>people do not have the right to privacy
>people do not have the right to free speech
>people should not be able to put in their own body and do with their own body what they want
>businesses should not be able to move their production or head-quarters to other countries, even if the taxes in our own are crippling
Sure sounds like the Founding Fathers would hate everything about him.
Doubt the founding fathers anticipated open borders, women's suffrage, and interracial genderqueer faggots adopting babies.
Different times require different methods. MUH freedom is good when it's for landed white males only, but not this shit.
This is a shill slide thread. You can tell from the obviously bullshit OP just made up to bait for responses. Hide and sage.
>2 posts will be made by this ID before Shareblue lets him go make another thread to slide the board
>>115132766
>please government, give me safety
>please government, take my liberty to protect me
Yeah, nah. They'd hate him.
>>115132928
More like
>please government, take Jaquan and Jose and Becky's freedom they're ruining everything, even if it means I have to give up some of mine
>>115133418
Yep. You're a pussy. Anyone who gives of liberty in exchange for a little more safety deserves neither.
>/pol/ votes for anti Net Neutrality president, thereby destroying 4chan
Pottery.
When will this "revolutionary america was a libertarian paradise" meme end? It was basically ruled by a landed aristocracy and had voting laws based on race and class.
>>115133604
Net-neutrality is retarded. Internet service-providers should be able to block or allow whatever websites they want. It's their business. If you don't like that, which most people don't, just do business with another Internet service-provider.
>>115132541
>people should not be able to o with their own body what they want
if you described the idea of an abortion to our founding fathers I'll bet you $5 they burn you at the steak
>>115132541