What film speed should I use for street photography?

>>3115480
this is a decision you should make yourself

if someone answers that for you they're basically dictating what kind of pictures you can take

>>3115480
>What film speed should I use for street photography?
As fast as you can get,. Always use black and white and push it a further 20 stops. Never use a focal length longer than 35mm and use a range finder.

These are incontrovertible rules of 'street'. Disobey them and you will be shot at dawn.

Most disposables have between 4-800 ISO film.

I tend to shoot 400 and push and pull.

>>3115480
400 if you shoot on daylight
1600 if you shoot just before and after sunset

this is me >>3115483
I accidentally read your post as "night photography"

as others have said yeah high speed film is better for street photography because you'll need fast shutter speed

>>3115480
I have been using 400 - if it's too bright, I use an ND Filter or that stupid useless purple filter for color film
>>3115488
I have been using a 50mm and a 45mm - I'm kind of liking that 45mm right now

File: 1474737006642.webm (892KB, 564x350px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 564x350px

>>3115505
>400
>daylight

>>3115480
What ISO should you use? As low as you can get away with.

File: FuckFGTs.png (57KB, 359x350px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 359x350px

This is why people don't like you

File: 2017-07-17_03-19-22.jpg (495KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 2048x1152px

>>3115614
Yes, iso400 is the lowest I go. You could go below, but I don't like motion blur.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Photographer	David Mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:16 13:12:02
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Brightness	2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>3115843
What a terrible fucking picture

>>3115843
>Come Jamal, we must go to KFC now on our newly aquired bikes

File: 2017-07-17_04-06-26.jpg (478KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 2048x1152px

>>3115856
>>3115844
Is this one any better?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Photographer	David Mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:16 13:08:59
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	2.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>3115862
Is the A7II's color rendition this much different than your 6D was or your post processing style changed?

>>3115868
I try different combinations of lenses and filters. Whatever camera I use, I mix the camera profile, the color curves and a film simulation until I like it. T-t-thanks for following me, senpai.

>>3115480
I shoot delta 3200 with an nd filter to bring it down to 800 then in development I push it back to 3200

>>3115904
Is it possible to get away with 3200 in an urban night scene under a source of light or it would be wiser to push it further? I have a couple of rolls I bought on a whim but still haven't dared to use them.

>>3115862
This is fucking shit too. Generic as fuck my man. Kill yourself.

>>3115614
>his camera can't shoot at 1/2000
>his lens won't stop down to f22
>he doesn't carry ND filters to shoot wide open
Top kek

>>3115480
>higher ISO make the image darker

You're not pushing it back to 3200, you're just developing it as normal since the film is already at 3200.

The ND filter doesn't magically change the speed of the film in the camera.

>>3116192
yeah well sometimes I need to push it to 12800 for night weddings and have my lee nd filter take it down to 1600 so that way i don't blow my highlights in the chinese lanterns

>>3116703
>12800 iso
What the hell? I can't mention it without posting samples.

There's a device you can attach to the camera and it will fire a pulse of light making you capable of shooting in the dark using low iso. I forgot the name of the device but it is often posted here.

>>3115614
Believe it or not, daylight is stronger in some places than it is in others.

>>3115862
This is a really good pic

>>3115843
>>3115862
>french people.jpg

>>3117110
lé /pol/'s (((((redpilled))))) edgelord
you're so cool

File: 974447000314.jpg (1MB, 2048x3087px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x3087px

>>3116767
yeah here you go dude, kind of a style i'm going for with my street photography, looking for an honest cc

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2048
Image Height	3087
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:19 11:50:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	3087

>>3117141
>Questioning demographic replacement in Europe makes you a /pol/ edgelord

Shoot yourself.

>>3117141
FUCK BORDERS AND FUCK TRUMP LMAO

>>3117455
>implying that using buzzwords designed to manipulate people with the brain and maturity of a middleschooler does not

Please go back to your containment cesspool.

>>3117302
You said you used it for weddings. What's even that picture? Not bad though.

>>3117476
Please go to Paris and see how shitty it is now

>>3117476
>buzzwords
>manipulating people

Seriously, you have no idea how bad it really is

>>3117539
>>3117604
>Please go to Paris and see how shitty it is now
>Seriously, you have no idea how bad it really is
ayyy lmao stop getting information from info wars and pjw

>>3117812
Literally go to any major western European city and compare it to 10 years ago.

File: Capture d’écran 2017-07-21 à 00.43.42.png (1MB, 1146x660px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1146x660px

What's even the point of 3200 film?

File: trentcop.jpg (470KB, 797x1000px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 797x1000px

>>3118000
lford 3200 film is the best looking film in the world. I love when my photo looks like it was printed on sandpaper

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Macintosh)
Photographer	David DeFino8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:20 22:26:50
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3115843

>f1.0
>1/640th of a second
>ISO 400

It is like you're giving it, taking it, and giving it back again. Do you know how a camera works?

>>3115862

Funny how you bring your shutter speed down and you ISO can come down too.

Really makes you think, doesn't it...

>>3115862
>>3115912
Don't listen to this guy. This photo is a lot better than the first. You have a much more focused subject that is interactive in a sense. The first photo was a mess however.

>>3118121
Complains about
>f/1.0
This doesn't ring any bells to you, I presume?

>>3115862
no

>>3117812
I've literally been there twice in the past two years

>>3118143


Nope, what am I missing here? a funny meme?

>>3115480
CMOS = 800 at most, grain is ugly.

CCD = 1600 is still fine, grain looks really nice.

>>3118617
>what am I missing here?
a literal brain.

>>3115488
OR

Do the opposite of everything this anon says and see what happens. Shoot on the street with a DSLR and a 300mm prime lens in color. Mite b good

>>3117302
A E S T H E T I C

>>3115480
depends what look you want mayne.

a high iso like 800 or 1600 just frees up more adjustability for aperture or shutter speed. if the photo is fundamentally good a little grain shouldn't matter. that said, pulling off low speed like 100, which would be kind of a bitch in low light, would look rad.

>>3118630
>CMOS vs CCD
>its 2017

go back to 2005

>>3115844
lmao you've got my upvote