How can I get lighting like this

Shoot MF 6x7 or bigger film

Digicucks will never understand the true quality you can achieve with medium format film, Digi cucks have to deal with shitty, pasty skin tones, and awful colors and but ugly contrast and """"noise"""". But despite all those shitty fucking problems, they still jump behind and defend horrible cameras that cost tens of thousands of dollars, despite being literally some of the worst cameras you can buy (not including xtranny Fuji, or Sony cameras, which are so much worse)

Fuck digicucks

File: 1471217115789.jpg (3MB, 3000x4242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x4242px

>>3126302
Decent lens, and closing it
Here's some lighting ideas

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:11 16:42:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3000
Image Height	4242

>>3126305
Actually a very cool infographic.

It looks to me like this is one light, head on, behind the photographer. Correct?

>>3126304
I shoot film but fuck off with this FILM IS SUPERIA REEEEEEE!!!!!!!! fucking gear fags I swear...

>>3126302
Just zoom in onto the eye. You can literally see the lighting thats used.

Is this even film?

Might as well be digital, A7RII or something

>>3126302
Look at her eyes. What catch lights can you see reflected?

>>3126302
It looks like clamshell lighting to me, and fairly close to the model because of how quickly the light falls off going back.

>>3126324
might as well be a rebel t2i, who cares?
that look is 100% lighting and a stopped down lens, you could do that with an iphone if it could trigger the strobes

>>3126324
Background noise doesn't look like grain and shows grid lines which might be sensor pattern. This is no canon pattern I guess. Fuji?

>>3126304
>awful colors
yeah because random colour casts on film totally never happen and even when they do it's "aesthetic"

you are a worthles fucking whiny gearfag just like 90% of the fags on this board.

how about you post photos instead of this faggotry?

>>3126304
also LMAOing at your life if you think OP pic cannot be replicated on digital

>>3126302

>Her slightly crooked eyes

What an ugly whore

>>3126304
How do you get the picture on your negative into your pc? You scan it, it's a digital file.

>>3126327
This, you can see the softbox in the catchlight

>>3126329
Can you explain why it is a stopped down lens? You just going off DOF or is there something else?

>>3126309
Look at her eyes to confirm it my lad, large light with the outline of a man holding a camera in between

>>3126304
Fuck you. You are the reason film shooters have a bad name. Use the format/process you like, enjoy what you do and the results you get and, for the love of god, shut the fuck up. You are as much of a gearfag as anyone in the gear threads.

>>3126302
>How can I get lighting like this
buy light
point it at model
????
profit

File: strobist.jpg (128KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1024x681px

>>3126302

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:04 22:13:51
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1024
Image Height	681

File: 1501772801660.jpg (99KB, 1000x606px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1000x606px

>>3126302
if only we had a way of seeing what lighting was used reflected in her eyes.

you know like the silhouette of the photographer in front of an large octobox, perhaps with a 40-degree eggcrate or so.

>>3126304
The image OP posted was taken with a digital camera, dumbass.

>>3127037
I lol'd

File: lenstest.jpg (59KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1000x667px

>>3126805
When you stop down a lens usually it gets sharper and better looking. It also gets darker. The main reason someone would use a lens wide open is either for background separation or lack of light. Because he has a flash and he is shooting against a wall he can get a separation from the background by stopping the lens down. This makes sure that the subject looks sharp through and not just on her eyes. This also kills any ambient light that might be in the room other than the flash. Owning like 1 speed light can make it so you can make really nice photos, though it would be best to have 3 strobes if you can afford it.

t. someone who took a single photography class in college to satisfy my art requirement, Class didn't really have flashing and light work though, but I think I saw a digitial rev video on taking portraitures with one light. One flash + cheap camera + plastic soft box is enough to make pics that really impress normies.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T1i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:03:10 19:39:07
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3127358
Great answer, thanks.

When you say the lens is stopped down, do you mean it's at like f/5, or like f/11?

>>3127649
Depends on the lens. Every lens has its sweet spot.

>>3127649
As much as it takes to remove the ambient light.

>>3126320
But Superia is film

>>3127358
your pic is underexposed

>>3128526
It is that fuji glow

Also dude is a darkie and I wanted the coat to disappear in the dark

>>3128648
pseudobabble

Sick of looking at this gross fucking anorexo.

Sage.

>>3129267
t. hamplanet owner.

File: IMG_6503.jpg (938KB, 2843x2087px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 2843x2087px

>>3129288

My man, she looks like she just won the Miss Auschwitz beauty pageant.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Lt. A. E. Samuelson
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	284 dpi
Vertical Resolution	284 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2843
Image Height	2087
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3129388
>not liking them hungry so you can feed them that cum

File: dsdfdsf.png (366KB, 573x873px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 573x873px

>>3129267
the feeling when all you can get is amerifat feminists

>>3129267
you heard the man, guys! only (((Real Women))) allowed here.

>>3129437
>>3129442

Lay it on me, turbovirgins.

Still saging so I don't have to see Emaci Grey up top.

>>3126305
more like this?

I would suggest using a single light... probably a large beauty dish about 3 feet away from the model's face...