>talk to a guy in The Netherlands >pays 14 euros a month

someone has to pay for the surveillance they have you on, this shit ain't cheap

>>126787390
I pay £40 a month for 76Mb down

>>126787390

State influence.

I work for BT, ask me anything.

>>126788897

How did you get a job in BT?

>>126789088

I applied, they interviewed and hired me.

>>126788606
How does it make you feel knowing you pay three times more for a service that's 1.3 times slower?

>>126789573

Its an open market shop elsewhere if you can't afford the prices.

>>126787390
I think it also depends where in the UK you live. Been to Hull, internet was complete garbage and overpriced .

>>126787390
>pay $8 for 1Gb
>laugh

>>126789815
It's not a matter of "affording the prices," it's a matter of "you're being screwed, buddy."

>>126787390
Got the same thing here, at least where I live. Time Warner has a stranglehold on pretty much my whole state last I checked, and they charge a good deal for hilariously terrible connection/speed.

Would love to switch but, oh dear wouldn't you know it, there's no one else around. Thankfully last I heard Google is laying fiber in the area, fucking hell that can't come soon enough after like 20 years of these Time Warner fucks.

>>126789573
The free market will decide

>>126790482
It won't. Monopolist don't have any reason to offer better services for the same price. This is especially true for eternal anglo, and that's the reason why you, burgers and cunts have such shit internet.

>>126791303
But /pol/ told me the free market was glorious

>>126787390
Where the fuck do you live?

I pay 10 squiddlybillies for 100/50.
UK really is a shithole eh.

>>126791303
The UK has a long, proud history of charging extortionate prices for inferior services.