Brit/pol/ - /pol/ General Election

File: o-okay.png (3KB, 159x199px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 159x199px

>tfw no links

SNP
N
P

WILLY
I
L
L
Y

>>126302907
>Strong and Stable
No you go to stable

BIGOTS
>>>/OUT/

THIS IS BRAND/POL/ NOW

>>126303418
>Implying anyone reads them
>Implying the people who reply to me saying they read them aren't faggots who were capable of getting their own damn news if they were interested in British politics

File: o-okay.png (5KB, 477x597px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 477x597px

>>126303750

File: nuige.png (15KB, 477x597px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 477x597px

boterham

in all this election hype, I am still yet to hear a solid reason for voting tory, other than bullshit soundbites about how Corbyn is a 'weak leader' or the conservatives are 'good with the economy'. I genuinely don't get why people, especially working/middle class people, would ever vote for theresa may.

Reminder Jeremy Corbyn has been on the record as being more Eurosceptic and more opposed to wars to destabilise the Middle East and send millions of brown people towards the West than Theresa May

PAY DENBTS

I'm surprised there is no uproar in /pol/ over Theresa May's internet regulations

File: Screenshot_2017-05-20-09-04-46.png (4MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1440x2560px

>>126303440
Well fuck me it's even got a shed lol

File: lonely.png (617KB, 1280x760px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 1280x760px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EEW-9NDM5k

>>126303989
You've literally never heard of problems with Socialism?

>tfw the false dichotomy of Tories vs. Labour will never die

>next time I'll vote Labour!
>next time I'll vote Tory!

i've been hearing a lot about this election and stuff but frankly lads i've got to say (being at true brit from the bottom of my heart) that jeremy corbyn will literally bring back the entire british empire and we will essentially live in heaven but if you elect may then she'll just force you to eat dog shit literally literally

File: OP's house.png (212KB, 1248x684px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1248x684px

>>126304080
sorry I deleted it as I thought nobody cared, but still, kek

>>126303989
Strong and stable leadership

>>126304074
Because everyone who's followed politics for more than 6 months knows reddit goes into a fit every now and then about a new internet regulation that never actually gets implemented, or if it does is nothing close to what they said it would be

>>126302907

Don't be fooled UK. May still plans on censoring the fuck out of the internet because it has grown apparent too many people are red pilled. Not that still will ultimately work, it is merely a delay before all out violence breaks out in the country.

File: more stronger more stablerer.png (1MB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x900px

>>126303989
in all this election hype, I am still yet to hear a solid reason for voting labour, other than bullshit soundbites about how May is a 'weak leader' or Labour are 'good with the economy'. I genuinely don't get why people, especially working/middle class people, would ever vote for jeremy corbyn.

>people ITT unironically think that decisions are made more for the people when the decisions are made by politicians and not by the people
shiggy diggy

>>126304147
It's all good. Is it common for properties to be named there? I'd fucking lose it if a customer came into my work and that came up

>>126304194
what if it does get implemented though and it's worse than china's and 4chan is banned in UK

File: IMG_1814.jpg (143KB, 750x418px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 750x418px

Literally the ideal scenario in pic related.

will consolidate and strengthen Tory support, make UKIP support the torys along with traditional working class labour voters.

What are the lib dems thinking?

>>126304196

Fuck me mate next you'll be saying Malcolm Turnbull is based.
What is wrong with you.

>>126304298
My insistence of voting Lib Dem isn't a meme.

>>126304231
in all this election hype, I am still yet to hear a solid reason for not voting Lib Dem, other than bullshit soundbites about how Farron is a L1 spam metafag greatsword' or Labour are 'good with the bulls'. I genuinely don't get why people, especially working/middle class people, would ever not vote for Tim Farron.

File: labour2017.png (617KB, 1689x1147px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 1689x1147px

>>126304231
you want to get cucked by Maybot and her selling the country off to the highest bidder, local or (more likely) foreign?

>>126303750
>implying you're OP

>>126304355
no potential lib dem voter will consider ukip, but they might consider tory. They are attacking the centre floating voter to get them to go libdem

>>126304296
>Unironically believe we aren't being brigaded

>>126304604
again, who the fuck are you?

the quality of women in places like Italy is insane compared to ours, why are our birds so ugly?

>>126304089
>Be Britain
>Spend 5 out of the last 7 years with a coalition government
>Have one of my 4 constituent nations almost completely controlled by a third party, and another one completely controlled by minor parties
>Have yet another minor party which was able to exert enough influence to force a referendum to occur which fundamentally changed the direction I would go in
>Have some faggot post on me/pol/ about how there's only ever a two party dichotomy

>>126303989
brexit, duh. She's been cucked by her manifesto into hard brexit

>>126304308
in the countryside yes .

I had to dig a pen into my knee to stop myself laughing in his face. He said it with such confidence, I think he didn't know what it meant.

>>126304231
There are no solid arguments FOR Labour, only arguments against the Tories. Thus all arguments on here in favour Labour are only arguments by proxy.

Have you all laid your bets on constituency seats for your free money yet lads?

Some nice odds in some safe seats.

File: power level increases.png (173KB, 1008x567px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1008x567px

>>126304620
>policies
If it hasn't sunk in yet, this election is about Brexit. Labour won't publicly commit and so they are going to drown in the deepest abyss of irrelevance and stay there for the next twenty years.

>>126303491
My local Labour MP is a former NHS manager who contributes papers to key reforms in how local healthcare is administered. She's ran a couple of apprentice fairs also. The Conservative candidate is a former dodgy Councillor whose only promise is to help improve road congestion. Obviously not all Tory MPs are like this but the talented ones seem spineless to object to what is being done to the country.

I'd much rather have Keir Starmer in charge of negotiations than David Davis.
>>126303828
Labour people haven't said this. Maybe they took advantage of White British people but during the Blair years they assumed inequality would be rid of soon so British people could take the attention being given to minorities. This was a mistake and most Labour politicians are genuinely listening to working class now, hence accepting Brexit.

I'd still say its not as bad as the class contempt the Tory elites and their tabloids hold for British people. Pick up a copy of the Sun and shit they print sums up how intelligent they think British people are.

File: 1482727283271.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>126304868
Even toothpaste understands.

>>126304896
>Labour people haven't said this
r u avin a laff m8?

>>126304896
Yeah but Labour will let immigrants in so vote for Tory

>>126304670

Given your (lack of) proper response I can only guess that you ACTUALLY DO think this kike lover is based. You must be that chink from Melbourne who ruins aus/pol/ threads.

To answer your question though, I've been around brit/pol/ for years, only started tripfagging about 3 weeks ago to piss off idiots like you. I don't typically post at this time if this is when you're regular.

File: IMG_1116.jpg (89KB, 640x385px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x385px

Is the other Cheshire lad here?

>>126304896
>This was a mistake and most Labour politicians are genuinely listening to working class now, hence accepting Brexit.
fuck off you lying runty paki

>>126305024
one more time, who the FUCK are you?

File: open and tolerant.jpg (170KB, 1000x655px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1000x655px

>>126304619
in all this election hype, I am still yet to hear a solid reason for voting green, other than bullshit soundbites about how Lucas is a 'literal communist' or Lib Dems are 'good with student finances'. I genuinely don't get why people, especially working/middle class people, would ever vote for Caroline Lucas.

File: www.dailymail.co.uk_2017-05-20_14-14-57.jpg (186KB, 379x334px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 379x334px

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4524810/BBC-threat-report-offensive-comments-users-BOSSES.html

>>126304868
Labour have committed though wtf are you talking about

>>126305001
Tories are neoliberals. Theresa May increased immigration.

>>126304620
>tax avoidance fixes
>police increases
>border guards, prison officers, firefighters increases
LITERALLY the only good ideas on this image

>>126302907
>>126302907
No links.......
It's bad enough that the "Edition" system has become so pathetic that there is no information at all but to include no links.
Disgusting.

File: 4090BBDB00000578-4524810-image-a-3_1495270635814.jpg (48KB, 634x234px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 634x234px

>>126305159

Both manifestos tell second scotland independence referendum to fuck off so that's funny.

>>126305112
>"ching chong wang fang"

Can't understand you sorry mate.

File: 0.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>126304896
>This was a mistake and most Labour politicians are genuinely listening to working class now

I used to hate snekposters, but with the number of people here who are unironically socialists I miss them

>>126305161
BUT BUT LABOUR IS BAD LABOUR, VOTE UKIP? *alt-right /pol/-fiend brain melts*

>>126304868
>Reminder that:
>Theresa May supported and voted REMAIN
>Jeremy Corbyn has long supported LEAVE and possibly voted that way too

>>126305161
At the expense of rejecting millions of rapefugees

>>126305159
Daily Heil are getting worried people are realising the BBC is biased to the Tories. I even noticed they were deleting comments for the first time after their readers were turning on the Tories due to the death tax.

Westminster voting intention: CON: 46% (-) LAB: 34% (+2) LDEM: 7% (-1) UKIP: 7% (-) (via @ORB_int / 17 - 18 May)

https://twitter.com/britainelects

Lol Labour are gaining but are not eating into the Tory vote at all.

Nothing can stop this landslide.

File: 1494992156852.jpg (66KB, 1000x662px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1000x662px

The fact that nobody cares about the planned regulations on the internet, ontop of the snooper's charter coming into effect, makes me think that this place is full of shills.

4chan 10 years ago was leading the fight for internet freedom. Now it's cooperating with the establishment.

File: Screenshot_2017-05-20-14-18-22.png (155KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 720x1280px

Hmm

>Le epic landslide

It won't be a landslide

File: 1485215596353.png (1MB, 954x968px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 954x968px

>post yfw you watched Three Girls

>>126305161
Exactly. UKIP voters should be going to Labour rather than conservative.

How can you support leaving the EU but not nationalisation?

>>126305047
i am a cheshire lad

File: bets.png (46KB, 758x724px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 758x724px

Lets see those betslips lads

Free tips for all, thank me later.

>>126305323
Non-EU immigration increased and outpaced EU immigration under Theresa May. Cameron had a part in it by bombing Libya. May wants to help Trump bomb Syria.

>>126304074
It's the same crap that is going on everywhere... Not sure how the UK could avoid it. Also, isn't the stuff about muh gender pay gap arguably worse?

File: tread chap.png (66KB, 600x340px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x340px

>>126305293
here you go lad. my hatred for communists is unwavering.
my will to vote tory to stop them... not so much

>>126305381
The poll result you are showing there is a landslide Tory victory.

File: 1445787831805.jpg (310KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1920x1080px

>>126305128
If I took away your skim, would you die?

File: ar.png (262KB, 609x1181px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 609x1181px

>>126305381

It will because the Tories are winning votes in all the right places. Seats that Labour have held since 1935 are huge favourites at the bookies to go Tory.

>>126305381
>LABOUR SURGE

>>126305372
Pretty sure people here just vote against ideas of morality for the sake of being edgy contrarians.

Basically the shittier the world is for everyone else, the happier they will be. Because their lives are already pretty shitty amirite

>>126305372
this

>>126305372
That's because 10 years ago we hadn't heard the same whinging for 10 years straight about hyperbolic internet regulations

>>126305344
will they ever break the tories double digit lead though?

File: mandatory donations.png (126KB, 615x434px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 615x434px

>>126305311
Reminder that socialism has caused ~100 to 150 million deaths during peace time, in the last century.

>>126305434
It's always been that way, it's our colonies i.e pakis. Be it sikh or muslim.

We would be in a state of trouble like Sweden or Germany right now if she had started taken rapefugees in.

Was QT worth a watch?

>>126305344

Depends on where those 46% of votes are.

kek is Wales seriously going to go Tory

>>126305427
Are you in a little town being affected by city expansion? Congleton's houses are fucking my schools and my GPs by overflowing them all, plus no local jobs because there's just so many people living nearby now

>>126305293
>but with the number of people here who are unironically socialists

It's just one guy who spams every thread.

>>126305381
>>126305344
Would it actually be better for the Tories if they won comfortably, but not enough to force Corbyn to resign?

File: commies just one more.jpg (10KB, 259x301px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 259x301px

>>126305576
>but that wasn't real socialism

>>126305430

Lad...

Bet on Tories to win Tom Watson and Skinner's seats.

>>126302907
wait

why are the conservatives gaining votes? I thought ukip was the pol party.

File: in charge.png (163KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 900x599px

>>126305477
What makes you think I would allow you to remove my skim? Do you feel... in charge?

>>126305661
No

If that happens conservatives lose next election

How deluded are labour voters, seriously? They are under the impression they're going to win, how? The local elections saw them lose seats everywhere and the only people they appeal to are left wing parasites and uni students. They're a joke party. I really hope Tories win by a landslide, just to see the butt hurt on social media.

File: la.png (52KB, 638x482px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 638x482px

>>126305706

Forgot picture. Lib Dems are not winning here.

>>126305661
He won't resign regardless. He's been campaigning like crazy in areas full of his key supporters. He knows he won't win the election, he's priming for a third leadership contest.

File: TF1-MuppetsTV-PhotoGallery-36-Waldorf.jpg (29KB, 324x324px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 324x324px

Will Vince Cable win his seat?

who the fuck do you vote for now?
hardly choice with commies and "illegal opinions"

>>126305756
They are, but they cannot win this election and we want to fuck Labour up. So people here will mostly vote, if they do, for either UKIP or Tories. Personally I'm voting LibDem because are Tim is the most righteous.

>>126305837
You take Peter Hitchens' advice and emigrate.

File: -physically remove-.png (112KB, 600x469px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 600x469px

>>126305688
The answer to too much state power, is more state power, comrade.

How can anyone vote Tories when they are the only one's pushing more internet regulations?

>>126305837
UKIP or spoil

>>126305661

Worst case scenario for the Tories is that Corbyn goes quickly and is replaced by Yvette Cooper.

The amount of reasonable Labour MPs that are going to lose their seats is going to make an absolute mess of the party though so I wouldn't be surprised if it kept hard left.

i'm going to miss you lads when may bans 4chan

File: nige official.png (400KB, 750x451px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 750x451px

>>126305756
they were, but since are nige left they have become a horrorshow. ukip voters are flocking to the tories as they are seen to be the only party who can deliver brexit.
it remains to be seen how ukip will fare after june 8th, but for this election, they are almost a non-entity.
proper shame tbph.

>>126305597
>our colonies
Fuck me make your mind up mate. I'm called a paki lover by most in this thread and suddenly you're talking about them like they're your beloved pet.

>>126305791
Where you live?

>>126305787
i don't know anyone who supports labour and thinks they're actually going to win. And being a student in Manchester, that's most of the people I know

>>126305159
>A BBC spokesperson said: 'This wording isn't new – it is standard in many privacy policies, including some newspapers, and has been in ours since 2003.

>It's designed to let people know that there may be circumstances where the BBC would take action, if we believed it was warranted by serious unlawful behaviour - for example if someone was at risk.'

>The Mail does not routinely contact employers or the police about comments deemed offensive.

>not routinely

so sometimes they have

i.e. The Daily Mail's policy is exactly the same as the BBC

>>126305837

Gommies are the lesser evil desu.

Just vote them out if they try to go full Venezuela next term.

Is there a link to see which parties minorities are voting for I heard that Jews and Sikh are voting conservative

>>126305993

North Yorkshire

>>126305965
No it's just when people start mentioning non EU immigration the emphasis goes on Africans and Arabs. But in reality it's pakis.

>>126305918
i've been rolling the pinochet-pill in my hand for over a year lad. it looks salty.

>>126306079
ahh when you said here i thought you meant north norfolk.

>people who pretend Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday are different newspapers

How can you be so autistic?

>>126306066
>voting out commies
You don't understand how this works.

Gommunism fails, they ask for more power because "capitalists are ruining are communism" and then they can no longer be ousted from power and suddenly half the population dies

>>126305919
The internet is cancer

>>126306156
they have completely different staff lad. they are literally different newspapers

>>126305919
The internet is quite honestly the worst thing to have happened to humanity.

>>126305787
>I really hope Tories win by a landslide, just to see the butt hurt on social media.
I think you need a serious period of reflex if you're calling anyone a joke and this is your priorities. No one thinks Labour are actually going to win but people are campaigning on real issues because that's what adults do.

>we will ban people with evil opinions from communicating online
>we will nationalise YOUR house
>we will join the EU again and take the euro!

i hate this election cycle

>>126306184

Only Corbyn's inner circle are gommies.

The current opposition government would be unable to really do anything.

>>126303989
The average Tory voter in this country

https://mobile.twitter.com/nsno_83/status/865312017044918275

Absolute mongs. And a fucking boomer too

>>126305381
Those polls are overestimating Labour by quite alot. I know of no-one in the party who thinks they are getting 30%, 34% is a pisstake

>>126305919
Because at this point corbyn seems worse. And much of the internet regulation is driven by the EU rn, it's unlikely labour will resist

>>126306288
this. the party i most agree with is fielding four candidates.

>>126303989
The average Tory boomer voting mong

https://mobile.twitter.com/nsno_83/status/865312017044918275

>>126306326
takbir brother

>>126306360
which one

File: Scum.jpg (236KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 2048x1536px

>>126302907

File: IMG_2944.gif (2MB, 425x481px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 425x481px

Just had a labour man come to the door lads. Told him Corbyn is my man, shook his hand, and wished him good luck.
As he turned around I shut my door and ripped his leaflet in half.

>>126306239

>complaining about the internet while on the internet
>mummy pls ban me from my own vices

Stop fucking using it if you don't like it.

Pathetic.

>>126306083
I don't understand. So because its Pakis its alright? Or is it because its always been that way?
Or is it because its the Tories? I just want some consistency.

>>126305661
>>126305603
Tories gains are all in working class areas and they already own the south so they will win lots of seats.

Ideally agent Corbyn gets 35% so they can't kick him out as leader and the party splits.

File: Untitled.jpg (55KB, 276x733px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 276x733px

>>126305430
At least one of these will win.
Literally free money.

>>126306156

They have completely different staff and editors, the Mail on Sunday was pro-Remain for example during the EU Referendum last year.

I voted Labour.

Great Britain needs a strong Left.

Brit/pol/ link: https://discord.gg/A6WU2zr

File: heinlein4.jpg (11KB, 279x434px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 279x434px

>>126306326
Reminder that universal suffrage was a mistake.
>I have never been able to see how a thirty-year-old moron can vote more wisely than a fifteen-year-old genius . . . but that was the age of the "divine right of the common man." Never mind, they paid for their folly.
>inb4 advocating votes for children

>>126306518
Krauts need a fucking strong right, if you know what I mean.

>>126306419
Should have took his clipboard and close the door. Just "the radical idea of sharing".

>>126304210
>Violence breaks out
A soldier was hacked to death on the streets by the current boogeyman and where were all the riots and lynch mobs?
Get over yourself.

>>126306478

I think Conservatives could lose some contested seats if the old people really want their bennies.

Hung parliament could happen, I think.

>>126306592
Are you referring to the Schlieffen Plan?

File: lbuk.png (45KB, 1106x410px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1106x410px

>>126306414

>>126306482
kek

>>126306257
>real issues?
Like nurses using food banks, muh zero hour contracts, and "not scape goating immigrants"
Labour talk the same lies as every other party, they've just convinced themselves they're honest and care about people

>>126306351
EU law is around data protection. Basically they're going to protect people from Microsoft and Facebooks takeover of nations due to data mining. I voted to remain almost entirely out of the laws they were bringing in.

You've got it around ass backwards like most Tory voters it seems.

File: 1478386415811.jpg (34KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 540x540px

>>126306652
When I get in power it truly will be a hung Parliament, if you know what I'm saying.

>>126306707
?

File: stock-photo-closeup-of-young-man-being-punched-in-the-face-over-white-background-253492201.jpg (38KB, 450x320px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 450x320px

>>126306668
no

>>126306734
I like it, good thinking.

File: hoppe2.jpg (98KB, 1080x704px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1080x704px

>>126306731
is that you hermann?

>>126306725
In my city the schools budget has been cut by 34 million, the council budget by 60 million a year. Austerity (if you could call it that) has achieved fuck all. These are real issues you moron.

>>126306326

He's saying Corbyn is unelectable.

>>126306801
The odds have come down a bit since then but it's still worthwhile if you fancy it.

>>126306864
"Austerity" is what happens when you take out huge loans and then have to pay them off.
fuggin evil conservativesm aking us go through our meth withdrawal symptoms

>>126306885
corbyn won't win and the tories will win in a landslide, why anyone argues anything but this is a mystery to me.

The election is two weeks away for god sake, nothing will change between now and then

>>126306326
wtf I love Corbyn now

File: 1492614732436.png (428KB, 656x1060px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 656x1060px

>>126306419

Should've got your willy out before answering the door.

>>126306864
Good. Fuck public school teachers

File: angloed.png (55KB, 1172x1416px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1172x1416px

>>126306518
>eternal krautcuck

>>126306692
>Despite seeking a reduction in the size of the state, the party is committed to the upholding of state-funded free healthcare, mental health services and care for the elderly in the United Kingdom;

>The party describes itself as "largely minarchist in scope"

Why is the U.K. so statecucked that minarchism includes the NHS

>>126306916
What site is that?

>>126306726
Never said I was voting Tory. The EU introduced regulations on multinational business to crack down on hate speech.

File: 1494244481305.gif (984KB, 252x276px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 252x276px

>>126306864


>austerity

>>126307012

R N/A CHESS

>>126306946
The banks were bailed out to the tune of 200 billion you cuckold. I agree more would have been lost by letting them fully default.

The country hasn't stimulated growth through austerity. All what has happened is YOUR local assets have been sold off for little reason.

This place wreaks of Civic Nationalism, I fucking hate you English fucks and the pakis I'm surrounded by atm

t. Scotsman in Sheffield

>>126307089
bet365

>>126306825
Shit, I was talking about a different "hung". I guess you really didn't know what I'm saying.

File: ancap pantheon.png (591KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 2048x1152px

>>126307012
yeah, they aren't perfect. sadly, 99% of the population wants some sort of gibs

File: 1493985366204.jpg (40KB, 396x354px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 396x354px

>Dianne Abbott may be put in charge of controlling immigration

>>126306864
>muh gibs
Oh no..

>>126307111
Would have been better if the banks were allowed to fail. I'm not in favour of state collusion with any sector, banks included.

>>126306725
these are real issues bruh
>2017 england
>having to rely on foodbanks to feed your children

what sort of world is this

>>126307008
>Fuck public school teachers
I agree. Vote Labour and their charity status will be removed.

File: The spook cares not for your temperature.jpg (65KB, 960x544px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 960x544px

>>126307213
>Diane Abbott may be put in charge of anything

>>126307111

We don't have austerity we are still spending more each year than we are getting in through taxes, it is by definition not austerity.

>>126306864
So? All a school needs is a building and some teachers. The memery about making schools "engaging" clearly doesn't work, costs too much, and the countries with better schools don't do it.

Same with police. We have plenty of police, and all they need is a bicycle, a club, and a whistle.

>>126306440
It's an addiction and I need help, as do many others, that's why I'm voting to give May the power to put curbs on the internet.

>>126307212
REMOVE ayn rand and socialist cuck hayek

>>126307153

t. country with a 'national' party who want the freedom to import more non-whites

>>126307213
What an absolute nigger.

>>126306257
What, I can't bask in the defeat of people who want to see this country become a land populated by thirdworlders and whom show utter competently for the people they claim to represent? Fuck off.

>>126307285
a world in which resources are scarce and you don't generate more of them by being a nice boy

File: mommys-helper-kid-keeper-bargain-child-leash1.jpg (34KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x400px

>>126302907
>people voted labour

>>126307153
>i hate you english
>but i moved to your land to find a better life
Silly sausage.

>>126307316

You'd probably just end up doing something worse, like watching TV all day.

Sort yourself out.

>>126307234
Letting banks fail is not a good idea lad. Millions of £'s in savings and investments would be lost. Not to mention the impact that would have on jobs. It would damage the economy even more than it already was damaged at the time, perhaps even irreversibly.

File: ss+(2017-04-29+at+02.22.44).png (15KB, 308x246px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 308x246px

>>126307322
>t. a country with minorities than Scotland has people

File: kwasi.jpg (859KB, 1742x2485px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1742x2485px

>>126307153
u mad bro?

>>126307285
i have personally never met anybody who uses a foodbank, nor do i even know of the existence of one in my city.
i do however know plenty of working age people who live off benefits and have higher living standards than others i know who work full time.

that's what's fucked about this country lad.

>>126307213
It's honestly shocking that such idiots somehow manage to get power. I know why she became an MP, but why make her anything more than a no-name backbencher?

>>126307212
Why do ancappers take Ayn Rand seriously?
As soon as you include her in any sort of meme or infograohic a normal person is going to switch off. Any reasonably intelligent person, regardless of political ideology, can tell that she was just a neurotic slag who wrote nicely dressed erotica.

>>126307435
I'm here on business paki, I'll be heading back home next week :^)

File: quote-cops-must-be-unleashed-and-allowed-to-administer-instant-punishment-subject-of-course-murray-rothbard-72-95-11.jpg (60KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 850x400px

>>126307212

>>126307213
this is why i cant vote for labour even if they did have a based leader.

You get the baggage. You get the marxists, the pro-immigration types. You get the anti-whites and those who want to eat the rich. They are ALWAYS there in the shadow cabinet/back benches.

Diane Abbot, Emily Thornberry, David Lammy. They sit there, waiting to push their anti-white, anti-british agenda.

>>126307459
Socialist short-termism will ruin our nation as it has ruined many other nations.
Subsidised irresponsibility will lead to more irresponsibility.

File: labour mathematics.jpg (207KB, 1030x728px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1030x728px

>>126307213
I wonder if she understands the notion of "tens of thousands".

>>126307285
The nurses using foodbanks meme is just flat out not true. Some individuals that cant manage their money use food banks. The government should not be regulating how people spend their money

>>126307314
>So? All a school needs is a building and some teachers. The memery about making schools "engaging" clearly doesn't work, costs too much, and the countries with better schools don't do it.

>Same with police. We have plenty of police, and all they need is a bicycle, a club, and a whistle.

I'm done for the day.

Reminder to vote UKIP if you're in a safe seat and Tory if you're in a marginal

>>126307172
Damn odds are pretty fucked now lol, enjoy your free money la

>>126307504
>I know why she became an MP
Why did she become an MP? Was the race card involved?

>>126307285

Its common knowledge that the majority of people who use foodbanks or complain about having to use them because they spend their benefits on non essential items like booze, fags, Sky etc.

File: bastiat.jpg (18KB, 392x509px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 392x509px

>>126307319
desu, i can just read bastiat's 'the law' over and over, the rest be damned.

File: ya2aXMH.png (162KB, 1640x1080px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1640x1080px

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/theresa-may-wants-to-regulate-the-internet?utm_term=.reaABjE8x#.xlQAP7zLN

>Theresa May Wants To Regulate The Internet

>May's manifesto also raises concerns about online news, warning it is willing to "take steps to protect the reliability and objectivity of information that is essential to our democracy", while pledging to "ensure content creators are appropriately rewarded for the content they make available online".

>One Tory source told BuzzFeed News this final comment relates to Google and Facebook's growing dominance of the advertising market, which the newspaper industry believes is crushing its business model. The source suggested that if the web giants failed to act voluntarily then they could be forced by legislation to find ways to financially compensate traditional news producers.

Old Rupert doesn't like the competition stopping him from controlling the narrative, so he's getting his lackeys to stamp them out. It's fucking shocking what they're getting away with, and you cucks are enabling them.

>>126307477
>1.2 million is more than 6 million
wut?

>>126307533
Kewl m8 kewl kewl kewl. Now stop it with your D&C dogshite.

>>126307388
Sure, play in your own shit if that's what you want to do. It's your choice. Just don't pretend to be a productive member of society.

>>126307587
Okay dickhead, what's your solution then? Throw money at everything and hope the problem fixes itself?

File: 1493648260117.jpg (66KB, 920x748px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 920x748px

Who getting excited to be able to watch all those lovely results come in and the swingometre and seat predictions? I think my autism makes me love election statistics.

>>126307583
Did someone just say 80,000,000?

File: 1421953050379.jpg (17KB, 165x141px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 165x141px

>>126307691
>linking buzzfeed

>>126307691
I would vote for the 1870s state in a fucking instant.

>>126307704
Read that stat I sent you idiot, that's just mixed people not minorities

File: 1467406541697.png (534KB, 736x708px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 736x708px

>>126307691
>vote for the 1870's
Sounds good.

>>126307670
I've never read it. How does it compare to Human Action and Democracy: The God that Failed?
Those are the benchmarks for ancap theory imo

>>126307711
What are you even talking about, you mong? You just sound assblasted comrade Corbyn has utterly destroyed the chances of a labour victory for at least 10 years.

>>126307613
Look at her constituency.
>The population is ethnically diverse. Of the resident population 36.2% of people describe themselves as White British. 18.2% are in other White ethnic groups, 23.1% are Black or Black British, 10.5% are Asian or Asian British, 6.4% describe themselves as 'Mixed', and 5.3% as 'Other'.

>>126307587
It's true, and you know it.

>>126307775
Why post a stat that demonstrates something that's not your point?

File: election wizardry.jpg (76KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 620x465px

>>126307734

I CANT WAIT FOR HIS DARK MAGICK

DEFINE neo-liberalism

>>126306885
No, he's saying "I won't vote Corbyn because he won't get elected, even if he has policies I agree with"

explain this

>>126307388
Yes, and you're all a bunch of alt-right nazis. Look I can generalise a whole group of people inaccurately too

>>12630504
Posh boy Cheshire fags, do yer mummies know your on 4chan? They will cancel your broadband you know.

>>126307734
Elections where the results roll in slowly and you see the reactions and changes of narrative live over several hours are the best

>>126306446
It's always been that way, pakis have been increasing since the 60's. You can never have no immigration unless someone like the BNP were in power which would never happen.

If Labour won last election those numbers would have been doubled.

It's literally take labour with 10x rapefugees including the existing pakis or take tories with 5x pakis.

You know lesser of the two evils, if anything taking an increase of pakis have saved her from the limelight of you know (((who)))

File: objectivism.jpg (73KB, 626x801px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 626x801px

>>126307516
>ad hominem
say what you like about rand as a person, i'd rather know where do you find flaw in her philosophy of objectivism.

File: 3123.png (661KB, 582x582px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 582x582px

Im currently undecided and whilst walking my dog yesterday I bumped into a labour candidate for Thanet in Herne Bay, I let her give me the spiel n then i started poking some questions at her and she couldnt give me a real answer back, she kept changing it to unrelated virtue signalling like "were gunna save the nhs, dont you want your friends n family to be okay if they get hurt??"

This woman also looking like she had 1 too many tokes on a crack pipe, but if youre from around here you know thats to be expected from Thanet

>>126307567
I just can't see as being one of the most unheathly nations in the world with falling productivity and skills training that Conservatism holds the answers? Its like going back to the Victorian times and suddenly expecting a slum to pick themselves up by the bootstraps and become self made successes.

>>126307846
>Black British
Made up ethnicity lmao

>>126307504
Hardly anyone wanted to be in Corbyn's shadow cabinet. He didn't really have a choice.

File: strong and stable.png (173KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1000x1000px

>>126307691
>buzz
>feed

>>126304074
It's a reddit tier muh internet argument and the sources are the independent via buzzfeed. Sounds like bullshit to me. They're trying to win over people like us the internet savvy generation because they know theyve lost ground like fuck.

>Brit/pol/: "The middle class are shit and ruin everything!"
>the most middle class areas of the country are white

What did (((they))) mean by this?

File: 1447721126252.jpg (25KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 375x375px

>>126307691
>PissFeed

File: butthurtlefties.png (363KB, 726x960px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 726x960px

>>126307795

>The lefties think going back to the good old days is a bad idea

File: 1495287535816.jpg (221KB, 1054x1200px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1054x1200px

>Saudi newspaper today

hahahahahahha
>Americuckia

>>126307734
>24% on repealing sec 28
>only 6% on letting fags adopt
Why is letting gays promote being gay less of an issue than letting them adopt shitty kids?

File: britishempire.jpg (22KB, 341x194px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 341x194px

>>126307770
>>126307795
Damn right.

>>126307730
What? I'm saying spend FAR less money, and do it in the ways that used to work.

>>126307937
Are pakis really making a huge negative impact on your social life?

can somebody please tell me what is wrong with grammar schools

>>126307795
Enjoy shitty water heating, every disease under the sun making a simple scratch a death sentence, taking days or even months to get anywhere and being worked to death in some coal mine.
Enjoy

File: muh viral.png (166KB, 786x676px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 786x676px

>>126307972
I just can't see as being one of the most unheathly nations in the world with falling productivity and skills training that Socialism holds the answers? Its like going back to the Victorian times and suddenly expecting a slum to pick themselves up by the bootstraps and become self made successes.

>>126307839
just read it lad, it's only around eighty pages.
Here's a taste
>Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.

>>126307915
>No, he's saying "I won't vote Corbyn because he won't get elected, even if he has policies I agree with"

If your local Monster Raving Loony candidate told you he'd buy you a Rolls Royce and eliminate all taxes that you or your descendants ever have to pay for all eternity if he becomes PM, would you vote MRL?

File: libdumb.jpg (316KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1024x576px

>>126304355

>>126308059

I don't really want to live in Victorian England.

It was pretty much worse than modern third world tier for most of the population.

Do you really think you'd be in at least the middle class? Do you even own a business now?

>>126307937
>If Labour won last election those numbers would have been doubled.

You mean double from Labour, which the Tories did, or double from what the Tories did (which was double what Labour did)?

>>126308153
God you're fun. Do you also post about how it's impossible for a frog to look smug?

>>126305627
Fucking mongleton

>>126308126
I know 1600 lasses who've got a good answer for that.

>>126308245
>>126308153
We're not asking to literally be transported back 147 years. We're asking for the ideas of 1870 to be in our state.

>>126308027
Those are the people who you keep seeing with "Refugees welcome!" signs and pushing mass immigration.

>>126305399
Labour are globalists just like the Conservatives. Just because they'd nationaliise some industries doesn't make them nationalist. They're al crooks.

>>126308067
>"Invade Iraq"
>"Y-yes, master"

>>126304896
>is to help improve road congestion.
This is genuinely the most important thing in the world though.

>>126308126
Yes. They vote, and I have to look at them

>>126307950
The objectivist idea of correct morality is to pursue whatever is most in your own self interest, at the expense of all else.
This is exactly the sort of morality that leads to the destruction of nation and social unit.

For the love of God I hope Corbyn and his shadow cabinet dissappear after this election. It is a truely terrifying thought that he or someone like Mcdonnell or Abbot could have actual power in this country.

The polls are naturally going to tighten although it will be interesting to see where they end up.

I'm predicting something like 360-380 seats for the Conservatives. Could go higher but they haven't had a great week this week so depends on how things play out.

File: anglo joy.gif (1MB, 200x199px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x199px

>>126308396
10/10

>>126307846
>>126307730
The problem is that we've never had a continuous level of investment like European countries who had to rebuild after WWII. That's why are infrastructure is shit tier. The problem is exactly to throw money until we catch up half a century no matter the pain.

For your comments on police officers only needing a fucking batton and teachers equipping people with the skills for the future. Not including the increased costs for teaching and special needs funding.

>>126308419
People literally always pursue what is in their best interest at the expense of all else. I don't think anything is actually added to a discussion by acknowledging this.

>>126308144
Socialists are too dumb to pass the 11 plus

>>126302907
Fucking establishment shill.
This harpy is not reducing immigration by even 1 muzzie.

If you believe these shill memes You're fucked England.

>>126308144
Literally that it's mean. That's it.

>>126308024
you should probably read the manifesto

>"In harnessing the digital revolution, we must take steps to protect the vulnerable and
give people confidence to use the internet without fear of abuse, criminality or exposure
to horrific content. Our starting point is that online rules should reflect those that govern
our lives offline. It should be as unacceptable to bully online as it is in the playground"

bye bye 4chan

>" Given the
comprehensive nature of the first stage of the Leveson Inquiry and given the lengthy
investigations by the police and Crown Prosecution Service into alleged wrongdoing,
we will not proceed with the second stage of the Leveson Inquiry into the culture,
practices and ethics of the press."

?????

>>126308144
You have to pass an exam to get into one.

Liberals will be scratching their heads when Jamal and Tyrone can't get in and protest that grammar schools are too white.

>>126308333

The general idea back then seemed to be that is was acceptable for the working class to be held at the level where their total paycheck can barely keep them alive.

That could still be the case now.

>>126308185
Of course I would, because it'd be absolute jokes and bants lol!!

>>126308615
So the issue is that they reflect reality and reality is unfair?

>>126308465
we need a group of 6-7 bobbies running in and smacking people down with truncheons again. That will put confidence in the police again desu

>>126308652
Discriminating on intellectual grounds is still discrimination, and illegal.

>>126308126
Put it this way I live a paki free area and i can smell Leicester from here.

>>126308253
Just take the tories numbers and times 2, it was even carved out milipedes giant rock thing he erected.

>>126308144
Nothing

>>126308657
One Nation Toryism came from then. What you're talking about is closer to the Conservative Party of Thatcher than it is to Disraeli

>>126308465
>police officers only needing a fucking batton
What else do they need? They're police, not paramilitary.

> and teachers equipping people with the skills for the future
And what skills require multi-million meme shit that demonstrably is not improving education? What is "skills for the future" in the first place?

>Not including the increased costs for teaching
Which is entirely based on wasted spending. If they spent less on rubbish they'd be able to pay teachers more with the money they saved.

>and special needs funding.
Yeah, let's drag the entire youth down because of the retards and mongoloids.

Why is May such a cunt with her internet policy? The only reason they aren't getting my vote

File: beady.jpg (25KB, 490x313px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 490x313px

>>126308428

The Tories devoted more pages of their manifesto to (gender,racial,disability) pay gaps than to national defense.

I want neither "Rotfront" nor "Reaktion". I want a third way.

>>126308735
So "no, but I hate pakis anyway" basically

>>126308657
>That could still be the case now.
No it couldn't. Real wages for the working class more than doubled from 1850-1900. Resources aren't infinite. We must do what we can to make the total amount of resources larger. I cannot think of a single country that embraced market policies for 30 years that was afterwards worse off than before. People's wages rise in competition as their marginal productivity rises and people want to buy workers for higher prices.

>>126308538
Sure but the (flawed) implication of Objectivism is that this is pursuit of self interest is primarily economic, which is demonstrably untrue, it totally ignores concepts such as culture and tradition. Hence why Objectivists support things like (((free migration))) when your average person intuitively understands that this would be an absolute disaster.
It is as idealistic and unrealistic an ideology as Communism.

>>126308714
>it's illegal to refuse the job of "synthetic fuels engineer" to a person who left school with a D in maths

>>126308366
Improving road congestion with Tories just means building bigger roads to allow more cars. I bet you love air pollution too.

No mention of that in the Conservative manifesto. I bet everyone here would still find away to support their health being deteriorated!

>>126308793
pssst, nothing will change

>>126308842
I've never read Rand, frankly. I think people's idea of what is and is not economic is extremely flawed. Praxeology is the way forward.

Brit/pol/ Discord: https://discord.gg/A6WU2zr

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?

>>126308990
fuck off MURDOCH (evil greedy fuck) I AM ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF YOUR BROW you GREEDY

>>126308990

I feel entitled to the milk of Isabel Oakeshott

>>126308990
You forgot the 'n' at the end of your sentence

>>126308126
Funny how you chose to ignore my reply to your question.
>>126308319

Would that be because your paki loving self cannot possibly find a way to excuse those pakis for what they did and continue doing but you refuse to allow yourself to speak the truth about what they are?

To you, Barry.

>>126305001

>The Tories will definitely reduce immigration THIS TIME!!!!

>>126308981
Every discord orginating from 4chan is literal cancer

>>126308835


I somewhat doubt that abolishing the minimum wage wouldn't put most people in the positon where they are given the choice between working for less than a pound an hour, or starving to death.

Free marketers seem to forget that people value their own life pretty highly.

>>126308812
As every white brit should.

Why wouldn't i hate them? what benefit do they bring to me or society?

>muh curry

File: kissycorbyn.png (124KB, 239x228px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 239x228px

>>126308990
"No says the man in Labour, it must be given to the gypsies!"

>>126308990
>No says the man in Labour HQ, IT BELONGS TO ABDUL

>>126308981
I don't even need to follow the link to know that it'll be full of anime posting cancer.

>>126309045
>>126309046
>>126309130
"No," says the man in Washington, "it belongs to the poor." "No," says the man in the Vatican, "it belongs to God." "No," says the man in Moscow, "it belongs to everyone." I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture. A city where the artist would not fear the censor; where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality; where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well.

File: surveillance_final-598x400.jpg (52KB, 598x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 598x400px

>>126307750
>>126307795
>>126308000
>>126308049

What is with the non-sequitur arguments? Why do you defend the regulation of what we say and do on the internet? You can find the same news from many other sources.

>>126309120
This, cunt not knowing how to cook value their culture(food)

>>126309095
>I somewhat doubt that abolishing the minimum wage wouldn't put most people in the positon where they are given the choice between working for less than a pound an hour, or starving to death.

Your doubt isn't an argument. There's no reason to believe that limiting the amount of contract people can agree to leads to people not starving. Minimum wages have never increased the average wage.

>Free marketers seem to forget that people value their own life pretty highly.
No they don't.

>>126309212
>What is with the non-sequitur arguments?
I was posting a fun meme for the lads in Brit/pol/ to enjoy
>Why do you defend the regulation of what we say and do on the internet?
See above

File: w-w-what.jpg (96KB, 1000x834px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1000x834px

>>126309212
>i don't want labour in power therefore i am arguing in favour of increased internet regulation
Keep me posted.

>>126309223

Why wouldn't you mutually agree with competitors to keep wages as low as possible?

'muh competition for best workers' isn't a particularly strong force in low skilled work.

>>126308938
>I don't know what I'm talking about
Basically

>>126308810
>I want neither "Rotfront" nor "Reaktion". I want a third way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWFxwTIJvDk