Egoism

>i'm entitled to your stuff because spooks

File: 13398848_256430768054377_1485822516_a.jpg (7KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 150x150px

>>115135135
Im entitled to your (you)s because of spooks

we gotta agree with each other on common spooks

this is why multiculturalism is a failure

did stirner in any way provide us with new ideas? i certainly agree he provided us with a way to defend ourselves from outside influences. the marxists use his philosophy too though.

spooky

>>115135941
i mean he provided a language with which to talk about it. were his ideas new? do we use him to talk about older ideas?

>>115135135
no idea

people who attack their own image of "ego" are cucks

>>115135135
Read Nietzsche and Kirkegaard too.

It is true that ethics and ideology are social constucts and have no foundation but you still need them for a functional society.

Hackings "the social construction of what?" explores these sorts of ideas within an easy to read and analytic framework unlike these poetic continental philosophers who cant back up their ideas with sound argumentation .

>>115136607
>have no foundation
>still need them for a functional society

sounds like they do have some foundation, otherwise they wouldn't be so useful

>>115135135
Ignores natural human moral intuition in favor of wrought neo-Hegelianism.

It's like the Sith from star wars, but a political ideology.

>>115135135
I think it's a poorfaggot philosophy for people who aren't intelligent enough to acquire actual property. Literally sour grapes the philosophy

>>115136798

Nice metaphysical conjecture you have. Use doesn't imply veracity. It's useful for an imaginary society to kill all myopic people. Does that mean they should? Does it mean that God handed down the order to do so?

/idiot