Comments on color?

File: bike.jpg (665KB, 2878x1921px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 2878x1921px

>>3119892
These are shot on a variety of films, but most photos were shot on Kodak 200, with an Olympus or a contax.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:23 22:41:44
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mohawk.jpg (782KB, 2606x1740px) Image search: [Google]

782KB, 2606x1740px

>>3119892

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:23 22:44:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3119892
bump

>>3119892
>>3119896
>>3119897
Ugh. Why do hipsters think film looks good without editing?

>>3120983
what would you change?

I mean, do you think it looks fine?

>>3121220
Yeah I think so. Maybe not the last one, but I really like the first two.

>Not shooting Ektar
Kodak Gold will always look like ass unless it's like noon and you're in direct sunlight.

>>3121243
ektar is way too contrasty through my contax lenses for my taste. I've tried it before and didn't care for the results.

>>3121254
>ektar
>too contrasty
you just don't know how to shoot it.

>>3122248
How do you shoot it?