The fuck?
>>127058682
>40 per cent lower than couples without children
Wow, that's great. I was worried it was going to be the opposite.
I suppose the meme that children will 'make you hate your partner' can't be all that true
>>127058682
Welcome to gynocentrism where man are expendable and women are cherished loved and praised every day
>>127058682
l i b e r a t i o n
>>127058682
Another strike against the "child-free" couples. Marriage, children, values, are are co-reliant upon one another.
The real take away from this should be to realize how fucked we are that nearly 50% of the future of this country are going to be extremely effeminate women pleasers with no manly bone in their body.
Think about it. Not only are the getting raised exclusively by women and by extension, government funds, but they're also being born in a time when not going outside isn't consider abnormal, because everyone is glued to phone and computer screens.
This is how the collapse of Western Civilization II starts. Best you can do is start a family and move to the country side, with a community of like-minded individuals.
Funny thing s, the majority of this board will never accomplish the above because most of you are self-defeating degenerate hypocrites. It's like pottery, really.
>>127060194
>the best thing you can do is become some kind of retarded recluse who lives amongst a bunch of knuckle-dragging hicks
>y-you're all degenerates
kek
>>127058682
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH
SHAREBLUE IS SHILLING HARD ACROSS 80+ THREADS
>>127058682
black people
>>127058682
43% percent
holy shit
that explains why the world is going to shit
This belongs in /bant/
>>127060504
Are you some inner city faggot? Nothing is better than living in the country side with a community of your kin.
Have fun fapping to Loli and virtue signaling in your echo chamber, fag
>>127058682
Social liberals. Take a look at this
https://medium.com/@freddiedeboer/conservatives-are-wrong-about-everything-except-predicting-their-own-place-in-the-culture-e5c036fdcdc5
>Social cons said that no-fault divorce would read to vastly higher divorce rates, and it did. Social cons said that ending the norm of the two-parent family would lead to more single-parent households, and they were correct. Social cons said that widespread access to birth control would lead to sexual licentiousness, and they were right. Social cons said that legalized abortion would decouple sex from procreation, and that happened. Social cons said that decriminalization of gay sex would lead to social acceptance of gay people, and so it was. Social cons said that social acceptance of gay people would lead to gay marriage, and that was true. Social cons said that efforts to end stigma against trans people would lead to a general rejection of the gender binary, and so it has.
>Again, these are mostly all good consequences, which is the difference between me and them.
>>127060685
Holy shit is she retarded or ignorant?
AND BLACK PEOPLE MAKE UP 100 PERCENT OF THE UN AVAILABLE FATHERS
>>127061950
well shes an ivy league graduate lawyer
but shes also black
so both probably
>>127059423
Same. Bitches take all your shit if there are kids involved
>>127060905
>Have fun fapping to Loli and virtue signaling in your echo chamber, fag
did you learn what right wing is from some kike network like TRS? kek
pathetic faggot, you're probably a dumbass kid with no wife
>>127062152
kek did it fucking explode?