Any polaroid users here? Why is the ejection flap slamming so

>>3143065
bump

This doesn't look like a case of something hitting the print as it's ejected. This looks more like bad film. I shot a bunch of thoroughly expired Polaroid film a few years back and got these sorts of results where part of the chemicals have just crystalized or something so they don't develop the image.

>>3143222
Should I call impossible project and complain? This is new film

>>3143239
>>3143065
It's the film. impossible project film is pretty low quality

>>3143239
If it's new film, then yeah.

File: 1ae38e3e2e20a004950b0cb42666f26a_original.jpg (68KB, 680x462px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 680x462px

No hope. I've shot many packs (expired and new) which all have had discoloration and distortions. I sold everything I had and will probably get the new lomo Instax camera which shoots square format. It'll probably be better quality and cheaper aswell.

>>3143065
It's the rollers that push the emulsion, not enough pressure in the SLR 680s and such. There was this thing you could to, pushing down on some part of the camera while it was feeding our the film, can't remember what though

>>3143683
Well it's a good start. thanks

File: Poloroid+SX70SLR680_jpg.jpg (130KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 600x600px

>>3143747
No problem!
Remembered more, see picture. Try to push down on those parts while taking the picture (I usually pushed down with an additional picture while pushing the shutter button) and keep pushing, not hard, while it ejects the picture.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi

>>3144718
Additional finger, not picture.

>>3144718
so push on the hard edge extensions things?

>>3145246
Yes, if I remember correctly. Not hard in any way, just downwards while ejecting the film :)

>>3145265
Awesome thanks!