Critque / small photo dump

File: 20183000_1810168162346273_1026247770_n.jpg (124KB, 628x960px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 628x960px

2.

File: 20206304_1810166869013069_846631986_n.jpg (146KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 639x960px

3.

File: 20197087_1810166809013075_1985440510_n.jpg (70KB, 628x960px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 628x960px

4.

File: 20179798_1810166825679740_1998739530_n.jpg (84KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 639x960px

5.

File: 20158553_1810167085679714_1862852429_n.jpg (70KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 639x960px

6.

File: 20179769_1810167205679702_413316392_n.jpg (75KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 639x960px

7.

File: 20187531_1810167089013047_1934355062_n.jpg (137KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 639x960px

8 and second last one.

File: 20179891_1810168145679608_1704799127_n.jpg (127KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 639x960px

9 and final photo for now.

There are more on my instagram but I won't bore all of you.

Thanks guys, let me know what you think.

Shameful self bump

>>3117100
Constructive feedback postponed. The first shot caught my interest. Also bump

>>3116960
>>3116961
>>3116967
>>3116969
>>3116970
eh
>>3116962
>>3116971
shit
>>3116972
ok
>>3116964
neat

>>3116964
This is the only good photo the other photos make me think you would probably be better off dead so you should likely just kill yourself

>>3117327
I agree to be honest, but only because youre buying expensive gear and produce this crap

File: havetonameit.jpg (89KB, 628x419px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 628x419px

>>3117328
>>3117327
>>3117325
Elaborate why you think >>3116964 is a good/the best shot. I think it's not balanced! The large surfaces are heavy which is why I ignore the details that would actually be there.
I'd say the amount of each surface in the lower half of the frame is too much.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:20 00:53:03
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	628
Image Height	419

>>3117483
Thanks for the feedback, I can definitely see what you mean. Thanks for taking the time.

>>3117327
Thanks mate, how would I go about filtering my subject choice or at least fixing my composition on what I've chosen to shoot thus far? What would you recommend I do other than kill myself?

>>3116972
this one caught my eye. would've been neat to work with different angles to make that stairway look more mysterious/intriguing

>>3118076
maybe also could've been cool to gather some more trash to throw in. since you're doing street photography maybe experiment more with subtle prop

>>3117483
not that anon, but >>3116964 is the most balanced in my opinion and the best of what you posted

The lighting stands out most in this photo and the geometry of the shadow feels consistent and inline with its surroundings. The sky is also not an overwhelming blue which is a problem I always seem to have. The circular movement also draws my eyes in more and that little hidden corner is a great psychological cutoff that captures my curiosity more so than any of the other photos you posted. Most importantly, I find myself asking "what kind of building is this?" "What kind of place would an exit like this be coming from?" ect. while your other photos I'm am mostly asking "Why am I looking at the utilities (or construction, ect.)of a building?"