Why do the colors look so different in Chrome compared to Lightroom?

>>3102730
windows color management

>>3102730
Did you export the file with a color profile?

>>3102730
http://cameratico.com/guides/google-chrome-color-management/

File: Capture.png (100KB, 876x588px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 876x588px

>>3102733
Are there any specific settings I should change?

>>3102735
These are the settings I use when exporting.

>>3102737
So I'm not the only one at least. It bothers me because when I upload photos to facebook I know at least half of everyone will see the crushed version of the image.
Also adding --enable-monitor-profile to the shortcut didn't make any difference for me.

>>3102744
>Are there any specific settings I should change?
no, can't do shit
color management on windows is bonkers

>>3102745
It has got to be a problem with Lightroom. The screenshot in my first post is saved from mspaint, and it actually displays the colors correctly.

>>3102749
no, lightroom is correctly color managed software

File: IMG_7650.jpg (714KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 1280x853px

>>3102751
I changed the color space setting when I exported from Lightroom, from sRGB to BenQ (which is my monitor's brand), and now it looks alright. The question is if not using sRGB is such a good decision in the long run.

For anyone using chrome - how do these look for you? Is there any difference? The blacks are supposed to have a pretty strong green tint.

This is using sRGB.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:23 00:28:45
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Bias	-1.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_7650-8.jpg (797KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 1280x853px

>>3102759
This is using BenQ.

Also to anyone not using chrome - how do these images compare for you?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:26 23:20:11
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Bias	-1.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3102759
this is good
>>3102762
this has a super raised black point

>>3102763
Haha yeah, I'm a basic hipster so that's what I was going for.

Weird thing is when I upload these two files to facebook they look identical (and not the correct version). But here and when I open up the files directly into chrome they're very different.

>>3102771
facebook, just as many other platforms strips exif and attached profile flag
so windows/the browser will either fuck it up completely or auto-assume srgb, depending on the software

>>3102773
Okay, that makes sense.

So in conclusion there's nothing that can be done about it. Chrome doesn't display sRGB properly, and facebook forces you to use sRGB. That's a bummer.

I guess the best bet is to export using a different color profile, and at least have the image displayed correctly on some platforms.

>>3102790
Print them as large as you can afford, bringing them everywhere with you showing your friends, family and coworkers the purest form of your vision.