The (((rape))) of Nanking

File: IMG_1620.jpg (93KB, 720x579px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 720x579px

>>127090532
Alot of (((((((((statistics)))))))))) produced in the book start with
>as many as one
So, if it just happened once is this not a jewish trick to over estimate the ACTUAL death total? To play on your sympathy glands and believe that this was incredibly frequent?

>>127090532
It was definitely a NAZI who set up the safe zone in Nanking to protect civilians.

He sent news of the atrocities to the German government many times only to be ignored and when he presented them with smuggled video reels of the victims when he got back to Germany the Government confiscated it and threatened him to never talk about it again.

He also had all of his assets seized and the Chinese actually gathered allot of money for him after the war to thank him.

>>127091212
He happened to have video evidence of ALL of these actions? How can you possibly prove some of these claims of a son being forced to fuck his mom but is killed after and then the mom commits suicide? That's just one of the claims stated there's more that are just as outlandish

>>127091781
No he had small sixteen second reels of the victims of the mass stabbings, burnings and shit like that.

It was serious enough that the government decided to arrest him and interrogate him thoroughly.

>>127091781
There are interviews of old japs talking about the rapes quite honestly on camera. I am sure you can find them on youtube.

There are also japanese doctors who admit to carrying out vivisection on living victims.

>>127092180
And there's no way whatsoever the interviewers could be paid off in an effort to continue to cover up the fact it didn't happen? As well as he showed dead bodies, they were at war of course there's dead bodies. Where's the babies being thrown onto bayonets? People being buried and eaten by dogs with their intestines dragged out? Trucks that have to literally form a path to drive through because of the absolute sea of dead bodies in the streets?

Does anyone have a link to the japanese site that tries to debunk it with things like the uniforms shown in photos being from the wrong year, etc? I remember it also mentioned some british correspondence which suggested the Japanese were actually defending the peasants from the communists.

>>127092018
Did the videos show Japanese soldiers?

>>127093522
http://www.history.gr.jp/nanking/chapter01_01.html

There were no rapes in ww2

Women open their legs for invaders

Nothing turns a woman more on than seeing her husband, father and brothers killed. It causes hastened ovulation

>>127093787
Kek, if only people were actually murdered

>>127092786
If everything is a coverup then why should we believe anything?

What would be evidence enough for you that the Japanese DID commit atrocities?

>>127093943
Yeah, no one died in WW2 except soldiers

Seriously though, what sort of basis do you have in WW2 history?

>>127094248
If it's so definitive why do alot of Japanese people deny it ever happened? Just cause you pull two gooks onto camera and ask them to read a paper doesn't mean they actually committed anything. Have you read the rape of Nanking? All these eye witness accounts of actions that happened to
>as many as one
So anecdotal evidence of actions that aren't in large enough quanity to actually prove.

>>127094489
Pretty sure i'm talking about 1937 there sweetie. Not WW2.

>>127090532
Japs invaded china peacefully. They didn't kill a single person. The chinese just simply commited sudoku at the sight of their imperial warlord neighbors. The women were begging to be penetrated for superior nippon samurai seed.

>>127095291
Who's to say the village wasn't disease ridden and the only way the gooks could stop the spread of it was vivisection because they couldn't gain enough information from already deceased victims? They're worried about the spread so they place bodies in mass graves and burn victims like the black plague.