So what are we going to do with the CNN bullying a kid?
>>132455621
Ask them why they are protecting a violent antisemite.
What are they really hiding?
Who else here /mongrel/
Apparently I'm
42% West European
23% Irish
20% British
8% Italian
7% Balkan
here
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/founding-fathers-descendants-united-241-years-later/
absolutely beautiful
>Slave rape babies and post 1965 miscegenation race mix babies representing the founding fathers
>Not one pure anglosaxon to interview
WE
>United States
>White
>>132455589
" ... and I hear the deafening gunshots"
TFW when you know you're fabricating evidence and you're continually bullshitting everyone.
Careful not to smile, then no one would be fooled by your "worldclass" acting abilities.
ITT: we complain about Jews destroying western civilization, yet do nothing to change it.
OH-HEY, GOYIM!
Press F to pay disrespects to the downfall of CNN.
>>132455554
S shit on their grave
F
#CNNBLACKMAIL DISAPPEARS
>>132455548
yep it was bound to happpen. just make a new hasthtag in the afternoon, when oeople are getting over their hangovers
>>132455548
There's literally more than 3 posts about it a second
>>132455548
It's still on the US trends, just not worldwide. Start posting it in other hashtags that are on the list.
Moldylocks approved
>>132455544
>>132455664
Still a small portion of the population and compared to people getting their news on the internet is pathetic. Nice try
The cancer we have spawned willingly or not is spreading out of control and threatens to change our timeline in ways unimaginable. It must be destroyed.
Present ideas how to bring down t_d.
The trait of a civilised and intelligent community is the ability to recognise threats to our goals. T_d is no longer of use to us.
"muh Jews, muh Elites, muh Globalists" (JEG = Jews Elites Globalists)
Just as economic systems cannot be centrally managed, neither can cultures.
But while we ridicule government's inability to manage economies, we insist that the JEG are controlling cultures.
The truth is that the JEG do not control cultures- they simply capitalize on changes.
If men give voting rights to women, then the JEG will profit on woman's mistakes.
If women want increased immigration, then the JEG will profit on immigrant's votes.
If immigrants want decreased liberty, then the JEG will profit on decreased freedom.
We could DEMAND that the JEG stop acting in their own interests, but most of us, in some small part, profit from these listed causes-
if you work at a restaurant, then you profit from women's "libertarion."
if you build houses, then you profit from increased immigration.
if you are law enforcement, then you profit from decreased liberty.
...and even if we did ask (the JEG to stop acting in their own interests), problems must be stopped at their root- WHITE MEN WHO CAVE TO SOCIAL PRESSURE.
The progression from strong-men/good-times to weak-men/hard-times is a manifestation of man's reaction time. From the time when men, due to social pressure, supports weed and casual sex, to the time when men realize the costs of degeneracy- this is the reaction time that causes cultures to be destroyed.
But we- having seen this story before (from strong-men/good-times to weak-men/hard-times), need not go along with it.
Stop caving to social pressure.
Stop being embarassed to not be friends with the common degenerate.
Stop giving attention to the common slut.
Stop pretending that discrimination is not man's highest virtue. (Discrimination enables man to support the good and shun the bad...which is the basis of Western Civilization).
Man's actions created the common world, and man's failures will destroy it.
CALL TO MEME STATIONS WITH NEW OP
>Can this work?
WE DID IT WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP, ONLY IN HIS FAVOR.
>Why will this work?
1. When you think CNN what do you think? An organization? Time to change that. It's a company with someone at the top doing scummy shit like the rest of the elites.
2. It's much easier for people to get behind something if there is one clear target.
3. The leftists won't have an argument for it, and will most likely support it.
He's a kike. Big surprise.
>>132455523
Exactly. So lets associate CNN with this guy.
10/10s only
Imagine that your race is hated by fellow countrymen of different races, due to disparite success, stemming from IQ differences.
Imagine these low-IQ haters increasing their ingroup preference, and initiate violence against the peaceful and productive high-IQ popultion.
Imagine not being a hypocrite.
>>132455391
hypocrtie?
what about rooting for your team ?
>>132456340
>what about rooting for your team ?
This is fine, but /pol/ chooses to blame problems on others...and fails to recognize that Jews don't have to CAUSE problems in order to PROFIT from them.
>>132456639
Duh
You fuckibg leaf
Ah /pol/,
Today in class there was greatness.
>be me
>minding my own business when
>based (possibly autistic) facts guy starts talking neutrally about ethics and gender when
>visibly feminist autist girl takes offence
>I'm thinking yes, based facts guy will not give in
>the debate reaches far and wide about equality, it got extremely heated to the point it interrupted most students.
>I'm literally holding my hand over my mouth trying not to laugh as based facts guy relentlessly deals 50% damage
> after about 2 hours, she finally stopped.
>based facts guy is extremely humble in victory.
>visibly feminist girl, sits in the chair next to me.
> she is now visibly shook girl.
>mfw
>>132455327
and I bet you didn't say a think the whole time, you creepy shut-in. In fact, you probably haven't said anything to your classmates all year
cool
>>132455327
Wow great blog, faggot. Appropriate banner showed up as well.
Hoppe's Argumentative Ethics disallows one to protect oneself (when violence is the only means necessary).
Hoppe, in his book Economic Science, aligns himself and Mises ( adopting Mises means using adopting a libertarian's works for communist usage) with Kantean a priori synthetic knowledge- which is anti-objective, and thus supports moral relativism.
Hoppe is simply (whether he knows it or not) undermining objective liberty.
>Hoppe's Argumentative Ethics disallows one to protect oneself
I kind of doubt that, provide a quote
Am I reading your argument wrong? How in any way shape or form can you use Mises economic positions to support Communism? There are legitimate critiques of von Mises whether right or wrong but to make a leap to communism is insanity.
>>132455314
simplify. i don't know what the fuck you're trying to say.
Busy with a side project, trying to make a comprehensive questionnaire that would weed out shills and normies with at least 75% effectiveness. Been thinking of asking shit like "Complete this sentence: "Fourteen..."
"What do you think about the JQ?"
"Are you pro-israel? If not explain why."
"What's worse, Communism or Fascism?"
"If you had to associate Turkish people with a non-human creature, what would it be?"
How do you personally identify shills?