Back the fuck up most patrician film choice coming through.

such a SAD thread

By now there's probably more cameras with APS-* sensors than there were ever APS film cameras out there.

>>3116110
>jewish trick to make people pay more for less film
>gets backfired and fucked the whole industry

For now only useful to reload and reuse those Polaroid I-Zone cameras.
They should have kept retrocompatibility with 135 format and its original dimension.

>>3116184
>They should have kept retrocompatibility with 135 format and its original dimension.

Why didn't they?

Couldn't they do fancy stuff like EXIF data between the holes, where movies store the audio track?

File: 111411438.jpg (38KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x400px

If they came up with this fancy new film format, why didn't they at least reduce the wasted margins on the sides to get larger frames?
At least 126 film got that kinda right.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 40D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2009:04:17 10:31:52
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	600
Image Height	400
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3116191
You need the margins to not fuck up the negs while the presure plate is pressing it in the film plane window.

File: 4087411977_74ab07e294_z.jpg?zz=1.jpg (88KB, 500x326px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x326px

This is the true patrician film format. APS is but a cheap imitation.

>>3116110
Jej. My aunt bought grams one of those. Not even murrican she got it for her on a trip. Had to specially import the film. Wtf.

File: Pocketfilm.jpg (254KB, 2272x1860px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 2272x1860px

>>3116329
>>3116110
you fuckers don't even know what you're talking about

>>3116110
>more shekels for less film

File: 188606.jpg (623KB, 988x800px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 988x800px

>>3116458
Are you even trying?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 40D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:16 12:11:06
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	988
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: full.jpg (242KB, 1280x857px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1280x857px

>>3116324
Then why aren't margins an issue in minox film for instance?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D80
Camera Software	Aperture 3.0.2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	90 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2010:04:02 06:36:40
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/14.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Auto, Return Detected
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	857
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3116329
126 is actually GOAT
Why didn't anybody build good camera for it?

File: MinoxC41enlarge.jpg (232KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 700x500px

>>3116793
Because its a snowflake spy camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2009:03:30 15:02:13
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	700
Image Height	500

>>3116832
Because it's bullshit. Anyone unable to load a roll of 135 should stay away from photography altogether

>>3117058
> bigger negatives
Check
> remove roll half way through to change iso or color
Check
> reloadable cartridges
Okay maybe not this one

>>3116110

Can you even buy this anymore?