Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: IMG_0063.jpg (685KB, 1200x869px) Image search:
[Google]
685KB, 1200x869px
Quick dumb question: How much of an upgrade is a Canon 1100D to a Canon 80D? Is it worth 850 euro? or am I better off saving for something better? (All my lenses are canon so I'd be sticking with that)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 (12.0x20100115 [20100115.m.998 2010/01/15:02:00:00 cutoff; m branch]) Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:16 07:59:24 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 869
>>
File: 1497358937276.jpg (248KB, 1500x474px) Image search:
[Google]
248KB, 1500x474px
>>3133914
If you need quicker adjustment on your camera settings, yes.
If you want bBUTTER PIKTHURrrs11!?!, buy a prime instead.
Next time, gear thread fukken newbie.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpcm Vertical Resolution 300 dpcm
>>
>>3133920
It's more that that.
The aps-c cameras before the 80D had an ISO variant sensor, that means the sensitivity is not linear, has a cutoff point.
Other camera like Nikon, and Pentax had ISO invariant sensors for many generations meaning the sensitivity is linear and gives the same amount of noise pushed in post or with raised ISO. This makes the high ISO performance much better and normal PP work is much easier.
While the 80D is nowhere near the sensor performance of the Nikon D7000 or Pentax K-5II but is leaps ahead of the past Canon crop bodies, including the 7D MkII.
It is much preferable to switch to the 80D, anything below that is just a marginal difference.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2