/p/ is a rotting corpse infested with a variety of maggots, the most notable of them being sonyshills and fujicucks.
are they equally worse? if you could erase one of those groups right now, who would you choose?
>>3146111
>complain about gearfags
>make pixelpeeping gearfag thread
>has never taken an actual photograph in his life
>has no interest in actual photography
OP. His thread.
Fujifags - their cameras are simply substandard.
Bad colour rendition, bad menus, bodies built for people with tiny claw hands...
>>3146114
gearfagging is coolio. brandfags are the real cancer. if you cant make this distinction, congrats, youre part of the problem.
>>3146111
Gearfagging and brandfagging are both shit.
>>3146111
Fujicucks, they are killing film photography
>>3146190
'No!'
gearfagging is an integral part of photography. we work with machines, we cant help it. but brandshitting is a behavior imported right from /v/ and its console wars.
daily reminder the only people that gets irked with gearfagging are poorfags who cant into good cameras.
>>3146203
It's nice to talk about the tools of the trade, but this isn't it. This is just flat out, unproductive, pointless to the art and craft of photography. OP is the person that skips all the photo threads and only posts and make threads about gear. Then shits on people for posting photographs outside of RPT, how dare anyone do that. OP KYS.
>>3146222
this is a meta thread, you maggot. grow a brain asap.