thoughts on Cinestill 800t 35mm

>>3126750
It's shit buy Portra instead and Portra in itself is already a meme

>>3126797
Fuck off is there anything that isn't a meme?

Never even heard of it.

>>3126750
There is literally a dedicated film thread AND a stupid questions thread. And you made a new thread for one simple question? Fucking Christ, learn to browse the catalogue.

>>3126808
Well if you could crawl out of your cave you would've

>>3126808
>poorfag doesnt know about expensive film
of course you dont. but its alright.

Shot a roll of MF. It was alright, obviously not a great daytime film. If you shoot at night in the city it's a great choice. It's great for neon signs.

>>3126840
you sound like a faggot

fuck this brand

it depends on what you are shooting. it's a tough film to shoot with. it casts a very blue/green tint over everything. it works amazing on the streets at night.. but thats about the only situation I have found it practical in.. one thing I will say about it is it adds a very moody feel to you're shot's almost that moody so called instagram look people try to replicate, And it does something very weird to lights it adds a weird halo around them that I haven't been able to get shooting with any other film.

ive shot home spooled 200T and its pretty badass. ultra fine grain, extremely wide latitude, crazy tonality that always look good. better than new portra id say. sadly no 120 version of that available.

>>3126801
Ektar hasn’t quite achieved meme status yet.

>>3127792
That's because 100 speed isn't versatile enough to be an everyday film.

its shit and the exposure latitude is not nearly as much as the manufacturer's claim

also overpriced but you should know that already

>>3127794
Only if you shoot a lot in low light handheld.