[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | | Home]

Realistically, what are the advantages of this piece of shit?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 26
Thread images: 3

File: Ricoh.jpg (386KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Ricoh.jpg
386KB, 2000x2000px
Realistically, what are the advantages of this piece of shit?
>Expensive (a few hundred dollars off of being able to buy a FF camera)
>Fixed lens
>Dust magnet which means you'll have to throw away your expensive camera since it's impossible to clean
>No viewfinder
>Shit in low light
>Pics at 1600 iso+ look like shit

Why would anybody buy this over a DSLR/Mirrorless camera?
Why not just buy a top of the range APSC size camera and throw an 18mm lens on it. Tada, you now have a Ricoh GR II that is probably sharper and actually works in low light and doesn't shit itself the moment a piece of dust blows into it.

Only advantage it has is >muh stealth which is nothing.
>>
Fuck off retard.
>>
>>3148109
Fuck off tripfag retard
>>
>>3148111

Sick retort retard.
>>
I don't justify myself to moranic morans.
>>
>>3148104
has sex appeal
>>
is m43 shitposting mutating or something?
>>
>>3148259
I fear this isn't even a final form
I fear all gearfaggots that leave their containment thread(s) will soon start making separate threads just for their specific autistic screeching about manufacturer x over y, lens s over t, format, model, sensor size, number if dials, filters, everything, everything you can sort on when you buy a camera online, there will be an autistic screeching thread for it
It won't be long til we see bickering about tripods and bags
>>
>>3148263
well i don't think there will be any final form
>>
Hey faggots, give me an apsc mirroless + prime lens combo that is quite """pocketable""". a6000 + pancake 20 2.8 is not as sharp as the gr lens. smegma 19 2.8 is quite long desu.
>>
>>3148265
Ricoh GR
>>
>>3148104
S O N Y
O
N
Y

Their RX100V killed the GR.
>>
>>3148278
lol. smaller sensor, worse ergonomics, more expensive.
>>
>>3148289
>smaller sensor
yet still much better
>>
>>3148278
Nope.
>>
>>3148104
>Only advantage it has is >muh stealth which is nothing
it's a compact, stupid, meaning it was made to be compact
>>
>>3148298
At what?
>>
>>3148298
kek

sonyfags are really this delusional
>>
>>3148265
Fuji x70
>>
>>
>>3149286
did it fall in the ocean?
>>
File: DSC01612 3.jpg (868KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
DSC01612 3.jpg
868KB, 2048x1365px
>>3148278
Spoken like a true armchair fagtographer.

The rx100 is a clever toy. Fucker takes 10 seconds to wake up and extend and can only be shot full auto with EC.

It is fine for still shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-RX100M2
Camera SoftwareCapture One 9 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness9.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length10.40 mm
Image Width2048
Image Height1365
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3149289
Just Sony tears, senpai
>>
>>3148104
>Why would anybody buy this over a DSLR/Mirrorless camera?

Fits in your pocket.
(and no, MILC's don't fit in your pocket with a lens attached).
>>
>>3148289
>smaller sensor

Not him but the smaller sensor is compensated by the faster lens.

It is expensive, yes, but it also has an electronic viewfinder and very good video capability which IMO justifies the extra cost.

I do agree on ergonomics: they are utter shit.
>>
>>3148104
The ability to prefocus is a huge one.
The AF isn't so good in bad light, but snap focus and being able to toggle between 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 5 meters and infinity makes up for it and much more.

Not that
>>3148278
would know, he doesn't take pictures of things that move.
Thread posts: 26
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.