Should nipples be allowed on social media?

I'm always glad when I see nipples so it shouldn't

>>123327775
yeah why not?

>>123328124
It's nudity and kids can see it.

Not those nipples. Those ones are shit.

>>123327775
Why do you care? They speak Japanese anyways

>>123328105
Are you sure you're French ?

I don't give a shit about social media.

If you think you can clone Facebook but also nipples that is your prerogative, good luck I hope you are financially successful.

I don't use social media and especially not media connected to my real identity.

allowed?
allowed?
how?
by edict?

>>123327775
Better question: Should people?

File: omegle_and_vince_slap_chop_by_akamaterasu-d2z3m55.jpg (35KB, 320x357px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 320x357px

>>123328233
You're right. If we ban nipples then kids will never be exposed to nudity

File: 1492954775017.jpg (14KB, 118x121px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 118x121px

>>123327775
i would swipe left to all of them on tinder 2bh

lol at that friendzoned dyel manlet in the picture too

>>123327775
Only if you identify as a male

>>123328233

>implying kids dont have nipples

kek

its not exactly porn

>>123328233
THEY SEE IT WHEN YOU BREAST FEED U STUPID FUCK

>>123328321

>and especially not media connected to my real identity.

translation

>i make a fake facebook account under the name "Citizen Z" to spy on the girls and the nsa cant track me behind 10 proxies

>>123328461
You're right. We should allow a 14 year old to post their nipples on social media too.

>tfw went to school with all of them
W E W
E
W

File: 4631513561.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>123328479

>>123328279
Just ate a frog

The thing is it's like a good wine, should be treated with respect and consumed with taste

Seeing tits everywhere will only undermine their beauty

>>123327775
Nipples are part of the human form, beautiful and natural like the rest of the body
>>123328105
People like you who sexualise and fetishise a single part of the human anatomy are part of the problem, get a life.
>>123328233
Kids are born nude, stop shaming people, especially children for their natural body. People like you make me sick.
>>123328238
No such thing as a 'shit' nipple, a nipple is a nipple, natural and beautiful.

>>123327775
saggy

File: coolDUDE2.jpg (64KB, 600x694px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x694px

>>123327775
too old
tits too big
A cup only
mb B

>>123328474
You shouldn't breast feed in public either. That's nudity and kids can see that as well.

I'd rather see snatch

>>123328604
I'm not falling for this low quality bait.

Sure i won`t mind.
There is a difference though with sexual posing or just nudity.

>>123328536

i think you have issues m8

>>123328604
numale

>>123328604

>No such thing as a 'shit' nipple, a nipple is a nipple, natural and beautiful.


idk anon i've seen some pretty fucked up nipples on fat birds

>>123328750
Nice argument.

File: 1493319200963.jpg (36KB, 645x851px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 645x851px

>>123328238
This.

>>123327775
Wouldn't be troubling if nipples came from your picture. But reality is, those tits flasher are 60year old granny =(

>>123327775
/pol/, always asking the important questions.

>>123328805

>We should allow a 14 year old to post their nipples on social media too.

>nice argument

>>123328604
do you want to see black whale nipple? Look disgusting to me

>>123328826

idk what happens in switzerland but i havent seen many granny tit flashers

>>123328536
Cant see why we shouldnt

>>123327775
Sure
Then we make collages of pictures with our ugliest goys cumming on their titty pics. Send to them publicly 1 by 1 making them feel absolutely fucking disgusting for having porn on the web with ugly guys jacking to it

File: 1488975647439.jpg (14KB, 538x491px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 538x491px

>>123327775
Only puffy torpedo boobies. The rest can fuck right off back to where they came from.

>american nude insecurities

what a stupid nation of NIGGERS

>>123328479
no way, wipe out humanity now!!!

>>123328954

this

fkk all the way

>>123328860
They have nipples too. What's the harm? It's not like it's porn.
Your turn.

File: News-JUso1.jpg (70KB, 980x652px)

70KB, 980x652px

>>123328826
>those tits flasher are 60year old granny
or JUSO : ^)

>>123328479

that cannot be real

>>123328536
You've yet to present a reason why that shouldn't be allowed

>>123328743
>anyone with a different opinion with me is a baiting
Typical American, too dumb to accept different opinions.
>>123328760
Meme xD
>>123328800
Only considered fucked up according to our fucked up social standards that are controlled by porn and sex magazines, in nature everything is beautiful.

>>123328805
Why make an argument when you have yet to make one?

>>123328989

i'm a nudist so i dont really give two shits

>>123327775
It's up to the owners of the sites.
There are sites where it's all kiddie friendly, and there are sites dedicated to watching people shove bees in gaping assholes.
What is and what isn't allowed is up to the site owners.

Stupid liberals need to kill themselves.
All this shit started because Facebook doesn't want people posting their tits on their site. Who the fuck cares? Facebook can have their rules.

>>123329021
They shouldn't be allowed because it's nudity and degenerate for the kids to learn from.
It's a bad example for our generation.

>>123328886
>to me
No one cares fuck off

>>123329032

>controlled by porn and sex magazines, in nature everything is beautiful.

see i've seen these "fucked up" nipples in porn.. there's an entire section dedicated to it on pornhub. it's called BBW

i just find it physically repulsive

>>123328993
>i want to go topless too
>but don't look I'm shy
wtf

>>123329077
I have made my argument. It's nudity and is not ok for kids to see that.

File: 1492838996477.jpg (16KB, 556x561px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 556x561px

>>123329116
>the human body is degenerate

>>123328904
Only those here. Oh am gonna go drink beer on beach => Granny flashing right next to baby pool.
Getting out of concert, feel your ass being grabbed, dang a Granny again ... Don't give them more power please it'll be cougar raping valley.

>>123327775
Why can't conserative fuckwits, just leave it alone and let them run around in their degeneracy so the rest of us can enjoy glorious tits.

I know that for future generations if it becomes social acceptable and the "Norm" , female breasts will become largely desexualized, but honestly i fucking hate SJW Femenazi with their misandry crap, however this is one point that i see literally no issue with conceding.

>>123327775
No, sexual stimuli causes us to return to our base instincts and behave like animals and wires us to short term pleasure.

It took many years for me to break the conditioning. I will delete all social media if it becomes a thing.

>>123329109
There is a reason why nudists are not a norm in America. It's a disgusting culture and we don't want it spreading degeneracy.

File: racemixing.jpg (862KB, 1800x1445px) Image search: [Google]

862KB, 1800x1445px

>>123328536
>>123329021
>>123329116
>>123329187

BAN ALL NIPPLES OF ANYONE UNDER 18

THIS IS DEGENERATE

A pair of tits does not right away means the picture would be sexual.

Its like being into feet should pictures of those be removed as well?

>>123328576
> Seeing tits everywhere will only undermine their beauty

I appreciate your sensibility, it is just that any kid in at the Louvre is going to see nudity. I'm thinking first and foremost of the Venus de Milo. I think that statue was one of the first 3 things I saw at the Louvre. I didn't go to see the Venus de Milo for the tits, obviously. I went to see her for her whole being. The sad part is when we think of nudity, we think of how nudity of women is something we ought to limit. Yet, we never seem to have this thought about nudity of men, which we seem to almost never allow. I like the part of French culture that is shameless about nudity, like on some of it beaches, bc there's no judgment about it. Nudity by itself is not a sexual act. Yet, somehow we attach sexuality to it, when that's not the entire premise to nudity. But I respect your POV, anon. I don't post nudity on /pol/, unless that's the theme of the thread. Even then, I'm reserved about it, out of respect.

>>123328993

what's that guy burning his bra for anyway?

No. If we allow nipples on media, we will sexualize them, spoiling children and just bringing discomfort. If you want to see tits, you search for porn or go fuck your partner, we don't need sex mixed in things that could easily get away without it

>>123329187
It's degenerate when exposed in public for the world to see, especially children.

File: 14079827877732.png (29KB, 313x453px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 313x453px

>>123329158
>expecting the JUSO (young socialist/daughter party of the SP) to make a coherent argument

>>123327775
Are pink nipples an indication of the Aryan race?

File: 1488679505085.png (13KB, 667x645px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 667x645px

>>123329187
What you choose to do with it determines degeneracy

You can't say that if it involves the body, it can't be degenerate

pic related

>>123329297
A mexican getting his head cut off with a chainsaw isn't sexual, therefore no social media site can ever ban that sort of content from their site, and it should be posted right alongside pictures of babies.

>>123329274

says the one who wants 14 year old nipples all on your facebook feed

you remind me of ned flanders, i bet you always wear a bathing suit in the bath so you don't see your own benis

>>123329274
>is a reason why nudists are not a norm in America
yes because you are fat and disgusting also many niggers

>>123329274
>disgusting culture and we don't want it spreading degeneracy

how about you cut off your nipples so there is no problem, like mutilating you penis by Dr. Shekelberg

File: 1492706424243.png (71KB, 896x716px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 896x716px

>>123329274
>There is a reason why nudists are not a norm in America.
There really is. :DDD

>>123329277
Why is the baby covered in a diaper?

File: 1445752245321532.jpg (56KB, 610x620px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 610x620px

>>123329315
Beats me. Please don't ask any further questions. Nobody knows.

>>123329352

>If we allow nipples on media, we will sexualize them

hardly - they become sexualised when they are seen as taboo, if its the norm its not sexualised

fuck me you don't look at pic related >>123329277 and get turned on by nipples

idk maybe you do, this is 4chan

>>123329456
I don't want that, you do.
I am wanting to ban nipples on social media.
>>123329492
Also, good point. kek

File: Tour de USA.jpg (80KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x720px

>>123329456
>so you don't see your own benis

see>>123329492

americans seeing their benis HAHAHAHAHAHAH

File: 22a7676da53299b9a1527ae09a4691f3.jpg (41KB, 400x508px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 400x508px

>>123329502
>Why is the baby covered in asbestos?
Different times...

>>123329502

incase it shits itself

are you 12?

>>123329352
Also, with the whole feminism thing going on lately, that if nipples were allowed, we would see a fuckton of fat and ugly tits and that's just fucking gross

>>123327775
For women no because they are supposed to be pure and showing your breasts is extremely degenerate if you're a women.

>>123329587

>I don't want that, you do.

>We should allow a 14 year old to post their nipples on social media too.

>>123328536

>>123329568
I meant that we'll sexualize the media, not nipples

>>123329629
Kek.
Anyway, it also prevents it from seeing its genitals.

>>123329683

if people are going to sexualise topless kids, it's already been done. fuck me look at beauty pageants and all that shit that is really popular in the US - now THAT is degenerate and sexualising minors

media is already sexualised, for kids and adults already

it's better that women just flat out show their tits because about 95% are disgusting after the age of 25 anyway so cuck men stop idealizing breasts and see them for the flabby bags of sand they are

>>123329309
We attach sexuality with women because they wear make-up to look like dead prostitutes. We do not attach sexuality with nude painting because it is erotic without being pornographic. Erotism do not exist anymore, it's a part of our culture that is dead.

Unlike a lot of the feminist agenda, this point makes sense, if its deemed acceptable for males, then why not females? by the logic presented any overweight man, with man titties should be considered public nudity at the beach?
Since as far as outward appearances go its pretty much the same thing.

Why are female breasts in public considered degeneracy anon's?
I hate to invoke the "Muh societal indoctrination", but isn't that exactly what this is.

>>123328954
More like a soccer mom discovered 4chan.

>>123329615
delet this

>>123329666
Sarcasm. The point was that your opinion was retarded.

>>123329746

>it also prevents it from seeing its genitals.

are you serious?

the diaper is there to stop the baby seeing its own genitals?

you cant be for real...

hmm

I'll allow it

by my decree nipples are allowed on facebook

>>123328233
If parents don't want their children to see nudity, they should keep them the fuck off of the internet as a whole.

Which they shouldn't, of course.

File: takeaseat.jpg (10KB, 680x440px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 680x440px

>>123329835

>The point was that your opinion was retarded.

>The point was that your opinion is retarded. *

you haven't convinced me to change my opinion yet, and you haven't given any argument to say why its "retarded" aside from saying how you are sexually attracted to minors so you don't want to see it

File: 1492537874021.jpg (7KB, 220x229px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 220x229px

>>123327775
Yes, don't be racist.

Honestly, it will be the end of a lot of the power women have so I'm all for it.

>>123329890
The motion is passed.

>>123329896

also make them blind so they cant see their own nudity

>>123329841
Yes, we have clothes on so we can cover our nudity. The diaper also for shitting purposes too.

>>123329767
But US is 3rd world country in its culture. Tbh South Park covered the theme in a really nice way in one episode when they started saying shit so much in TV that it lost it's meaning. Same would happen with tits if we did that, if we would allow them everywhere, we would get used to them and they'd no longer turn anyone on

>>123329890

objection!

the judge is drunk

>>123329032
Basically it all comes down to what your background is.
My gf is danish and she thinks the same as you.
I believe that's because protestants/Germanic/nordic/Greek people are very much ok with showing their body and adoring the body in general while people with a Catholic/traditional Jewish/Muslim background are more coy and reserved

>>123329943
I am not sexually attracted to minors. It sounds like you are since you are ok with everyone being nude.

>>123330006

idk i wear clothes so i don't freeze generally, i don't mind being naked if the situation permits such as:

public swimming (locker room/showers)
at the beach (where there are always many kids naked, even at non nudist beaches or topless. that is not a sexual thing, nobody cares)
at home
in the bath
in the shower

if you have a child and you bath it, will you make it wear a diaper?

some people wear clothes to shield their nudity from others, not from themselves like you just said

>>123329896

All kids should be banned from the internet until 18 years of age.
it wasn't created for their stupid ways.

>>123330038

>Same would happen with tits if we did that, if we would allow them everywhere, we would get used to them and they'd no longer turn anyone on

thats what im trying to get at. ever since i was young i haven't really thought of breasts as anything sexual, more a means of feeding your young. don't get me wrong, seeing a hot woman without any clothes on is attractive but seeing breasts by themselves is not to me

>>123330092

> It sounds like you are since you are ok with everyone being nude.

heard is here first - all nudists are sexually attracted to minors by the logic that it is ok to be nude

americans you amaze me

>>123330218
>at home
>in the bath
>in the shower
All not in public. We are talking about going outside nude purposefully in front of people to see.

>>123329796
>Erotism do not exist anymore, it's a part of our culture that is dead.

I agree.

>>123330083
Fair enough, cultural heritage obviously plays a big part on the way we perceive things but to say human nipple or nudity is inherently degerenate is silly.

>>123330092
How do you draw the parallel lol?,

its two entirely different things, i see my 6 year old niece naked all the time, when giving her a bath or even just helping her get ready for bed ( she has some learning disabilities) so by your logic i am a pedo since i am comfortable being around her while she's naked.

>>123330004
Legit said right in my post that they shouldn't be kept from that, however parents are free to do so.

>>123330409
So you are ok with children being nude, yes?

>>123330411

>We are talking about going outside nude purposefully in front of people to see.

>Yes, we have clothes on so we can cover our nudity.

>it also prevents it from seeing its genitals.

we are not talking about other people here, unless your english is just fucking awful which is likely

>>123330501

im being sarcastic, im agreeing with you

>>123330336
Well yeah and do we really want that? We show too much sex already on media, and I think that if we would see breasts as a just part of woman's body, that would normalize another part of sex, a major one in my opinion, and there would be nothing special about it.

>>123330440
When it's strangers is where I draw the line. I am talking about going out in public and showing off nudity. You seeing your neice take a bath is in your own home. Would you want strangers seeing your neice naked?

>>123330526

yes because i don't see it as a sexual thing, like all nudists

read >>123330440

by your logic doctors and surgeons are also pedos because they are ok with nudity

>>123330538
Yes we are. The whole concept is being ok with other people being nude out in public. I don't care if you nude inside your house. Just keep it there. It's still weird but whatever.

>>123330526
Yes? i think the only instance in which case it shouldn't be perfectly natural to let your child be nude, or at least topless is for their own protection against pedophiles but this philosophy in itself just perpetuates an endless cycle.

>>123330638

> I am talking about going out in public and showing off nudity.

no you aren't

>Yes, we have clothes on so we can cover our nudity.

>it also prevents it from seeing its genitals.

>our
>it

so tell me, if you go to a public swimming bath and have a communal changing room - what do you do if there are minors in there?

>>123330676
>yes because i don't see it as a sexual thing, like all nudists
I'm not either. I think pedophilia is disgusting. But there are creeps out there. And I don't trust those creeps if there are children outside being nude right in front of them and taking pictures and shit.

>>123330638

If nudity or atleast the partial nudity on topic with the thread was a socially acceptable standard which i think it should be i would be perfectly happy with other people seeing my niece naked.

>>123330743

>I don't care if you nude inside your house, it's weird

KEK

i quoted your posts, your posts are not talking about being outside with others but i'll just put that down to your english comprehension being shit. maybe i should speak spanish instead amigo?

>>123330813
>so tell me, if you go to a public swimming bath and have a communal changing room - what do you do if there are minors in there?

>>123329379
>aggies

I kinda don't want nipples to be normalized because it will be fun for a while but then I just won't find them sexy anymore once I'm desensitized

>>123327775
I honestly dont give a shit
Women arent providing sex anyway (not in the way most men want them to) so them showing up nude somewhere is mostly false advertisement

We all know its not gonna be the attractive women who do this either, so there is no winning in this battle

>>123327775
Nipples aren't even sexual, there's really no good reason to ban them.

>>123330813
>no you aren't
Yes I am.
Also, there needs to be privacy in those changing rooms. Hence why it's a changing room, it's for privacy. By your logic, we shouldn't even have changing rooms. They would be pointless. Just change outside.

>>123327775
Each website should be free to set their own terms of use. Societies may try to impose regulations. Many of the top platforms today have bowed to pressure (both from the market and governments). If a competitor disregards these regulations there is little governments can (or should) do to stop them (at least in liberal democracies). It is not the job of government to regulate morallity. The choice of the social media platform is then fully decided by the users who choose to use/not used based on the ability to post whatever, in this case a nipple.

I don't use social media and personally don't give a shit.

>>123330859

i was going to get to this point, that everyone is now scared of the big bad boogey man pedo creeping around the corner

the bottom line is this, if they are creeping on your kid they wont care if they are nude or not. i am attracted to women without seeing them nude, i assume that is the same with pedos - who knows.

so you'd never take your kid to the beach or swimming for fear of pedos? they dont have to be nude but swimming gear isnt exactly good to cover up with

before the 70s/80s and jewwood movies, nudity was an accepted part of life and people werent so scared of pedos and shit - so the world had a different view. it mainly changed in the US after that and after all the news reports of cunts like fritzel

>>123331143
Why further the problem when we can limit it? Pedos would much rather them be naked than with clothes on. Do you want some stranger taking pictures of your daughter being nude?

>>123331026

you don't get it

have you ever been to a communal locker room or swimming bath changing room? they sometimes have cubicles for disabled people getting changed that self conscious people use, but for the most part its open plan with benches and public showers

the only privacy is that its separated by gender

being ok with someone being nude doesnt mean being nude 24/7 with no walls or barriers. my point is that if there are minors in that changing area and it is as i described, what would you do? just walk away, or not give two shits that people are naked and get changed?

people live nude or semi-nude all over the world and humans did it for a long time too - the original olympics was all nude

>>123328461

Kids also have genitals, should they be allowed to post/see adult genitals on social media?

It's not about keeping them ignorant of human anatomy. It's about knowing what parts of the body are private. A woman's breasts are sexual, and should be kept private.

>>123330859
That's the crux of the argument though, certain anatomy becomes an object of sexual desire simply because it is stigmatized.

If a precedent was set 50 years ago, that was supportive of this kind of equality i can assure you this probably wouldn't be a discussion today since it would be the most normal thing ever, you would have grown up with it.

This is why the concept is totally alien and degenerate to you, because you grew up in a society that deemed it unacceptable.

>>123331409
>humans did it for a long time too - the original olympics was all nude
Why did we change?

>>123327775
As long as the vapid cunts who are going topless understand that some men like to see women's breasts.

>>123331295

they are legal faggot, it's a matter of social media policy

child nudity is legal, child porn is not, there is a big difference

but you are from singapore which is a major pedo hotspot so, i imagine you see it all as the same

>>123331324

>Pedos would much rather them be naked than with clothes on. Do you want some stranger taking pictures of your daughter being nude?

of course not, but there are also pedos who creep on feet and candid over the clothes photographs. there are those who creep beaches and swimming baths for kids in swimming gear. there is often no avoiding it, really

if i had a daughter and someone was taking pictures of her while swimming, at a beach or whatever of course i'd have a problem. i would also have a problem if someone was taking pictures even when fully clothed without my consent

also see >>123330600

>>123327775
>Should nipples be allowed on social media?

I'm a nipple and I'm present on social media all the time, and this is my story.

>>123329379
whats with all this outrage? when i was a kid i didnt have a bathing suit until i was 7 or 8 and it was never a problem.

>>123331666
>when i was a kid i didnt have a bathing suit until i was 7 or 8

Slut.

>>123330431
A nipple is not degenerate in itself, and you'd be ok with having women bare-chested outside, but for someone with a different cultural background and a different sensibility, it can be degenerate, you have to understand that.
To me, it all depends on who sees the nipple, and where the woman is located. Obviously, you have no business walking around naked in a Muslim country as a woman, and a Catholic person shouldn't be offended when he/she sees a bare-chested woman on the beach in Denmark.

>>123331587
Of course they do
That's the point

>>123331421

>A woman's breasts are sexual,

so every mother who breastfeeds is a pedo?

> It's about knowing what parts of the body are private

should be taught standards by parents, not social media. i'm sure most kids are aware of this by the time they are on facebook (13 is the min age limit i think, i know kids use it younger though)

here's the thing though, they can just google "human body" or even be taught in their science class about the human body. we aren't talking about 5 year olds being exposed to hardcore porn here...

what you need to realise is that nudity does not equal porn, but for sex-starved beta faggots like you i can see why thats hard

>>123328233
bann kids

>>123331666
That's weird desu
In America there's no age where that's acceptable
And we don't do the whole speedo thing either
>>123331720
Kek

>>123331507

>why did the ancient olympics stop being nude

because ancient greece didn't pay debnts and collapsed... you tard

>>123331720
not a grill. though i remember in the park near here we used to play until we were 10 or so and the girls went out topless in the summer like the boys and i only remember once one of the girls complaining to her grandma that she should put a top on and her grandma was saying but why its so hot, go run and play with the kids. we never knew why she was making a fuss about it

>>123331934
>he thinks only girls can be sluts

Do you even know what year it is, shitlord

>>123331912
>because ancient greece didn't pay debnts and collapsed... you tard
How them hell am I suppose to make that correlation? Why did the Olympics after Greece collapsed fully clothed?

>>123331999
>>he thinks only girls can be sluts
i wish...

>>123328233
what is the big deal about nipple?
it's just fucking dot on breast to suck on.

I can't understand why many sluts wear weird, so called micro bikini which only hide nipple, when it's no different to just being naked.

>>123331507
Romans conquered ancient greece and outlawed the Olympics

>>123327775
If the social media site wants allows them sure.
If a site like facebook makes rules against nipples or whatever then people have 2 choices, follow the rules of the site they voluntary visit or find somewhere else to show their nipples.
This is like getting mad you can't walk shirtless into a restaurant when they have a no shoes no shirt no service sign.

>>123327775
No, it'll remind me that average women look like shit, and that makes me want to throw up

>>123328262
top kek

>>123327775
Showing nipples is like giving away free money. It will inflate women breast sexual value. Not sure if this is what most women really wants.

>>123331421
>Kids also have genitals, should they be allowed to post/see adult genitals on social media?
Absolutely. Do you have any rational reason why not?

>>123331295
I'm pretty sure they are as long as the girl isn't photographed for the purpose of showing her nipples in a sexual context.

>>123332083

>Why did the Olympics after Greece collapsed fully clothed?

are you mexican?

anyway, when the olympics started again it was in the 1850s. by then culture had already took over and people wore clothes in public. it became an international event too, compared to when it was just in athens in ancient greece

alot of tradition was also lost so initially they may not of even been aware they competed naked. but my best guess is to comply with the culture around the world they clothed the athletes

but you have to remember that at this time, public nudity was primarily a taboo for adults not children

>>123327775
>leftists have ugly tits

who could have guessed

>>123332101

>so called micro bikini which only hide nipple, when it's no different to just being naked.

this 10x

>>123327775
Yes

>>123332407
>but you have to remember that at this time, public nudity was primarily a taboo for adults not children
What I am basically asking is why did humanity start from being ok with nudity and then find it unspeakable?
If you can answer me this then I will side with your opinion on this debate.

>>123332101
Why am I not surprised the Worst Korean doesn't understand nuance in secondary sexual characteristics?

>>123329277
no one noting the baby nigger,
In uruguay they use white babies

>>123332561

>why did humanity start from being ok with nudity and then find it unspeakable?

i already told you in the thread, it's the boogeyman. fear and hysteria >>123331143

and the world doesn't find it unspeakable, more of the world accepts nudity than rejects it but america has to be the odd one out as usual

>>123332654

check the filename

I say it should. If people are prepared to show their tits to the world then they're obviously prepared to deal with the consequences of doing so.

>>123332695
Very well, you make a good point.
Do you just not fear the boogeyman though? And I thought nudity wasn't acceptable in the UK. Is this wrong?

File: ED71B3FA7C2CD77DF87A68E9F838F7E29473786C1B23740F4F730065AA9494D2_713x0.jpg (39KB, 713x475px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 713x475px

>>123327775
>>123328238
>>123328604
Regardless of what one thinks about the nipples of the third girl here, be aware that they are attached to a brain that created this "art"
.
(As if her presence at this event wasn't proof enough already).

>>123327775
Yes

File: 1491373140043s.jpg (5KB, 250x220px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x220px

>>123327775
Yes

If only to piss off mudslimes & biblefags

>>123332728
Well since I'm here and late for the thread I expected someone else to say something.
Have a good day and brush your teeth

>>123332854

>Do you just not fear the boogeyman though?

not really, i don't buy into hype and scare stories. i know that fucked up people exist in this world, i have seen more on the internet than i would've wanted to. i was exposed to the early days of 4chan when i was 13 years old, i'm 21 now. i saw some shit on here in the old days

that being said, it's pointless to live in fear. if i have a kid and they want to be nude at home - fine. if they want to be nude at a beach in public, i'd insist on swimming gear but if not possible i wouldn't mind

if someone just started creeping or taking pictures, i'd deal with it, but i wouldn't live my life in fear of it

generally the UK has a mixed atttiude, the older generation don't care about nudity esp with children after they raised kids and grandkids. i have cousins that when i go see my family always run around naked or nearly naked. i go to the beach and there is nudity, but nobody seems to really care

if you were to walk around nude in the city centre people would have an issue, but thats just our strict/stiff culture

>>123333361

>brush your teeth

thanks for the reminder

you have a good day and pay your debnts

>>123331806
>but for sex-starved beta faggots like you i can see why thats hard

You're so fucking dumb. Do you think that 13 year olds have sex? you don't think that they ABSOLUTELY sexualize breasts.

Do you remember seeing your first pair of tits? did you look at them and go 'eh, I'm not thirsty' or 'eh I'm too old to breast feed'? No you were like 'holy shit a pair of tits awesome!'

>so every mother who breastfeeds is a pedo?

BABIES aren't going to be able to sexualize breasts because they're fucking babies.

What if I told you that they had two purposes, one to feed babies, and one to attract men. They are sexy, case closed, it's an evolutionary tactic, men want to fuck women with big tits because they will feed their children well.

I hate that I have to teach you this stuff because your mother should've done a better job.

>>123333544
I'm not greek
Checked

>>123333645

>Do you think that 13 year olds have sex?

yes, i lost my virginity at 12

>Do you remember seeing your first pair of tits? did you look at them and go 'eh, I'm not thirsty' or 'eh I'm too old to breast feed'? No you were like 'holy shit a pair of tits awesome!'

first pair of tits i saw were my mums, and i saw them alot. she'd be in the bath and i'd need the toilet when i was younger, or she'd be getting changed in a hotel room or something on holiday. i didn't care.

saw my aunts too on holiday, didn't care (she was quite hot)

first girl i slept with when i was 12 and i saw her tits, wasn't a major thing - what excited me was touching not seeing

>so every mother who breastfeeds is a pedo?

i never said babies sexualise it. the guy i replied to said that a woman's breasts are sexual, meaning they are for sexual acts meaning to breast feed your child is to perform a sexual act

obviously this is not the case and im explaining why breasts are not sexual, but sexualised

>>123333898

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/uruguay/government-debt-to-gdp

>>123328640
>tits too big

>>>/lgbt/

Who's the beta???

>>123328461
>implying kids don't have erections

File: mark jewberg.jpg (27KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1280x720px

>>123334159

this guy

>>123328750

maybe he's 12 and likes older women, you don't know what type of underage faggots lurk here!

>>123333969
13 year olds have sex, but it's not a common thing, just because you raped a 12 year old when you were 12 doesn't negate my point.

Your moms tits don't count and neither do your aunts.

Women can use their breasts to feed babies, it's their primary function, and are sexualized because of this. The act of breastfeeding isn't sexual, however the ability to breastfeed well is a sexual thing for a potential partner.

>>123327775
as long as no one in my family or my gf do it, I don't really care. Don't go on social media a lot but I'd be pissed off if my gf was posting topless photos for the world to see

but sluts gonna slut

>>123332899
Ah the great fleur de roastie

>>123334385
>just because you raped a 12 year old when you were 12 doesn't negate my point.

she was 14 actually, technically she raped me

>Your moms tits don't count and neither do your aunts.

>first breasts i ever saw

ok, the first female i had sexual relations with - when i first saw her breasts... i did not care. i was excited to touch them, not see them. i had already watched thousands of hours of porn by then

>>123334049
shhhhhhhhhhhh be quiet

>>123334498
why were you excited to touch them if they aren't sexual?

File: photo recreated.png (770KB, 1080x964px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 1080x964px

>>123331720

> Slut.

I think our ease with nudity, as adults, is given to us by our parents. We think how we were socialized is the only correct way of being. Anything else, we can't understand.

>>123334604

why was i excited to touch her ass? why was i excited to touch her hips? why was i excited to touch any female in general?

i was excited to touch any part of her because i was "in love" with her

because im a straight white cis-scum male

>>123327775
3 2 1 4

>>123334630

when you have kids or young relatives and you watch them grow up, take baths, wipe their ass and change their diaper you don't really care about nudity like you used to

our culture is about decency and self image though, so i think thats why people don't embrace it as much

File: IMG_1038.jpg (80KB, 450x331px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 450x331px

>>123334630
I can't unsee that, can I?

>>123329297
Fuck off with this feet argument, I see it every single time public tits is discussed. feet are not a sex organ you foot licking dumbshit

>>123335020

>feet are not a sex organ you foot licking dumbshit

neither are tits

File: 1317300669048.jpg (21KB, 236x314px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 236x314px

>>123327775
they should let those puppies fly desu

>>123333645
>Thinks 13 year olds don't have sex
>Thinks sexuality doesn't begin to form in early years of childhood.
>Burger

>>123328105
what about the bathroom scene in the shining?

>>123334385
Peopl have such hilarious mental gymnastics on this issue.

The elephant in the room is that everything about the production of children is sexual - producing children is the whole point of sexuality and that includes breast feeding.

What's wrong is that sex and all things sexual are seen as taboo and "degenerate" these days when in reality they are nothign of the sort.

>>123335196
They're pleasure centres and a fucking secondary sexual characteristic.

>>123327775
no nipples
no porn whatsoever

>>123335777
let kids be kids you britpedo faggot.

>>123336496

still not a sex organ

File: 1493378082228.jpg (30KB, 430x242px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 430x242px

>>123336397
Great. Inject some sanity into this bread.

File: IMG_7228.jpg (110KB, 1024x939px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x939px

>>123328479
JUST

>>123328935
P A T R I C I A N

>>123327775
I think it should.

The only problem I have is that I like tits, and I like tits has a sexual thing.
If showing boobs becomes a common thing then it stops being so sexual and it will suck

>>123328238
this. nasty tits are haram-ful and offensive. All uggos should wear the veil.

B O O B S
O
O
B
S

>>123328604
t.dyied armpit

>>123327775
no, nipples are gross

>>123328233
Really young kids put their mouths on them for fuck's sake.

>>123327775
Eh, actually it's doesn't mater.
Problem with naked people it's about theoretically prostitution. ( w/e child old adult ). All type of prostitution always contact with illegal Institutes.
Also we have a lot of Interests. { People who want to see the nipple and people who don't }

Also people who's care about porn. { Most of them just a losers who's need drop they energy }. Plus you have a lot of sites with porn.
Plus all the media is a piece of propaganda. And they are really don't care about this.
If they have a good reason to do this, they gonna do it.
"Should or not? " - no reason!
Also it's you drop this shit on 4chan, Bra. Why? most of people in 4chan just a idiots ROFL
It's just about. if you go the facebook and just ask: should i masturbate in toilet or not? - Who da fucking care?

>>123327775
idk, what are the prevailing winds?

Do feminists want it? Then no.

Are feminists against it? Then yes.

>>123328105
seems degenerate so no