Why would you buy anything other than a Sony camera in 2017?

>>3138453
Because Sony cameras are fucking shit. /thread

>>3138453
Why would you do anything other than shill for a mega corporation when you can exercise independant thought?

>the sensor is the sole criterion when choosing a digital camera

no.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 8.31.19 PM.png (587KB, 876x786px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 876x786px

>>3138479
>best lens lineup
*blocks your path*

File: olympus_1[1].jpg (94KB, 1200x747px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1200x747px

>>3138481
>best lens lineup

>>3138453
Because i like old rangefinder cameras like Yashica Electro or Olympus 35

>>3138453

who gives a flying shit

File: 36201229031_98f489f9c6_h.jpg (611KB, 1600x1081px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 1600x1081px

But I bought a Sony famalam

Quite happy with my collection of vintage C/Y Zeiss lenses, and a cheap FE 85/1.8 that rivals Zeiss Batis 85/1.8 and the legendary Sony Zeiss 55/1.8 that no other brand has. All of them are affordable too kek

>hurr Sony has no lens
>hurr Sony lens overpriced XDDDDDd

is there any meaningful difference between /p/ sony threads and /b/ blacked threads?

>>3138453
I bought a sony rx100iii and it's a piece of shit, really. Evf is shit, ui/ux is just total garbage, making it just a dumb p&s. The screen tilts atleast, but scratches like a mofo and it's not usable in hard sunlight, shit colors, noisy as fuck, sloooooow laaaggggyyyyy operation, af is meh, batterylife is meh and the thing is slippery as fuck. Only positive thing I can think of after a few years of declining use is that the lens is sharp:ish.

I much rather take my LX100 with me instead.

>>3138511

That is a good comparison.

What are th Fuji threads? AMWF?

File: 1484724567997.jpg (13KB, 354x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 354x360px

>>3138453
>new D850 sensor is Nikon-designed
>it's the best FF DSLR sensor on the market
>in the city of OP right now

>>3138548
>What are the Fuji threads? AMWF?

Of course not.

Fuji threads are cuck threads.

>>3138549
No, it's an outdated sony sensor, not even stacked and the d850 is gonna be the flagship for ~5 years?! Ouch.

Sony have already said they're using a higher mp sensor with newer technology in the a7riii.

>>3138565
Why don't you site some credible sources since you seem to know something others don't?

>>3138484
>microdick4/3
>best anything
lmao @(you)

>>3138569
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sources-sony-not-worried-new-d850/

That took all of 5 seconds to google you dumbfuck-niggerspic.