Replace X100s with GR II or sell it all?

keep the d7000, wait a few months for the GR III to come out.

or buy an x100f.

>>3105430

The difference between APS-C mirrorless and fullframe mirrorless is minor, so I'd say it is at least worth the wait to see if Sony's upcoming a7iii will be any good.

Also go X-T2, not T1.

Otherwise yea, I'd say go all in for mirrorless. I'd keep some of my dslr lenses if they were any good though.

>>3105450

>The difference between APS-C mirrorless and fullframe mirrorless is minor
>so I'd say it is at least worth the wait to see if Sony's upcoming a7iii will be any good

lol wut

File: xpro2_a7II.jpg (475KB, 1400x788px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 1400x788px

>>3105452

I meant size difference.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	X-T1
Camera Software	Digital Camera X-T1 Ver4.30
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	83 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Width	1400
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Image Height	788
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:03:09 21:49:54
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Exposure Time	11/2000 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
F-Number	f/6.4
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	1400
Exposure Mode	Manual
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Height	788
Brightness	-3/100 EV
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Lens Aperture	f/6.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	400
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Light Source	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Metering Mode	Pattern

>>3105454
>>3105452
>>3105450
>>3105431
All good help, cheers. Would it be worth destroying the credit card and going C.) mirrorless and GR II for pocket-ability?

No point getting both dude, too much overlap...

Buy the GR II for now, pull the plug on selling D7000 later

Did you like your X100S? I personally couldn't live without an EVF or OVF which rules out the GR for me.

>>3105454
except for the lenses fe lenses are huge comapred to apsc lenses

File: aligned (1).jpg (30KB, 700x229px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 700x229px

>>3106221

Totally.

Absolutely massive.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Width	700
Image Height	229

>>3106229
>one lens that is a bit small
You always gonna find small examples. In every category for every mount there are smaller lenses and bigger lenses with the same numbers written on them.

Bigger sensor => Bigger projection required => more and bigger glass => bigger and heavier
You can't argue against physics with cherrypicking.

>>3106229
i´m a sonycuck myself, would never pay 700 bucks for a fucking 35 f 2.8

>>3106229
>he picked the one small lens made by somy
>2.8

File: DSC03414.jpg (371KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1500x1000px

Yea, the 35mm is kind of an exception, but it is a fantastic lens. Tack sharp corner to corner even wide open, and with no CA or other issues.

Most of the Sony primes are decently sized, but their zooms are massive.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Macintosh)
Equipment Make	SONY
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	39 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	1500
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Image Height	1000
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:06 06:34:11
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
F-Number	f/8.0
White Balance	Auto
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Color Space Information	sRGB
Saturation	Normal
Brightness	5.0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Light Source	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Metering Mode	Pattern
Contrast	Normal

Just get a X100T or F. It's more compact than any other camera mentioned here and you're already used to it.

>>3106253

Most of their primes are pretty massive too. They suffer from glassitis.

>>3106168
It was my favorite camera I've very used.

>>3106366

Get the 100F then. It's truly the camera the x100 series should have been this whole time.

>>3106253
Pretty much every prime lens is tack sharp with no CA at f/2.8

It's fucking f/2.8, that's where you normally stop down to for best image quality....

Get a GR, GRII is a meme.

>>3106374
This.
GR is a meme now. X100f is the only compact for professional camera owners.

>>3107340
>>3106374
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

>>3107340
how so, is it just marginal improvement for the price?

x70

>>3105430
sell it all for xt2 or 20.
or a7.

Go GR now, then once you can't stand the D7000 go XT2 / XT20 / A7

I have a X100s and a GR for some dumb reason.

I'm thinking about selling the X100, I rarely use it.

>>3110438
Ho

>>3110438
How do you find the lack of viewfinder?

Op here, I have decided to get a used GR, and then once my tax return comes sell all my Nikon gear and get a Sony A7 (unsure what variant). Cheers for the help :)

>>3112545

Waiting on the a7 is a good idea.

a7iii comes out in November, will be interesting to see what Sony does with it. Each release from Sony seems to add a lot.