my first picture what do you think [EXIF data available. Click

File: DSC00690_4.jpg (4MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 6000x4000px

>>3091580
just learned how to use spot removal lmao

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One 10.1.1 Windows
Photographer	Ivan Čajka
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Brightness	11/640 EV
Exposure Bias	-2.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3091583
Why remove spots? Just think of all the delicious pus they're filled with...

>>3091584
t-thanks

>>3091583
great, now learn to downsample your images like it tells you to in the sticky

>>3091589
not OP, but downsizing is the biggest bullshit about this board, and everybody has a fucking aneurysm about it every fucking time an image that's 1 pixel too big gets posted. ITS A FUCKING PHOTOGRAPHY BOARD!! You can't fucking bear to wait an additional second of time to download a higher resolution??? Fuck off with that shit.

OP keep posting high res

>>3091591
fuck you, get out and never come back

File: 12308837_193019607707973_6894178063632357400_n.jpg (46KB, 576x960px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 576x960px

>>3091580
>>3091583

>>3091592
WAHHHH!!! MY INTERNET IS TOO SLOW TO DOWNLOAD 3MB!! PLEASE UPLOAD TINY IMAGES SO MY SHITTY INTERNET CAN HANDLE IT!!!

>>3091594
it's not at all the point. if anything is slow then it's the 4chan 'servers'
also read the sticky, mate

File: 15068530_1311072308916567_4105634904627244765_o.jpg (137KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1080x1350px

>>3091593
>>3091580
>>3091583
Or is this you?

File: FB_IMG_1496942825724.jpg (281KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1536x2048px

>>3091596
This

>>3091589
ok

>>3091580
>DSC00690_1.jpg
>DSC
Did you take that photo with a Sony camera or with a Sony Cellphone?

>>3091615
a6000 with Sigma 1.4 dc dn

I think the top of her head could've been completely in the shot. Also, the left side of the image is just a massive black hole. Takes away from the image. I like the shadow on the side and the focus is good if you were focusing on her feet and ass.
>UGLY ASS GIRL
>just throw your gear in the garbage since you'll never be cut down for this

>>3091616
Wew, it's a Sony product.
Btw, nice photo, 9/10.

>>3091618
damn you are right about her head.
At first I cliped her toes. Focused on ass and feet to much forgot about the head. Blacked out the top left part because my ugly bar table behind the sofa isnt finished yet it is suposed to have sliding doors for storage but it has a giant hole now.
thanks for your input

>>3091621
thank you

>>3091580
>>3091583
please post more, but more bagina and butt, not so much feet

>>3091580
Her right foot looks dirty.

>>3091625
ebin

>>3091580
Not sure why so much underexposure? Focusing on the feet comes off as creepy. Legs, with feet nearly the focal point, would've been a better choice.

>>3091580
>cropped head
noob

>>3091580
i can fap to this

File: 1490298961938.png (11KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 657x527px

>>3091672
i can't

>>3091625
Incorrect. Feet are the best part.

the image is a little flat. could benefit from some color correction and dodge/burn

File: 18901674_1157153094389689_1396829361_o.jpg (98KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1000x667px

not even close

>>3091607
cellphone cameras are a fucking abomination, holy fucking shit

File: f7252c9ff58d024dca4fae18bb7bd59d14c05997_hq.jpg (104KB, 1024x841px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1024x841px

>>3091591
>everyone on this international board has an unlimited and high-speed connection to Internet
>Every picture is worth pixel-peeping at 25Mpxl & 4Mb

>>3091583
I'll review it according to the same guidelines I've used in >>>3086086

Overall it's not bad.

Good
- Nice ass, legs and feet on the model
- Lighting kind of cool, dim and shadow

Bad
- Doesn't do a whole lot in the end. Feels a little flat compared to some of the other images I posted. But for just messing around with your special ladyfriend this is good work.

File: DSC01333.jpg (351KB, 1000x724px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 1000x724px

Reminds me a little of this one I took a few weeks ago

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:10 23:03:13
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	5000
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	-3.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3092829
Literally no one wants to hear your "feedback" where you detail your personal fetishes.

>>3091594
>>3091591
if your photos need high res, you're not doing it right, get off /p/, you're worse than brandfags

>>3091580
Seems okay. But the other anon is right, spot removal is usually a good choice for beauty to porn shots.

>>3091615
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make SONY
Camera Model ILCE-6000
Camera Software Capture One 10.1.1 Windows
Photographer Ivan Čajka
Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi
Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
Exposure Time 1/125 sec
F-Number f/1.4
Exposure Program Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating 100
Lens Aperture f/1.4
Brightness 11/640 EV
Exposure Bias -2.3 EV
Metering Mode Pattern
Light Source Unknown
Flash No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length 30.00 mm
Image Width 6000
Image Height 4000
Rendering Normal
Exposure Mode Auto
White Balance Auto
Scene Capture Type Standard
Contrast Normal
Saturation Normal
Sharpness Normal

>>3092835
can you make her more green/yellow plz? my fetish is bitches with severe jaundice

>>3092835
this one is significantly worse compared to the OP pic

File: DSC01333.jpg (44KB, 300x217px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 300x217px

>>3092900
Thanks, I don't know why I always get colours so wrong. Re-did WB.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:13 14:59:52
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	5000
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	-3.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3092882
This is correct.

>>3092825
what is that image supposed to be showing?

>>3091580
>>3091583
thats my type of ass tbqh. 10/10 would eat.

>>3091580
light is shit; subject is overrated and overused. Soft porn / 10.

>>3092835
that green tone, is she dead?

>>3095218
Don't be salty that you dont get to shoot sexy girls like Jason and me
t.Chaika

File: 20170614_191225.jpg (5MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 4032x3024px

>>3095237
>>3095336
Posting from phone, meant to him

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G935F
Camera Software	G935FXXU1DQEA
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:14 19:12:25
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	-0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	C12LSII00VM C12LSJK01GM_

>>3091580
Why do women have so many imperfections on their ass cheeks and shit? I notice it in porn a lot. I look at my own ass cheek and it's pretty much flawless minus the hair.

>>3095339
Shit diet, overuse of cosmetics that have toxins, fluctuating hormones I guess

>>3091625

Please abscond with your pedestrian titsguy PIV pedantry.

Footsexuality is the only ethical basis for any relationship between man and woman.

>>3091591
>I'm a retard that only post phone pics and don't know how to resize

>>3095338
sexy camera

>>3094338
>300x217
are you kiddin me?

>>3091580
looks like shes about to get BLACKED