Name a company that has done more for photography Protip: you

>>3110444
Adobe
>also checked

>>3110444
Pentax

>>3110444
Kodak my guy

>>3110444
>another brandfaggotry thread
kys

Schneider Kreuznach desu

>>3110444
Leonardo DaVinci

File: Barnack+and+Leitz.jpg (285KB, 1600x1049px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1600x1049px

>>3110444
>Name a company that has done more for photography

um
Leica
basically invented the 35mm camera we know now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1049

Fuck you gearfag. Sage.

>>3110444

fuck off poopco

>>3110533
35mm is shit

>>3110545

fuck off Sugar

Uh, Kodak. But you are too young to know better.

>>3110444
Kill yourself moopco you cancerous cunt

Fujifilm, also nice trips

>>3110533
lolno.

>>3112457
>>3110457
There's quite seriously no other answer.

>>3110444
Magnum.

Carl Zeiss Jena
Tessar, Sonnar, Planar...

>>3110444
Apple lol

>>3110444
Kodak

>>3110444
Playboy

>>3110457
>>3112457
>>3116445

Lol, nah, if kodak closed up at the height of it's game, film would survive through kodak/agfa/ilford/etc.

If sony shut shop tomorrow, then 95% of non canon aps-c and full frame cameras would go out of production and recovery would take decades.

>>3116564

Just look at the effect of the earthquake.

Sales dropped for every company except Canon. The mirrorless numbers alone are pretty nuts.

File: 1.jpg (49KB, 682x378px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 682x378px

>Name a company that has done more for photography
There isn't one. Everybody would stagnate at step 1 without Sony.

There are quite simply 2 fronts that pour billions of dollars into sensor research right now.
Sony, and car companies.

The camera industry would be at the mercy of fucking Toyota, Volkswagen, and General Motors to advance sensor technology if not for Sony.

>all these sony digiplebs

>>3110457
/thread
>>3116564
>kodak's biggest contribution to photography was producing film when agfa/ilford/fuji were in business

>>3116702
These digital sensors are a byproduct of research into computer microchips.

We would still be here with or without Kodak.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (409KB, 1920x720px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1920x720px

why?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: Kodak-rebrand-Work-Order1.jpg (13KB, 724x280px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 724x280px

>>3110444
ahem ...

>>3116568
That's what you get when every soccer mom wants to take better pics but doesn't want to carry a DSLR

>>3116704
You know nothing apparently.

see, anons, i understand you're new, but if you want to clean this board up, IGNORE THESE THREADS YOU FUCKING MONGOLOIDS

4chan

>>3110444
I literally can't

>>3117627
bankrupt and finish.

>>3119793
>>3116704
>>3116564
Without Eastman and Kodak though we wouldn't have commercial film in the first place.

>>3116589
>photography starts with digital
>I'm also so stupid that I think Sony is the only imaging company doing research and I don't realize that Sony patents are literally what's held back sensor development in other companies because unique solutions exist.

Sony is milking all those gearfags. The Sony a7 and 9 was not supposed to Be a fullformat even the lens manufactors told that in Interviews the emount is Shit the gap between the Sensor and the mount is to small.
>Muh Technology Progress. Sony is overpriced hipstercrap

>>3116736
Because Sony never puts OIS in their flagship phones for whatever retarded reason.

>>3116564
>Lol, nah, if kodak closed up at the height of it's game, film would survive through kodak/agfa/ilford/etc.
They also came up with that thing called "digital photography"