God Cinestill is a shit film.

>>3101064
C U C K

>>3101071
if anything, he's a cuck for hesitating. a non-cuck would not give a damn and post it regardless.

>>3101064
Is it because of the shit DR?

No wonder she broke up with him.

>>3101064
>god dumbfuck hipsters who intentionally shoot a tungsten film in regular light are so shit
Fixed that for you

File: 2017-06-24 13.59.57.png (805KB, 1572x764px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1572x764px

would scatter my procreation fluids on her harlot countenance, oulthought.

>>3101104
>>3101104
Yeah, she's hot and famous as well. I think she's that girl from braindead tv series.

By the way if you use a tungsten light film on daylight you're an idjit.

Effin Disgusting. When you break up with a girl you do not posts her pix online. You do what every civilized person would, remove every post with her in it and only send the occasional private photo of her to your best bud and lesbian ex.

How do you miss focus? Blinding sun or not, the split prism still works, and you can zone focus as well. That's assuming it's not an AF camera. How do you fuck up metering? Just meter for shadows. If it's center weighted meter, just fill the frame with her face or look down at her chest to get a reading off of that.

>>3101064
Why is it shit? The colors turned up nice in that pic.

>>3101253
you do not belong on this board, sir
go away

File: 1435862123214.png (169KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 800x800px

>>3101064
>the meter would have failed in this situation
TOP FUCKING KEK!

Also,
>tugsten film in daylight

>>3101064
>Exposed with a rangefinder camera
>Rangefinders focusing is easier with strong sources of light
>Uses a tungsten film with 5500 °K light
>Idiot.jpg

File: Capture d’écran 2017-06-24 à 15.08.15.png (385KB, 590x390px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 590x390px

>>3101272
He could easily focus in that situation if he had aim to the edge.

The split image on my yashica is so dim it's pratically non existant and I still take sharper images than him.

>>3101071
>>3101079
>>3101081
>>3101085
>>3101104
>>3101241
>>3101247
>>3101255
>>3101258
>>3101272
HAHAHAHA SO FUCKEN BAD, AMIRITE PHOTOFOLKS?

protip: even if another board is looking (/tv/ in this case), act normal. youre being as self conscious as when we got merged with /fa/. tone it down, neckbeard.

>>3101064
it is a shit film (because its super grainy and the speed and exposure range is waaaayyyy overestimated) but it has nothing to do with the picture you posted

you need to learn to differentiate from a shit picture and shit film

>>3101284

t. rileystearns

>>3101284
>>3101287
>t. Riley stearn
>"""film""" director

>>3101281
>split image is the only way to focus

>>3101342
When you are wide open, yes.

>>3101281
>i take sharper images than him
>complaining about sharpness in a tiny low res image

Are you mentally ill?

>>3101385
>Are you mentally ill?
Are we asking rhetorical questions now?

>>3101385
>complaining about sharpness in a tiny low res image
well, his negative is still out focus regardless of the resolution.

>>3101420
>>3101421
are you dense?

RILEY NO!