nothing wrong with reposting someone else's image. He should have given her credit, though.

she posted it on social media

he obtained it from that

what's the problem?

>>127127041
>Nothing wrong here. Except it's wrong.

He should bodyslam that fuck for being a theving twatwaffle

>>127127277
Given how easily he is triggered, there is a very long list of minor infractions he would resort to bodyslamming for. He's like an autistic Judge Dredd.

But yes in this case even a rational human being should want to deal with plagiarism in such a way, how goddamn hard is it to give credit?

File: 1401702828714.png (172KB, 334x300px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 334x300px

>who gives a fuck stole who gives a fuck from who gives a fuck without citation
>/pol/, can you believe it?

>>127127053
There isn't one, except butthurt

Is Whitney bodyslammable?
Does Jonathan Martin (((echo)))?
SO many questions.

>>127125308
>Can you see what I see?
That OP is a faggot?

>>127125308

Another great reminder that anyone who posts a picture (or anything really) to any social media forfeits the rights to that content?

Because I hope there is more to this than that.

>>127127053

You are actually very incorrect. Even if she posts it on social media, the photograph is still her and permission is required.

It is just very rarely enforced, and there is a difference between some random twitter user posting it and the NYT claiming credit.

>>127129024
Wrong.

>>127125308
Posts it publicly
>Gets mad when others post it publicly
Unable to comprehend how Twitter works.
Nothing to see here

>>127129024
>you forfeit your rights when you post
>except every time there's a happening and CNN asks for permission to use your video
You're an idiot schlomo

File: good good.png (584KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1280x720px

>>127125308
I recognize that silhouette anywhere