TONY & CHELSEA BTFO SONY HATERS

File: 1476808531414.jpg (676KB, 1500x1100px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1500x1100px

>>3092160
I wonder if Tony feels insecure about the number of guys who have jerked off to his wife.
[spoiler]nevermind the number who have fucked her[/spoiler]

wtf i love cuckoldry now!

>>3092172
>[/spoiler]
>on /p/
HELLO NEWFAG

>>3092172
Why would he when he's the one who takes the pictures and sells them

>>3092179
I knew spoilers don't work on /p/.
I just don't care

>>3092185
>i was only pretending

Funny video, but a couple things

>adapters
Will never fully replace native lenses. And not everyone who brings this up is trying to bash Sony, it's a valid concern.

I don't really hate Sony I just hate it's fanbase. They don't know how to shut the fuck up about muh innovations muh game changers muh technology. Muh I can't take a god damn photo without EVF previews because photography is so hard guise. etc. It's annoying as shit and I wish they would stop.

File: 1496619448211.gif (768KB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 360x240px

>>3092187

>>3092192
>im not triggered!

>>3092191
What else do they need to bring out other than long primes? The lenses they have now are fine for everything aside from sports and wildlife

>>3092200
Tilt shift. It's a small niche to fill though, and since T/S lenses do not use AF to begin with, adapting one is trivial.

>>3092172

What is there to feel insecure about as far as people jerking off to her images?

IF he's fucking her, taking the pictures, and making money, I doubt he cares about Joe on the internet rubbing one out.

>>3092192

wow those are some tiny hands

File: 1493408438166.jpg (123KB, 500x542px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 500x542px

>>3092248

>>3092172
He shot his load in her and had her carry his children, I doubt he cares all that much

>>3092172
You toss yourself off to a picture of some youtube shills wife just because she's the wife of some guy with a camera? The internet is overflowing with hot naked women what has she got that the others don't have?

>>3092172
Do you think Tony lends Chelsea to get fucked by BBCs?

>>3092282
those are her ex-husbands kids, tony has no offspring

>>3092160
Who are you trying to convince, yourself or somebody else?

>>3092327
holy shit what a mega cuck

File: pyy.jpg (53KB, 454x722px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 454x722px

>>3092327
cucked to oblivion

>>3092191

>people talking about the benefits of innovation in technology in photography on a photography conversation board.
>wishitwouldstop.jpeg

Grow up sausage.

>>3092206
There's tilt shift adapters though, allowing any lens to be used as a ts. Which kinda leaves every other brand in the dust.

T H A I L A N D

>>3092160
Well if I had to choose, I'd rather be a canikon fanboy rather than a photo-less sonyshill, kek

>>3092327
is this real?

File: Lying on the internet.jpg (59KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x450px

>>3093036

>>3092327
The ultimate cuck.

Worst fanbase is Pentax.

Distant second is Sony.

>>3093035
>the amount of photos I take depends on the gear I take with me.

Fucking hell lad, you're king of the gearfags eh?

>>3093066
>you're king of the gearfags eh?
>says the sonygger that spends all day comparing dxo scores and never taking photos

>>3093090
Dxo is useful in my line of work.

You have no work or photos.

>>3093092
>You have no work or photos.
kek nice projection sonygger

>>3092191
>adapters
>Will never fully replace native lenses

why not? I mean obviously they will never *fully* replace native lenses; that would imply there would be *zero* native lenses.

>>3092200
Not who you are replying to but they need a 24mm or 28mm at f1.4 or so. Their 35mm f1.4 is close, but I prefer a bit wider.

>>3093029
>implying you can "convert" a lens to RD.

No. It has to be designed with a larger image circle or the movements are useless.

>talking about innovation
It's always the same shitposting. "I switched to Sony because they are innovating", as if photography was impossible before IBIS and EVF.

>>3095556
RD? Fuck auto correct. I meant TS.

>>3093092
DXO has almost no use outside of Sony shill posting.

Oh I see what you did there.

>>3092191
Sony a9 has shown to have faster and more accurate af with canon lenses than the latest canon 1d.

The main reason sony lenses will stay relevant is that they are the highest quality lenses currently on the market. That doesn't mean adapted lenses are lacking any functionality or usability.

>>3095556
Tilt shift is about correcting perspective, covering the whole of the frame is much less of an issue than wonky geometry. Cropping is a thing.

>>3095556
>progress is irrelevant
You can also drive a steam powered car and heat your home using a pan of coals. There's always people stuck in their old, objectively inferior, ways.

>>3095678
> Sony a9 has shown to have faster and more accurate af with canon lenses than the latest canon 1d.
Sony marketing at its best. But you won't have any video compacting them side by side would ya?

>be a sour Sonygger
>see someone confirming your brandloyalty beliefs
>run to /p/ to spread your Sonyggery
>think this will affect the opinion of anyone about Sonyggers
This is why everyone hates you
I didn't even own a camera yet and came here to lurk and learn about Photography and I could already see why everyone hates Sonyggers

>>3095678
>covering the whole frame isn't an issue
>having a massive vignette on the edge of the frame is perfectly ok

No. Not if you're doing it seriously and especially not if you're doing it for work. If you cannot afford to buy the lens just rent.

>progress is irrelevant
Thats not what I meant. Being a shitposter is annoying. Also,
>implying new=better
We still can't touch large format with anything digital so I hesitate to say that everything in the past is old and bad. Same with an EVF that destroys battery life so you can be lazy with exposure.

>>3095680
This.

If you make outlandish claims you should back them up.

(in b4 video of 1D in live view mode, or only comparing auto AF point selection)

File: 500_F_27370055_QgGexKIrxOSZVryUkVMGeFdq0OpsuMwA.jpg (69KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x334px

>>3092172

File: 1477952393395.jpg (122KB, 681x499px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 681x499px

>>3095819

>>3095967
kek

Well if I need to boil water, I will buy a Sony.

File: 40717[1].jpg (15KB, 140x210px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 140x210px

>all these people itt jealous that they are not the sexiest geek alive

https://www.geek.com/news/sexiest-geek-alive-565275/

>>3095983
I sensibly chuckled

File: 1383731317312.jpg (61KB, 536x375px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 536x375px

>>3095725
>I didn't even own a camera yet
That's because Sony haters on 4chan are mostly ass hurt nintendofags. It is actually that obvious.

Of course you don't own any camera, of course you're not a photographer.
Most sane photographers actually appreciate the new technologies Sony is developing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Live Photo Gallery14.0.8081.709
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2009:11:02 09:30:25
Unique Image ID	555BD546351B446C8712083713D3385E

i would eat Siobhan's poo

If every mirrorless gets A9 AF then it might finally be time for DSLRs to die.

>>3092327
that isnt true at all.

>>3096056
mee to bruh, me too.

>Those last 8 minutes in the video completely BTFO of Canikon fanbois.

But Tony is right though, there is a lot of unwarranted nitpicking and hate on the Sony tech.

And the reason why is rather simple: People don't like to feel like they've been duped.

Most pro photographers use Canon or Nikon. They've invested many thousands of dollars into equipment and many hundreds of hours into working with that platform -- so when a new camera comes along and reviewers say "DSLR killer" and "New tech" and "DSLRs don't have X", these people get defensive about their investments and purchases.

It's only natural that we want to believe that we made the best decision. And when information comes out that goes against that decision people get angry and frustrated and go on the defensive.

Your 1dx and D5 are still great cameras, no one is remotely saying they aren't.

>>3096017
I didn't know Sony made projectors this powerful
But knowing Sony it probably shuts down and loses warranty if you try to play anything not recorded with Sony equipment on it

>>3092160
Tony and Chelsea have this perfect combination of being uptight hipsters while also being master shitposters.

>>3095819
My sides!

Where did you get that?

>>3098365
>so when a new camera comes along and reviewers say "DSLR killer" and "New tech" and "DSLRs don't have X", these people get defensive about their investments and purchases.

But you have to admit here that these titles are clickbait. They are coaxing reactions out of people, only to say "chill out man! don't be such a fanboy bro!"

>Your 1dx and D5 are still great cameras, no one is remotely saying they aren't
Oh man you should see the comments posted all over the internet. I've seen everything from "Sony is eating Canon's lunch" to "Sony is 'smashing' Nikon" (wtf does this even mean?) SOME people actually are pure-blood Sony fanboys and enjoy mocking other manufacturers because THEY like to feel vindicated in the purchase that they made. It's not like Sony is this innocent victim of undeserved ridicule; their fanbase loves to shitpost brandwar bullshit, it's no different than Apple vs Android, GM vs Ford, console wars, etc.

>>3098365
Naah it's more like, some stupid youtube vloggers of the week do uninformed paid reviews and then when the actual pros' tell what is wrong with their ramblings, the fanbois (sonyggers and the vloggers in this case) get pissed and do a whole bunch passive aggressive shitposting. Sony a9 is not a professional sports camera simply because of the lack of weather proofing. It has all the amazing tech in it, yet it wouldn't survive a day in a life of d5/1dx, through jungles and deserts and warzones. It's already quite large and the pro lenses are all massive, why not push the limit a little and get it completely right the first time? And keep the a7 line smaller. There must be a whole bunch of apple fanatics somewhere in the middle management of sony camera division...

You're right about the fact that people don't like to get duped tho. Sony does many things right, but there's always something infuriating about them. I have rx100iii and while it is pretty nifty thing in tech pov, it is gimped by the horrid interface, reducing it to a basic p&s. I much prefer my lx100. Likewise, I wanted to like a7, I wanted to like a7ii (I'll probably buy one when I find a good bargain just to fuck around) but using them felt like trying to eat the most delicious cake covered with broken glass and rusty nails. Thus, after a decade in the nikon land, I went with fuji for my main system, and I'm happy with them.

File: a7a9trump.jpg (138KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 600x500px

The only people this argument is ever going to truly concern is:

1. Every amateur/semi-pro photographer who spent more than a thousand bucks on photo gear.
2. Every amateur/semi-pro that has actually invested a notable amount of time into their photography hobby/small business.
3. Every amateur/semi-pro who just finally got their first big-boy camera (flagship or high end)
4. Every amateur/semi-pro that thinks their work is pretty amazing.

Actual industry professionals don't really give a damn because they know what they are doing. By pro I don't mean someone who has shot a few calendar/postcard-like shots of horseshoe canyon on a nice sunny day. People who actually live in their work daily.

The people who argue about what is better or worse are just like your typical douchebags when it comes to cars. Everyone is a goddamn F-1 Racecar driver, without ever competing professional in an F-1 Race. Get their first mustang, WRX, a corvette, maybe that rich guy who gets a ferrari, no you're all just douchebags.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:29 10:33:34
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	600
Image Height	500

>>3098559
Well said.

>>3095788
Wait, you do know the vignettes get automatically corrected? Or are you using some shit brand without decent lens profiles in lr?

>nothings as good as large format yet
For what? Usability? You ever try scanning an 8x10?

>>3095967
Sony put more of the sensor into accurate shadow recovery instead of absolute dr/colour depth, learn2dxofamalam.

>>3096017
I have a wii u and xbox one, sony cameras are still my go to ;)

>>3096060
A7iii confirmed for a9 focusing

>>3098559
What is a semi-pro?

>>3098602
someone who's made this a full time job but doesn't generate any income.

>>3092160
what if i don't like either nikon or canon?
what if i just like the best the camera industry has to offer?
what if i want a camera that won't stop working if i drop it a river, snow or gravel?

>>3098599
>vignettes are automatically corrected
It works like this, if you start tilting or shifting a lens and the movements go outside of the image circle, you start to see a pure black vignette creeping into the frame. The lens couldn't record outside the imaging circle, so you get the black nothingness.

A tilt shift lens is designed with a much larger imaging circle than a normal lens. IF you take a non-TS lens and try to shift with it, the black nothingness creeps in much sooner. You can't "correct" for this because unlike a vignette where it's just darker at the edge, this vignette has nothing in it. It's pure black, with zero information at all. You could, in theory, content-aware fill the missing info, but at this point it would've made more sense to use an actual T/S lens, or shot at the best angle you could before correcting for perfect verticals in post production.

>>3098966
Oh, also

>>3098599
>nothing's as good as large format yet
I mean if we're talking about pure technical image quality - sharpness, resolution, detail, color depth, dynamic range - nothing digital is really beating 8x10. A niche yes, prohibitively expensive yes but the point simply being that newer technology is not always better.

>>3098966
You ignored my original point that the perspective correction is the useful part, who gives a fuck if you have to crop in 20%? And fwiw, many full frame lenses have image circles larger than you would expect, if it has good corner performance, it usually has a huge image circle.

File: 1390167628169.png (430KB, 824x720px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 824x720px

>>3098599
He (You?) admitted he didn't have any camera. That's your first clue.
And he was pretending someone from the Sony camp offended him, while in reality he's probably some immigrant from /v/ with a long history of console wars.

It's a known fact this website is infested with ninendo manchildren who have grudges against Sony all the way back from the 1990's.
Usually they stay on /v/, but sometimes they spill over.

Think it through next time before you rush to defend clowns.

>>3099183
Watch the latest tony northrup video, anti-sony is widespread among the photo community, and it's exactly the same reaction that tesla is garnering from 'petrolheads' (holy fuck that's a cringe word). If you rock up amongst a bunch of old boys and tell them they've been doing it wrong all along and there's a much better way using new technology, they get upset.

But sure, put your camaro up against my tesla.

>>3099180
>who cares if you have to crop
Anyone who's serious enough about doing perspective correction in the first place to want to do it with a specialty lens, is not going to fuck with something that could end up losing parts of the subject in the process. I cannot seriously believe you're recommending a shitty adapter for something as critical and specialized as tilt/shift movements. Do you also use fish-eye adapters on your lenses? Fucking hell, man.

>>3099199
It's like you refuse to read the first and most important sentence.
The guy isn't from the photo community.
>He admitted he didn't have any camera.

>>3099201
Bruh, you've never used tilt shift lenses or done serious architectural photography have you?

>losing parts of the subject
The fuck are you talking about, you do know how to compose a photo, right?

>as critical and specialised as ts
That doesn't explain why you need to cover 100% of full frame and never crop

What you clearly have no fucking idea about is the constraints of commercial architecture photography, the only real scenario ts are used, first and foremost is the best focal length, you want the building to work with it's background and you will have massive restrictions to maximum shooting distance in 95% of cases.

When I shoot architecture I take a 12-24, 17-40, 15mm, 20mm, 28mm and 35mm with me along with a couple of ts adapters. I used to have a 24mm ts and 35 shift, but they were just too niche to be justified purchases. I'm probably in the top 10% for my day rate for commercial architecture photography.

>>3099205
>you have never used them
I've shot large format. You're defending using adapters for architecture lol.

>you do know how to compose a photo
>you don't need to cover 100% of the frame
If you like shitty workarounds because you can't be creative then I guess it's none of my business.

>top 10% of my day rate
Without knowing where you live, I can tell you that I've seen the work of "top" photogs in my area and it doesn't mean shit. You shouldn't be appealing to authority when it's obvious the level of mediocrity most people settle for in photography nowadays.

File: tmp_15530-IMG_20170621_214102303529811.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

Just curious if anyone knows what the small one is. Its a cool gift I received

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 5
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.97 mm
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
ISO Speed Rating	1401
F-Number	f/2.4

File: tmp_15530-IMG_20170621_214910887486478.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>3099667

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 5
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.97 mm
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Time	1/24 sec
ISO Speed Rating	1495
F-Number	f/2.4

File: tmp_15530-IMG_20170621_215339-398775186.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>3099671

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 5
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.97 mm
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Time	1/9 sec
ISO Speed Rating	2446
F-Number	f/2.4

>>3099667
http://briansmith.com/mini-sony-a7ii-24-70mm-se-16gb-usb-flash-drive/

A flash drive? I want one

File: tmp_15530-IMG_20170621_215146359761025.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>3099688
Yep :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 5
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.97 mm
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
ISO Speed Rating	1590
F-Number	f/2.4

>>3099667
I's a camera for fedora ants