Why aren't you using instax film on your TLR or other MF camera?

File: Capture d’écran 2017-08-07 à 17.30.49.png (178KB, 361x452px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 361x452px

Here's the result.

File: Capture d’écran 2017-08-07 à 17.33.44.png (195KB, 438x319px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 438x319px

>>3128912
A little bit sharper than the taken with the fuji instashit and the colors looks more real because there's no fill flash.

Sorry for the quality, my phone is a potato.

>>3128911
Terrible cost / value quotient.

>>3128911
How did you load them?

>>3128914
Way cheaper than impossible project film.

>>3128916
In my bathroom but is better to use a changing bag.

>>3128918
Really cool, a bit unpractical though. Is there any special method to it? or just align and close the lid? They are rated iso 800, right?

File: Capture d’écran 2017-08-07 à 18.00.42.png (395KB, 494x603px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 494x603px

>>3128920
>Is there any special method to it?
You take it out of the fuji cartridge and put it emulsion down on the TLR(the film is exposed from the back unlike polaroid film). Be careful to not put fingerprints on the emulsion or acidentally press the chemicals.

After you expose the film put it back on the fuji and take a picture with a smaller apertura with the lens and flash covered and thats it. It's quicker than it seems.

File: Capture d’écran 2017-08-07 à 18.00.55.png (365KB, 497x594px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 497x594px

>>3128927
This is the wrong way. See the emulsion is towards the film plate.

Use a meter or sunny 16 for 800 iso film and be happy.

>>3128927
That is a bit of a hassle, but fascinating none the less. If it didn't require the instax camera, I would try this.

>>3128931
well... you could use a rolling pin or something to spread the chemicals. or buy a cheap used instax mini for 30 bucks like I did.

File: belais_instant_back_quarter_1.jpg (97KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1500x1000px

If the instax back for the lomo belair didn't cost 89 euros I would buy it and try adapting it to my TLR.

File: 20170131_131719_Richtone(HDR).jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

but I am, OP. Just need to get that emulsion spread right!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:31 13:17:19
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Unknown

>>3128936
What's that tool called kurwa? Buy a fucking used instax to process the film.

>>3128936
Too stingy to clutter my gearcave with a useless instax cam, instant film is a cool gimmick but only for a pack or two, unless you have a printer and penchant for socialising/advertising.

That's a budget Polaroid Colorpack 80 emulsion spreader - they were removable to be cleaned from the gunk old filmpacks leaked when developed. They were better, roller versions too. The next best thing to an instax camera.

You saw it too, OP? It does seem like a neat little hack.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7JUsbPXF82Y


I'd like to try this with my Mamiyaflex. How did you get full frame coverage for the first shot?

>>3129023
>>3128927
>>3128913
>>3128912
>black bars

just get a tl70 2.0 innit

Because I own a Bronica.

Nice thread.
I just wish you had a flatbed scanner to scan those pictures.

>>3129023
The exact same principle but I don't use a glass plate back.

>>3129119
It will broke on you and most of filmfags here already have one or two MF cameras.

File: instaxsquare.jpg (24KB, 450x311px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 450x311px

will the instax square film fit on a normal 6x6 camera?

File: polaroid.jpg (243KB, 1000x834px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1000x834px

Because I use a Polaroid to shoot Instax

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro1
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:05 20:52:58
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	0.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	834
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>3129362
How you do it?

>>3128927

Might be easier to disassemble an instax so that you could feed a shot through it without having to dick with loading it back up.

>>3129416
Help me, senpai. I might try to pop out the back of my tlr and glue a intax into it.

>>3129415

Easy,

Just chop most of the back off the Polaroid camera, take some bits off the Belair instant back, black silicone/scotch lock/felt/weatherstrip instant back upside down on Polaroid, put a ground glass in a dead instax pack to reset front standard for infinity focus and calibrate range finder.