What went wrong /p/?
>>3117203
Your parents failed to wear a condom and your mother failed to avoid abusing drugs and alcohol when pregnant with you. They again failed raising a decent person and then you went on failing at every aspect of life. That's about it.
>>3117203
nothing
Isn't this camera not a failure?
>>3117203
nothing.
Believe it or not, for some people, there are other attributes besides image quality to judge a camera by.
Lumix succeeds because they know a camera is more than just its sensor.
>>3117203
they still can't into autofocus
other than that price?
high iso doesn't matter too much, buy a fuckin light
>>3117318
autofocus during video is disgusting looking anyway
and the price is justified by how strong a video camera it is otherwise (at the very least, the price is easier to swallow than the E-M1)
>>3117203
nothing. the camera was hyped up and acclaimed almost as much as the a9 was
>>3117324
You're right, it's better than the a9 because it has working ergonomics, a touchscreen and doesn't burn your fingers.
>>3117203
CDAF AF. Fuck Panny and their deprecated shit.
>>3117320
canon's dual pixel actually works
sonys, while not as good looks the most like a person operating with the speed of rack focus
Fuji even has it figured out
so everyone's got it with more demanding, bigger sensors.
it might not matter to you, but it is the future
maybe not for cinema but I can see it in ENG or diy indie applications