How do you guys best deal with ISO?

Shoot at iso 6400, and say you're shooting film

People will love it, the more noise the better

I am trying not to limit myself to only 800 and up.

I have conflicting feels. I usually go for low ISO but some great photos I had were from high ISO

>>3125846
I enjoy high iso because I think digital photos look like shit desu with you senpai

>>3125846
personally, I love grainy/noisy shots

I use the ISO that is appropriate for the exposure I want. What kind of question is this? Do you have a favorite ISO or something?

>>3125945
Sounds like he doesn't know how to use it

>>3125945
/thread

>>3125846
>>3125945
>>3125947
>>3125948
how can someone be this dense

>>3125955
What do you mean

Idk

File: sjNznzN.jpg (34KB, 780x390px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 780x390px

>>3125906
>I enjoy high iso because I think digital photos look like shit desu with you senpai

You probably like high iso because it reminds you of film grain.

File: asldsadlk;.jpg (82KB, 1088x715px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1088x715px

is it normal for indoor portraits to use high iso even if you have an external light source

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Me
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3126037
Yes

>>3125846
I use what it says on the roll.

Whatever

digital noise is so fucking trash, just look at that. its like they took the pic at iso 100 and then plastered over some stupid white noise effect. so unorganic. thats why film rules, and digital droolez.

>>3126037
Kai said it was because he was too much of a dumb shit to actually use the lights and instead used sunlight from outside

Idk

File: ergr.jpg (177KB, 1009x631px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1009x631px

Shoot wide open or shoot longer exposures.

Call me revolutionary.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	John
Image-Specific Properties:

I don't like taking pictures of people with high ISO, my camera renders some real fucking weird skin colors.

M

File: L1005352.jpg (4MB, 5216x3472px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5216x3472px

I put it in black and white jpg mode and get over myself.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Leica Camera AG
Camera Model	M9 Digital Camera
Camera Software	1.196
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:16 14:33:49
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5216
Image Height	3472
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Unique Image ID	00000000000000000000000000002bbb

Noise really isn't an issue until it starts seriously effecting image quality. Grain is a natural quality of sight even with people, who cares it a photo has a bit of it? if your photo stumbles because of noise then it was probably shot anyway

>>3125846
To deal with noise at high ISO I usually use Sony

>>3127914
I second this

>>3126084
No one cares about film. If digital is so shit stop using a computer to look at digital images

I don't deal with ISO because I have a man camera that can do 12,800 without looking like a bowl of Fruity Pebbles.

File: 1254437540539.jpg (27KB, 695x316px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 695x316px

>>3125846
Don't use a shitty camera?

what's a good portable tripod to use for low light, longer exposure shots for travel? I was thinking of the Sirui t-025x or t-005x, but I don't know if it's stable enough for an aps-c sized dslr.

High ISO noise > 1/8s blur > missed focus wide open > no picture at all.

>>3128029
do yoga 5 times a day for 3 hours to master your body. It will help you train your muscles into a finely tuned steady tripod. I've been doing this for 4 years, and I can hold a m4/3 camera with a 400mm lens, iso 50, f22, for 2.5 sec, and it's perfectly clear like you wouldn't fucking believe

Git gud fag

>>3127962
you are literally the most insufferable trip on this board, and that's really saying something.

>>3125846
The© Sony™ A6000® barely has any noise at 3200 and is perfectly usable at 6400

>>3126836
Is that in Zurich?

>>3125846
I never shoot anything above ISO 100. Anyone who does is a racist, homophobe who voted for Trump.

>>3128034
>m4/3
>ISO 50
good laugh there mate