Best begginer camera

>>3140573
I'm sure this could have been asked in the gear general

DSLR, your choice is pretty much Canon or Nikon, coke or pepsi, ect. They are the same and if you ask the sales person they will sell you whatever has the biggest sales intensive (makes them the most money).

you could pentax a shit, but then no one would ever care and your photos will be bad

well actually i thought of pentax cause one of my friends shoots a pentax k7 and the photos are actually good

File: 34567.jpg (52KB, 543x433px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 543x433px

>>3140579

>2013 - Pentax K5 - wow much unforseen DR, shits on Canikon
>2017 - Pentax a shit

Never change /p/

>>3140573
>in a year or so

What's the point of this thread then?

>>3140573
you could probably get a used nikon D700, full frame goodness, anon, and access to the full range of nikon lenses including D series.

>>3140869
Dont forget that the K1 is cheaper and has the same low light performance as the A7SII with the sweet sweet K mount for those retro lenses.

>>3140579
Pentaxes have weather sealing and some even IBIS which is normally only found in pro models. i was close to buying a K2 but bought a meme4/3 instead because of the size.
In the end, it really doesn't matter that much. Every camera is able to make great photos, even pretty old ones like the canon 450d. It is also better to buy a cheap body and spend the money on lenses.

>>3141004
not Pentax K2, but K-S2

File: 1407566245115.gif (3MB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 350x200px

>>3140573
>not buying an Sony RX100 V
wutnigger?

>>3142112
That camera is fucking incredible. Only drawback is that no interchangable lenses, and it's $1000. I wouldn't mind adding it to my lineup of cameras though.

>>3140573
I never liked Canon and their round designs on cameras, they look for faggots.

>>3142112
Tiny sensor, terrible controls, piss poor battery life, evf sucks donkey dicks. Sure looks like a good deal for a thousand dollars.