Judgement

A little pissed you started a new thread for one picture but it's fine/10

>>3134328
Sky is blown the fuck out. Framing is way too tight. Aspect ratio is inappropriate. File is fucking huuuge. Not that I care but read the fucking sticky.
That said colours are good, location was good, so no need to kys just yet.

>>3134328
Colors are nice, but what am i looking at here? There is no subject.

File: lens_diffraction_in_photography.jpg (28KB, 600x330px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x330px

>>3134328
>f22
You need to look into lens diffraction and DoF calculations for a given aperture and pixel size.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Photographer	Dell
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	600
Image Height	330

>>3134328
Looks like a B&W picture that has been colorized, at lease that's what the colors convey.

>>3134376
That's what makes it art

File: 1502946683282.jpg (831KB, 1000x773px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1000x773px

fixed it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	8985
Image Height	6946
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:17 19:47:12
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/22.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	773
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3134762
That magenta is fucking distracting on the roof and that blotch in the dead center

Learn to mask

>>3134328
too teal. You're not working with skin tones on this scene to push this teal/orange this hard

this anon >>3134762 got it.

Composition is good tho, only the colours are kind off

>>3134328

Dude. Resize.

And that sky is blown the fuck out. I don't even know where to begin with the colors. What's wrong with the colors??

>>3134823
>composition is good
Mirari pls..

>>3134762
i like OP's, more cozy

>>3134857
come on, don't be too harsh. It's above /p/ average

>uses 1/8 and f/22
op are u dumb or what?

>>3135085
this. Its almost like it's bait

>>3134328
Not liking the cutting off of the hytte on the right, but I do like the distance you capture here.

This is norway, right?

>>3134328
you got the raw?

>>3136368
Norway? wtf I thought it was fucking Wyoming.

>>3135069
You clearly never see /rpt/

>>3135085
>>3135124
Not op, but what is the problem with that?
Seems like a totally reasonable thing to do if you want to shot at a tight aperture

>>3140034
Diffraction.... Its like purposely shooting yourself in the "quality" foot.

>>3140050
There is a lot you can do about that in post and it is also highly dependent on the lens.
You should not avoid everything past f/8 because diffraction exists. Missing a shot that is good at f/22 because your lens will not be a tack is silly.
Some of the best landscapes ever taken were taken at f/64 with lenses you would toss in the trash today.
Stop obsessing over minute sharpness at 1:1
The only reason to care is if you are making large prints, if you are making (and selling) large prints than you can probably afford a lens with better properties at high f numbers