/fgt/

File: l32p10.jpg (88KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 720x480px

>>3124032

Too long, didn't read.

What are some good third party a-mount lens?

File: yessprod.jpg (637KB, 1063x1600px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 1063x1600px

>don't be afraid to fill this thread with the kind of throwaway FILM images that characterise the digital RPT.
>make a habit of spamming bad effortless content
10/10 would devalue and bring /fgt/ down to /rpt/ levels of quality again

>>3124043

What lens was that?

The bokeh makes my eyes bleed.

File: metering-4.jpg (9KB, 500x209px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 500x209px

Are there any SLRs with this kind of light meter within the viewfinder?

Most of the ones I've used just suggest which shutter speed or aperture you should use.

File: Clipboard01-2.jpg (357KB, 1400x921px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1400x921px

>>3124045
olympus infinity zoom 80 QD :^)

Anyone here used a TLR? Thoughts? Considering getting a Yashica Mat or Rolleicord.

>>3124046
Literally any SLR with a fully manual meter. My OM2 has one, hell, even my crappy throwaway Miranda SLR has a basic one with LEDs. The metering systems you have used were shutter/aperture priority.

File: 41FR79B15DL.jpg (25KB, 500x406px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x406px

>>3124032

What do you call the little piece of leather that goes around the strap attach point to protect the body?

I need a few for my camera and have no idea what to search for.

chyeah boy just snagged an f3 + md4 + 50mm 1.8 for 350

also can anyone point me as to where I can get a good review for a nikonos V? it's a meme camera but I've always wanted one lol

File: BinnaburraEOSITN00019.jpg (908KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 1500x1000px

>>3124046
Pretty much any EOS camera has this display,
If you'd also be happy with a physical needle without the stop gradations, lots of pre-LED manual metered cameras will do this.
It's called a match-needle display.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:19 13:55:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

I've reposting about 70% - 80% of the newer /fgt/'s so this is probably my fault, well I did add text in the sticky encouraging people to post photos so I guess I did good? I dunno...

File: FM3aRetro80s200021.jpg (272KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 800x1200px

>>3124043
I'm happy with people spamming bad effortless film content :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 21:31:25
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: AA019.jpg (3MB, 3000x1999px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1999px

Just got my second roll back, first ever colour roll. A bunch of pictures have what I assume are light leaks. I didn't notice any on my first roll.

Not sure if it's the film or the camera. Can someone help me diagnose?

It's only on a handful of frames and it's not really consistent.

File: AA026.jpg (3MB, 3000x1999px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1999px

>>3124066
it's entirely possible i messed up loading the film. I also ordered the film from another country, is it possible something happened during transport?

it's 35mm

File: AA031.jpg (4MB, 3000x1999px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x1999px

>>3124068


I know my photos are bad

These photos belongs in the recent photo toilet.

File: AA033.jpg (4MB, 3000x1999px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x1999px

>>3124070
A lot of the photos are entirely fine, there are just a few with the problem.

>>3124072
If you're talking about me, I'm entirely aware. I wouldn't be letting anyone within ten feet of them if I wasn't trying to diagnose my light leak.

>>3124074
>>3124066
>>3124068
>>3124070
>>3124073
First, read the sticky. Resize your photos before posting.
Second, yes these are light leaks it seems. Get your seals replaced. You could even do it yourself if you are careful, there are guides online.

>>3124077
thank you sir

>>3124078
No worries, on a related note it looks like the shape of the leak is consistent.
>>3124066
>>3124070
If there's a little window on your camera's back do check that one as well.

>>3124080
I've currently got a roll loaded that I started shooting on before I realised I had the leak.

If I wrap the back and edge of the camera in tape will it serve as a ghetto fix to prevent light leaks on the current roll until I can get it serviced, or is this just retarded?

>>3124083
Yes, it is the best thing you can do right now to protect the rest of the film if you are this worried about it. Just don't expect it to work wonders, that's all. Also don't use tons of tape because it will be a pain in the ass to remove and you will get glue everywhere which will make cleaning a nightmare.

File: FM3ASuper10000006.jpg (512KB, 1173x800px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1173x800px

>>3124068
>>3124066
It's the camera.
Tape over the hinge on the camera back.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 21:58:53
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1173
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: roots.jpg (228KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 667x1000px

Repost of a repost

>>3124086
>>3124087
thanks, just taped it

File: IMG_20170731_222454.jpg (249KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1000x562px

Packed up, see you /fgts/ sometime in 2018. Hope I'll have some bangers to show ya'll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:07:31 22:24:55
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3124107
where you off to my man

File: IMG_20170731_213223_206.jpg (229KB, 999x562px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 999x562px

>>3124109
SE Asia and then maybe into the Himalayas or down to Malaysia / Indonesia. No plans set in stone, just going to go where the wind takes me.

>>3124110
Oh fuck bro

File: 1137-001.jpg (732KB, 1200x797px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 1200x797px

have some repurposed sugar film snaps

here's some Kodachrome

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-100071.jpg (606KB, 1000x814px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1000x814px

here's some 6x7 tri-x 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-136.jpg (869KB, 1000x730px) Image search: [Google]

869KB, 1000x730px

here's some tits in 645 Portra 160vc

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:04:07 02:42:18

File: 1137-0016.jpg (2MB, 1500x1013px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1013px

fuji 200 walmart

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2013:10:19 21:32:38

File: FM3ASuper10000005.jpg (230KB, 800x1108px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 800x1108px

>>3124107
>those cameras
>insufficient bullshit lithium batteries to get to the botom of the driveway and back
Good luck finding rust free CR1294XDDD's in darkest borneo, friendo...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 22:16:26
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1108
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3124126
Fuck me tits in MF look good.

More please.

Should I cop? Such a random collection!

https://www.gumtree.com/p/non-digital-cameras/cans/1256564409

Bought a bunch of cameras at auction, one of them had a roll of Kodak Gold 200 loaded in it that hadn't been started. Should I even bother with shooting it? It could be up to 25 years expired...

>>3124110
What led to you doing this? I've really wanted to do something similar.

File: IMG_20170731_184330.jpg (449KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1280x960px

>>3124039
>Buying third party A-mount lenses
I'd have to have negative money to stoop that low

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A5000
Camera Software	OnePlus5-user 7.1.1 NMF26X 19 release-keys
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 18:43:30
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	-2.2 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	960
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 1501510747552.jpg (2MB, 1500x1013px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1013px

>>3124123
ok it's a train
>>3124124
great idea for a Southern BBQ restaurant but pointless as a photo
>>3124126
shoulders square to camera, hard shadow on face making her nose look huge, left arm awkward, poor angle.

would have been better if her shoulders were at or about 45, head back slightly with a flag to block that sun from the face, have her do something with that left arm possibly hand on seat back, and position yourself about a foot to the right.
>>3124129
flat with too much wasted space crop & curves

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 10:40:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1013

>>3124046
OM series, Minolta Dynax 7 series, a lot of old rangefinders, or well actually every metered camera built before the invention of AE

>>3124211
What have you got to lose?
Just go out and shoot. Go have fun with it and see what happens.. free film is not something to be wasted.

>>3124107
>>3124110
hopefully u and ur waifu can have a threeway with a glorious ladyboi

be sure to take some snabs of it on sum 400X

>>3124052
wouldnt recommend them unless you're a big tripod shooter desu. I have the old Yashica Mat without a meter. Optically it's fine, but it handles like a cinderblock, you have no option for eye level shooting really, and the parallax will fuck you up any time to try to pack the frame anywhere near your subject.

If MF wasn't already a luxury I can't really afford, I'd have upgraded to another system

>>3124056
The connectors are called lugs, I think if you search for lug protectors or some such shit you'll find them

>>3124320
>it handles like a cinderblock
Could you explain more? I generally shoot static or faraway subjects at a slow rate so parallax etc. shouldn't be much of an issue.

Quick, I need an answer: polypropilene or paper to store negatives in a ring binder?

>>3124107
>>3124110
This is on my list to do one day, maybe not Asia in specific but damn, you're going hard and I commend you for it.

Safe travels and enjoy the hell out of it!

>>3124335
It's basically a brick. You only have a waist level finder, so you have to cradle it with both hands at the base, looking down. The shutter release is at the bottom front corner, so if you're ever shooting something in a hurry you can end up doing stupid shit like getting your finger in the bottom of the frame. They aren't that heavy or anything, but compared to any modern design they're clunky as hell.

If you're okay shooting very slowly and deliberately they're a good entry point, but I'm much more of a run and gunner these days and mine has been collecting dust as a result.

>>3124354
Fair enough, thanks for the info.

>they're a good entry point
This was my reason for getting one, I've never shot MF and I'm a poorfag. Any other entry-level suggestions?

>>3124360
Unfortunately no. Unless you're willing to go straight into toy cameras (with their massive drawbacks) or find a 60's or 70's compact or folder in good working order (good luck with the shutter curtain) TLRs are your best bet as a budget option.

I'm going to shoot film expired in the 80's
Mainly color but some of the films in the lot are B&W.
How do I handle the exposure? +1 at box speed? +2? Setting the ISO lower than box speed?

>>3124360
I think the other most common avenue is the Bronica ETRS or SQA systems. Usually only a couple hundred bucks, and solid lenses. Worth looking into, they're a lot more customizable/versatile if you decide you want to try out different focal lengths or viewfinders

>>3124367
Rule of thumb is to overexpose a stop for every 10 years expired. Following that ruie film expired in the 80s means that, for example, 400 speed film should be shot at ISO 50 or manually overexposed 3 stops. 200 speed would be much trickier at 25, and I just wouldn't bother with stuff with box speed 100 or slower.

>>3124368
Cheers m80

>>3124365
>60's or 70's compact or folder
Was also considering this. What do you think of stuff like Zeiss Ikontas? They look like they might fall apart if you so much as sneeze while holding them but also seem to give lovely 6x9 negs.

File: DSC00901.jpg (325KB, 1451x1000px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1451x1000px

>>3124039
>>3124237
lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSLR-A580
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	42 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:21 16:48:16
Exposure Time	0.4 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Brightness	0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1451
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: TMX120001-6mini.jpg (368KB, 1147x800px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1147x800px

>>3124375
>lovely 6x9 negs.
6x9 isn't enought to account for a garbage lense with no focus calibration being held on by a rusty, crooked front standard in front of film that isn't held flat, with crumbly, crusty bellows leaking light in between.
I'm sure one in mint condition with a nice Tessar or something would still take very high quality photos in the right conditions, but odds are you can't afford one of tthose, and if you could you'd just buy a Fuji 690 instead.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment
Projection	Rectilinear (0)
FOV	13 x 10
Ev	13.41
Color Space Information	sRGB

Looking for advice. I have about a dozen K-mount lenses from a Pentax i no longer own. I want to get into medium format, should I go with the 645? Right now I have a cheapy Kodak Duaflex II which produces okay but otherwise soft images.

>>3124375
>>3124360
koni-omega/rapid omega 6x7 rangefinder goes for $150 or so on ebay, no bellows, not a toy.

File: 30VSuper40000007.jpg (258KB, 800x1131px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 800x1131px

>>3124413
>If you can take impromptu candids in my style with a film camera i'll suck your cock :^)
Lel, using a camera in public iz realllly hard you guize!!!
>B T F O
>T
>F
>O

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 08:06:45
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1131
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: img006.jpg (1023KB, 1613x1100px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 1613x1100px

I just bought a Nikon F3HP, and I think it needs a foam replacement. Any ideas where I should look? Do you guys just get kits on ebay or do you use dedicated sites? tia

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3541
Image Height	2415
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:02:08 01:28:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1613
Image Height	1100

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170731_175704.jpg (2MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x2048px

>>3124032
I just bought this lens from value village and i realized after i left the store that the upper part is stuck at an angle and because of that the focus ring is stuck too.

Is there a way of repairing it without needing a professional? Everything else seems to be ok.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LG Electronics
Camera Model	LG-H831
Camera Software	Lightroom Android 3.0.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:07:31 17:57:04
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length	4.42 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: IMG_4653.jpg (402KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1200x1200px

can i get some feedback about my work?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7240
Image Height	6629
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	2000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2000 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:09 15:23:17
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	16000
Image Height	16000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_4656.jpg (434KB, 1237x1200px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 1237x1200px

some more studio stuff

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6875
Image Height	6670
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:13 16:58:09
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	6875
Image Height	6670
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_4654.jpg (402KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1200x1200px

my website:

loski.format.com

thoughts on the site?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	24000
Image Height	24860
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 18:25:32
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	6000
Image Height	6000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3124439
My mouth is gaping and awaits your massive, throbbing cock master

File: IMG_4652.jpg (934KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 1200x1200px

last i'll post unless if someone asks for more

first time using fuji velvia 50

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	15200
Image Height	15200
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:04:10 22:17:25
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	2000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 20170727-58630005.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

>>3124450
>>3124451
Pretty eerie. Nice job with the lighting. Got any more?

Posting a few doggos. Superia 800 and a 14mm Rokinon on my nikon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 22:20:33

File: FM3ASuper10000009.jpg (488KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 1200x800px

>>3124444
>Everything else seems to be ok
What else, exactly? It's junk, you moron.
You wasted you $5.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 22:37:13
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_4657.jpg (420KB, 1208x1200px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1208x1200px

>>3124456
some very early work. multi exposed on one negative

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3600
Image Height	3577
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	421 dpi
Vertical Resolution	421 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:30 17:32:47
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3600
Image Height	3577
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 20170727-58630012.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

>>3124456

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 22:22:09

File: IMG_4659.jpg (539KB, 1340x1200px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1340x1200px

>>3124456

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7063
Image Height	6327
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	1177 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1177 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:09 13:32:00
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	7063
Image Height	6327
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 20170727-58630013.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

>>3124459
Very cool. Do you plan out how the layers will overlap, or just sort of let it happen organically?


Right as I took this shot, the brown dog bolted to go see the german shepherd in >>3124460

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 18:29:41

File: 20170727-58630015.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

>>3124463
The lab didn't care about the other dog, because he's blind.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:31 18:29:33

File: 20170727-58630016.jpg (1MB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x1200px

>>3124465
but he sure was excited about his red squeaky ball.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:30 22:42:16

>>3124378
Nice collection, but why? Original A-mount lenses can be had for very cheap.

>>3124459
This is absolutely stunning. A rarity in fgt's

>>3124480
thank you

File: IMG_5514.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>3124450
here's another photo of my friend david. rb67, ektar 100.

feel free to follow me on instagram, i'd really appreciate it

File: IMG_5516.jpg (185KB, 750x963px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 750x963px

>>3124450

more shameless self promotion

grape hyacinths

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	963

File: Tmax_002.jpg (549KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 750x1000px

>>3124140
>to get to the botom of the driveway and back

wat did he mean by this? I got spares bro.

>>3124215
My job contract ended yesterday and I'm heading back to grad school next year. Don't hear about my acceptance until April / May, so I don't know what city I'll be going to school in. Going to be travel until I know and then I'll head back home and settle down.

>>3124286
dats da plan. 400x @ 1600 to avoid motion blur ya know

>>3124343
Cheers anon! Going to be an interesting few months.

>>3124354
>It's basically a brick. You only have a waist level finder, so you have to cradle it with both hands at the base, looking down. The shutter release is at the bottom front corner. Compared to any modern design they're clunky as hell.

All you did was describe what shooting with a WLF on any medium format camera is like.

>>3124360
Bronica SQ-A. Shit's cash. If you want an RF the Fuji GS645S are dope and cheap.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:20 11:01:50
Exposure Time	2 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: fan posting.resized.jpg (568KB, 1000x319px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1000x319px

shot on
fuji smart shot plus
Fuji Xtra 400 35mm

File: AE1P400NC221.jpg (585KB, 1183x800px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 1183x800px

>>3124512
>wat did he mean by this?
I meant that you should have chosen more durable cameras to go trekking through 3rd world shitholes with. See:
>texas leica
>actual leica
>nikon f/fm
>canon f1
>gs645s if you really must have a compact 645
The electronic 645's are dank memes, but when it shits the bed you'll be stuck carrying it and a whole bunch of film for it halfway around the world for no reason. And yes, I'd also be very surprised if you got more than 6 or 7 rolls from a set of batteries, esp if using flash, and lithiums are v. likely to get binned at one of the several airports you'll go through, and then you won't be able to find new ones. Again, your cam is now a brick you get to carry around.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:30 01:36:00
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/9.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1183
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: 7xiGold20000030.jpg (470KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 800x1200px

>>3124472
>Original A-mount lenses can be had for very cheap
Only trash zooms. Pic related, it's the xi 28-105.
Everything else is damned expensive.
>inb4 the zooms are good
Dude, lmao, no zooms are good. Sure, if you forget that vignetting, distortion, purple fringing, CA, apertures faster than 4, and bokeh quality are things, then you betcha, some of them are sharp enough for film use from about f/8 at the wide end and f/16 at the tele end.
And furthermore, almost no menelta primes are good, even if you can find them.
But mainly I have all those smegmas because I picked them up ridiculously cheap. $500 incl the shitty Sony DSLR they were with.
Still haven't got around to testing them all.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 11:07:19
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: Yokkaichi_002.jpg (634KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1000x1000px

>>3124544
I wouldn't travel with the gs645s, too fragile with that stupid plastic lens mount.

I've shot 15 rolls through the GA and the battery is still showing full. I never use the flash dawg.

Good call on the airport though, gunna have to try to be sneaky with muh spares.

The GA is definitely not the most trustworthy camera haha. I figure worst case scenario that GA dies and I pick up a random MF camera. Doubt I'd go longer than a week or so before stopping in a big city and finding a used camera shop. Already have a bunch of labs / shops in various countries noted.

Still a little on the fence about the Natura S to be honest. I could take my MJU II instead...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 13:56:25
Exposure Time	1.6 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

why is the ae prism for rz67 so expensive?

anyone have a shot of what it looks like in the finder as I've searched high and low and seen nothing

>>3124444
Just take it apart and put it back together. assuming nothing is broken, it should be fine when you re arrange it

File: X7RPX25KML17 24.jpg (628KB, 859x1280px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 859x1280px

Did two rolls in one go w/ Rodinal stand dev, shot with different cameras, and noticed a lot of them appear overexposed in the bottom/left side of the frame. It's mostly obvious in the ones shot in portrait orientation. Is my chemistry fucked or something?

File: X7RPX25KML17 29.jpg (710KB, 870x1280px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 870x1280px

>>3124619

File: R35KTM1AS0717 11.jpg (703KB, 858x1280px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 858x1280px

>>3124621

File: R35KTM1AS0717 16.jpg (733KB, 851x1280px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 851x1280px

>>3124623
Last example.

File: HelmLakeBlackTusk.jpg (575KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 800x800px

>>3124619
Both rolls have that happening? You deved both rolls together in one tank?

Does the light area go outside of the frame area on the negative (into the sprocket hole area)?

I've had that happen with stand dev Rodinal too. I attributed it to a bad film back...but maybe that wasn't the case...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4984
Image Height	4992
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2012:09:16 20:39:18
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	800

>>3124560
ayo I'm gonna be in Vietnam like november/december time, gonna be riding a motorbike from south to north like every other clueless tourist. Any itinerary plans yet or just making it up as you go?

>>3124619
Uneven development usually happens because of too little agitation. Stand development recipes usually call for two turns every 30 minutes, or something like this.

It could also be that RPX 25 and/or Kentmere 100 don't do well in stand dev, or don't like whatever the other releases into the developer (assuming you didn't prewash).

File: IMGP9797-Edit.jpg (514KB, 1000x656px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1000x656px

this is hermes from sekkou boys

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	250 dpi
Vertical Resolution	250 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_1198.jpg (524KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1000x1000px

>>3124636
Making it up as I go! I may be in the area, would be neato to meatup. I did a bit of a bike trip in 2012 from Hanoi to Hoi An. 10/10 would recommend. Here's a photo from the top of the mountain pass we went over.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2448
Image Height	2448
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 12:57:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3124644
Presoaked, also did two flips at 30 minutes. Oh well, I should have just done them in Fomadon Excel, but got lazy.

>>3124322

Thanks, anon. That did the trick.

>>3124555

Some of the zooms ARE good. The beercans and Secret Handshake are all pretty solid lenses.

Many of the primes are so good that they are still being produced by Sony.

$500 would have been better spent on actual a-mount lenses if you ask me.

File: FilmScan (5).jpg (316KB, 1000x679px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1000x679px

So I ran around a nearby park to test my new camera.

Shutter is pretty much silent, meter works great (and seems to give faster speeds than my other camera in similar lighting situations), and it is an overall joy to shoot.

Still not sure how much I like rangefinder focusing though. The patch can be hard to see in certain lighting conditions.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3124660
put a piece of translucent tape over the center part of the viewfinder where the rangefinder patch is. It'll dim the light coming through that part of the viewfinder, so the rangefinder patch will appear brighter in comparison.

>>3124661

Good idea, I will have to try that.

>>3124555
Well in that case I might have done that too, that's a good deal

>>3124560
You could mail the batteries to the hotel you're staying at first, or instruct a family member to do so

File: OlyInfSuper20000024.jpg (557KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1080x1350px

>>3124657
>meme zoom names
>primes so good that they are still being produced by Sony
>$500 (and I was talking australian)
>actual a-mount lenses
All my keks. You know how I know you don't know what you're talking about?
Buddy, if the zooms were "so good", why are THEY no longer produced?
Be reasonable, newfriend. The reason Menelta zooms developed any kind of reputation is the combination of Leica completely selling out on the R-system's development, and the halo effect of that, accompanied by the fact that they had fuck all decent primes, so people had to pretend to be happy with what they had, much like suckers who buy into M43 try to defend muh 5-axis IBIS today.
And all this talk is just pissing in the wind anyway, because there are test shots for most of their primes easily googleable, because the people shopping for them are sony gearcucks. Most of them are falling apart in the corners of low-res APS-C shots, let alone full frame ones.
And then you get to the prices. Because A-mount is so pleb-oriented, both in the Minolta days and now, the primes are impossible to come by, which is why you end up with stupid shit like the single 35/1.4 RS on ebay being listed at $750US, or the 200 Macro being $2200. And I don't care how good you think they could be; they're not better than the Sigma and Nikon equivalents that you can buy brand new for the same price.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1350

>>3124689
>>3124657
>>3124555
>>3124472
>>3124378
>>3124237

Here is a site with sample images and in depth reviews of most of the more common a-mount lenses produced, both first and third party. I think he leaves off some of the shittier kit zooms.

You could also check out Dyxum, but their reviews are all over the place.

>http://kurtmunger.com/lens_reviews_id21.html

>>3124693
Thanks, this is some thorough material. I don't use my Dynax that much but I'll keep this in mind

>>3124655
Then my guess is that your camera's light seals are going. The damage would be oddly specific for anything related to the chemistry.

File: agfavista400_bulk_640a.jpg (107KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 640x480px

>>3124032
Is this a rebranded Superia?
Agfa Vista 200 = Superia 200
Agfa Vista 400 = Superia Xtra 400

File: 54456759_8e3b63ea3c_z.jpg (135KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 640x480px

Is there still any reason to shoot slide film?

Any slide film recommendations?

File: ScanImage073.jpg (2MB, 3327x2152px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3327x2152px

>>3124739
Vista 200 is rebranded Fujicolor C200

>>3124761
What about the Agfa Vista 400?

File: kumano.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>3124680
That's an idea, but we don't have any places booked. Worst case Ontario, the airport takes them away and I buy them when we land in Bangkok.

>>3124756
There's no reason to shoot film period anon.

Slide film is fantastic though. If it won't break the bank, I'd recommend shooting some. Pick up some Velvia 100 or Provia 100F. Don't shoot the latter in overcast light without a warming filter. Don't bother shooting any slide in shit light, it'll look like shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:29 18:04:39
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3124765
Please upload some Slide film photos

What about other slide films like Agfa CT Precisa and Lomo Lomography X-Pro?

File: ScanImage037-2.jpg (1MB, 3352x2119px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3352x2119px

>>3124764
No idea

File: Odai Station.jpg (357KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1000x1000px

>>3124766
Agfa CT Precisa is rebranded Provia 100F. Same film, buy which ever is cheaper.

Lomography X-Pro looks alright if processed normally (processed in E6 and not x-pro'd). I wouldn't buy it unless it was cheap.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:29 18:30:22
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-8.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3124776
>and not x-pro'd

Not cross-processed? Meaning processed with C-41?

File: Yokkaichi_017.jpg (812KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 1000x1000px

>>3124765
>>3124776
Forgot to mention, both of these are Provia 100F. Here's Provia 100F during the day with an 81A warming filter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:27 22:19:00
Exposure Time	2.5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: cows.jpg (715KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1000x667px

>>3124778
No, Lomography X-Pro is E6 film. Cross-processing it would be processing it in C41.

Here's Lomography X-Pro processed in E6 chems.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4447
Image Height	2783
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:17 19:15:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

File: Austria2.jpg (773KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 1000x667px

>>3124780
It's a bit purple. Like I said, I wouldn't buy it unless it was cheap (<$4/roll).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4469
Image Height	2826
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:01:19 22:27:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>3124779
I thought they were taken by a digital camera
>ILCE-7

>>3124765
>>3124776
Did you use a tripod for these? How can you take decent night photo using ISO 100? I can't take a decent film photo even at ISO 200.

>>3124783
>It's a bit purple. Like I said, I wouldn't buy it unless it was cheap (<$4/roll).

>tfw b&h sells them for $21.99/pack of 3

I asked Lomo X-Pro because I can't find a $4/roll slide film.

>>3124779
>>3124780
>>3124783
Btw since slide negatives doesn't need to be "reversed", can you scan them with a regular scanner?

>>3124784

>taken by a digital camera

He is most likely using the camera to 'scan' his positives.

File: Elanket.jpg (503KB, 1000x626px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 1000x626px

>>3124784
I scan with my Sony A7 camera...hence the EXIF.

I used a tripod for the fireworks. I rested the camera on a railing for the train station photo. ISO is irrelevant when it comes to night photos if you're using a tripod. As long as you get the exposure right you're golden.

>>3124785
eBay is always a good avenue. 35mm E6 is pretty pricey...don't know where to point you to for cheap stuff. I guess you could pick up that Lomo stuff to try E6 out. Just make sure you tell your lab you want them processed in E6 chemicals. I've heard of labs seeing the X-Pro C41 markings and x-proing it.

>>3124789
No, you still need a scanner with a backlight. Use a digital camera if you have a good one or get a film scanner. Slide tends to be a bitch to scan with flatbeds...much easier to pull good detail out using a camera to scan.

Another Lomo X-Pro

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4447
Image Height	2783
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:06:02 01:19:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	626

File: _DSC8846.jpg (3MB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4288x2848px

>>3124797
>I scan with my Sony A7 camera...hence the EXIF.

What's your light source? I tried scanning my negatives before as pic related and it is pure shit. I use a tablet as a light source

>eBay is always a good avenue. 35mm E6 is pretty pricey...don't know where to point you to for cheap stuff. I guess you could pick up that Lomo stuff to try E6 out.

I guess I will. I'll check Ebay right now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D90
Camera Software	Ver.1.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	972
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:19 22:47:12
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4288
Image Height	2848
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO
Focus Mode	MANUAL
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	39.7 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	28.0 - 85.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/4.5
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	25352

File: dddd.jpg (516KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1000x663px

>>3124799
What's shit about it? Doesn't seem too bad depending what lens you're using. Don't shoot through that tube though, you're just asking to get weird reflections / colors bouncing off your negs.

I just use my smartphone with a plain white screen to scan. Simpe shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 17:21:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

>>3124765
Airport security makes a difference between carrying batteries in hand luggage and hold (check in) luggage. Batteries in hold luggage are usually forbidden, as fire in the cargo hold is much more dangerous. IIRC, most small batteries are perfectly fine in hand luggage. Also, you might want to keep your films in hand luggage, as hold luggage is passed through a much more powerful röntgen/xray scanner, which can cause streaks, especially on higer ISO films. If you're lucky, you might even be able to have your filma not scanned at all. I once got an Italian security officer to hand search all my film for druga so they didn't need to be scanned. Poor guy.

File: 286019.jpg (1MB, 1480x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1480x1000px

>>3124797
>Just make sure you tell your lab you want them processed in E6 chemicals. I've heard of labs seeing the X-Pro C41 markings and x-proing it.

This. Be aware that developing that film in C41 will give it a yellow tint, saturated colours and a crazy amount of grain and digital-like noise. Cool if that's what you want (I think it looks cool if you want a gritty or surreal look) but fucking awful otherwise. Pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	X-300
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:13 18:50:40
ISO Speed Rating	200
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1480
Image Height	1000

>>3124032

Speaking of slide film, anyone seen Provia 400x with an expiry past 2017?

My two remaining rolls go bad next month.

I hear that you can shoot Provia 100F at 400 and get the same effect, but I have yet to try it.

File: BeachLinesBackgroundIsland.jpg (254KB, 999x999px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 999x999px

>>3124804
We aren't checking any bags, everything will be carry-on! Thanks for clarifying the battery thing.

I've put film in a checked bag once.

Never again...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	Nikon SUPER COOLSCAN 9000 ED
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1799
Image Height	1799
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	269 dpi
Vertical Resolution	269 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2009:03:23 20:34:59
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	999
Image Height	999

File: Provia400X_007.jpg (719KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 750x1000px

>>3124806
I have 02/2018 as my latest date. It was some of the last stuff I bought before it totally disappeared from stores.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 21:36:18
Exposure Time	2.5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3124808
What a waste.. I'd become an hero if I had streaks on the film stash you posted. That has to be almost a thousand dollars in film..

File: BuntzenBog.jpg (947KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

947KB, 1000x1000px

>>3124811
I don't even want to think about this stash getting x-ray damaged...

I lucked out with a lot of it though. All in it was
around ¥60,000.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5261
Image Height	5281
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2012:11:17 17:37:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>3124816

Could probably sell it for triple that now.

>>3124816
Wow you'd have to have had some sweet prices then. Velvia and Provia are 9-10 eurobux a piece here and that's at the cheaper webshops. Japan must be a walhalla for film enthousiasts

>>3124803
I think you have good Photoshop skills my man. My edit with that photo is shit.

File: _DSC8846 edit.jpg (573KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1000x663px

>>3124803
Are you using ColorPerfect?

This is the best I can do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D90
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	790
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 16:58:29
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3124077
>Resize your photos before posting

Are you in Africa?

File: entrec-web.jpg (607KB, 780x596px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 780x596px

shot with Agfamatic 1008 and Lolo Peacock in C41, some color correction in Photoshop
feedback?

>>3124828
love how the colors turned out
>>3124816
what a place! I would prefer it a bit darker/contrasty
>>3124775
cool

>>3124843
>Obvious newfag is obvious
Internet speeds isn't the only factor as to why you should resize your photo, go read the full sticky.

File: airport_xray_3d_model_570f91ac-683e-43ba-96e2-bf607a2b4f9a.jpg (66KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1200x1200px

anyone here who actually had film damaged because of airport xray??
I had to put my films through because the staff was not cooperative

>>3124459
great, I prefer this one of yours, because it's more rough

>>3124903

I heard it was only an issue for films iso 1600 and up, and only if they go through multiple times.

>>3124903
Enjoy your brand new lomography film.

Ok, now realistically, if it was slow film (200 and lower) it will most likely be perfectly fine. 400 will get streaks if the power used by the machine was too high which isn't common in hand luggage x-ray scanners. 800 and faster will most likely be fogged and/or get streaks. Do NOT store film in checked-in baggage, it will be beamed with the highest possible power several times outside of your reach and film will be most likely FUBAR.

Usually the staff is more cooperative if you make their work easier, not harder. Carry all your cams unloaded so they can go through the scanner and store the film in a separate small pouch you can quickly take out and request to have hand-inspected. Any camera you "cannot open" will be a huge red flag.

>store the film in a separate small pouch you can quickly take out and request to have hand-inspected

did that, the guy was just overworked and pissed off at everyone and told me "man just leave inside of your bag."
only 2 films, next time I will insist

>>3124805
Is that cross processed? It looks normal though

>>3124797
>ISO is irrelevant when it comes to night photos if you're using a tripod. As long as you get the exposure right you're golden.

Won't the black turn out to be super grainy then?