Thread replies: 23
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: IMG_9303.jpg (5MB, 3888x2592px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 3888x2592px
Grainy images occurred on my Canon 1000D and i'd like anons opinion if this is due to dust collection or did i just fuck my settings up.
Picture taken during sunset.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:07 17:54:01 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>iso1600
>canon 1000D
found your issue
>>
>>3109199
did you see the grain in the lower portion of the picture?
>>
>>3109203
It's not grain those are stars nigguh, and they're all over the place not just in the lower half of the picture.
The moon is pretty grain heavy though. But for a consumer level, decade old camera you shouldn't be surprised.
>>
>>3109232
>stars
>17:54
>1/4000 sec
>>
>>3109240
Ahh man shit yeah dude nah you're right. All the stars just follow the dark side of the earth at around 9pm to 3am.
Don't greentext me faggot I've been here since '05.
>>
>>3109232
Those are stars, because it shows up on the dark side of the moon, which would be blocking them.
>>
>>3109250
*aren't stars
>>
>>3109250
moon dust
>>
>>3109195
>ISO Speed Rating 1600
Could start with something like 100, and work from there.
>>
>>3109244
>I've been here since '05.
>since '05
>'05
>'05
I've been here since '98. Fuck off!
>>
>>3109539
Wew man, on a website 5 year before it even started. That's pretty rad man.
>>
>>3109543
>He wasn't part of the closed alpha testing
>>
File: 1491340697153.jpg (6KB, 224x73px) Image search:
[Google]
6KB, 224x73px
>>3109543
>4chan
>'98
>website
He doesn't know.
>>
>>3109195
You should worry about finding focus, champ
>>
>>3109562
It looks pretty focused to me, bitch.
>>
>>3109195
Which 300mm lens you use on that? Looking at the 250mm EF-S lens myself.
>>
>>3109195
Looks like sharpening artifacts, which you probably did in software.
>>
Put your camera in the freezer.
>>
>>3110672
That's all fine and everything until the humidity condenses on all your camera gear. Which will probably happen instantly.
>>
File: IMG_3810.jpg (25KB, 1334x889px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 1334x889px
>>3109195
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1334 Image Height 889 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>3109195
>Iso1600
>the moon
>>
File: CRW_6934.jpg (115KB, 3072x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
115KB, 3072x2048px
I am not a photographer, but I would like some evaluation. It's slightly edited.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 300D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:13 00:58:07 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 3072 Image Height 2048
Thread posts: 23
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5