/fgt/ - The roll of shame edition

>>3144417

>roll of shame

I have a 24 shot roll I managed to open the back of my camera on and have the first 5 ruined

Too embaressed to finish the roll and get it developed.

>>3144420
No shame, my dude...but yeah, the guy at the lab is going to lol at you

was shooting my first roll, was about 17 exposures in, and then i felt my cameras back somehow got opened in my bag
closed it, rewinded the roll, and decided to get that shit developed i dont even care

File: IMG_20170904_182506.jpg (459KB, 1199x809px)

459KB, 1199x809px

>You know that roll of film that you absolutely know you fucked up and realised too late, so you will never have it developed?

I have a roll of Provia 100F full of snapshits from 2007 that I still need to dev. It needs to be pushed two stops and I can't justify that kind of $$$. Would be interesting to see though...maybe soon.

Shot this today. Fuji Natura thst went through two airport x-rays. Seems unaffected. Found a lab in Hanoi with insane dev+scan prices. 2 rolls of 35mm and 2 rolls of 220 dev+scan for ~$7usd.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Android Gallery
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:09:04 18:25:08
Image Width	1199
Image Height	809
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3543
Image Height	2397

Does the type of plastic sleeve I use affect the negative after time?/Will I be fine with cheap ebay sleeves over the more expensive ones? Looking to get these.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/HAMA-35MM-NEGATIVE-STORAGE-PAGES-2251-FOR-RINGBINDER-PACK-100-SHEETS-NEG-SLEEVES-/192238226846?epid=1324849486&hash=item2cc24a8d9e:g:8U8AAOSw8-tWXD7w

File: IGUAL PASCUAL 1000PX.jpg (529KB, 1500x339px)

529KB, 1500x339px

it wasnt A roll, it was 2 of them that i absofuckinglutely cucked up. one was a provia roll and the other one a fucking e100VS roll. it happened because i didnt test the camera, it was a full electronic one and it somewhat had set its internal EV compensation to +8. photos are still intelligible after photoshop recovery but as slides they are literally transparent. fuck.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	14426
Image Height	1639
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:02 04:57:46
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1500
Image Height	339

>>3144523
Surely you would have noticed that you were shooting 8 stops overexposed???

>>3144533
it was like +4 actually, enough to cuck up slide film. and no, i didnt right away. i did when i shot shit at sunset hour and it took a little too much time on exposures, then i suspected shit, but not THAT shit.

File: V4zyNnJ.jpg (4MB, 4500x3000px)

4MB, 4500x3000px

>>3144523

I did something similar once.

Bumped cqmera out of aperture priority mode and shot two whole rolls, one of them Provia 400x, at 1/1000.

Whole thing was an underexposed mess. only a handful were salvagable. This was the best exposed one on theentire roll.

File: IGUAL PASCUAL 7 1000PX.jpg (602KB, 574x778px)

602KB, 574x778px

>>3144546
sometimes the pay is way too hard for being a dumbass. this was the provia roll, it got roasted even harder.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	14392
Image Height	1673
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:02 05:44:49
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	574
Image Height	778

id have wasted so much film and money if I would had to have learnt on film.
id probably have been put off and lost enthusiasm

>>3144560
Probably not. You fuckup less once you realise the tangible amount of money each amount of shot costs.

Shooting film is no harder than digital, and in some ways is slightly easier

>>3144568

I use to go out with my digital camera, shoot 400 pictures a day, and never get around to editing more than a handful.

Now a 36 exposure roll lasts me days.

>>3144513
Get printfile.
It is the only good brand.

>>3144417
Shot 2 rolls at a party with the camera set to M-sync instead of X-sync. Totally blank.
Developed 2 rolls of 220 from an overseas holiday at once in wasted e6 chems. Blank slides.
Some things you've just got to learn the hard way.

Two rolls of tri-x, one a test roll for a new body and the other a completely irreplaceable 37 shots on a Fed 2 at a once-in-a-lifetime event. Tried to do the 1+100 2-hour semi-stand dev in Rodinal, turned out the dev had expired or gone bad (my aluminium foil cap on the bottle may have had something to do with it) & got completely blank film w/ a slightly pink hue to it. Thankfully I had shot 6 or 7 rolls with a F5 as well, would've been real embarrassing otherwise, now just annoying and a real shame 'cos Fed 2 + stand dev'd tri-x had been all kinds of win previously.

Do leader tests, lads. Xtol in particular goes bad in a snap. Don't be like half the posters in this thread, lel.

File: 0I3A8974.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px)

1MB, 1920x1280px

anyone else here /developetheirownfilm/?

My uni has a free open-use darkroom for photo students and I just use that to develop. It's nice because I can pick and choose which shots I want to print and keep all my negatives for later.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5760
Image Height	3840
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2015:01:23 14:29:46
Exposure Time	20 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1280
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3144632
(pic is from google not me)

opinions on devving with bleach bypass? also x-proing with bleach bypass? yay or nay?

>>3144632
I'm pretty jelly, my uni's pretty big and has an art school but as far as I can tell no photography courses therefore no darkroom. And the closest one that I can get access to is two cities over.

File: StatueSmall.jpg (444KB, 672x1000px)

444KB, 672x1000px

Got some free TriX from a neighbor, expired in 2009 or so. Went on a snapshit adventure to test it.
Super foggy... nothing ventured nothing gained, though.
1/5

File: StatueSmall2.jpg (442KB, 1000x743px)

442KB, 1000x743px

>>3144645
2/5

File: 3Plant.jpg (414KB, 664x1000px)

414KB, 664x1000px

>>3144648

File: ChairSmall.jpg (376KB, 675x1000px)

376KB, 675x1000px

>>3144649
4/5

File: Single Fernsmall.jpg (361KB, 658x1000px)

361KB, 658x1000px

>>3144651
5/5
Thanks for the dump

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-04 at 18.51.00.png (42KB, 357x233px)

42KB, 357x233px

I'm trying to determine reciprocity failure for Fuji Pro 160 NS, but Fuji's datasheets are not as informative on it as I'd like them to be.
Instead of the usual graphs they only have this table afaict.

How am I meant to interpret this for longer exposures of 10, 30 or even 60s?
A third of a stop for anything over 4 seconds, third of a stop for every 4 seconds or just don't do it because it'll be fucked?

File: 7201_01.jpg (419KB, 985x1000px)

419KB, 985x1000px

There's that one roll of film I shot on an old folder where I didn't forward the film far enough between shots so all the shots overlap. I thought it was enough to forward until the double-exposure lock was released and didn't check for the frame numbers in the back window. That was the first film I shot with that camera.

It might actually be an improvement for some of those snapshits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:22:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	985
Image Height	1000

File: p (1 of 6).jpg (1MB, 905x1350px)

1MB, 905x1350px

Posting some recent snaps shot with my lovely Olympus XA. Comment appreciated.

Ektar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:13
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p (2 of 6).jpg (1MB, 1350x905px)

1MB, 1350x905px

Ektar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:12
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p (3 of 6).jpg (1MB, 1350x905px)

1MB, 1350x905px

Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p (4 of 6).jpg (1MB, 1350x905px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1350x905px

Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p (5 of 6).jpg (2MB, 1350x905px)

2MB, 1350x905px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:13
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: p (6 of 6).jpg (1MB, 905x1350px)

1MB, 905x1350px

>>3144688
Both Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 19:26:15
Color Space Information	sRGB

>tfw that roll is now my keychain
I'll develop it myself when I get a dev kit tho.

do you think lab developers laugh at my pictures and my mistakes? my first roll ever came back like shit and i was just imagining the guy laughing at me lmao

>>3144717
Probably not, they have seen it all/a ton of photos. They just do their job and develop your photos.

I really want to take some B&W lewds of my girl, but I'm a bit shy to get them developed. I mean she's of age, but she looks young so I don't want them to bat an eye. Is it immoral to just give the roll to my friend who usually develops and not tell him?

>>3144719
If you just dev yourself there won't be a problem

>>3144717
i developed all of my films in the same place, never took much pictures before starting with film, started and stayed with manual all these years, must have been like 1000's of shit photos, now guy knows me by name, remembers my phone no., calls me when hes done with developing them and comments on the ones he especially likes, its been like 7 years at this point, still 20 photos out of 36 are shit, 5 in a row are the same etc, not a single fuck was ever given

Just scored an old compact Olympus Trip with some expired Konica Minolta Centuria Super 200 for a buck at a local thrift and wanted to know if there's anything special I should do with the expired film or do I just shoot it like normal?
It expired in 2008 if that makes any difference.

>>3144749
over expose it 1 stop
it's 1 stop per 10 years expired

>>3144632
My school does but it's only B/W which is fucking lame

>>3144751
And development is the same?

>>3144497
thats a great shot anon

File: 27.jpg (684KB, 1818x1228px)

684KB, 1818x1228px

>>3144719
>>3144723
Agree, just develop them yourself

On the other hand, and in keeping with the theme, the first two rolls I developed myself were terrible. All the shits were either over or underexposed, I rinsed terribly, and my handling of the film was horrifying so some shots are full of dots and scratches. Also, fomapan film in foma universal developer and fomafix, is this amount of grain really normal or is this another thing I did wrong?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:06 10:32:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1228

I need to finish a roll of Delta 3200 I started at a family indoors event. Shooting at EI 1600 to have it developed at 3200. Any neat ideas to finish it off and develop?

>>3144423
Are you dumb? You had about 20 frames unexposed and safe inside the canister that would've been absolutely fine, and now you're just gonna develop the 17 that you might have fucked up.

Besides, the other ones are probably fine too. I've had that happen three times and it's fucked up two frames (and that was a half frame camera, so one normal frame).

File: 36203990863_2ef1589546_o.jpg (138KB, 666x1000px)

138KB, 666x1000px

>>3144799
Looks quite grainy, but also underexposed. Rinse/wash the negative and get that dirt off of it. The residue might fuck your scan and PP:
Here's some fomapan 400 I shot 1/3stop under and developed in HC-110 dil. B.

>>3144810
Shoot when it gets dark.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1544
Image Height	11524
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:03 19:08:24
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	666
Image Height	1000

File: half frames.jpg (511KB, 667x1000px)

511KB, 667x1000px

>>3144717
As a former lab technician, yes, we laugh at fucked up film and stupid or weird pictures, but who cares.

>>3144799
Looks like it's just underexposed. The bits that actually had light on them look fine enough. Though it is a grainy film. I've only shot Fomapan in 4x5, and those came out looking much worse than HP5 does in 120 or even 135 if devved in X-Tol.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3144818
it was a 24 exposure roll so i wasn't the farthest from finishing

didnt feel like messing anything up if i were to expose more with the counter fucked up, is there any sort of danger of the film like coming out if i expose it til the end? or is it just gonna go taut and stay attatched?

>>3144497
I've also gone through airport xrays twice with Natura and had no damage at all. Don't know if they use weaker machines these days or whether you just need to be unlucky, but seems like the warnings are exaggerated.

>>3144523
That makes me sad half frame bro.

I think the only roll I've fucked up bad so far was a roll of Tri-x that didn't want to get into the spiralmwhen developing. The Agat 18k I shot it with has a habit of ripping sprocket holes so that was probably the cause. Because it went into the spiral all wonky I got some marks from the film being stuck together at points, and partially empty frames from developer not getting everywhere properly. Nothing of value was lost however.

Also shot a roll of 35mm on a Holga using adapters I 3D printed. Had the frame count window taped up badly and had accidentally left the camera on the bulb setting for the shutter for over half of the roll. The negs have awful light leaks from the frame window and are probably fucked from camera shake, don't think I'll ever scan it.

>>3144823
You'll definitely feel it when you reach the end of the roll. It's possible to break your film but you can just take it out in the darkroom and develop normally if you're developing yourself.

>>3144827
na i sent it off, im just getting into film
ill be sure to jus continue shooting next time then

File: 36148833624_f13e0d9d23_k.jpg (623KB, 2048x1353px)

623KB, 2048x1353px

TriX 400

File: 36984643885_74272db8c4_k.jpg (957KB, 2048x1376px)

957KB, 2048x1376px

>>3144831
TriX 400

>>3144830
I still don't have much experience with film yet (not even with photography in general) and accidentally fucking up a roll should not stop you from developing it unless you're completely sure you blew it up like >>3144546 or >>3144523 because you'll probably get some happy accidents with light leaks or double exposures.

I my case, I shot a whole 24 exp. roll of self portraits out of pure boredom with a tripod and since I put the viewfinder cover as instructed by the camera manual not to throw the meter out of whack when using the timer, I completely forgot to check the focus. As soon as I finished I realised I had it at infinity, f/2.8 so there's no way in hell I could salvage anything out of it. It's sitting perpetually in my drawer as a reminder not to fuck it up again so badly.

File: 00015.jpg (1MB, 2048x3072px)

1MB, 2048x3072px

>>3144761
Yes! It's the same.
Also, you might have a slight color shift bc it's expired but it varies from roll to roll (see pic related, kodak colorplus 200 expired 05/2013, shot last month, unedited scan is orange as fuck)
Anyway, 15 seconds in photoshop should fix it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:08:03 13:49:11

>>3144723
>>3144799
Never dev'd myself. My friend wants to get into it so maybe learn with him. I also actually have access to a student lab for one more year.

>>3144821
Ever see some shots that amazed/wowed you? What did you do in that scenario??

>>3144719

>lewdy pics

Yea, I'd like to take some of my gf, but since even porn is censored here I am hesitant.

Figure I'll do it on b&w and dev it myself someday.

>>3144821

>we laugh at fucked up film

How di you see them? I just get mine developed, no contqct sheets, no prints. Can you really tell what I shot from just a negative?

>>3144719
Just develop them to negatives and scan them yourself. The people in labs have jobs and other things to do than going over your negs with a loupe.

>>3144579
Thanks I'll look into them

>>3144881
>The people in labs have jobs and other things to do than going over your negs with a loupe.
Nigga please, there's no way anyone who works in a photo lab has better things to do with their day than scan and ogle the one roll of titty pictures they've processed this year.

redpillme on large format lenses (4x5).

what is the helios of large format?
what is the 50 1.4 super takumar of large format?

File: 000002edited.jpg (695KB, 1200x900px)

695KB, 1200x900px

>>3144794
Cheers anon. Just last week I posted about how I pass up photos of strangers because I puss out. Glad I went through with it here.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: aero.jpg (23KB, 500x456px)

23KB, 500x456px

so, why arent you buying this 43€ single roll of Kodak Aerochrome? are you a cuck?

File: download_20170831_122509.jpg (359KB, 1000x672px)

359KB, 1000x672px

>>3145001

If I want fucked colors I would just get lomo purple.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1000
Image Height	672

>>3144497
I've had several rolls of Natura go through 4 or 5 airport x-rays and they were totally unaffected. I think x-rays have just gotten better the days

File: 2011-10-20finalmosse_lores-8-copy_2.jpg (105KB, 800x431px)

105KB, 800x431px

>>3145006
t. visually illiterate.

>>3145001
I have a roll on my freezer somewhere but i dont have the correct filter to shhot it. I cant find a b+w 099 filter anywhere.

>>3145025
All you need is a yellow 12 dawg

File: ECUADOR 1000PX.jpg (599KB, 1200x908px)

599KB, 1200x908px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	28752
Image Height	3266
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:09:05 00:36:01
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	908

>>3144979

What film is this?

>>3144549

Yea, I got two more rolls of Provia 400x sitting in the fridge that go bad next month.

Hesitant to shoot them cause I don't wanna fuck them up.

>>3144645
>>3144648
These are very nice

File: 000018edit.jpg (709KB, 900x1200px)

709KB, 900x1200px

>>3145065
Fuji 160NS, da best c41 film produced atm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3602
Image Height	4807
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 13:33:18
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	1200

File: IMG_9890resize.jpg (640KB, 1200x800px)

640KB, 1200x800px

>walk up crater
>shoot delta 100 for tiny grain cause no MF cam atm
>forget 5D so no backup but fuck it i never had a bad roll
>literally dev at 800 instead of 100
>get cucked by grain

oh well gonna go back, the 40mm was too long at the crater anyway

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 16:17:18
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: CONDENSED 1000PX.jpg (570KB, 800x1065px)

570KB, 800x1065px

dunno if this is fuckup or what. roll shot fine for 30 photos or something, then it decided to stop advancing (and i was unaware of that) and what you see is a multiple exposure comprised of 40 shots. i was a bit mad, but then i saw pic related and im liking it a lot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5936
Image Height	3266
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:09:05 02:20:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1065

File: 64210015.jpg (4MB, 3089x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3089x2048px

fuckin' around, third roll I've shot ever.

Kodak Gold 400, about 15 years expired, was kept in a 110+ degree garage in Cali, shot these in Santa Cruz. Shot with my OM-1 and a Tamron SZ-38 lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 10.00.020 2009.12.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 64210006.jpg (4MB, 3089x2048px)

4MB, 3089x2048px

>>3145095
but as for fucking up, this roll has to be my worst. Forgot to push it, ended up getting a lot of shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 10.00.020 2009.12.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 64210012.jpg (3MB, 2048x3089px)

3MB, 2048x3089px

>>3145096

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:04 12:39:38
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	3089

File: 64210019.jpg (3MB, 3089x2048px)

3MB, 3089x2048px

>>3145097
didn't push my shit, ended up with shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 10.00.020 2009.12.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: img338.jpg (588KB, 1169x1798px)

588KB, 1169x1798px

>>3144417

tried pushing HP5+ to 1600

I regret everything

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:02 23:27:13
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1169
Image Height	1798

File: img337.jpg (491KB, 1199x1799px)

491KB, 1199x1799px

>>3145112

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:02 23:21:34
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1199
Image Height	1799

File: cat.jpg (222KB, 790x1000px)

222KB, 790x1000px

>>3144873
Sometimes nice stuff came through, and we'd show it to the others.
But tbrqhwy most of the stuff was typical /p/ shit.
Never made any personal copies or extra prints of nice stuff if that's what you mean.

>>3144880
By fucked up film I mean when people give you rolls that are either not exposed at all, or extremely under or over exposed, which you can tell without even looking for it.
Sometimes I'd look at the negs to judge their quality, especially after mixing new developer and such. Of course you can tell what was shot from looking at the negative, but I didn't take the time to look at every one of them, like >>3144881
says.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3145077
>Fuji 160NS
It sucks it doesn't come in 35mm its my favorite looking film :(

>>3145025
if you look at aerochrome on flickr all the shots id consider good are shot with the 099 filter and thats what richard mossed used.

>>3144632
Ya, we've got a small room at school. We pay for chemicals together, B/W and color.

>>3145112
Fampai, low light means shit light. To make a photo you need at least a bit. Two stop push just lets you shoot a lit scene at two stops faster a shutter speed or narrower an aperture; it won't cause the film to see things that're so far below reciprocity they leave a clear negative. Which is a funny thing to find out while shooting Tri-X at EI1600 at nighttime, thinking I'm so bloody clever.

I've had very nice results from HP5+ at 1600 in Microphen, though I suppose that's both Ilford's recommended combo for pushing and kind of expensive even in Europe.

/p/, what is your file naming convention? Was thinking of YYYYMM__CAMERA(-LENS)__FILM__DEV__DEVTIME

Maybe add the number of the film developed, so roll number 3 of year 2017 for example.

>>3145083
I think it looks cool like that anon

I should be posting this in /gear/, but fuck it.
Is a Leica actually worth it? The M6 is like $1300

>>3145225
It's not, the reason why people buy it is the same reason people buy expensive watches, it looks cool but a 100 dollar Seiko will be just as good quality and show the time 30 times more accurate.

>>3145232
>clock accuracy is a gradient
u rly making me think.

>>3145235
Well, i collect watches too but a Rolex is +- 6 seconds a day and a quartz movement (electric) is +- 6 seconds a month.

File: FilmScan (39).jpg (437KB, 1000x675px)

437KB, 1000x675px

>>3144417

I wasn't a fan when shooting it, but I kinda like how my tri-x came out. This is a straight scan. It does kind of have a sepia tint I am not sure I am a fan of.

Probably wont bother shooting it again until I get stuff to develop it myself.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: img260.jpg (630KB, 3878x2579px)

630KB, 3878x2579px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:25 22:43:06

>>3145072
Thanks anon

>>3145232
>>3145237
Just sharing again because I will never let my mate live it down.
He found a Grand Seiko on a train platform in Japan.
Kept it.

Also, I vote that the Pentacks LX is the Grand Seiko of cameras.
>just subtly shooting muh pleb brand
>bitches don't know about my dank quality

File: resize.jpg (812KB, 1000x800px)

812KB, 1000x800px

cheeky bit of X-TRA 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2560
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	238 dpi
Vertical Resolution	238 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 21:51:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	800

File: resize2.jpg (772KB, 1000x800px)

772KB, 1000x800px

>>3145415

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2281
Image Height	1825
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	238 dpi
Vertical Resolution	238 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 21:52:17
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	800

File: resize3.jpg (952KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

952KB, 800x1000px

>>3145416

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2048
Image Height	2560
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	238 dpi
Vertical Resolution	238 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 21:52:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1000

File: IMG_20170905_140536.jpg (2MB, 3328x1872px)

2MB, 3328x1872px

Neighbor who sold me her OM-1 gave me this; not sure what the heck to do with it. It takes 126 cartridge film. Dafuq am I supposed to do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	BLU
Camera Model	R1 HD
Camera Software	MediaTek Camera Application_
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 14:05:37
Exposure Time	24999/500000 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	243
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3328
Image Height	1872
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3145425
If you absolutely want to use it buy a 126 cartridge, use it and keep it, then put 35mm film inside.
Otherwise put it on a shelf and it'll do a good job as a decoration.

File: IMG_20170906_000308.jpg (3MB, 3310x3310px)

3MB, 3310x3310px

Rotterdam
Hasselblad 500C/M, 80mm Planar and Kodak Portra 400 film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0 (20060914.r.77) Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:09:06 24:03:08
Image Width	3310
Image Height	3310
Vertical Resolution	1719 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1719 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Height	3310
Image Width	3310

>>3145446
portra is so depressing to look at

>>3144687
>>3144686
Where in Norway?

File: LjoesE100555966-19 resized.jpg (225KB, 960x642px)

225KB, 960x642px

The shot I'm the most happy with this summer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3637
Image Height	2433
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 00:54:41
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	960
Image Height	642

>>3145485
big booty bitch

File: ccc.jpg (508KB, 1024x683px)

508KB, 1024x683px

Shitty pic I know. >>3145200 is also of the same roll. Here you can see the delicate love I made with the roll after it wouldn't continue "reeling" it on there. But I kinda like it.

Tomorrow I'll do 2 more 35mm and I'll also try developing my first ever shot MF... really curious.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 02:27:13
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	683

anyone else here /smelllikeadarkroom/

or am I just really bad at developing

>>3145536
my hands smell like fixer heaps, so you're not alone

File: IMG_20170706_001014.jpg (4MB, 3405x3405px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3405x3405px

>>3145467
It depends.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0 (20060914.r.77) Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:07:06 24:10:14
Image Width	3405
Image Height	3405
Vertical Resolution	1154 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1154 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Height	3405
Image Width	3405

File: yashicamat-web.jpg (2MB, 1500x1500px)

2MB, 1500x1500px

trying out long exposures on 160ns

I wanted a sorta spooky, abandoned look but I don't think it came out as I wanted it. Also shoulda focused at infinity instead of the nearest goal post.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1500

>>3145225
I think it is.

>>3145536
>>3145538
even with gloves and an odorless fixer, my hands still somehow pick up the scent a little bit, wtf. the room doesn't smell, though.

>>3145175
This. Of course pushing helps shooting in low light a bit but it's mainly pushing up the shadows and midtones, blacks are going to be black still. I push to 160" routinely but it's mostly so I can use smaller aperture/faster shutter speed and also to get the high contrast look. I also live up north so it's my only option during winter.

Where would I be able to get a ricoh gr for around $200? I'm sick of these hipster fags on ebay charging $500-$800.

>>3145527
what scanner you using anon?

>>3145768
You're an idiot aren't you? If anyone had that knowledge they'd be buying and flipping them.

Those are the prices they go for now, deal with it.

>>3145794
I refuse to pay $800 for a camera I payed $100 for 7 years ago just coz some hipster fag decided to make a living out of reselling camera by 2-4x the amount they're worth.

>>3145796
I feel you, but that's demand and supply really. You can thank "top 10 film cameras" lists for the price climb though.

>>3145799
Or, should I say, "top 10 compacts" seeing as the Ricoh is digital anyway. The principle still applies.

>>3145485
Nice. What film?

File: IMG_20170906_173223_827.jpg (2MB, 3200x2397px)

2MB, 3200x2397px

>>3145796
But...that IS how much they are worth now. You don't get to pick a good's price from an arbitrary time in the past and apply it to today. Otherewise, gimme an NSX for $20k because thats what they were going for 8 years ago.

35mm film compacts have gained popularity. The same supply, which is even smaller now than it was 7 years ago, now has to meet a much higher demand. Prices reflect that. Economics 101 broski.

There is probably a more affordable alternative. What features do you like about the GR?

File: untitled.jpg (1MB, 2222x729px)

1MB, 2222x729px

>>3145467

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	300 dpcm

>>3145822
The great auto focus, compactness and overall ease of use was the main reason I loved it back then, I only got back into photography about 6 months ago picked up a Fuji DL-200 from an op shop for $3. The AF misses a lot and the flash can't be turned off (auto flash) which is a problem since I shoot street.

>>3145768
You don't. You can find a Ricoh R1 for cheaper occasionally though - that's what I got.

>>3145833
Maybe you can try an Olympus mju? Either a "1" or "2" will work. Search a prime lens model though, zoom versions suck ass and have lousy IQ and aperture. Being a meme themselves they also went up in price (especially the mju-2) but if you shop around they can be found for a much reasonable price than a GR. Don't pay more than 50 bucks for either of them, though.

File: IMG_20170906_175351.jpg (440KB, 1199x811px)

440KB, 1199x811px

>>3145833
The mjuii is sick. Ive used a few and they would miss focus once every 4 or so rolls. Great camera, the hype is real around them.

If you want Ricoh, the R1S is a cheap alternative. Also look into the GR10, which is essentially a fully auto GR1 (no exp comp or anything).

Pic unrelated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-490
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:09:06 17:53:53
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3543
Image Height	2397

>>3145832
Xpan?

>>3145839
ISO, Film and what shutter speed?

>>3145836
>$430 for cheapest prime mju ii on ebay
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/OLYMPUS-Mju-II-35mm-compact-film-Camera-w-Olympus-pouch-Good-Condition-/253048102504?hash=item3aead79e68:g:l5oAAOSwY4pZaygD
Really fucking hate hipsters honestly.
I'm gonna scour auction sites for the cheapest gr1 I can get. Any recommendations sites?

>>3145842
why would the shutter speed matter? You can't emulate the photo by using the same shutter speed unless the lighting situation is *exactly* the same as that photo. It seems like an irrelevent piece of information to ask for

>>3145844
I was more wondering what the light conditions were when he took the photo and if it would be possible to handheld it.

File: sony-qx1-grip.jpg (107KB, 1200x900px)

107KB, 1200x900px

>>3145836

Are there any good film compacts that haven't reached meme status and cost under $100?

>>3145839
>R1S
Does it have the same AF as the GR1? I've found some going for around $20-$30 I can live with a f/3.5 lens over an f/2.8 if it means paying over a tenths of the price.

>>3145843
Look for a mju-1 (or infinity stylus, same stuff) instead, I literally just paid 40€ on eBay for a fully working and tested one a week ago.

>>3144579
It's cheaper than shitty kenro too.

>>3145841
GX617

>>3144632
The two British universities I went to (Bristol and Manchester) have both more or less closed their student darkrooms (albeit they do have darkrooms for postgraduate use (materials Dept) that are still pretty nice, to bad most peeps can't use em).

I develop a fair few processes (be,c41,e6) and print ra4 at home though, having a nice durst 138 helps with that...

>>3144878
You in Japan or something?

>>3145842
Fujicolor Pro 400. No clue on shutter, but I imagine the camera was wide open at F1.9. Handheld.

>>3145850
That I'm not sure...but for $30 thsts well worth the price. They typically go for at least $75burgers

>>3145867
I don't think it could be wide open because of the small depth of field. I think its above f8

>>3145868
The camera he's talking about has a 24mm lens, so the depth of field at f1.9 would be far larger than a 50mm at f1.9

>>3145807
Thanks, man. Ektar 100, got it developed and scanned by MeinFilmLab

>>3145485
Hey, that's the Oslo Opera with the Havnelager in the background.

You have your film developed in Oslo?

>>3145868
No way the exposure was F8. The only light is from the moon and the film was 400iso. The lens is 24mm, so DOF is pretty large.

>>3145847
no, I spent a few days trying to reading up on obscure small compacts, everything good or small is insanely overpriced. everyone trying to be cheap and get bargains has brought prices closely in line with demand. the only good deals are large, ugly cameras or ones with bad reputations.

>>3145883
Correct!
Nah man. I tried at Oslo Foto once, but found out it's cheaper if I send it to MeinFilmLab in Germany if I send 2 rolls or more so I just do that now

File: 36890025222_79008a13d3_k.jpg (983KB, 2048x1373px)

983KB, 2048x1373px

>>3145889
How much do they charge at MeinFilmLab and how much is postage? Do they return your film?

Pic related was developed at Oslo Foto.

>>3145888
Just take a look at ebay, but don't look for a specific model or brand; e.g. mju.
Look for "old cameras", or "old camara".. people are stupid and oftentimes sellers don't know what a specific camera is worth, or they sell in bulk to get rid of them as fast as possible.
Got my mju alongside some canon ixus aps, pentax espio and yashica AF for less than 20eur incl. shipping this way.
Even if these aren't working you can still sell them for more than you paid yourself if you're just selling them "for parts".

File: FilmScan (22).jpg (360KB, 1000x673px)

360KB, 1000x673px

>>3145860

Yep, Kyoto.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3145888
Use this search on eBay

35mm "compact" "camera" -zoom

Then filter by price and buy now options. I've seen some interesting stuff with manual flash controls, you just have to investigate the range of ISO values it accepts and you're pretty much good to go without paying scalper/hipster taxes.

>>3145892
It's 13 euro for a 35mm roll and 12 Euro for 120 film. If that's for just a single frame or the whole 120 roll I'm not sure.
That's to get 2430x3550 scans. You pay more for bigger. And you can pay extra for either them sending it back immediately or to have them collect your film and then send it all back at the end of the year.
I paid around 75 NOK to send two rolls last time, but I could fit more rolls into that letter.
I'm about to do it again and send in 3-4 rolls of 35mm and one roll of 120

>>3145899
Hm, if that's 13 euro with scanning then its more than half the price... Nice!

>>3145900
Yep. And the scans are really nice so I recommend trying them out

>>3145782
Minolta Dual Scan IV. My first scanner and I love it. It's very fast and quite sharp.

File: ebd8ff042f4e.jpg (32KB, 400x325px)

32KB, 400x325px

what sort of crazy photo do you get when you do a movement like this?

>>3145965
none because the accordion does not bend light.

>>3145967
ree

>>3145527
I am really going to take a lot of fucking pics. Analog is so much fun. Developing is fun. Just bought a bulk loader and 30m roll of film. Next up is a darkroom. I already have everything I need except a red light and a timer.

Health wise I am feeling better so waking up feels okay again. I can go outside now.

I just need to DO IT. I rarely take pics... Happy I bought a G R because I do not like taking a big DSLR with me.

Anyone else having hard times taking pics? I have health issues and can get a bit near depressed if I feel like shit.

Which K mount camera should I get to replace my Petri GX-4?

Been looking at the Pentax MX and Super ME

Any third party bodies worth considering?

>>3145561
this looks great though

>>3145077
what camera are you shooting with?

File: XRX3Retro80S35.jpg (184KB, 558x800px)

184KB, 558x800px

>>3146043
:D
Get a Ricoh XR-X 3PF.
Probably the dankest manual focus K-mount body going, if you're into multiple metering modes, and high top shutter speeds, and automatic film handling.
Also, the Rikenon 50/1.7 is one of the highest contrast 50mm's I've used, and very compact.
>pic related taken with the Pentacks 50/4 macro though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	558
Image Height	800

whats the difference between a bronica SQ and SQ-A? which one should i choose?

>>3146217
the sqa has mirror lockup and supports viewfinders with autoexposure capabilities. the sq-ai adds the capability to use motor drives, among other things

>>3146217
nevermind that question. heres a better one: which bronica should i get? i like the EC one because it looks hasselblady, but will i be lucky?

SQ ones look boxy and unsleek, but the lenses are sort of cheap for how good they are, and the fact the shutter is on the lenses is p good too.

>>3146050
Fuji GA645

>>3146230
Get the SQ-A more SQ-Ai. The EC is nowhere near as good to actually use...looks aside.

File: S2AAcros1_04.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px)

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>3146230
S2.
Cheap and sexcii.
Comes with real nikkor glass, not zenzanon faggottry.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>3146295
>zenzanon faggottry
whats wrong with it? ive seen some stunning stuff with both nikkor and zenzanon. i like the 80mm look better than the 75mm too.

File: 17759155066_8c2edb6f9e_b.jpg (74KB, 632x632px)

74KB, 632x632px

>>3146297
There's nothing wrong with Zenzanon lenses.

>>3144734
honesltyf if you get 1 good shot out of a roll you should be happy

>>3145083
nice story but that's such a dumb way to hold a snowboard

>>3145847
nikon lite touch's are fairly cheap online. or keep going to your closest thrift store until you score.

File: IMG_9842resize.jpg (904KB, 1000x1500px)

904KB, 1000x1500px

>>3146359
honestly i was carrying my skis like that, after a bit more than an hour of walking and trying different carrying methods, i think it was the easiest

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:07 16:09:10
Exposure Time	1.3 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3146361
getting a backpack with a ski carry system was the best decision I've made for backcountry/sidecountry stuff. Saves your arms and makes climbing/hiking a hell of a lot easier

>>3146018
Hey anon, good for you. Having a hobby to motivate you to do something really helps.

Any tips for loading 120 into Paterson reels? It's such a fuckaround everytime I do it, takes me at least 10 minutes compared to the 30 seconds it takes me to do 35mm

>>3146371
I find it easier than 35mm. Pull the film past the bearings and you're good to go. Be gentle pushing it after that point.

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27002.jpg (609KB, 1000x1000px)

609KB, 1000x1000px

Broke out the Yashica Mat for the first time in ages. Not used to shooting B/W at all either, so a bit of a shift.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27005.jpg (649KB, 1000x998px)

649KB, 1000x998px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:08
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27006.jpg (635KB, 1000x1000px)

635KB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27009.jpg (500KB, 982x1000px)

500KB, 982x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:30
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3146376
Cool to see this from a slightly lower vantage point than the typical from-the-bridge location.

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27011.jpg (506KB, 999x1000px)

506KB, 999x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:36
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27007.jpg (645KB, 1000x994px)

645KB, 1000x994px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:21
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170828-ACROS-08-27003.jpg (778KB, 1000x1000px)

778KB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:06 23:05:04
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3146371
>Any tips for loading 120 into Paterson reels?
Buy steel reels.

File: 000021edit.jpg (687KB, 1200x900px)

687KB, 1200x900px

>>3146402
>hey, just go buy a different product despite thousands of people having no issues with the one your currently having problems with

Cause yeah...buying something new is always better than learning how to use what you already have...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3602
Image Height	4807
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:05 13:27:14
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	900

>>3146185
okay I didn't want a plastic fantastic camera

File: foto.jpg (475KB, 1000x667px)

475KB, 1000x667px

>>3146361
>>3146364
>not skinning

>>3146371
Make sure the end is straight, not bent from being on the spool. Bend it straight with your fingers if needed. If it get stuck winding on, just give the reel a slap on its side with the palm of your hand.
If you're really struggling, cutting the corners of the end off at 45 degree angles, a few millimeters in, can help.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3146377
>>3146378
Nicely done - I just got a Yashica-Mat LM recently and I'm loving it. Not as inconvenient to use as I thought it'd be.

What do you use to scan? Still tossing up my options for medium format scanning

Best m42 mount body for someone starting out? Already inherited a few takumar lenses. I know some of you like the spotmatic f, but haven't heard much else other than Zenit (which seem expensive but maybe i'm not looking hard enough). Trying to spend less than $20 for just the body.

Guys, go check polaroid.com

:DDDDDDD

>>3146479
I use a V600. I haven't really tried to do big files for printing yet but it's alright.

File: 2016062505.jpg (770KB, 960x1280px)

770KB, 960x1280px

>>3146515
Zenits are clunky and wildly unreliable garbage that idiots pay premium for. If you're on a budget then the Praktica MTL5b is probably your best bet. Crude but reliable, the meter is accurate and the metal blade shutter will still have life in it when you enter your grave. b-model uses modern SR44's, so you should make sure to grab that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M10
Camera Software	OLYMPUS Viewer 3 2.0.1W
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern	11644
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:27 21:59:39
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3456
Image Height	4608
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: reasons_to_live_p.png (774KB, 750x1500px)

774KB, 750x1500px

>>3146548
If you're in Europe, this.
In the US, probably some spotmatics or whatever are cheaper, more abundant.
Anything above $10 for a Zenit is overpaying. They're bottom of the barrel worst possible option stuff.

>>3146522
So, what?

>>3146573
In the pop-up with the countdown to the 13th they're pretty much announcing new film. Yeah, announcements of announcements and all that but it's still really interesting.

>>3146565
Are there any spotmatics that dont have the cloth shutter curtain?
And how much should I look to pay for a spotmatic body?
I would prefer the praktica, but I am in the US and the shipping would just be too much.

>>3145481
Telemark

>>3146580
Well, another instant film to use with plastic trashcams.
I would like to see new instant backs for medium format cameras.

>>3146624
Maybe they're diversifying their portfolio into the 135 and 120 realms? One can dream...

>>3146522
That's surprising. Wonder if they'll beat Impossible Project's POS film or if Impossible and their shitfilm is involved somehow. Or if Polaroid's gonna enter the Instax game or something.

>>3146649
The better be announcing a packfilm replacement or else I won't be interested.

>>3146649
Polaroid used to sell 135 film but I think it was a rebrand of some other films. I don't think they'll produce something that is not instant.

>>3146670
>>Polaroid used to sell 135 film but I think
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4vdOGkTSjY

>>3146674
Shit, that was neat. I bet the dev cartridges were expensive as fuck, though. Now I want the lab-box even more.