/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - DAY OF THE REMOVAL EDITION

File: Kill_Commies_For_The_NAP.png (71KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 800x800px

>>126080979
>If communism was so profitable why did it collapse?
Communism has never been shown to be profitable. Never in human history has a society abolished private property.

You know, "It wasn't real communism". And all that trash.

>>126082376
Also, the NAP only applies to people which communists are not.

File: article-2251746-168F78E7000005DC-660_634x473.jpg (72KB, 634x473px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 634x473px

Daily reminder that pic related is why authoricucks fear capitalism.

>>126082695
that too.

>>126080827
>Those are red anarchists you're talking about.

red or cap anarchist are of the same (((root)))

Adolf Hitler describes the National Socialist
monetary system in a succinct paragraph: “If
ever need makes humans see clearly, it has made the German people do so. Under the compulsion of this need we have learned in the first place to take full account of the most essential capital of a nation, namely, itscapacity to work.
All thoughts of a gold reserves and foreign exchange fade before the industry and efficiency of well-planned national productive resources. We can smile today at an age when economists were seriously of the opinion that the value of currency was determined by the reserves of gold and foreign exchange lying in the vaults of the national banks and, above all, was
guaranteed by them. Instead of that we have learned to realize that the value of a currency lies in a nation’s power of production, that an increasing volume of production sustains a currency, and could possibly raise its value, whereas a decreasing production must, sooner or later, lead to a compulsory devaluation.” He added, “We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency [backed by] gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced.”
The National-Socialist economy is one based off work and production.

File: RonPaul2.png (140KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1000x1000px

I've mentioned it before but there is a top priorty bounty on finding the archives of Ron Pauls controversal 1990's newsletters. I've seen it quoted, I've even seen a single page on PDF, but I cannot find a full archive. Please, if you're a neet with nothing better to do please look for them!

>>126083079
You're jewish.

>>126083606
What exactly is on those letters? Rants about minorities?

File: muhfreedom.png (236KB, 402x482px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 402x482px

>>126083606
Nope, you are.

>>126077045
The idea is narrowed down to 2 main points:

1) Degeneracy is increased the moment people can isolate themselves from any judgement and their livelihoods are not affected in any major way.

Welfare enables degeneracy, back in the day, in order to have a good healthcare deal you needed to associate with others and form an insurance, obviously people would not associate with people known for their degenerate lifestyles as that would incur a higher cost on the non degenerates.

The elimination of welfare will force people to interact again, and therefore they shall be exposed to judgement in a decentralized (more efficient) way.

2) Anti-discrimination laws are also degeneracy enablers. Anti discrimination leads to multi-culturalism, again, back in the day some might have been atheists but Christian people formed communities that were more successful due to better moral values, and atheists had to adapt to those moral values for their economic interest.

With anti-discrimination, successful people dictate the morals, because you want to live near them so you will accept their hard work ethic, without anti-discrimination and no ability to segregate, the power of dictating the morals falls on the hands of democracy, and the majorities are degenerate.

We have the belief that economically motivated migration is augmented incredibly in Anarcho Capitalism because of segregation, people who would vote (due to social pressure) for degeneracy will never "vote with their feet" to move to degenerate neighborhoods, so it should, eventually, lead to healthier societies.

The moment you ask yourself why brown people loving liberals always threaten to move to the whitest country they can if a rival wins the election, why commies always emigrate to the most capitalist country they can, or why the commies built the Berlin wall, you understand that people voting with their feet tells us a different story than when they vote with a ballot.

File: 1489622843739.jpg (201KB, 800x352px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 800x352px

>>126084004
All the race realism, "homophobia", and anti-semitism you know libertarains are into but never publish. Ron Paul has denied writing them but I believe he did. He was running for office at the time after all.

>>126083606
Nevermind I did a quick Google search. Now I like Dr. Paul even more. "Zootopia" lmao.

>>126082855
Sales?

>oh scheisse mein fuhrer, they have a 2 for 1 deal...

>>126083535
I thought you guys liked order. Why are you posting this shit here? Go to a natsoc thread.

/r/Libertarian is the least libertarian community on the internet.
people there support minimun wage, govt healthcare and education...
how do we deal with it?

File: Shoah.jpg (11KB, 187x204px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 187x204px

>>126084176
>n-no I'm not jewish.

>>126084615
NatSoc will win the internet and ideological war.
You can't compete against the spirit. It's also the worldwide known defender of white race ideology.
The masses will crush you, "rebels" !

File: 1491600796988.jpg (666KB, 1944x2592px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1944x2592px

>>126084707
Ignore them, the time for arguing with leftys is over. Libertarian civil war NAOW!

>>126085221
Do you like RAC n Roll?

File: Hyde Glock.gif (2MB, 288x162px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 288x162px

>>126085221
You're rejected from every forum on the net and now you're shitting up one of the few sites that'll have you by posting off-topic crap. Do your movement a favour and gas yourself.

>>126085311
>mfw Hoppe comes here this summer and I can show him the work we're doing

We got to organize some nice thread for the 30th of July

>>126085802
lolbertarians are off topic in general

>>126084615
Are you not talking economics?

What is a libertarian economy for btw?

Would it not essentially boil down to smaller economys of free trade?

This is a viable sub unit within a libertarian society btw.

>>126082016
Being from Europe I am so jealous at you guys, at the fact that there were libertarian flags vs the commies in some Trump protests...

File: socialist healthcare4.png (130KB, 1134x1357px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1134x1357px

>>126084707
Years back we tried arguing that you don't need any of that government crap to have a lefty society. Cooperatives and mutual organizations exist in fairly free markets like Switzerland today. So there's no reason to exclude that option under a right libertarian system.

>>126085311
this
succession is the force that creates liberty

>>126086874
>Are you not talking economics?
No. Discussion on roads only.

>What is a libertarian economy for btw?
Producing copious amounts of drugs and sex toys.

>Would it not essentially boil down to smaller economys of free trade?
No. Imagine a Hunger Games society. Now add warlords to the mix.

>>126086874
If you're saying could you have a natsoc 'themed' covenant that engaged in free trade within an overall ancap society, then I'd agree that's viable - as long as those participating were doing so voluntarily

File: 20170517_130015.png (652KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 720x720px

There's a ton of hypocracy in the right and left wing libertarian movements. The only reason there's a "right" and "left" wing libertarian movement is because of the hypocracy. Protecting personal freedom and liberties from government, institutions and entities should be the main goal here. We need a unified movement because all and all our core beliefs aren't that different, just skewed by a media that ties things into narratives to appeal to different demographics.

>>126089131
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_toYr_Hcdo&t=1s

File: 1493042650959.png (352KB, 1250x2705px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1250x2705px

>>126089131

>>126089131
the (((left-libertarians))) are just subversive kikes and sheep
thinking we can reconcile our differences is naive because they're libertarian in name only
we're not a democratic movement, quality and dedication is far more important than quantity

File: 5487251+_cb03fd8bc095719feee272b0802b2eeb.jpg (97KB, 400x320px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 400x320px

>>126089360

>>126089846
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9pRig-k5Vs

File: 1488136985741.jpg (97KB, 961x759px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 961x759px

>>126089360

>>126082016
Are authoritarian-national-libertarians allowed in here?

File: quote-it-is-possible-for-a-dictator-to-govern-in-a-liberal-way-and-it-is-also-possible-for-friedrich-august-von-hayek-65-6-0643.jpg (71KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 850x400px

>>126090310
Yeah I'd say so.

>>126090310
A wut now?

File: Immigration act 1965 graph.jpg (31KB, 620x317px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 620x317px

>>126089976
He's not wrong. But pragmatically you really need to end social programs first. And restrict voting rights along with that.

>>126089745
We're assuming in that statement that there's 0 hypocracy in right wing libertarianism and that all libertarians that lean towards the left have the exact same experience, beliefs, ideas and intentions. We're giving the establishment more power by splitting into left and right wing tribalism because of media fearmongering. I think that when critically evaluating the essence of libertarian values which is personal liberty, we see that both sides have the same core values and that if we were to come together we'd have more power to advance these.

File: when-you-see-a-friend-from-your-school-days-being-8221539.png (169KB, 500x485px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 500x485px

>>126090310
you'd be in good company

File: pino2.jpg (37KB, 460x287px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 460x287px

>>126090744
He wants an authoritarian govement to enforce libertarian ethics and protect the people I assume.

>>126090940
>We're assuming in that statement that there's 0 hypocracy in right wing libertarianism
no I'm not
>that all libertarians that lean towards the left have the exact same experience, beliefs, ideas and intentions.
no i'm not
>We're giving the establishment more power by splitting into left and right wing tribalism because of media fearmongering.
no we're not
>we see that both sides have the same core values and that if we were to come together we'd have more power to advance these.
no we don't

File: Compass abtirsi.png (14KB, 998x166px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 998x166px

>>126090310
Tfw anarchist nationalist moderate

>>126090841
https://mises.org/library/open-borders-are-assault-private-property

>>126082376
>>126089618
who exactly makes these graphics? are there more?

>>126091076
Just seems a bit of an oxymoron

File: why-the-fuck-everything-cost-money-penguin-cla-karl-marx-18040470.png (122KB, 500x718px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 500x718px

>>126091703
lots of this

File: Death-Of-Mutual-Aid.jpg (336KB, 1267x653px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1267x653px

>>126087507
> How government solved the healthcare crisis

I weep everytime. Found some interesting newspaper clipping from the Australian version of events.

> Mutual Aid societies not hurt by National Insurance scheme
> Nekk minnit

>>126091703
>What we believe in are private property rights.
Which is exactly what Kokesh says in the video.

File: quibhoppeorder.jpg (397KB, 954x1600px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 954x1600px

>>126091821
Some is OC by the guys here - that one I lifted from the lrg site
http://www.libertarianright.org

There are literally hundreds of libertarian memes at the url in this pic

File: 1470672513135.jpg (84KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 640x640px

>>126082016
End Result.

File: RightWingPopulism.png (222KB, 1000x1821px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1000x1821px

>>126091821
I make em'. I like to make them as edgy as I possibly can. Im inspired by the success of communist propagada in the modern age. I want there to be propaganda just as powerful for hardcore libertarianism.
>>126091875
sometimes you need a pinochet when times are tough.

File: No_Roads.png (170KB, 1500x1231px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1500x1231px

>>126092330
I dont have much more tho, and I posted the wrong pic.

What Hoppe and Rothbard books would you recommend buying first?

>>126092529
Democracy: the god that failed should be a necessary pre-requisite to posting on this thread

the road to serfdom by Hayek is good but not necessary

File: 1470771163694.png (669KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 540x720px

>>126092159
Saved.
> Mutual Aid societies not hurt by National Insurance scheme
>t. Federal Royal Commission
Yeah that was completely impartial.

File: QS4dss.jpg (25KB, 212x212px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 212x212px

>>126092995

>>126092995
Yeah I definitely got the PDFs, but nothing beats having a physical paper book to read from.

>>126092529
Anatomy of the state
Democracy, the God that failed

>>126092995
>>126093118
>>126092529

fuck, i hit post by accident.

Anatomy of the state for beginners, literally any of rothbards essay books
as stated above Democracy is pretty much required reading.
Man, Economy and state was was pretty brutal but covered the basic Austrian Economics position

>>126083606
Bump for this

>>126092330
What fonts you using mate?

File: Rothbard.png (126KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1000x1000px

>>126093439
http://www.dafont.com/old-englished-boots.font?text=Libertarian+Right+General
http://www.dafont.com/typographica.font?text=LIBERTARIAN+RIGHT
http://www.dafont.com/lemon-milk.font?text=Libertarian+Right+General

>>126093916
Thnx

libertarian and capitalist here. i finally have the (((credit))) to purchase property. tired of being a poor pleb, i would rather be a just land lord

File: 1470699032336.jpg (66KB, 546x434px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 546x434px

>>126094176

Have some feel good, old school, fat, chris cantwell spirit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzxjFc2ctHo

>>126093323
>Man, Economy and state was was pretty brutal
That's because it is an economics textbook. Not exactly casual reading, although Rothbard's writing style is one of the most palatable that I've seen from an academic. I find Hoppe comparatively harder to read.

>>126094176
>land lord
You sound like a parasite to me. You are engaging, literally, in rent seeking behavior

>>126095123
>>126094176
You just HAD to summon him didn't you?

File: Bill smart.jpg (22KB, 480x523px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x523px

>>126094176
Good luck with your investment. Would be a shame if something were to happen to the housing market...

File: IMG_20170518_005953.jpg (24KB, 532x505px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 532x505px

Serious question guys - Ive had enough with this world now thag leftism has truly conquered everything. Free speech is now being opressed in canada and more socialist programs are in europe and the partys are a fucking joke. What the fuck do I do now? Im thinking of living on my own in the woods i cant deal with this shit any longer

File: uu6Jpia.png (287KB, 1000x774px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1000x774px

>>126095618
come to Somalia and start helping build outer haven desu

>>126095618
>Im thinking of living on my own in the woods
Do you have any experience living in the bush? Do you have any gear? Do you even have woods to go inna?

>>126095618
>Im thinking of living on my own in the woods.
I've been saving and planning for exactly that for years. soverenty is the goal. I don't know if you'll be safe from communism innawoods of europe tho. Long as the man doesn't come for my guns or shutdown my moonshine still im fine.

>>126095618
Without the internet it took 50 years for Marxists to gain a strong foothold in my country, with the internet we can turn things around in our life time. Don't run away.

>>126082016
I'm a libertarian and I'm a faggot. I like sticking carrots in my ass and watch my wife take big black cock! This thread was started by an agent but we will ignore that to get are fag feels out and about! Oh god, I need some bbc in my ass because I'm a libertarian faggot!
>By Based leaf

>>126096205
(((you)))

>>126095896
>>126095914
Ive had camping experiences in the past not so much on hunting but im eager to learn. I go shooting on weekends so holding a gun is fine. UK is full blown nanny state so im not sure what state to move to in the US hopefully one with more freedom than here.

>>126096428
So no, to any of my questions.

Don't go live in the woods, you will die.

>>126096752
Outer space it is then

>>126096347
(((fag)))

hey folks guess what
the united states government is communist
apparently i learned that the mortgage, (or deed) that you get nowadays is so that the government owns the property, you just use it; its been that way since the late 1800's

>>126084438
Fuck off, seriously fuck right off the planet

>>126085221
no, we just shoot you in the face as soon as you go beyond talk.

>>126086072
we're going to hang you and the spics niggers and jews are going to help us,
then
We Dance

>>126095472
yeah but at least i'll still have a place to live, and my price range of property can't drop much

>>126095123
what a typical loser bern bro comment. burn in the hell you'e created for yourself, commie faggot

>>126082016
Since most of the regulars on the lrg are not sub 80 IQ brainlets and since these threads always end up gradually disappearing due to inactivity can we make a habit of starting a topic of discussion in the OP and maybe have some reading or listening we can do before we join where we can begin to start a FAQ or something. Just an idea.

File: 1494550357361.jpg (1MB, 2426x2676px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2426x2676px

>>126099511
it's usually expected that other people would post bait that we refute. Over and over again. As far reading/listenings go, the website has a good selection of reading material as well as pic related, with hoppewave on YouTube for music

do you have any particular questions in mind by the way? maybe that is how discussion can begin, honest discussion at least, better than the usual bait replying

File: triggered communists.png (363KB, 2026x1433px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 2026x1433px

how to trigger a communist

>>126082016
I've got so much love for the philosophy behind libertarianism, but it contradicts my interests as a poor, practically disabled person

>>126097269
you can't into race realism, homophobia and anti-semitism? why not?

File: 1486186775179.png (56KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1000x1000px

fuggn bump

File: 1479962570345.png (548KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 633x758px

>>126102759
Sorry to hear that man.

>>126102759
I don't think it necessarily contradicts all of your interests, at least not in the long-term. true, it would depend on the extent of one's practical disability, but a better economy means the greater availability of jobs, employment opportunities and career advancement, cheaper goods and services, and most of all, more money able to be charitably donated to the needy. These benefits can be enjoyed by everyone

i'm rather poor myself but I stand by libertarianism as it eventually raises standards of living for everybody. That is what capitalism does, and what capitalism will continue to do. The tragedy is the short-shortsightedness of the masses to seek gratification in the immediate moment, rather than delaying it for more future gains

>>126099511
Yeah definitely this.

I'm a little surprised Libertarians in general aren't very active on activism ideas considering the momentum the ideas are having over the last 10 years.

>>126103449
thanks bro

>>126103533
that's a good point about more money to be donated. it's not like philanthropy will be non existent, rich people will still need to virtue signal. although it's comfy to have a social safety net so i don't starve, as guilty as it makes me feel to accept

>>126103706
it's difficult to sell. There is barely any "edge" factor outside sneks, helicopters, and smiley faces, with the underlying economics principles tricky to grasp at a glance. I don't think libertarianism can work under a democracy, not when the idea of radically less government means less free shit for the voting populace or less control for special interest groups. That's not to say activism isn't important, but on a larger scale it seems like a futile losing battle; after all it's still playing under the very same state rules that it intends to destroy

it is in essence an ideology supremely hard to accept when everyone is taught from a young age that government is always good, all the time

>>126100252
> it's usually expected that other people would post bait that we refute. Over and over again. As far reading/listenings go, the website has a good selection of reading material as well as pic related, with hoppewave on YouTube for music
It's the same bait over and over. Instead when someone says "Oh well how about the roads huh? We should give them a question number and they can check out the response. So instead of long responses we just post a refined answer with possible links and further reading suggestions.

>>126102759
You love philosophy, obviously you're a smart guy why couldn't you work as a professor, or analyst of sorts?

>>126103706
We are a bit snobby. It's beneath us to go out and speak to the common man. I mean socialism has it's intellectuals and popularizers we only have intellectuals.

>>126104398
the idea is to eliminate the need for public safety nets in the first place. I admit it's a scary thought, but hear me out. If people have more jobs, everything is cheaper, and charitable people have more money to give, what need does it have that a more local private version can't replace and do better with? family members, churches, just charity groups in general could prosper in greater concentrated effort (more support money) to those they care about -- and that could mean to you

Social safety nets, at least in my interpretation, seems like lube given by the state to ease their own regular acts of rape. Less painful, sure, but wouldn't it be nice not getting raped in the first place?

>>126104398
> although it's comfy to have a social safety net so i don't starve, as guilty as it makes me feel to accept
We'd have private charities that cater to the disabled. What kind of disability do you have? Are you a vegetable who can only speak or what?

>>126105410
I get chronic cluster headaches, I'm usually either in intense pain or groggy from being in intense pain. Can be useful a few hours a day, but I can't plan when and they're not guaranteed. Maybe more flexible contracts would let me actually do something outside of the 9-5 paradigm

>>126105645
Good analogy. They also make you feel like shit to accept, although not everyone feels that way

File: muh chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Two questions: 1.) Can I be a nationalist and a libertarian?

2.)What is the view on "National socialists?" Do you actively oppose them or just let them be?

>>126104583
>>126103706
>>126099511

I would love to help put an FAQ together, there was an effort to make one early ing /lrg/s conception but we didn't put in the work.

btw theres tons of edge factor /pol/ will love beyond memes. some libertarians may be too pussy to look into it but any hardcore libertarian should look into race realism, anti-egalitarianism, natural law and so on

File: Pol (2).png (338KB, 1052x1064px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1052x1064px

>>126106237
>1.) Can I be a nationalist and a libertarian?
Yeah, it especially makes sense for americans since the history of america is libertarian and revolutionary.
>2.)What is the view on "National socialists?" Do you actively oppose them or just let them be?
Some really hate them, some pal around with them.

>>126105410
> We should give them a question number and they can check out the response

ha, that sounds like a good idea. Someone should make a pic about that, I agree

>socialism has it's intellectuals and popularizers we only have intellectuals

it seems that we're just too good. Socialism at least uses their fools as cannon fodder to die in glorious combat for great cause or at least as drones to swarm and drown out discussion, unaware of what's really happening while their intellectuals reap the benefits of their struggle. It's beautifully ironic, in that way

I don't know how else to share libertarianism to the common man without making it clear to them it's short-term pain and long-term gain. When that is presented to them, it becomes massively unappealing -- for if the common man could think of tomorrow rather than today, he would have excelled already

>>126106551
btw I am fairly Nationalist myself, I love America, its history and culture.

>>126106551
another thing: I'm not sure it's right to call ourselves "anarcho capitalists" since that would imply lawlessness. I'm completely against a society that doesn't value higher morals. I'm also in favor of some government, but limited to the point where people can truly experience liberty. By the way, has there ever been a libertarian nazi (or one who claimed to be)?

>>126106224
> Maybe more flexible contracts would let me actually do something outside of the 9-5 paradigm
You could do contract work of your own. Personally I would love to support firms that hire people with such ailments even if it mean an increase the cost of their product or service.

>>126106293
A few questions we could begin with. Also we should have a glossary page for terms.

1. What is libertarianism?

2. What is anarcho-capitalism

3. What in particular is 'right libertarianism'?

4. What are the differences between anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism?

5. What is a free market?

6. What is Austrian economics and what does that school of economic thought teach?

7. Why is free trade good?

8. Why do we advocate for privatisation?

9. Why should health care be privatised?

10. Does the USA have a private/free market healthcare system?

11. Why should government welfare be abolished?

12. Why should governments reject gun control?

13. Why are labour unions bad?

14. Why should education (at all which includes levels primary/elementary school, secondary/middle and high school, and tertiary level) be privatised?

15. What does free speech matter?

16. Why is the freedom of association important?

17. Why do you oppose taxation?

>>126106293
>theres tons of edge factor /pol/ will love beyond memes

that's true. I've often described ancap as a form of soft eugenics with a distinctly economical twist. Obviously degenerates would not last very long in ancapistan, not when their natural self-destructive nature of being a degenerate would mean that they naturally wither away on their own from a lack of state support

>>126106614
> I don't know how else to share libertarianism to the common man without making it clear to them it's short-term pain and long-term gain. When that is presented to them, it becomes massively unappealing -- for if the common man could think of tomorrow rather than today, he would have excelled already

Molymeme made a great video a long while back when he spoke about certain Libertarian speaker who gave a talk on libertarianism however he himself was fat.

Molyneux makes a great point. How can a fat person lecture you on concept of deferred gratitude when he's can't control his own eating habits, all to his detriment.

>>126107447
What I mean is we should expect to hold people's hand through this and we should be examples of that.

>>126104583
It's difficult to sell in its current form because Libertarians are so focused on being pure & intellectually consistent rather than persuasive & appealing.

Long winded rational arguments to show the basis of self-ownership & property rights are fine to start with but the movement has to go Ron Paul style to move beyond it and focus on learning how to sell & persuade, the Marxists did it over 100 years after they had their basis.

>>126107777
Divine quads prove this

> to go Ron Paul style to move beyond it and focus on learning how to sell & persuade

We have to distill our long arguments into shorter ones and have slogans that are practical.

I think the first objective of all libertarian everywhere is to abolish public education, either completely or via a voucher system and not allow the gov't to draft any form of curriculum.

>>126107973
Don't forget politics is a lagging indicator for the culture, need to spring up the culture of freedom/choice/individualism etc Promote it in the day-day lives, real tangible examples people can see and get behind, everyone loves Uber, Netflix, Bitcoin, the net itself etc.

File: Cold-War-Ads-The-Red-Menace.jpg (69KB, 480x319px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 480x319px

sounds good, wanna work onb some answers?
>1. What is libertarianism?
>2. What is anarcho-capitalism
4. What are the differences between anarcho-capitalism and libertarianism?
For Anarcho-Capitalism would center it on non-aggression. I don't know how I would seperate libertarianism from ancap tho.

>3. What in particular is 'right libertarianism'?
Paleolibertarianism-social conservatism, rothbardian/hoppean, nationalist, or reactionary libertarians.

>>126107209
ment to quote you.
>>126108222

File: k41V9sG.jpg (39KB, 700x498px)

39KB, 700x498px

>>126094176
>be a just land lord

no such thing.

File: propertyrights.jpg (517KB, 1637x866px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 1637x866px

>>126095204
Maybe one day youll understand property rights and what they actually imply; until then enjoy the Georgeposting

Also add in some history.

> 0. Where did Libertarianism come from

The enlightenment, classical liberalism, aristotelianism yadda yadda, we are the inheritors of the enlightentment of the libery move, individual rights & freedom etc Jeffrey Tucker has some great articles on this as did the old Daily Anarchist website.

File: tj.jpg (99KB, 500x595px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 500x595px

>>126108511
Careful going down this path. Your feudal masters will be upset if you start looking into classical liberalism.

Never mention the Lockean proviso

>>126108222
4. Right libertarianism is the particular libertarian philosophy as espoused by Murray Rothbard, Hans Hermann Hoppe and Lew Rockwell. Adherents hold traditional Juedo-Christian beliefs on morality and oppose globalism, Marxism, socialism, multiculturalism, open borders and homosexuality. They are in favour of closed borders preferring ethnic nationalism over multiculturalism, and would otherwise be considered 'conservative'.

2. We should just copy verbatim the first three paragraphs of the Mises Wiki entry.

https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism

>>126107061
>I'm not sure it's right to call ourselves "anarcho capitalists" since that would imply lawlessness

i don't blame you for thinking that anarcho-capitalism means lawlessness, but ancap just means being free from a central, coercive government, not voluntary private laws or private governance. Higher morals can definitely still be in place, just within one's own private borders of private property

believe it or not, yes, this means that you can technically be a libertarian nazi. It would just be being as nazi as you can from your own realm of private property, but nazi rules can still apply there and you can gas anybody that trespasses, particularly undesirables. Overall as a long-term effect, this means that while everyone experiences freedom, the split in land ownership all means shitty economic models (reckless socialism) inevitably collapses, and private nazi territory can expand -- legally and without blood from purchasing undervalued property once people leave.

as an endgame, people would have freedom beyond their wildest imagination. private property based on shitty economics models would still have their own little corners of detroits, only you're not responsible for forced to pay for it anymore. You can just point and laugh from the comfort of your own property and say "let that be an example to all those who follow such policies and abandon freedom, eternal reminders of foolishness"

>>126107061
its often called private-law if you don't like anarcho capitalism.

File: rigtwinglpidiots.jpg (41KB, 754x382px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 754x382px

>>126108222
A "right" libertarian is a royal libertarian. They conflate state and public property. They ignore the principles of self ownership and what they imply. They confuse common resources with socialism. The quote people who have tried, and failed to argue against true libertarian values like everyone's right to community created economic rent. They love making sport of combining what they have made with what no one has made and calling it theirs.

>>126108899
> i don't blame you for thinking that anarcho-capitalism means lawlessness, but ancap just means being free from a central, coercive government, not voluntary private laws or private governance. Higher morals can definitely still be in place, just within one's own private borders of private property

requesting that infograph comparing an anarcho-capitalist world as a group of competing swiss cantons

people have to realize there are going to be communes where people we'll live in an essentially fascist country, other myself would prefer a communal court system, others might enforce Sharia, and that's okay

any good wallpapes lads?

File: terra-formars-guns.png (107KB, 370x507px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 370x507px

>>126082016
YOU SHALL NOT, STEP ON

File: 1489426808999.png (80KB, 1982x1133px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1982x1133px

>>126109395
personally I use this one despite it not being in proper wallpaper resolution

i think it is still very nice

>>126107209
>5. What is a free market?
I want to make a point to contrast the "most profitable exchange wins" concept. People WILL turn down deals to sell their family into slavery and all matter of stupid shit we get accused of.

File: Flag.png (264KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1920x1080px

>>126109395

>>126095123
>land lords are parasites
because people should be able to live on your property without paying?

File: National_Flag_Of_Ansnekistan_Vector.png (116KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1920x1280px

>>126109395
if you're edgy.

File: commonvsstateprop.jpg (778KB, 1695x961px) Image search: [Google]

778KB, 1695x961px

>>126109754
>09754▶
>>>126095123
>>land lords are parasites
>because people should be able to live on your property without paying?

We call ourselves the "party of principle," and we base property rights on the principle that everyone is entitled to the fruits of his labor. Land, however, is not the fruit of anyone's labor, and our system of land tenure is based not on labor, but on decrees of privilege issued from the state, called titles. In fact, the term "real estate" is Middle English (originally French) for "royal state." The "title" to land is the essence of the title of nobility, and the root of noble privilege.

The royal free lunch

When the state granted land titles to a fraction of the population, it gave that fraction devices with which to levy, and pocket, tolls on the fruits of the labor of others. Those without land privileges must either buy or rent those privileges from the people who received the grants or from their assignees. Thus the state titles enable large landowners to collect a transfer payment, or "free lunch" from the actual land users.

careful not to conflate state and common property; if you really wanna know read pic related.

>>126109274
The right side of that image does not make sense. Property rights infer the right to give, sell and develop your property. The old man's father passed his property voluntarily to his son, what's wrong with that? He's justified in doing so. Since the right libertarian in your image is leasing property and to an extent depreciates the overall value of the house he is paying for that in his rent. Also the owner is taking the responsibility for the utilities and if the there is a change in the housing market whereby his suburb/city becomes the next Detroit.

> If you want to live in this state ,you have to pay taxes
Stealing is when you take people's property coerecively or without legal right. I believe government are justified in taxing their population but only to an extent (10% at most). But taxation is theft when it involes taking half your pay check.

> They confuse common resources with socialism
Socialism seeks to make everything a common resource through gradual nationalisation of industry

There would be communal resources in a libertarian society (certain roads, court systems, community centres, libraries)

>>126109880
>>126109650
>>126109542
thx

>>126110121
and you dont even understand what socialism is.
Youre just ITT for the memes right?

go back and read >>126108461 and >>126109954

if you still dont get it ill answer your questions.

File: landright.jpg (12KB, 327x154px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 327x154px

>>126110121
the pictures not the posts

>>126110531
not him but for the ease and benefit of lurkers, could you summarize what your image intends to convey succinctly so that the position is made as clearly as possibly?

this helps people understand your cause as much as it helps reduce ambiguity on both sides

>>126109954
The land itself is not produced by anyone, but any buildings and/or changes to the land are, and the owner(s) have every right to profit off of its use.

File: 1488752319484.jpg (90KB, 600x340px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 600x340px

>>126109954
Even Molymemes Can BTFO geofags.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOZvvyw5PoQ

File: frederic-bastiats-quotes-6.jpg (122KB, 500x220px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 500x220px

How fine is your clay statists?

>>126109274
against private property, eh? socialist

>>126111363
this brings up an interesting thought: what if bionically augmented humans are elected to rule over organic fleshfags?

they are not made of finer clay, but finer steel, complete with optimized cognitive functionality. Are they then exempt from this criticism?

>>126112039
No, fucking no. once the robots start asking for civil rights your fucked. You think robots made for the purpose of ruling you is gonna care about libertarian ethics?

File: consents.jpg (26KB, 640x478px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 640x478px

Am I the only libertarian that doesn't like being associated with this meme because it's against the most normal values and I'm also against it?

File: RPV19Q4LN1KlFo8PK732zajI2wuGMz6kfPIsGakF37I.jpg (79KB, 480x756px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 480x756px

makes me reeee. no child can consent to that shit, and any ;parent who would allow that should be put down.

File: 1494349465202.png (262KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1600x1200px

>>126113543
most ancap memes are wild exaggerations, and that one is definitely no exception

>>126107061
>ce that would imply lawlessness. I'm completely against a society that doesn't value higher morals. I'm also in favor of some government, but limited to the point where people can truly experience liberty. By the way, has there ever been a libertarian nazi (or one who claimed to be)?
for the last fucking time. anarchy doesn't mean no rules, it means no rulers.

File: 1495048289.png (37KB, 870x545px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 870x545px

Is this where the fags who are afraid of losing their private property go to suck each other's cocks?

File: 1492871175973.gif (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

bump

>>126108694
>Lockean proviso
ie. complete nonsense