>tfw sister bought me this camera She went to Singapore and

What's wrong with it?

>>3134463
this is a 10x better camera than sony a6500

>>3134463
Since the A6500 is mirrorless (I think), and the Fujifilm XT-20 not, and they both cost $1500 aproximately (I did the calculation based on MXN to USD) and this only costed her $350 is actually a quite economical price.
>>3134466
>What's wrong with it?
Nothing, it's a good camera and if you're planning to sell it, don't use it, but if you want to give it a try, just do it.
>>she said it looks "cute".
Anyway, you could have told her other cheaper options, and maybe that cameras aren't measured by it's cuteness. Still good luck! I would buy it [spoiler] If I had the budget to pay you[/spoiler]

Models are going to laugh at your tiny unsatisfying sensor faggot

File: chrome_2017-08-17_09-25-35.png (54KB, 325x313px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 325x313px

Well finding this thread after this one makes me feel sad for you

>>3134463
>oh look, yet another m43 bait thread

honestly, what the fuck is your mental defect that compels you to make a few of these every goddamn day?

>>3134475
>Fujifilm XT-20 not, and they both cost $1500 aproximately

It's $800 only about $100 more than the shitty OMD EM-10 Mark II and even then if you got Meme4/3 you will spend more money on their shit lenses.

>>3134463
you get free shit and then complain about it? you don't even deserve a camera. kys plz

>>3134553
>800
If you buy body only. With a kit lens it's about $1000

so what's wrong? it won't take pictures?

>>3134463
The om-d looks more like a traditional camera which is prob why your normie sister thought it was better
Are cameras cheaper in Singapore? Is that why you had her buy you one there?

>gets free camera
>still complains

please kill yourself

File: Q-auto110_111014_05k_waeebcss1xw600.jpg (85KB, 600x217px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x217px

>>3134463
>not appreciating cute cameras

are you some kind of cranky faggot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX K10D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	150 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2011:10:14 17:26:52
Exposure Time	6 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	600
Image Height	217
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto Bracket
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Close View

OP, please. We already know you hate M43. It's fine. Problem is - M43 users don't really care about this. You use Sony/Fuji or something else - good for you. We use Panasonic/Olympus - good for us. .
/p/ is a slow board and i think we could live without few of these bait threads up at the same time, so it'd be nice if you stopped that and focused on having fun taking photos instead.

>>3134664
I live in Singapore and I'm the cameras here seem quite costly. Some of us fly to Hong Kong for better deals.

E-M5 Mk2 owner here
Stop being a faggot, OP.

It's a great camera, just go out and take some goddamn photos rather than complaining about your gear (or lack thereof)

>>3134790
Singapore is costly generally. HK is perhaps a little cheaper than most places around Asia but probably not worth flying to unless you are buying a lot of stuff all in one go.

>>3134463
see:
>>3134469

>>3134463
It's better than the a6500 meme in ever way possible, you ungrateful little cunt. Kill yourself and give me the camera

>>3134686
>M43 users don't really care about this
oh yeah? well then riddle me this: why do these shitty troll threads keep getting dozens of replies?

>>3134790
>>3134839
What about Malaysia desu?

Bought a Lelnovo laptop there and the specs are better than other SEA countries w/ the same model and a bit cheaper.

>>3134658
For additional $200 the Fujifilm XT-20 has a bigger sensor, 4K video, handles well, performs better, greater colors, amazing lenses and a camera that can last longer.

>>3134880
This.

These bait threads are made my meme4/3 users so that somebody notices their small wee wee camera.

NO ONE GIVES A FUCK

>>3134463
did you give her money?

>>3134914
cameras are not cheaper here.
laptops are different because of the quantity sold.
sony a9 is RM21800.
that's USD5069 after conversion.

it's better to fly to japan and buy there.

>>3135100
>Fuji
>colors

My sides

>>3135120
>this man only shoots shitty landscapes and tourists photos

Fuji have the best portraits photos

Fake thread is fake, OP has no sister and by the looks of it has no life either.

>>3135372
>fuji have the best anything
Oh mother of kekes.

>>3135382
You mean apart from the sharpest lenses available and better low light performance than any full frame camera?

Stupid sonigger

>>3135384
>You mean apart from the sharpest lenses available and better low light performance than any full frame camera?

It doesn't have either of those though.

File: 200px-Disc-110-135_Film_Comparison.jpg (2KB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 200x133px

>>3134680
the great thing is M4/3 sensor and the auto 110 film are the same size

why are m/43 cameras still so xbox huge in relation to the sensor?

>>3135514
Screen in back, interchangeable lens mount, buttons, pressure to look like a "real" digital camera.
A m4/3 p&s would be neat. Like the Pen-F without all the extras.

File: 4659833087_c6a47121d7_b.jpg (418KB, 1024x772px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1024x772px

>>3135520
The Auto 110 is a real SLR with interchangeable lenses, mirror mechanism, pentaprism, and a film transport mechanism. it could even accept a motor drive and external flash

>>3135520
>a m4/3 p&s would be neat

the panasonic lx100 (or the version made by leica, the typ 109)

>>3135514
Auto 110 was an engineering marvel, but it had to sacrifice a lot to be that small - it was a very basic camera even by the standards of that time.
A digital camera has one or more electronic PCBs, flash, relatively bulky battery, IS and/or AF mechanisms, metal focal plane shutter, screen and a shitload of buttons. This applies to all of them, not just m43 - you won't find a FF digital camera as small as a Mju-II, or a MF digital camera that fits in a coat pocket.

>>3134632
Holy fuck, I know right? Really doesn't deserve any camera with an attitude like that.
If my brother brought me anything I would be overjoyed that he even thought of me when off having fun.

>>3134463
Are you seriously complaining that you got a free camera? Jfc what a whiney bitch. Your life really is tough, isn't it? Say "thank you" you little twat. Someone went out of their way and spent hundreds of dollars to buy something for you.

>>3134680
Always kinda gassed for a pentax q. Actual pocket shooter that isn't some dookie point and shoot.

File: _DSC2735.jpg (182KB, 780x314px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 780x314px

>>3135563
perhaps, perhaps not.
I don't imagine the Ricoh GR would change much in size if they were to put a ff sensor in there, the Sony A7 is pretty equal in size to any vintage manual SLR without sacrificing anything (the EVF is honestly an improvement to OVF in a lot of ways) and the Leica M10 is pretty dam close to the correct Leica M dimensions (M3,M4 & variants, M6, M7, MP).

I don't know why camera designers love buttons and dials for fucking everything, The Nikon Df abomination is the perfect example of designers not knowing or not giving a shit what consumers want.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	854
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2013:12:04 16:51:47
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	780
Image Height	314
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3135563
>the system's lenses did not have a built-in iris to control the aperture. Instead, an iris was mounted inside the camera body, and functioned as both an aperture control and a shutter

damn, that's pretty neat.

>>3135606
>Are you seriously complaining that you got a free camera? Jfc what a whiney bitch. Your life really is tough, isn't it? Say "thank you" you little twat. Someone went out of their way and spent hundreds of dollars to buy something for you.

>spoken like a Trump supporter who spouts that millenials are all entitled bitches

It's our right to complain. If you fucked up your work your boss will complain. OP's sister had one job.

>>3135619
If you put a FF sensor in a GR, you'd likely have to increase thickness or sacrifice lens speed.
The main problem with compactness is that with film cameras, you could put the focal plane only a couple millimeters from the back, while digital cameras need to fit a screen with backlight and protective glass, a PCB and perhaps an IS mechanism behind it. With all other things being equal, a digital camera is always going to be fatter, and the only way to compensate is removing stuff like the mirror box - but when it comes to pocket cameras, there's often nothing to remove.

>>3135621
While neat, it also meant severe restrictions on lens designs and overall system expandability.

>>3135953

I'd love a small digital camera with no big screen, but instead just an evf for compactness.

Shit would rock.

>>3135958
A quality EVF adds as much bulk as a screen if not more, just in a different shape. And reviewing/sorting images with an EVF is a pain in the ass, especially if it's a small one with a shitty eye point.

i don't think i've ever seen a photo from a m4/3 camera. Does such a photo even exist?

>>3136179
yes

File: 32255521895_7bb54a8585_b.jpg (268KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 768x1024px

>>3136179

File: olyem1ii_270887_2b.jpg (61KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x450px

>>3136179

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Model	E-M1MarkII
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Color Filter Array Pattern	782
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:01 16:26:35
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1500
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20170408-P1004387-Edit1-1000-sec-at-f-10ISO-200.jpg (3MB, 3400x2410px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3400x2410px

>>3136179

>>3136238
>>3136240
>>3136241
all shit

meme4/3 cucks BTFO

>>3136238
>>3136240
>>3136241
those are bad examples for shilling dude

>>3136300
>>3136304
what's so bad about them?

>>3136307
he's just getting even more irrational when someone upsets his m43 threads by posting actual photos.

>>3134475
>Since the A6500 is mirrorless (I think), and the Fujifilm XT-20 not.

They're both mirrorless. Tbh I recommend getting a second hand X-E2 or XT-1

>>3134463
Humble yourself you fucking cunt. Your sister loves you and you dont deserve an ounce of it. Fuck you. Be grateful

Just sell it. No need to keep it when it isnt the one you want.

>>3134463
I don't get it, what is wrong with the camera? Does it take pictures? Do they look nice? Will people look at your pictures and say "Hey, those are pretty nice"? If so, what is the issue?

>>3137343
Loves him. But not enough to buy him the camera he wants. She might aswell not have bought him anything

>>3137349
>Anon wants me to buy him this camera
>That camera is too far out of my price range
>This one is similar, has similar features
>I can afford it
>Anon will love it!

Then he spergs out like a faggot.

>>3137351
Seeing as he propably is paying for it himself. The chance of him being happy with a camera he wants is pretty higher than a camera he doesnt want.

File: P8160462.jpg (654KB, 1536x1152px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1536x1152px

I like having a camera that people compliment as they walk past me :3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Camera Model	E-M10MarkII
Camera Software	Version 1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:16 19:47:16
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3134463
>I specifically told her to get me a Sony a6500 or a Fujifilm XT-20. Her only excuse is that she lacks the budget
She paid for it.

>>3136307
those are not sharp

>>3137351
calm down. OP is clearly a made-up story just so he can spam the board with yet another m43 bait thread

File: 1437972640495.jpg (119KB, 876x719px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 876x719px

>leave /p/ for a month
>autist still making Micro 4/3 b8 threads

>>3134463
i am autistic, the thread feat. op

>>3137357
Wipe the cum from your eyes and look again.

File: IMG_20170824_141151.jpg (3MB, 3968x2976px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3968x2976px

The em-10 mkii is the cutest of the current lineup. Go out and take some pics, prove how bad it is or how good you are. >>3134463

>pic related

These lenses are all I'll ever need, no regrets

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	HUAWEI
Camera Model	EVA-L09
Camera Software	EVA-L09C45B320
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3968
Image Height	2976
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:24 14:11:51
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3968
Image Height	2976
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

If your sister brought you a camera all the way from japan, suck it up, thank her, and show how much you like the camera. Not even /p material, just common decency

>>3138989
>deleuze
my man. i really like Postscript on the Societies of Control, but fuck you for shamelessly flaunting muh continental philosophers.

ive always lusted for the 75mm, but i switched over to mf film, and can't justify the expense anymore.

>>3139065
The 75mm is one of the best lenses out there of any system. It's superb.

Srry for the books, lacking a proper shelf for the gear.