/fgt/

previous thread:
>>3127534

first for hp5

>>3130913
What's everyones alternative to portra ?
Let's say if you cant afford much of portra

>>3130934
Fuji 160nc but the price is pretty much the same as portra

File: ScanImage011-1.jpg (662KB, 1690x2277px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1690x2277px

>>3130934
Superia x-tra 400

Looking to get a rangefinder, what are some budget ones? Minolta Hi-Matic?

I have a decent collection of cheapish film cameras i've built over the last 2 or 3 years and I've decided I want to buy my first higher end 35mm film slr. I really like the nikon f2. what do you niggs think about the f2, or are there other cameras i should consider in the ~200 price range (for a nice one)?

File: KonicaPro160002-2mini.jpg (299KB, 1194x800px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1194x800px

>>3130934
My alternative to portra is never shoot portra because it's fucking trash.
>based sakuracolor 4 lyfe

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment
Projection	Rectilinear (0)
FOV	13 x 9
Ev	13.40
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3130945
Voigtlander Bessa
Leica IIIf
Leica CL
Minolta CLE
Leica m4-p

>>3130945
you can find canon ql17s really cheap

>>3130934
>>3130944
mah nigga

>>3130913
>126 cameras
>135 film

What the hell

File: 24167.jpg (24KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 640x480px

What does /fgt/ thinks about Kodak Color Plus?
In my opinion it's a great film considering its price. Actually I wish I could have it in 120 format, I'd literally don't worry about the cost.

>>3130946
Just get a Nikon f5 you fucking idiot

File: ducclang.jpg (623KB, 1161x1741px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 1161x1741px

>>3130967
Going to be a fag and post this picture again. Aside from some minor grain looking at some shots close up it seems to be a good stock.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone
Camera Software	VSCO
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:07 04:51:41
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1161
Image Height	1741
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: menofmadrid.jpg (296KB, 1000x782px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1000x782px

>>3130979
I don't normally like nature photography like this, but I really like this one. I like what you did with the scale of the animal.

I'll repost one too lmao

File: IMG_20170419_203810_582.jpg (745KB, 1502x1502px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 1502x1502px

>>3130934
Portra sucks. for 120 replace with 160NS. For 35mm replace with Superia

File: 51070002.jpg (359KB, 1048x884px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1048x884px

recents

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:01:47
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 51070016.jpg (328KB, 853x1048px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 853x1048px

>>3131023

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:02:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 51070033.jpg (221KB, 1048x632px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1048x632px

>>3131024

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:04:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 55400023.jpg (336KB, 695x1048px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 695x1048px

>>3131025

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:06:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3131022
just ordered 5 rolls of 160ns in 120 for 38 ozbux, expired last year. Hoping it's good

File: 80340002.jpg (315KB, 1048x732px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1048x732px

>>3131026

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:00:33
Color Space Information	sRGB

Ayo andrew/japananon

unrelated to film, but looks like I've got a job in Japan for 4 months. What's the best way to go about getting a simcard / phone plan?

File: 81810020.jpg (169KB, 835x1048px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 835x1048px

>>3131030

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 22:07:51
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 83330022.jpg (448KB, 810x1048px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 810x1048px

>>3131035

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 00:46:27
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 83340001.jpg (375KB, 1048x695px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1048x695px

>>3131038

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 00:44:40
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20170428_080830_345.jpg (116KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1000x750px

>>3131029
Great stuff, you'll love it!

>>3131032
Yo dude, depends where you're living. I'm not too well-versed it short term plans as I lived there for years and had ab2 year contract. There are definitely monthly plans you can sign up for. Be prepared to show your visa as places are quite hesitant signing over plans without proof of you being in the country for the duration of the plan. Also be aware that unless you sign up on the first of the month, you may get suckered into an extra month. I was with DoCoMo, but don't think they do monthly plans. Definitely make sure your phone is unlocked prior to coming.

>>3131057
okay sweet thanks for the info. I'm going to be in Hakuba being a ski bum.

btw any info on mail-in film developing?

>>3130946
Getting a high end 35mm slr is silly.

It's a light tight box. It doesn't matter. Get a nice medium format system, or get a rangefinder where the lenses you'll be buying into are actually markedly improved over SLR lenses.

The difference between high end SLR lenses and low end slr lenses is LESS then the jump in quality you'll get from high end SLR to a RF or any medium format camera.

File: IMG_20170311_195350_217.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>3131063
Dude Hakuba is sick! I didn't explore the towns much, but if there's a kitamura camera in town they would send out for you...and potentially do 35mm c41 in house.

Otherwise people advertise their services on yahoo auctions as a Buy It Now price. If you go that route, once you have the contact info of a particular place you won't need to go through yahoo auctions again. I never went this route, but prices can be pretty damn cheap. ¥200 + shipping for dev + 16base scan.

>>3130949

CLE owner here. Shits cash, especially with m-rokkor lenses (I think voigtlqnder makes new m lenses that are roughly equivalents too). Framelines are a little weird (28/40/90) and don't always activate properly, so it can be odd with some of the more common m-mount lenses.

File: Cherry Blossom Liquid Shoe Polish - Black 75 ml Bottle-750x750.jpg (44KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 750x750px

>>3130913

How do I clean an old leather camera case?

It is actually leather, but stinks of dust and age. Would using something like this on the outside work?

What about the inside? It is the fuzzy stuff. It is pretty disgusting with what I hope is chocolate on it. A wet rag and some elbow grease?

File: CNV000009.jpg (464KB, 1004x1500px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1004x1500px

>when will my scanner return home from the war

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 14:13:36
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: CNV000024.jpg (549KB, 1004x1500px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 1004x1500px

>>3131213
good kebab

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 14:39:53
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: CNV000018.jpg (845KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

845KB, 1840x1232px

>>3131215

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER350/370-7.0-0E-868
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 13:45:06
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: CNV000007.jpg (934KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 1840x1232px

>>3131216

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER350/370-7.0-0E-868
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 13:44:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: IMAG1778-01.jpg (2MB, 3772x2828px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3772x2828px

>sees this on yahoo auctions
>seller says it's junk
>bids 1 yen bc why not
>wins auction
>mfw
>it arrives in under a week from Japan
>puts a fresh battery in it
>mfw it works completely fine
>mfw I'm a mjufag now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	HTC 2PS6200
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Sensing Method	Unknown
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:11 17:17:31
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Unknown
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.58 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3772
Image Height	2828
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: fruit.jpg (362KB, 1000x779px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 1000x779px

>>3131205

>>3131215
Awesome colors!

>>3131212
I would probably just use a coarse brush on the inside, you never know how the fuzzy stuff and the glue holding the whole thing together might behave with water in
The outside you just clean like you would a leather shoe

My recent garbage.

File: 41790020.jpg (2MB, 1024x1545px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x1545px

>>3130913
I am not a pro.

>>3131229
Yeah...but how much was shipping? I wouldn't pay more than $5 for a mju zoom. Super common to find second hand, unlike the sought after fixed lens versions.

>>3131212
If it's really disgusting on the outside, you could wipe it off with acetone and get some shoe cream in roughly the same colour (or even rub all the colour off and make it another one if you'd like). Do be sure to apply the cream relatively quickly after the acetone or the leather will dry out. I'd do the inside with a damp cloth with some green soap or other mild detergent. If you're really into it, you could even stitch in a new inside but idk how good you are with needle and thread

>>3131267

Thanks, will give the outside a good polishing tonight.

At the very least it should cover some of the old dusty musk smell.

Still not sure how to handle the inside. Gave it a good scrubing but the choclate/mud/shit/whatever-the-fuck-it-is did not come off at all.

I would just buy a replacement, but the only e-bay listing is $60 with $25 domestic shipping.

>>3131343

It is black and i like it black, so I am just gonna go over it with some polish. Seems to be in good enough condition for a 30 year old case.

As for resowing insides....that'd be a great idea, but i can't even sew a button on, so I will just try to give it a cleaning.

>>3131345
What country do you live in?

>>3131349

Japan.

>>3131351
Oh nvm then, if you lived in Europe I would do it for a nominal fee, but I'm afraid the shipping costs would make that unfeasible

>>3131353

Yea, it'd probably cost half as much as just buying another.

Thanks though.

There is probably a leather rework shop nearby I can look into. I know of one that does bags, this shouldn't be too much of a difference.

>>3131364
Yeah, I think a regular cobbler would do it too. Mine also does wallets and bags so I imagine that won't be much different in Japan.

So I've read you can use g series lense on old nikon but you need an aperture ring adapter. Anyone know what adapter ring I'd need? Every time I search for one it comes up this crazy other shit.

Just got a 35mm 1.8 for d3300 and I'm excited knowing I may be able to use it on my fm2.

File: ATLANTIC WALL 2.jpg (811KB, 1500x1494px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 1500x1494px

>>3130947
really nice tones in the water, can you burn in more detail in the sky camera left?

>>3131280
the el dorado is such a wild building inside, one floor apparently has gold carpeting in the hallways and you have to take your shoes off, no matter whose apartment your going to.

Pic is Portra 400, all I shoot for 6x6. New scanner and using Silverfast now, 100 times happier than EpsonScan.

Over one million French workers were drafted into construction corps to build the French segments of the Atlantic Wall. The wall was frequently mentioned in Nazi propaganda as impenetrable and often greatly exaggerated in size and scope. Although some strongholds and port fortresses held out until Germany's final, unconditional surrender, most of the emplacements were stormed within hours of first contact with Allied forces.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 09:59:29
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1494

>>3131371
thats actually not the el dorado, I think its the San Remo.

File: 234254.jpg (22KB, 278x331px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 278x331px

Should I cop for $20?

The only problem is where can I buy a 620 film?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	RR
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3131422
ur asking us if you should shoot yourself in the head. but also you dont have bullets.

>>3130947
Where to buy Sakura Color?

>>3131423
There's someone here who converted that to 120. Is that possible?

>When you get a roll back and youre reminded that youre a big stupid retard that shouldnt be taking pictures because youre unable to properly focus

If I'm shooting black and white film with a yellow filter on the lens, and using flash to fill, should I add +½EV to the flash power when doing fill computation because of flash spectrum being heavily blue? Or take the filter off entirely and go as one would at uncompensated box speed?

>>3131422
I would rather tear my own fingernails out than use that camera. Why any sentient creature would pay money for it is beyond me.

>>3131431
>tfw didnt load roll correctly and have a ton of double exposures

>>3131425
Yes, but it's a pain in the ass. 620 is 120 in a thinner spool (kind of a proprietary format by Kodak to drive the sale of their own cams). You'll have to re-spool 120 film in 620 spools and then pray your lab won't throw them away even if you ask them not to.

File: colour-guns (1 of 1).jpg (1019KB, 1200x796px) Image search: [Google]

1019KB, 1200x796px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi

>>3131483
Not that hard, it's really easy to be true.
I rarely use a 1934 Kodak Vollenda 620, great folding camera that, as suggested, requires 620 film. You'll just need to trim the exceeding edges of 120 film until their level reaches film level, that's it. I use a nail cutter, matter of 1 minute.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170811_172501.jpg (1MB, 1569x1255px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1569x1255px

Snapped this for 60 bucks at the flea market. There's some dings but it seems to work properly.

Considering there was another dude selling one for 300, i think i did pretty good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LG Electronics
Camera Model	LG-H831
Camera Software	Lightroom Android 3.0.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:08:11 17:25:01
Exposure Time	1/11 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length	4.42 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>3131561
is that a huge scratch on the front element?

>>3131561
Worst deal in history. That scratch on the front elements will give you a shit ton of flares and diffusion.

>>3131561
Singapore or Germany?

I have shot some of my best photos on my Rollei 35!

>>3131576
No it won't. You know nothing about optics if you think that. The front elements purpose is primarily protective. You can smash a lens with a hammer and still take a passable photo with it.

See yourself out.

>>3131582
you should smash yourself with a hammer

>>3131584
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/10/front-element-scratches/

>>3131577
Germany, the guy told me there's was actually a slight scrach in the front lens, but that wouldn't be a problem since the back lens is the most important.

>>3131582
You clearly don't know a single fuck about optics.

File: Panasonic_HDC_TM90_HDC_TM90_High_Definition_Camcorder_749863.jpg (384KB, 2500x2500px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 2500x2500px

>>3130913
is there a point in getting a camcorder?

ive wanted one since I was a kid and ever since forgot about that desire, I saw one in pc world again and was reminded of how much I thought I could make really cool movies, anyway to the point:

is it worth it or is a smartphone with a good camera just as efficient?

>>3131591
see
>>3131585
then read your own post and pretend I wrote it towards you.

Idiot.

>>3131595
I've already read that article, retard, as you can see there will be diffusion and flares.
Fucking idiot.

>>3131598
That article is the worst case scenario with an entirely smashed front element.
You're not an experienced photographer if you've never used a camera with a single deep scratch and realized it doesn't affect the image quality save for occasionally a small loss of contrast.

A spiderweb fracture is exponentially more surface area for light scattering than a single scratch.

>>3131605
I'd rather say I'm not a photographer that literally throws his lenses on the ground. Look at that enormous scratch on that tiny lens. I would have never bought it unless they asked me 5 euros for it.

>>3131625
That's because you're an idiot, anon. You also throw out perfectly good milk and vegetables because someone wrote a number on it. It's in your nature.

>>3131641
Well well, keep using your scratched lenses you retard, it's in your nature.
I'm happy with perfection.

>>3131651
Post photos.

>>3131665
I'm not talking about composition or exposure. I'm talking about lens' rendition.
My gear is perfect, my pictures could not be so. They are to my eyes.

>>3131561
Can't you get pretty darn minty examples for $100 on eBay?

>>3130979
This picture feels like its a picture of a plastic bird in a plastic surrounding... I like it!

>>3131545
Just end yourself already

File: 1.jpg (660KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 1200x1200px

Not enough black and white in this thread, have some Acros and gratuitous MF bokeh.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV550
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 00:21:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2.jpg (587KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1200x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV550
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 00:21:07
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 4.jpg (836KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 1200x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV550
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 00:21:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3131545
with DOP that shallow whats even the point

>>3131797
I don't know, something about it I like. Not just because 'omg bokeh', I just like the aesthetic.

>be on ebay
>everything film to buy is amerisharts selling their garbage expired 24exp rolls, or even 12exp
>at 36exp fresh roll prices
no one wants that trash. keep it for yourselves you maggots.

File: a765f18085264ee528905272e8a7d9c2_original.jpg (134KB, 1552x873px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1552x873px

Can't wait for this.

>>3132140
What does it do?

>>3132141
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2017788873/lab-box-the-first-multi-format-daylight-loading-fi?lang=fr

>>3132140
>rolleicord
this is like when they do marketing and use not so hot girls for the promos. immediately cheapens the product and tells you theyre not so into it as they say.

>>3132118

>go one ebay
>every cunt ebay seller thinks that film anything is some kind of antique justifying 400% uphike

everytime

>>3132155
they all know E100G is like gold and sell a *frozen* 5pack 120 at $100. and the poor saps buy it.

>>3132155
What you're seeing is the stuff that didn't sell.

File: Image (21).jpg (1MB, 2089x1393px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2089x1393px

35mm newfag, should i kill myself?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7400
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:06 15:55:11

File: 82250010.jpg (1MB, 1039x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1039x1024px

>>3131422
You don't need 620 film you need 620 spools you can shoot with 120 as long as you roll the 620 pool onto it.

It's fun to fuck around with but imo a total waste of money unless you really want to try it.

t. photo taken with one it might be a shitty scan but my 35mm looks way better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.40.003 (150911)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1039
Image Height	1024

File: 82840021.jpg (2MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1545x1024px

>>3132170
>>3131422
This is taken with a canon QL17.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.40.003 (150911)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: DSCF1768.jpg (333KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1000x664px

Why doesn't this camera get more love? Very solid build, huge viewfinder, fast AF, plays well with manual lenses, decent featureset, takes AA batteries, and best of all it's cheap. Ridiculously cheap. I paid 700 yen for this one in pristine condition, and it came with an old-style metal hardware Nikon strap probably worth that alone. Definitely recommendable!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix X100
Camera Software	Digital Camera FinePix X100 Ver2.11
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 21:33:07
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Brightness	-3.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	664
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>3132140
September launch planned right?

Gonna order one myself.

>>3132140
I fail to see the point in this. Good if you live in a studio with no walk in closet I suppose. If you can load film in a dark place, buying this is truly a cucked move.

>>3132260
smaller than a paterson tank

uses less chemicals since it's constant rotation/agitation (similar to a jobo)

plus it lowers the barrier to entry for home film developing. loading the film in the dark is the 'scary' part that turns a lot of people off. if this thing gets a whole heap of people into developing film then it's cool with me

>>3132260

I don't even have a sibgle room where I live without a window. Plus it is extremely cramped and has limited space. A small tank that does not require darkness to load and requires less chemicals per roll is a major plus.

>>3132157

It's those impatient retards that can't wait a few months for it's re-release, but a fools and it's money are quickly parted

>>3132297
they will release a generic "Ektachrome" with new updated (((eco friendly))) formula, not the beloved original E100G. retard.

File: __5_0034.jpg (426KB, 850x1000px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 850x1000px

Got my Fuji 200 developed some days ago. Can't wait to start using Fuji Superia 400. (1/4)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 10:32:15
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	850
Image Height	1000

File: _30_0058.jpg (298KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 667x1000px

>>3132332
(2/4)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2000
Image Height	3000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 10:33:22
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

File: _28_0056.jpg (748KB, 1000x843px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 1000x843px

>>3132333
(3/4)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 10:33:03
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	843

File: _16_0045.jpg (707KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1000x667px

>>3132334
(4/4)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 10:32:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>3132184
Eighties plastic horror from the time before AF had become good. But obviously a damn good cop if otherwise no camera, or no backup camera for F-mount stuff.

>>3132260
It's supposedly handier than a 2x135 Paterson for developing 2x120 in sequence, if there's two reels available. Temperature measuring on the tank seems useful since there's no obvious way to stick a separate meter's head in there. There may be convenience advantage for developing one-offs as well.

>>3132246
I'm in the kickstarter; I'll post to describe mine once it gets here.

>>3132369
>I'll post to describe mine once it gets here.
Please do. I'm on the verge of ordering a Patterson tank and a changing bag but those make little sense as I still don't have a scanner, so I'm thinking I'd rather wait and get one of those instead when they're made available to the public.

I mean, who wouldn't want a box as easy to load as a mechanical SLR where you only have to pour the 500ml Rodinal dilution, then the fixer and call it a day?

>>3132369

I wish I had seen it before the kickstarter ended, would have totally been in on it.

Looking forward to what you have to say about it.

>>3132381

What would be the best scanner now-a-days anyway? I shoot enough that a dedicated scanner would be worth it over a dslr setup.

I hear the Plustek 8200 can't be beat, but that is 135 only. The new revisions of the epson flatbed is supposed to be pretty nice, but I hear tons of negative things about the lower end models.

>>3132385
No idea. I have exactly the same dilema. I've almost ordered the Plustek 8100 several times already but then I remember I also shoot 120 from time to time and I'd rather not pay an arm and a leg to get it scanned in a lab, neither do I have an SLR: just a mirrorless Fuji that I doubt would be good enough for this task. I guess I'll eventually just get a flatbed, but the bulkiness is really off-putting.

>>3132387

You could probably get decent enough shots with the Fuji, but considering there is no even halfway decent x-mount macro lens and you'd have to deal with the terrible xtrans raws and odd Fuji coloring, it probably isn't worth it.

>>3132387
>dslr cuckscan
>with x-tranny
JUST

>>3132389
I don't have the patience either. Even if I tried to do it the ghetto way with the lenses I have (just the cheapo kit and the 27mm pancake) I'd still have to buy a film holder and a light box so I'm again at the point I'd rather just get a fucking scanner or pay the lab.

>>3132387
>>3132389
>>3132392
>>3132394
You're taking your samefagging to a whole new level here, Moopco.

File: IMG_20170813_144527.jpg (203KB, 1000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1000x1333px

>>3132405
Let's not derail this thread. I also hate that fucking cunt but it's not him this time. Yes, I do have a Fuji and I like it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Xiaomi
Camera Model	MI 5
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Sensing Method	Unknown
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 14:53:01
Exposure Time	4166081/125000000 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	263
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.14 m
Metering Mode	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1333
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>3132389
You do know that you can mount pretty much any slr macro lens ever made on a fuji, right? I've got an old vivitar 55/2.8 1:1 macro lens on f mount and it produces wonderful results. For less than 100 bucks.
>terrible xtrans raws and odd Fuji coloring
How about you take adobes dick out of your mouth and learn how to post process properly.

>>3132405
>>3132418

>even the film thread is flooded with fuji shills

Is anywhere safe?

>>3132437
Not even shilling, just correcting retards spewing their tired old horse manure all over the place.

>>3132381
>>3132382
Will do. Could be months still though, seeing how much Kickstarters are usually late & it not being promised until like late October or some such.

>>3132451

Probably a good chance you will be able to buy it before kickstarter pledges are delivered if previous kickstarters are anything to go by.

Feeling completely uninspired. I live in a shit town in Britain and there's only so many le artsy urban decay meme pictures I can take

>>3132468
get some dude weed lmao and shoot.

>>3132140
Let me see if I understand this. It's a multi-format Paterson tank + changing bag, right?

>>3132501
It substitutes for a changing bag, a retarded single-reel developing tank, a reel, a pair of scissors, a thermometer, the dev tank's agitation rod, and fine motor skills in the dark. Per marketing anyway.

>>3132461
All of my ceques if it goes that way. There's italians involved, so I'm expecting a heady mix of Ferrania and Juicero, delivered once they've sold some higher-priced units to make up for the eventual difference in price. But hey, at least Kickstarter popularized (((business)))!

>>3130934
VSCO portra presets

I just processed a roll of Delta 400 and there's a yellow streak across a lot of frames. Did the fixing fail somehow or what happened?

>>3132646
If it's a yellowish grey, then it sounds like part of the film drooped into contact with itself, therefore avoiding (most likely) both development and fixing. You may be able to clean it up a bit by re-fixing the affected bit. 120, right?

Post a quick cellphone snap to be sure.

>>3132334
i like

File: 1502613473178.jpg (707KB, 1000x843px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1000x843px

>>3132334

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:13 10:33:03
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	843

>>3132648
135 and what I doubt in that theory is that the streak is so long that the film should have been touching itself for most of the spiral. If every layer is supposedly bulging and touching the next layer, no part of the film can be in contact with itself.

Can't snap a photo but you seem to know exactly what I'm talking about.

File: image.png (44KB, 306x232px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 306x232px

>>3132693
Thanks mane, i like it.

File: BrownieOrtho01-cieon.jpg (252KB, 1353x802px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1353x802px

>>3132170
>>3132171
>t. labcuck
What's also amusing to me is that you used two motion blurred photos to illustrate sharpness.
>>3131422
I believe that the Hawkeyes are actually some of the sharpest Brownies you can get, but don't quote me.
Even so, simple single element meniscus box brownies will take very sharp photos if you use correct technique. Pic related.
620 film is just 120 on a slightly smaller spool. You will need to use a correct metal spool as your takeup, so the winding knob engages properly, however you can simply use a file or a bench sander or something to take some width off the plastic 120 spool at either end, and take the excess diameter off as well so it's almost level with the paper. Once it fits in the camera, you're good to go.
Use the red window on the back to wind to each frame, but keep it out of direct sun and then tape it over between shots.

>>3132726
Yeah, for 135 I got no idea. A duff fixer bath would underfix all over, bad agitation would make overall thin negs or streaks down the sprocket holes... could be something like a manufacturing defect, some crud along the film as a streak keeping the fixer out, if it's down the whole length incl. the fully black bit at the start. But I wouldn't expect this of Ilford based on their previous defect response; they were very thorough, clearly a reputation to maintain there.

If the streaks are vertical in landscape orientation, it could be a loading error, like even minutely moist reels or something, causing the film to actually bunch up a little bit here and there. That can also happen because of the film sweats, being summer and so forth. Or condensation if you kept the film in the fridge waiting to process, and didn't let it warm up for a couple of hours in between.

File: 000006310014.jpg (80KB, 398x600px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 398x600px

>>3131780
piling on

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 16:08:09
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	398
Image Height	600

bois I'm looking into films and I can't seem to get the fidelity/smooth contrast that other b&w photographers get - when shooting stuff with a lot of sky, how do I get that sweet dynamic range where the sky isnt completely blown out compared to the subject?

using an om-40 btw

>>3132767
I have to keep investigating. It is horizontal. It's in the middle frames and runs through about a dozen. Both ends are clear. I've had this problem once with 120 in the past. The reel was dry but I'll see, if it's a loading error.

File: T70MelbHP500017.jpg (374KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1080x810px

>>3132810
Ah, you're using a consumer body.
You need to upgrade to a prosumer or pro-tier body to get that increased dynamic range. Something like an OM4-Ti would work, however Olympus is really a low-grade brand.
Nikon or Leica will give you the best dynamic range.
I took this photo with my hasselblad, it's an "upper-pro tier" camera, check my range.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:05 22:55:25
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	810
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: MS-Optics-Apoqualia-G-28mm-f2-lens-for-Leica-M-mount-4.jpg (718KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1280x854px

I am looking for an m-mount 28mm lens.

Can't decide between m-rokkor 28mm and Ms Optics 28mm.

The m-rokkor is a better lens, especially wide open, but it is really hard to find a copy with clean glass since they had a manufacturing defect that causes spotting on the front element. Most aren't bad enough affect image quality, but it is unsightly and can get worse.

The Ms Optics isn't all that great wide open, but stepped down past f/4 looks fine. Plus it is small enough to make it pocketable.

I am going purely on reviews for this, does anyone have any first hand experience with either?

File: DSC02975.jpg (391KB, 1160x800px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1160x800px

>>3132825
Why are you so dead set on either of these two?
The MS is made of pure JCH meme faggotry.
The menelta has a known manufacturing defect.
Pick something else for fucks sake.
>mfw an ai-s nikkor 28/2.8 AND an FE/FM body would be less than either of these, and give better IQ

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:24 15:22:56
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1160
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3132831
>Why are you so dead set on either of these two?

any recommendations?

>mfw an ai-s nikkor 28/2.8 AND an FE/FM body would be less than either of these, and give better IQ

I actually have an F-501 and AF 28mm f/2.8. Nice little combo actually, I just love my m-mount body a lot more and want a similar lens for it.

>>3132839
konica hexanon 28mm

File: DSC02289.jpg (332KB, 602x800px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 602x800px

>>3132839
The hexanon, the zeiss, any voigtlander, any old Nikkor or Canon with an LTM-M adapter?
People have been making 28's in Leica mounts since the dawn of time.
>SHIT NIQQA YOU CAN EVEN GET A GSW690 FOR LESS THAN THESE MEMES IF YOU LOVE RANGEFINDERS AND SYMMETRICAL LENSE DESIGNS AND THE 28MM FOV SO MUCH

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:14 15:41:11
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	602
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3132843
>>>3132839 (You)
>The hexanon, the zeiss, any voigtlander, any old Nikkor or Canon with an LTM-M adapter

Yea I considered the Voigtlander. Using their 40mm now and love it. Others I saw are too pricey or too big.


>People have been making 28's in Leica mounts since the dawn of time

I was leaning towards the native Minolta because I have read that the Clear is weird and lenses from different manufacturers can set off the 40 and 90 framelines. Not too much of an issue, but kind of annoying.

>>SHIT NIQQA YOU CAN EVEN GET A GSW690 FOR LESS THAN THESE MEMES IF YOU LOVE RANGEFINDERS AND SYMMETRICAL LENSE DESIGNS AND THE 28MM FOV SO MUCH

I actually prefer SLRs. I just love my rangefinder because it is so tiny.

I considered the GS690 but if I am going medium format I am gonna get a 500cm.

>>3132166
Killing yourself would possibly be a bit extreme. It's a good subject and suits being backlit like that, but by you've trivialised it and removed any potential mystery by having those trees in the background. Keep the same focal length, go in closer and lower so having it take up more of the frame, back it against the sky so it's completely isolated and have the comparative height feel much more imposing. Then you've got a good snapshit.

>>3132810
You start out with a real pretty sky. Then add a colour contrast filter (orange is typical for shots that've got a lot of sky) and/or polarizing filter (adjust until the sky gains hella contrast). Because the sky will still be many stops above things lit by it (and direct sunlight), you'll still want to overexpose your film and underdevelop it.

You can also do what Alex etc. do and put a graduated ND filter on top of the sky part, bringing it down from blown-white range without fucking the shadows.

Basically, landscapes are hard.

File: GOVrjjs.jpg (81KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 800x800px

>>3132810
Overcast sky is tough to fix with anything other than a graduated ND.

If you do lots of landscape stuff, a graduated ND filter is a must have. 2 stop soft is the most versatile, look into Formatt-Hitech resin filters for best bang for your buck.

I have a few questions about the ae-1 since I've recently come to own one through a relative. I got it with two lenses both 50mm 1.8, but one FD and the other FL.

Question #1: Is the only difference that the FD can take advantage of the auto aperture feature and the FL cannot?

Question #2: Do you guys have any recommended lenses for regular street photos, other than the kit 50mm 1.8?

Question #2: I was comparing the light meter of the camera to an app on my phone and it seems that the camera's meter works fine, it's just inaccurate. Is there a fix to this or am I stuck using my phone for reference?

>>3133109
>it seems that the camera's meter works fine, it's just inaccurate
So that would be the opposite of working fine, you moron.
What does it actually do?

>>3133200
Meant it's functioning, but functioning incorrectly. As opposed to nothing happening at all when I half press the shutter button.
If you don't have an answer, why reply? Just shut the fuck up and continue with your day

>>3133202
>Meant it's functioning, but functioning incorrectly.
Holy shit, you fucking retard.
>so i got this car, it seems to work fine, but it doesn't drive right. any tips? or should I just ride my bike?
Tell us what the actual problem is you raging mongoloid.
>do numbers just light up?
>did it touch you inappropriately?
>does it burn your hand and screech satanist mantras?
>is it just off by a stop?
>did you even set the iso to match your stupid phone, or whatever you used to check?
>would you even know what you were doing if you did have the iso right; are you metering correctly?
kys

>>3132818
This is bait, right?

>>3132299

fuck you

>>3133273
>gets told
>I HATE YOU
real mature.

redpill me on infrared film lads, is it worth it to shoot it without a filter?

BOY OH BOY JUST WON AN EBAY AUCTION OF BASED EKTACHROME 64 35MM, RARE AS FUCK TO FIND. FILM WAS LITERALLY SAVED TODAY.

>>3133299
chances are theyll take all ths film out and send it ruined

gl developing it lmao

File: IMG_20170605_073822_037.jpg (145KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1000x667px

>>3133109
The 35mm 2.8 is a dope lens for street and insanely cheap. <$40 pic related.

How is the meter inaccurate? Explain with examples.

>>3133295
No, not worth it to shoot without a filter. Filter could be as simple as a red 25 or yellow 12 though. Depends what film yer shooting.

>>3133301
CHANCES ARE ILL DO MOTHERF*CKING KINO WITH IT AND NO SALTY ASS HOMO WILL STOP ME.

>>3133299
>>3133303
OH FORGOT TO TELL THE WHOLE PACK: IT HAD FUJI 64T 120 AND REALA 120 TOO. THE UNIRONIC KINO PACK. FUCK ALL IM OUT TO SHOOT. FAGS.

File: dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd.jpg (489KB, 800x776px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 800x776px

>>3133312
GL with 64T, especially if it's the first version and not type II

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3133316
ITS TYPE II IM GONNA MAKE SOME PATRICK JOUST NIGHT SHOTS.

File: IMG_20161012_212131.jpg (146KB, 704x704px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 704x704px

>>3133323
Kek, he uses Portra and Provia dummy

>>3133327
WHEN YOU RUN OUT OF THE GOOD STUFF YOU PICK WHATEVER GARBAGE IS LEFT AKA KEKED ""NEW"" PORTRA.

>>3132334
>>3132335
Love these!
Also, you will have a great time using Superia 400. I like it more than Portra, actually.

File: Portra160VC120001-6mini.jpg (494KB, 1192x800px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 1192x800px

>>3133333
Quintuples of truth. Now turn your fucking capslock off.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment
Projection	Rectilinear (0)
FOV	9 x 7
Ev	13.28
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_3033.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

guys. so i've just found my grandpa's old camera. how do i find films for this camera ? what is different between films for this camera and films for other cameras ? it's a 50mm

>>3133355
Buy 35mm rolls online.

>>3133355
thee 50mm might just be the lens, that doesn't really have anything to do with the film size
your camera is just run of the mill 35mm slr.
Films mostly just differ in sizes.

>>3132166
include only the statue, sky, and the tree. exclude everything else

>>3133355
That’s a medium format camera, it takes 120 film.

>>3133355
Don’t listen to the other guys, it’s a half-frame camera so you need to get 35mm then cut it in half horizontally across the whole strip

File: A107403_9.jpg (908KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 900x900px

shot some film for the first time in 10 years, finally got the results back from the shop.

zeiss ikoflex 1a, superia x-tra 400

File: A107403_1.jpg (728KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 900x900px

>>3133513
i'm well aware these are snapshits, but this thread needs some pictures

File: A107403_6.jpg (936KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 900x900px

>>3133516
jpeg sure has a hard time compressing film

File: A107402_8.jpg (786KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 900x900px

>>3133517
and here's the holga 120 with lomography 100 film. go ahead and shit on me for that, i deserve it.

can someone explain why the numbering on the film is visible though? is it a light leak?

File: A107402_7.jpg (855KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 900x900px

>>3133519

File: A015820-R1-18-18-5.jpg (924KB, 1120x1200px) Image search: [Google]

924KB, 1120x1200px

How do I get my photos to stop looking washed the fuck out? It means that to get them to look any good I have to edit them into this weird over-vibrant look. I'm using KodaColor 200 & OM-10 & OM 50 f/1.8. Could it be the developing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:15 16:58:44

>>3133574
Post the original scan?

File: A015820-R1-18-18.jpg (804KB, 1228x1484px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 1228x1484px

>>3133594

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:15 18:27:16
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1228
Image Height	1484

>>3133519
>>3133520
Goddamn I knew lomo/holga were shit but I never expected something this bad from MF.

File: DSC_4169-e.jpg (281KB, 1024x1252px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1024x1252px

>>3133519
could be huge light leaks all over, the numbers are presumably from lots of light shining through the backing paper.

>>3133598
What part of this is ‘washed out’? The sky and reflective ground have lost a bit of their colour but that’s normal highlight rolloff. Try using a UV/skylight/polariser.

>>3133510
this anon is correct
be careful though, it has to be exactly and uniformly half width the whole length of the strip

>>3133643
This. Be sure to use a red safelight so you can see what you're doing without ruining the film.

>>3130965
>filename

File: DSC07876.jpg (552KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1080x1350px

>>3133513
>superia in 120
All of my hnnnngg, my man.
I know it used to exist, but I've never laid eyes on a roll myself.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:15 18:41:57
Exposure Time	2 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1350
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft

File: DSC03323.jpg (566KB, 1080x704px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1080x704px

>>3133623
>Try using a UV/skylight/polariser.
>>3133574
This is the advice you're looking for, m8. Pic related, Kodak Gold 200 w/ polariser.
Additionally, don't take photos of bitumen, shrubs and empty sky in harsh direct light and expect them to be exploding with bright colours.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 14:20:31
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	704
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3133519
Their backing paper is fucking hot garbage. Their color negative line in 120 format is chink shit and should be avoided. There are no redeeming features at all

File: BEC2.jpg (12KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 450x450px

Can you guys recommend me an enlarger? I do mostly 35mm and might try 120 in the future, my apartment is quite reduced so I would need something small that i can easily move around.Any tips?

>>3130913
Is there such thing as good/bad film camera ? Should it be a bummer that i'm shooting an obscure Ricoh SLR instead of Minolta X-700?

>>3133769

Not really.

It mostly depends on the lenses available for the camera.

After that look at features, such as meter, battery free operation, priority modes, etc.

As far as film cameras go, the X-700 is a pretty solid choice. If I were tou I'd be looking at new MD lenses, not another body.

File: GhettoDarkroom.jpg (226KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1000x667px

>>3133758
I recommend the free-est one you can find.
You will print 4 photos and never touch it again.
Seriously do not worry about the lense either. They will all produce very acceptable prints from f/8 onwards, presuming they aren't destroyed by filth or fungus.
If you have the option or the insatiable urge to spend money, however, 6-element f/2.8 lenses are the way to go.
For heads, colour diffusion models are the easiest to use. Condenser models are sharper and brighter, but require scrupulous dusting of all condenser elements, and the filters and the negs to produce perfect dust free prints. If you're not autistic about dust, or alternatively you are massively autistic about it and print in a climate controlled, HEPA filtered clean room (yes really people build these for printing) they they are the way to go.
Older Durst and Leica models seem to need a whole heap of expensive and hard to find parts to change lenses or masks or filters, etc, so I'd avoid them.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:01:30 21:34:04
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3133513
>>3133517
Really digging the colors on these.

>>3133758

this guy is correct:
>>3133784

watch for enlargers on craigslist or whatever in your area. beseler 23 or similar show up fairly often in my area. make sure it has the carriers and all other shit you'll need.

>>3133840
I think you're lost. Here take my hand
>>>/pol/

>>3133840
>You wouldn't buy a car just because it was popular with anime fans, would you?
I would and I would drive it too

>>3133758

>>3133758

I'd look out for a Beseler 23c. I've seen three out in the wild. They usually come with a 50mm F4 Nikkor for 35mm

>>3131678
They start at $100. Mint would be closer to $200.

Do you guys think I should buy a Canon 300 with EF 28-90 lens? I've just been using an old zenit-e without a lightmeter for years now, but I'm not sure if I need to be expanding or not. Is it just my eyes are hungry then?