Is the true Red Pill the Blue Pill?

>bitter virgins
>pushing for less sexual promiscuity
seems counter-productive

>>115122944
not true, not for me anyway. I type this as I sit next to my beautiful wife and daughter on my monthly week long holiday from my 6 figure a year job... The leftist are projecting again it seems.

File: veggies.jpg (84KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1080x1080px

>>115122944
They always group people.

We've seen what /pol/ looks like and it's mostly middle class mixes of races. The world thinks they know what we look like and who we are, but they're always further from the truth.

>bitter virgins who refuse to accept the present
Probably true for many. But they use their power of refusing the way things are to try and change things. Why is that bad. This society is the ones that are wrong and crazy and stupid. Time for things to change.

>Is it actually red pilled to just be blue pilled?

No. Remember that ignorance is bliss. This is why /pol/ is a good thing. You can hear opinions on both sides of the political spectrum which challenges our beliefs.

>>115123513
As in, in bygone times casual sex was not a thing, the vast majority of men and women had one sexual partner for life. Which meant most people actually did someone.

Ironically it's sort of like socialism. Whereas with sexual liberation it's basically free market capitalism, and a lot of alt right posters are the equivalent of niggers and Muslims in terms, i.e. fat depressed MGTOW autsits who women don't want.

>>115123992
fair point.

>>115123992
>which meant that most people actually did get someone and thus were not lonely angry incels.

>>115122944
>but are we just losers? Would we give a damn if we were higher up in the social hierarchy?
I'm rather "high up in the social hierarchy". You don't need to project this ridicule image.
Keep in mind the people accusing us of this are the same that portrayed typical Trump supporters as poor when they were noticeably richer than the other side.
But even that isn't important. The thing is, the very claim is a complete non-argument. It's attacking the people instead of the argument. The red pill is made by arguments and memes. It doesn't matter if the people involved are rich or not. It's true (or should be) IRL, and even more among anons.

If that was merely talking about riches, that would be already bad enough, but what you are referring to is even worse. It's a desperate attempt at turning the opposition into a psychiatric case (muh inadequacies, muh insecurities, etc).

Also I can vouch for the typical higher ups being more red pilled than the average. This fucking media meme of "elites" not giving a care or being our enemies does not survive even light scrutiny.

>>115124890
I take that. But is the fact we went out and found this viewpoint in the first place not evidence of a defence mechanism to cover our own inadequacies? Chad may be red pill, but I don't think he knows what the red pill is. if you get me.