Why can't we secede from Bosnia?

>>126759159
Because we signed this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton_Agreement

Because you will be abolished soon, little ISIS

File: Screenshot_2017-05-23-18-12-19-2.png (47KB, 720x188px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 720x188px

>>126759518

>>126759777
Are you calling Serbs little isis?

>>126760032
Do you think a referendum for seceesion would be allowed tho? I mean, there a huge fuss about "Day of the republic", let alone independance.
Also, Brčko district would seperate west RS into an enclave. We could only annex Eastern part without problems.

>>126759777
>belgium
>not being btfo by isis

>>126760317
That's what I want to find out. Why is Bosnia as a whole so geopolitically important. It would be easier as a separated state

>>126760195
Nothing against Serbs in general, but serbs from Republika Serbska are junk, since they are mostly descedants of war criminals who slaughtered unarmed people, raped women and destroyed other people's religious temples

Acted absolutely same way as ISIS
And what is more surprising they even get half of state's territory

>>126760931
You do realize that 250k Serbs were expunged from Croatia trough violent acts? It was literally self defense

>>126760931
countries have been doing that since the beginning of history

>>126761251
It's unfortunate, but still can't be considered as a good reason to kill civilians

>>126760931
Shut up, achmed.

>>126761623
So it's okay when they do it, but it's wrong when we fight back?

>>126761623
>non-country talking shit Serbs
what has the world come to

>>126761734
>has nothing to say
>throwing achmed joke
>>126762060
>40k civilians casualties among Muslim Serbs, and 4k among Serbs
Do you genuinely believe that someone gonna buy that shit?

>>126762649
"Civilians" or do you mean mujahedins who came from the middle East?

>>126762846
we both know that shitskins from Middle East participated in that mess in insignificant numbers
Still, most of the victims were Muslim Serbs,
Why do you have troubles with acknowledging the fact that killing unarmed and mainly innocent people is WRONG?

>>126763585
Why do you have a problem comprehending the fact that they started it? I don't think my English is that bad