Islas Canarias: a short series

File: caleta-de-burro_lg.jpg (404KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 800x530px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

Very pretty. Ektar? Or Velvia?

File: backcountry-fv07_fv.jpg (484KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 800x530px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: teide-crests-twilight_tf.jpg (362KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 800x530px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137615
I let you figure it out
I'll post more if interested

>>3137625
Do post more.

To me first and fourth look like Velvia, second Ektar and third Portra but I’m guessing they’re all the same film?

File: teide-valley-trail_tf.jpg (475KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 800x530px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: teide-valley_tf.jpg (425KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 800x530px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137639
I shoot film but not this time, it's all digital

>>3137616
Just when I thought I'd seen every variation on the road into the distance shot, anon pulls this out the hat.
Lovely set btw.

>>3137655

Interesting. What camera/lens combo?

File: apt-view_lz.jpg (374KB, 800x541px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 800x541px

>>3137658
Very appreciated
>>3137683
Camera is a broken Pentax K50 that suffers from aperture motor failure, forcing me to abandon any automation. Lens is Vivitar 35/1.4 prime for everything. Setup is not good but I have patience

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137655
That’s interesting, the detail reproduction especially in the first one is very akin to film. Do you always try and emulate film when you shoot digital?

File: windmill-jardin-de-cactus_lz.jpg (306KB, 530x800px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 530x800px

>>3137696
In a way, you could say I try to emulate film as much as possible. But I prefer to think of it as the pursuit of the actual scene I experienced in that moment, with a certain degree of free interpretation, which may be different from what others next to me see. Film tends to get closer to that idea most of time, while on digital a lot of work may be required, and sometimes you never get quite there. That being said, the magnificent light painted the first image, I could only stare in awe and try to make the most out of it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137713
See this one looks very much like digital, the colours quite hard and plasticky. But this >>3137691 looks like a 35mm scan all the way down to the softness and purple shadow tinting.

pretty good stuff

File: corralejo-national-park_fv.jpg (337KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 800x530px

I'll post a few more later, I go to sleep now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137613

these are all sick. If you come back to post more could you talk about your treatment? Are you using a tripod? You achieve really great focus and tones. How u do it brother?

File: offshore_lz.jpg (380KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 800x530px

>>3137852
Thanks mate, appreciated. Sometimes I use a tripod, for instance >>3137764 is part of a timelapse sequence, I have over 100 similar shots I tried to blend together in PS but the result is not that great. >>3137691 is also on tripod, I stacked 5 shots with different exposure. >>3137611 is a stitch of 3 shots since at 35mm I couldn't get everything I wanted on the sensor. Focus: my setup is not high-end but the lens is the best 35mm I've ever seen, so it helps. Again here, when within hyperfocal distance I think of what I want to display and I try to imagine the outcome, sometimes I take multiple shots and focus-stack, sometimes it's better to have a bokeh. Treatment and tones: I import in LR and work the shot there, sometimes finishing it in PS. I begin by adjusting the basic values such as shadows, whites, blacks, vibrance and so on, then I move to colors and I spend way too much time there trying to get the basic colors right. I may create a bunch of variations here and compare them later side to side. Here is where I mostly give a personal interpretation of the captured scene. When I'm sold on the colors, I work on lights, this is the most significative task in my opinion, as it makes the landscape pop out. On the other hand, if the original light is bad, every effort to polish it will be useless. Shots in this series are not all on par for that very reason.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

Are all these shot at dawn?

File: visitors_fv.jpg (393KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 800x530px

>>3138025
Mostly between late afternoon and late twilight with some exceptions

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3137691

Patience and skill go a long way. Seeing these photos and your post processing inspired me to do better. Keep it up

derp

File: on-the-road_lz.jpg (360KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 800x530px

>>3138102
Glad to read that anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3138019

Thanks for the reply, I will try to incorporate some exposure/focus stacking as well as a tripod into my workflow as I've fallen off the horse pretty hard over the years, and when I do get a photo I am happy with I usually have to deal with some aspect of the image being totally botched, for instance an underexposed foreground or lost focus. Keep shooting brother, love your style.

I still can't believe how good some of these colors look.

Yo do you have a Flickr opie?

Great set, OP. You should feel proud. Please do post more on the board, this level of quality is very inspiring. Are you solely interested in landscape?

File: vegetation-teide_tf.jpg (380KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 800x530px

>>3138211
>I still can't believe how good some of these colors look.
I'm glad you like them, it means a lot to me
>>3138358
>Yo do you have a Flickr opie?
I have an Instagram account but I don't exactly love how things work on there, anyway I tend to keep my profile updated. Feel free to follow me, I usually follow back, the best way to improve is to keep observing other people's works
https://www.instagram.com/sunnylosophy/
>>3138394
>Are you solely interested in landscape?
Thank you. Landscape is where I tend to perform better, or to suck less, it seems. I just like to go for a hiking and get myself lost where I can hear nobody and take all the time I need. I wish I could travel more and get better faster.

>>3138395
>>3138161
>>3138041
>>3138019
i think im cumming

>>3137611
You are my new inspiration. I followed your insta just to keep up. Your composition is amazing, subjects are done so well.
>>3138019
You said here you stack photos, do you stack the photos before, or after editing them?

>all this samefagging

>>3138395
>instagram
Ouch. Get Flickr dawg.

File: tttt (11).jpg (435KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1000x667px

Just when I am about to give up on /p/ you go and post epic bread like this.

Kudos. And thankyou.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4676
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:24 10:20:31
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3138492
Feels a lot like a Catsby thread, huh?

File: buenavista-car_tf.jpg (441KB, 1000x414px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1000x414px

>>3138428
>do you stack the photos before, or after editing them?
Before or else I don't have a view of the whole scene
>>3138492
That hurts, I would never do that, I just felt like sharing my images. I appreciate the compliments but I don't obsessively look for them
>>3138591
I signed up a long time ago but I'm not a social media type of person. What are its advantages?

Thanks everyone for your appreciation.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

itt: fucking sad dad-core photographers in their early 30s sucking other dad-core photog"s dick, who still think that adding tons of saturation and clarity give "film look".

please stop this uncle ken editing/photographing style.

>>3138668
Flickr is good for storing and organizing your photos and not much else. I would highly recommend to sticking with Instagram solely because they have a wider target audience. Flickr is basically other photographers shilling their own shit instead of being interested in your work. Instagram is full of non photographers who genuinely like your pretty photos.

>>3138835
Go back to jerking off to hipsters with memecopters on instagram you piece of shit

>>3137611
>>3137649
>>3137764
>>3138041
these are damn good scapes you got here, the rest are sorta just run of the mill, uber saturated stuff i see from guys like Alex Burke and any successful Instagram landscape photographer

>>3138668
>What are its advantages?
Generally high standard of photos, collaborative albums and groups, easy to search for specific cameras/films/subjects etc., better resolution/compression, just generally geared more towards photographers rather than children.

>>3138639
>500px
>photos of literally nothing with nice colours
Feels like a carlos thread actually.

>>3138969
That describes the general idea of flickr, but not the reality.
At least in my limited experience if it.

Maybe there are some niche groups with strict curation and membership that embody those ideals. But I've never seen them.

>>3138835
Kek

>>3138835
if op said he shot on velvia you'd have jumped on his dick too, fucking filmfag

>>3138835

>t. butthurt Anon who can't achieve that timeless comfy film look

>>3139010
>carlos
lmfao you done undig this bitch

Good shit dude. Nice to see compelling landscapes that aren't the same bullshit. As mentioned, exposure, tones and PP is great; your photos truly resemble film.