[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Post a good photo

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 161
Thread images: 63

File: colour.jpg (62KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
colour.jpg
62KB, 1200x675px
This forum is full of harsh criticism. It's one thing that most users' photos suck, but /p/ even hates the photos of famous pros.

Post a photo you think is actually good, from any genre. Let's see if we can agree on some standard of quality.
>>
File: i02_16000031.jpg (844KB, 1247x1624px) Image search: [Google]
i02_16000031.jpg
844KB, 1247x1624px
One of my favorite snowboard images of all time. 2013 Red Bull Illume winner.
>>
I love Fan Ho, I'm thinking of buying one of his prints
I was even inspired to visit Hong Kong, obviously his photos were taken at a different time and I'm not that good but it is still awesome for photography
>>
File: Development1993.jpg (387KB, 700x558px) Image search: [Google]
Development1993.jpg
387KB, 700x558px
Roy Arden, "Development," 1993 (shot on 4x5)

Roy Arden is like a realer version of Jeff Wall. This photo ticks all the boxes for being considered good, here's why.

The light and colour is optimum: it was shot in the evening so there is a strong, direct illumination of the scene from a low angle that retains the density and texture in the sky, and the large format film does a good job of reproduces the rich areas of colour without transforming them into an artificial over-saturated mess. The scene selection was either very judicious or insanely serendipitous--the photographer probably returned to this site several times during the course of its construction in order to capture the appearance of the building in a semi-completed state that simultaneously exhibited an array of different levels of completion. The composition is simple, but in a complex or subtle way (in other words, it reveals of a lot of thinking about how to refine the presentation of the key elements down to their barest necessary presence--a simplicity that results from the photographer's thorough understanding and visual processing of the scene in front of the camera in a way that accesses a lucid image of what is significant for them therein). Finally, the photo is stimulating to the imagination and intellect because of the skillful way it self-evidently presents an otherwise abstract content (development, construction, etc.), it rewards individual contemplation and relates thoroughly to the rest of Arden's photographs from the series.
>>
File: capacolor_2.png (435KB, 505x500px) Image search: [Google]
capacolor_2.png
435KB, 505x500px
>>
>>3094304
whats this garbage.
>>
>>3094364
Please share how in the world you came to that conclusion. Its a phenomenal photos in terms of composition, scale, lighting, and planning.

> “It was basically just flashed from behind with two big Elinchrom Rangers,” he explains. “I had a 4-second exposure in order to get a bit of light from the moon into the dish. I’d done a lot of testing on this thing during the summer, and when winter came I pretty much knew how to light everything up.”
>>
File: 220px-CheHigh.jpg (16KB, 220x282px) Image search: [Google]
220px-CheHigh.jpg
16KB, 220x282px
>>
File: MfFTJi7Bsbo.jpg (150KB, 720x1080px) Image search: [Google]
MfFTJi7Bsbo.jpg
150KB, 720x1080px
OP here
>>3094304
Not bad, looks like amateurish digital art. So kind of cool that it's actually a real photograph, but if you take the long route to a mediocre destination the result is still a mediocre destination.
>>3094305
Cool subject but I don't like the style. A bit soft and grainy. Looks like film.
>>3094318
Worst in the thread, literally a snapshit.
>>3094320
Typical photo you can find in /rpt/ thread.
>>3094422
Take shitty photo, hope murderous rebel someday becomes an icon among angsty teenagers, profit.

Makes me sad that you guys will shit all over my pic related but get excited over this average boring stuff.
>>
>>3094303
>post a good photo
>starts thread with shitty shop of iconic photo that ruins the composition
wew lad/crumpled me dumplesacks bait you got there
>>
>>3094766
t. the guy making threads overanalyzing cheesecake nudes
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer© Martin Parr/MAGNUM PHOTOS
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2014:02:03 15:12:26
>>
File: IMG_2723.jpg (2MB, 1700x1110px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2723.jpg
2MB, 1700x1110px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:06:08 18:51:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1700
Image Height1110
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3094318
The definition of a snapshot.

>>3094320
dude let the mean vertical line come right out of the top of her head, but otherwise well composed with that tower on the left

>>3094422
outta focus

the rest I have nothing bad to say about
>>
>>3094822
unnecessary dutch angle
>>
>>3094829
>the rest I have nothing bad to say about

Judging from the level of insight displayed by your comment, you have nothing to say about anything
>>
>>3094305
like this photo but it really annoys me that you can clearly see on the top and sides of the image where he darkened something out. The black levels are much lower than the rest of the image

>>3094318
Ass

>>3094320
Not my style, so I won't comment
>>3094304
I've seen this photo several times, and I just now realized thats snow falling, not stars. I like it
>>3094303
I enjoy this one, but I don't think it deserves the praise it gets. It's just a nice portrait

>>3094422
Ass

>>3094766
Ass

>>3094822
Don't like it
>>3094827
Ass
>>
File: 1-Xdjhcxdsf3Favs7TOc21gQ.png (1MB, 1400x800px) Image search: [Google]
1-Xdjhcxdsf3Favs7TOc21gQ.png
1MB, 1400x800px
i have shit taste tho
>>
is architecture ok?
>>
File: AA024A.jpg (454KB, 1470x2205px) Image search: [Google]
AA024A.jpg
454KB, 1470x2205px
for you

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2017:05:21 19:21:32
>>
File: x2013.505.740.jpg (60KB, 599x383px) Image search: [Google]
x2013.505.740.jpg
60KB, 599x383px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeBetter Light
Camera ModelModel Super6k
Camera SoftwareQuickTime 7.6.6
Sensing MethodTrilinear
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution100 dpi
Vertical Resolution100 dpi
Image Created2012:01:09 11:28:56
Exposure Time1/25 sec
ISO Speed Rating400
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1024
Image Height655
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1024
Image Height658
>>
>>3094927
garbage placement. i would have put the shooter on the right side at the intersecting lines with him and the body on each line.
>>
>>3094927
Really good only thing I don't like is the aspect ratio
>>
>>3094931
>the photographer could have just told the assassin to stand somewhere else
>>
File: IMG_2762.jpg (49KB, 703x960px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2762.jpg
49KB, 703x960px
>>3094927
I thought this was the best photo from that incident.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width703
Image Height960
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3094927
someone post the fixed version where the gun isn't blending with the frames
>>
>>3094947
>that dutch angle

no
>>
>>3094952
The shot above lacks the intensity of what went down. It looks sort of like a spy movie still, but it misrepresents what happened as being something superficially cool.

>caring about verticals when there's a man with a gun shouting six feet from you
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-R1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2010:08:26 15:23:24
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating160
Exposure Bias1.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length17.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3888
Image Height2592
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 2002_39.jpg (37KB, 432x428px) Image search: [Google]
2002_39.jpg
37KB, 432x428px
Robert Mapplethorpe

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS D30
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2003:11:25 16:16:37
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.90 m
Metering ModeAverage
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width432
Image Height428
>>
>>3094766
nah its pretty obvious you just have shit taste man
>>
File: RH_PRESSE_03.jpg (3MB, 4724x3189px) Image search: [Google]
RH_PRESSE_03.jpg
3MB, 4724x3189px
Ren Han

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2014:06:15 16:12:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4724
Image Height3189
>>
Cindy Sherman
>>
File: 1491433660356.jpg (369KB, 1230x960px) Image search: [Google]
1491433660356.jpg
369KB, 1230x960px
>>3094303
I'm not sure whats the source is for this photo, but I really like it and my amateur eye feels its a good photo. Please don't kill me :,(
>>
Nicola Kuperus

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2008:08:29 23:34:28
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width800
Image Height635
>>
File: hitler_everett_img.jpg (206KB, 1440x907px) Image search: [Google]
hitler_everett_img.jpg
206KB, 1440x907px
>>
File: images (5).jpg (22KB, 342x430px) Image search: [Google]
images (5).jpg
22KB, 342x430px
Sry this one is such low res
>>
File: images (7).jpg (22KB, 474x311px) Image search: [Google]
images (7).jpg
22KB, 474x311px
>>
>>3094997
that penis is too low
>>
File: Columbia.sts-1.01.jpg (226KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]
Columbia.sts-1.01.jpg
226KB, 1000x800px
I always loke this photo. It's technically good, it's appropriately dated to its time, its historical, it's beautiful, and it captures something about the excitement, scale, and sense of wonder of the time and of the event.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareArcSoft PhotoStudio
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution250 dpi
Vertical Resolution250 dpi
Image Created2017:06:14 18:27:50
>>
>>3095078

>that white external tank

It looks so much better.
>>
>>3095083
Sadly they stripped the paint off because it didn't have all that much effect in terms of reflecting heat/radiation, the novelty of a having a shimmery white shuttle wore off after the mainden launches, and they figured they could save the 600lbs of paint for other payload. Makes sense but not as æsthetic.
>>
>>3095078
>loke
>>
>>3094931
>i would have put the shooter on the right side at the intersecting lines with him and the body on each line
No, you would have got shot after crying and shitting yourself in a corner without having taken a single photo.
>>
File: 1496972171951.jpg (380KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1496972171951.jpg
380KB, 1500x1000px
>>3095078
sugar did it better
>>
>>3095096
sugar did a fine job
>>
>>3095092
yes anon, i'm currently refining the english language and you just remound me to start writing it all down
>>
>>3095078
The shuttle program was a waste.
>>
File: 19.png (17KB, 366x600px) Image search: [Google]
19.png
17KB, 366x600px
>>3095102
Way to dangle some low hanging fruit anon.
>>
File: Goth-kids.png (65KB, 293x165px) Image search: [Google]
Goth-kids.png
65KB, 293x165px
Why are you guys so mean towards eachother? I understand it was super cool for you when you found this totally unique website where people use swear words and advice eachother to 'kill yourself', when you were teens, but thats getting kinda childish. Right?

It feels like people are self consciously trying to be more cool than honest, which is not necessarily the point of a anonymous website.
>>
File: IMG_0995.jpg (37KB, 534x363px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0995.jpg
37KB, 534x363px
>Nachtwey

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width534
Image Height363
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3095108
don't let it get you down anon. lead by example I always say!
>>
>>3095093
not true. the dude was shouting say everyone to be calm he was shouting he was only there to fuck up the Russian. I would have had loads of time.
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2014:06:21 12:01:09
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width882
Image Height900
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4069
Image Height3200
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution150 dpi
Vertical Resolution150 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2009:03:06 11:05:07
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1017
Image Height800
>>
File: 020_73+alexey.jpg (262KB, 1000x1011px) Image search: [Google]
020_73+alexey.jpg
262KB, 1000x1011px
>>
>>3095110
He is incredible desu.
>>
>>3095108
It's a nice sentiment to always be positive but I'd rather this place stay honest than become a circle jerk filled with false compliments.
>>
>>3095186
>but I'd rather this place stay honest

it's not honest when everybody tries to out-edge each other with "kys" and "cuck"
>>
>>3094318

I don't like a single thing about this photo. It's not interesting, it doesn't tell an interesting story and composition wise my eye is drawn to his shitty shadow at the bottom.
>>
>>3095186
you're missing his point.

honest negativity is fine. it's not cool if people try to be more negative than they really are. being dishonest to look cool bc they are so edgy and hate everything
>>
>>3095193
Why is it shitty for the photographer's shadow to be visible at the bottom of the frame?
>>
>>3095192
>>3095198
I get ya, but at the end of the day it's 4chan. Unless there's constructive elements in the comment, I'm sure most people would just dismiss any value in those overly negative posts anyway.
>>
>>3095202

>Why is it shitty for the photographer's shadow to be visible at the bottom of the frame?

I didn't say it's shitty and should never be done.
In that particular picture it's nothing but a distraction and fucks up the composition.
>>
>>3095210
It seems to me that it's an intended part of that particular composition, and should be interpreted as such.
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>3095211

I don't disagree, but that was only one of many problems I had with the photo, the main one is that it's just not interesting. The shadow is just an additional annoyance that only distracts from what little this photo has going on in it.

Art is subjective, I don't care for this one.
>>
File: taigawhut.png (259KB, 485x481px) Image search: [Google]
taigawhut.png
259KB, 485x481px
>>3095224
Actually, art is "inter-subjective". Meaning that it is capable of acting as an objective medium for thoughts and ideas that are otherwise only subjectively accessible. Precisely for this reason (viz., art is an attempt to create universally- or at least collectively- accessible forms of individual experiences) the function of art CAN and MUST be understood and discussed in objective terms. If it were not so, it would be impossible both to assess the successes and failures of artistic undertakings, as well as to improve artistic forms themselves. Repeating the hackneyed phrase "art is subjective" is simply an excuse to avoid the difficult work of thinking about art and, moreover, of comprehensibly if not persuasively formulating and presenting these thoughts to other people. If anything, it signifies that your own thoughts and feelings about art--rather than art itself--are stultifyingly subjective.
>>
>>3095077
You have to be 18 or older to use this site.
>>
>>3095269
You're dumb and think you aren't.
>>
>>3095765
You bumped the thread just to post that weak insult?
>>
>>3095768

This is /p/, weak insults and baseless claims are what we do.
>>
>>3095770
our insults are like smartphone bokeh
>>
>>3095007
british soldier in northern ireland. They were brought onto the streets to maintain order a few decades ago. this would probably be in the late 60's or 70's
>>
>>3095770
>weak insults
yeah, remember that "poopco" insult? we really are the thinking mans board when it comes to insults.
>>
>>3095770
literally the numale board.
>>
>>3095269

Hey, it's that poorfag memester from the other thread!
>>
>>3095993
its junk, the schizophrenic tripfag weeb.
>>
What could you have done with seven landwhales and a jacuzzi?
>>
File: 1430181667048.jpg (754KB, 1050x809px) Image search: [Google]
1430181667048.jpg
754KB, 1050x809px
>>3094303
The sky here looks unreal, and the composition has a great balance. Looks like the poster for a steam punk anime or movie.
>>
File: 1383431725422.jpg (594KB, 800x532px) Image search: [Google]
1383431725422.jpg
594KB, 800x532px
>>3094766
So this is literally "why do people like what I don't like/not like what I like", the thread?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: IMG_0449.jpg (165KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0449.jpg
165KB, 2000x1000px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3094318

My father is a construction worker and has rolls and rolls of shots like this.
>>
File: Rhein_II_2052673b.jpg (47KB, 620x322px) Image search: [Google]
Rhein_II_2052673b.jpg
47KB, 620x322px
>>
>>3096266
dumb faggot.
>>
>>3095168

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width2700
Image Height1822
>>
File: windows_xp_bliss-wide.jpg (1MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
windows_xp_bliss-wide.jpg
1MB, 1920x1200px
Probably the nost viewed image ever.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution600 dpi
Vertical Resolution600 dpi
Image Created2012:08:02 11:40:00
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1920
Image Height1200
>>
OP here again

>>3094892
Like it
>>3094895
Love it, but mostly just a really cool building
>>3094923
Like it but don't like the grain
>>3094927
>>3094947
instant classics
>>3094962
Very good
>>3094997
Nigger dick/10
>>3095000
Not bad
>>3095007
Top 3 in this thread, wow
>>3095010
Pretty good
>>3095035
There are a few other old Third Reich photos that are much better, imo.
>>3095072
Feels so 50s. Is it? Overall good
.>>3095075
I like it yeah why not
>>3095078
>>3095096
I actually prefer the first one, lighting looks more dramatic to me, this huge historical event.
>>3095110
I think he cropped out the bottom half of his head. Weak.
>>3095163
I think this falls flat
.>>3095164
Don't like it, horrible quality.
>>3095167
Cool effect and well done
>>3095168
I've seen better.
>>3096230
Drowned myself.
>>3096235
I too, know how to use the hue tool in LR. Not a bad photo tho.
>>3096242
Like this one.
>>3096266
I'd pay like $20 million for a print of this one.>>3096282 Meh


The quality went up tremendously since my last post. Keep up the good work.
>>
>>3096306
but nobody cares what you think?
>>
File: shrug.jpg (23KB, 500x327px) Image search: [Google]
shrug.jpg
23KB, 500x327px
>>3096306
>I actually prefer the first one, lighting looks more dramatic to me, this huge historical event.
of course, the sceond one was just a random shot that Shoog took, not the official NASA pic hours before maiden launch
>>
>>3096307
very edgy, random anonymous internet person. well done.
>>
>>3096306
>I actually prefer the first one, lighting looks more dramatic to me, this huge historical event.
No shit, it was an obvious joke you idiot.
>>
>>3096314
Lol who is sugar
>>
File: burning hearse.png (304KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]
burning hearse.png
304KB, 500x330px
>>
>>3096482
what romanian soap opera finale is this
>>
>>3094997
quit posting this shit you raging homo.
>>
>>3094829
>Out of Focus
>Old film camera
>Mistaking focus for low resolution

shit judge
>>
>>3096571
>2017
>Still this deep in the closet.

It's a good photo. Sorry it stirred up something inside you.
>>
File: JasonHawkes-0151_original.jpg (462KB, 1798x1200px) Image search: [Google]
JasonHawkes-0151_original.jpg
462KB, 1798x1200px
>>
File: chile.jpg (157KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]
chile.jpg
157KB, 800x534px
>>
File: careful now.jpg (69KB, 276x328px) Image search: [Google]
careful now.jpg
69KB, 276x328px
>>3096486
>romanian soap opera
>>
>>3096700
wow that sucks.
>>
File: 1480000804650.jpg (423KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
1480000804650.jpg
423KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)41 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpcm
Vertical Resolution70 dpcm
Image Created2016:11:24 18:18:11
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness6.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length27.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: 1456467293655.jpg (129KB, 2028x1500px) Image search: [Google]
1456467293655.jpg
129KB, 2028x1500px
>>
>>3096689
I don't agree with a centered positioning. Saved it anyway
>>
>>3097127
That would be a painting.
>>
>>3097135
but it's a photo of a painitng
>>
File: 2013-fall-review-roy-arden.jpg (53KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
2013-fall-review-roy-arden.jpg
53KB, 1000x667px
>>3094318
Offensively bad. You have to be kidding.

I googled the guy, Jebus what a hack.
Pic related.
>>
File: arden05-1024x819.jpg (222KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]
arden05-1024x819.jpg
222KB, 1024x819px
>>3097156
And another masterpiece by Roy Arden.
>>
>>3094318
Truly fucking awful

>>3097156
>>3097161
>mfw half of /p/ takes better snaps
>>
>>3094827
Nice
>>
>>3097167
These are great you're just a hobbyist pleb
>>
>>3094997
Best in this thread
>>3094927
Really really good, but I prefer staged photos.
>>3095000
*Ren Hang
I like his work, but this isn't his best
>>3095168
Amazing
>>
>>3097156
>>3097161
snapshits desu
>>
>>3097245
These are trash, you're just a tasteless retard.
>>
File: 1486583952452.jpg (675KB, 2048x1351px) Image search: [Google]
1486583952452.jpg
675KB, 2048x1351px
>>3096700
shit, that guy gets around, time hasnt been kind to him, either
>>
ive recently discovered bill henson
>>
File: ruven-afanador-img_5004.png (1MB, 1476x2048px) Image search: [Google]
ruven-afanador-img_5004.png
1MB, 1476x2048px
>>3097426

also im not a fag but im also in love with this bullfighter
>>
>>3097426
he got an exhibition down for those.
>>
>>3097426

http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/images/galleries/HENSON_2008/030.jpg

nude photographers always seem to find their way into underage land.

this guy is ok.
>>
>>3097448
>nude photographers always seem to find their way into underage land
But it's okay because it's fine art!
>>
>>3095214
Shit photo, I have taken better images with my oneplus.
>>
>>3097448
Wait what thats not a adult?
>>
I come to /p/ specifically because there's criticism here. I'm tired if all my work being called amazing and getting a oat on the back when I really don't deserve it
>>
>>3097611
those deli- i mean undeveloped nipples arent adult looking, pal.
>>
>>3094827
Nice. Like the abstract thing you were going for, was it?
>>
>>3097611
>>3097476

He got in trouble for underaged girls in one of his showings, he even went to a primary school to find a model in australia to shoot, kind of creepy.

There's a lot more impressive nude photographers out there. I understand how as a man and a big photographer who shoots nudes how you can be tempted to do what he and others have done like that french guy who killed himself last year, but it's probably best left alone.

There's a slippery slope with erotic photography a lot of people end up going down.
>>
>>3097688
Hamilton was English, but I know who you meant.

Too many photographers use their abilities and connections to do things they'd get into trouble for without them. And even so, it tends to catch up with them sooner or later.
>>
>>3097688
Whats the name of the french guy?
>>
>>3097766
David Hamilton. English, not French. Killed himself in France.
>>
>>3094318

No, this is shit.
>>
>>3094947
Horrible incident. But Jesus Christ that camera man was at the right place at the right time good focus too.
>>
File: IMG_6953.png (1MB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6953.png
1MB, 640x1136px
What does /p/ think of this guy and his IG? I like the consistency with his style, but I don't necessarily like that style. Just out of interest though, how do you achieve portrait photos like this?
>>
>>3096283

Damn I had been there
>>
>>3098385
Use large aperture lens, overexpose. Not very hard.
>>
>>3098385
>how do you achieve portrait photos like this?
shoot backlit models?
>>
>>3098385
style: blown highlights
>>
>>3098385
>how do you achieve portrait photos like this?
Higher-end prime. Presumably on FF. Gives you both bokeh whoring abilities and sharpness.
>>
>>3098385
Shoot average white people
Overexpose everything
Take pictures of people's backs outdoors because you have no original ideas
>>
File: FB_IMG_1497917437891.jpg (446KB, 1319x2048px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1497917437891.jpg
446KB, 1319x2048px
Gregory Freidrich Hael

His stuff is amazing. Literally can't get enough of it.
>>
>>3094318
It's a snapshit.
>>
does anyone have the photo that was posted here a while go, during trumps inauguration, an anon posted photos he took during it and, it was the best out of his whole thread?
>>
>>3095078
This photo was hanging in the hallway as you walked into my elementary school in the early 90s.
>>
File: 20170619_214818.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
20170619_214818.jpg
4MB, 4032x3024px
Big hug?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSAMSUNG-SM-G891A
Camera SoftwareG891AUCS2BQE1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:06:19 21:48:18
Exposure Time1/38 sec
F-Numberf/1.7
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Brightness2.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDC12QSJK01SM
>>
File: -andres-serrano_piss-christ.jpg (1MB, 2803x4200px) Image search: [Google]
-andres-serrano_piss-christ.jpg
1MB, 2803x4200px
>>3094767
summer is here, what did you expect?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:03:03 10:16:03
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2803
Image Height4200
>>
>>3098514
the amerifatso doing the selfie? that one was incredible.
>>
>>3098522
get a haircut
>>
>>3094374
>4-second exposure
>perfect silhouette of a snowboarder in mid-trick

sounds like bullshit to me.
>>
>>3098437
Be sure to put a tree branch in between you and the subject
>>
>>3098662
flash from behind him, the rest is just a black sky with snow illuminated by the flash, a flash lasts a 10000th of a second, so its not that unbelievable..
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (18KB, 304x326px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
18KB, 304x326px
>>
File: DSC01422.jpg (487KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
DSC01422.jpg
487KB, 1000x667px
>>3098445

Thought you might like this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:06:22 14:26:50
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness0.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3098662
Someone doesn't understand flash photography.

The sky is black behind the snowboarder. Popping him with a rim flash will give a perfect silhouette. If there was a city or some lights directly behind him you may see through him a bit...but since there's absolutely no light back there the silhouette comes out as crisp. That type of photo is all about controlling ambient light with artificial.
>>
File: 1137-3728.jpg (1MB, 1400x933px) Image search: [Google]
1137-3728.jpg
1MB, 1400x933px
>>3095096
>>3096306

I have to concede defeat that picture of STS-1 has always been my absolute favorite shot of the Shuttle program it was the shot that got me interested in the Space Program.

I will say if any of you are in Florida to visit you need to do the Kennedy Space Center. Come see what it was like when this country had the world by the stones. I say that as a native, most of us hate tourist attractions in our state but that one is a must do, it should almost be on your bucket list.

>>3096308

it absolutely wasn't a random shot I planned it from the moment I heard they were rolling out the last one and I had front row seats. I'm so sorry none of you got to experience that, the whole time I was there I was thinking, "/p/ would have a god damn field day here."

>>3095099

thanks :) it's probably in my top 5 I've ever shot, I'll be back for more of this if SLS gets off the ground, I should be able to get a media pass again.

>>3098521

Mine too, I went to Columbia Elementary when I was a kid. All of the schools in our area were named for the Shuttles and some of the people who flew on them.

Fun fact: the Endeavor was named in a contest amongst the schools by kids. NASA pieced it together from spare parts after Challenger exploded but didn't have a name for it so they turned to elementary school children to name it and some kid thought of that and NASA went with it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:09:30 20:15:05
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3099935
I remember my whole school went outside to watch John Glenn take off in Discovery. Shuttle launches were insane, especially night launches.
>>
>>3099940

Hell yea. Our classes would let out early for the launches. Even when I worked at Rockwell in later years the whole factory would shut down to go watch SpaceX and the Air Force launches.

The space program is an integral part of our culture where we live. When STS-135 got off the ground all of the 528 stopped on the middle of the bridge to watch it go.
>>
>>3096482
>>3096701

Feck me! I thought that was 'Father Ted'
>>
File: alexweebb3.jpg (3MB, 3892x2605px) Image search: [Google]
alexweebb3.jpg
3MB, 3892x2605px
>>3095075
Webb GOAT

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
PhotographerAlex Webb
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:06:25 13:22:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3892
Image Height2605
>>
File: 0_IMG_20161228_222205_032.jpg (110KB, 1920x1273px) Image search: [Google]
0_IMG_20161228_222205_032.jpg
110KB, 1920x1273px
>>
>>3094947
nigga what is up wit yo tie?!
Thread posts: 161
Thread images: 63


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.