Link between weakness and left wing.

>>127114723

The biggest and strongest rule. That's why the ruling class came from the warrior caste and not the merchant, farmer, or priest caste.

>>127114723
>So turns out the weaker you are physically, the more likely you are to be a commy scrounger.
Then why isn't this board a commy board?

File: Commune_de_Paris_gardes_nationaux_sur_la_colonne_Vendôme[1].jpg (1MB, 2290x1680px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2290x1680px

yeah look at all them weak ass dudes

File: 1495734324718.jpg (59KB, 355x474px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 355x474px

>>127114723
>cant fight for his own
>has to get socialistic

Who could have guess that.

>>127117868
>using computer his parents bought him in his basement

>talks about fighting on his own while he's in western europe

>>127115312
>That's why the ruling class came from the warrior caste and not the merchant
You sure about that?

>>127118101
kek

>>127114723
How about we discuss the studies that link racist views to low IQ?

>>127118101
Sixth post best post

>>127117975
>western europe is socialistic

You fell for the american soci-meme, comrade. Do you believe in the /pol/ memes? Like, theyre some root of news for you?

>>127118653

the fuck are you talking about ? I'm just telling you you live in one of the best countries in the world compared to billions of people who live in shitholes

and yet you talk about fighting for yourself

>>127118653

>Americans have a fuckload more welfare than Europe
>Somehow we're the socialists because we don't pay x3 the money to (((big pharma))) for our healthcare

really activates my charcoal

File: 1463279322677.jpg (44KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 250x250px

I've had this pic for ages. How are there only just now people writing about it?

I can't find the actual study, I'm curious to see how deep the correlation is

File: oreillywtf.jpg (35KB, 419x360px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 419x360px

>>127115312
>the clergy was never a ruling class

>171 men

Sample size too small to make it ecologically valid.

Expand the sample size and soon enough your dreams will come true

oh, it's evolutionary psychology
into the trash it goes

>>127114723
This is up there with the non-stop "republicans have lower IQ study shows" garbage, but I'll laugh anyway because this one is far more accurate and sensible.

File: 1432217725560s.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x250px

>>127118101
hoooo

>>127118385
That's unfair
hispanics and blacks are racist as all hell and they're populous peoples

>>127121030

> 171
> too small

That is bigger than most sociological or psychological studies. It's even bigger than most medical studies.

You only need a random sample of 30 people to identify statistically significant trends.

If the 171 was truly randomized, this is more than enough people to draw a conclusion.