Hey /p/ where do you guys go to print your pictures? [EXIF data

>>3115245
at the "Resize Your Snapshits" store!

>>3115247
>my retarded dial up internet can't load an image .4mb over the request in the sticky
>I'm autistic and need to let EVERYBODY know because change is hard

File: IMAG0939.jpg (3MB, 1791x2483px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1791x2483px

>>3115245
At the photo store

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	HTC Desire 620
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1824
Image Height	3264
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:09 14:31:08
Exposure Time	1/36 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	600
Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Brightness	-4301/125000 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Unknown
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	2.96 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1791
Image Height	2483
Exposure Index	314
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.0
Scene Capture Type	Unknown
Gain Control	Unknown
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3115253
no need to go full sperg bud, just take a hint and resize your shit so things load a little faster on the shit /p/ server

>>3115245
>not buying a commercial printer for your home to print out posters of your snapshits
shiggy

i go to a local camera outfitters who will print on their real fuckig nice canon pro-1000, plus i like to give a little back to local businesses

>>3115262
OP here thats not me sperging out, is his internet really that slow? Fill size images load very fast for me.

>>3115247
>You need to REEEEEEEEEsisze that picture

Which has better printers: Canon or Epsom?

Which has better inks: Canon or Epsom?

>>3115253
>"I don't need to follow rules because everyone else is poor anyway!"
I bet you also drive 200 on the Freeway because everyone else's car is unsafe.

>>3115265
How much should I expect to pay for a decent size print? Also where can I go to get decent priced photo frames?

>>3115264
he already bought a Sony, So I guess he's open for the idea, as soon as Sony makes printers with unworkable ergonomics and overheating issues.

>>3115245
I print smaller 15x10cm - A4 prints at home.

Larger prints either go to a local shop or to Fotopick, both of which are too regional to Switzerland.

>>3115277
Canon has slightly better photo printers if you ask me.

But they're far bigger asses about their ink pricing and DRM-chips-on-ink-tanks and introducing-even-more-ink-tanks-to-drive-up-costs bullshit. I'm entirely pissed off with Canon' DRM+pricing bullshit by now, and I'm not going to suggest them to you either.

For ink I like "Peach" 3rd party ink tanks because the ink they use is good (confirmed multiple times by swiss and german lab tests, and also fine with my observations).
They're probably also more easily available in Europe than elsewhere, but if you are somewhere else I'm sure someone else is filling tanks with good ink..

>>3115280
i payed $10 for a 13''x20'' print, and if they dont already sell frames, go to a hobby lobby, or get your own materials and make it for cheap

I do up to A3 size at home, never wanted something bigger desu

>>3115281
Whoa we got a salty Fuji cuck.

>>3115245
Walmart prints up to 20x30. I know a guy who uses them all the time to sell his stuff at farmers markets, and fairs. They actually use good paper, and can print on canvas.
>>3115277
Canon's printers are their only product I will own. Though they do rape you on ink.

>>3115346
Yeah actually, Wal-Mart has surprisingly good prints. In my little town, they're the only place you can print, and I have used them a few times including a 20x30. Quite happy with the result.

>>3115245
to my darkroom