Photo Composition Thread

>>3090732
good photo but not good comp. its value is in the story behind, not on its aesthetic display.

>>3090732
Rooftop Koreans? Ok, I can get behind that but not much composition wise.

File: sugimotocaribbeansea.jpg (116KB, 800x615px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 800x615px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2308
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:10 15:24:59
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	800
Image Height	615

File: IMG_0917.png (848KB, 1080x798px) Image search: [Google]

848KB, 1080x798px

gonna shill my own photo here to bump. Shit on it all you like

>>3090768
I Should've cropped it better on the left side, gonna do dat now.

>>3090769
that's the least of your problems desu

File: 1457513436910.jpg (245KB, 1500x833px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1500x833px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	1500
Image Height	833

>>3090768
no

File: 1483113233015.jpg (1MB, 4600x3074px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4600x3074px

>>3090729

>>3090790
magnificent

File: 1457211675631.jpg (1002KB, 1118x1116px) Image search: [Google]

1002KB, 1118x1116px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2012:09:04 10:39:10
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1118
Image Height	1116

File: BillHenson_1985_TheGreatLeapSideways_05.jpg (629KB, 829x1000px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 829x1000px

this shit makes me cum.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3725
Image Height	4766
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:03:08 13:16:02
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	829
Image Height	1000

>>3090748
>>3090807

Garbage.

>>3090729
This snapshit would be considered carbage if it was taken by anon.

>>3090833
nah, that's a great photograph.

>>3090807
did he use a remote radio flash to brighten the cars?

File: images (4).jpg (23KB, 471x312px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 471x312px

Alex Webb is based

File: 96023700903_n.jpg (84KB, 867x704px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 867x704px

>>3090729

File: Hp5Ae1020.jpg (88KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 800x800px

Reminder: If you're not posting your own photos in this thread you're a massive faggot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:27 17:22:36
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>>3090790
love that one too.

>>3091025
why bother, eventually someone will post one of mine, something that, of course, wont happen you :^)

btw, post more of left, looks deliciously thin.

>>3091025
youre retarded

File: 1465079879688.jpg (33KB, 500x372px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x372px

>>3090790
Fuck me that's good.

>>3090790
this is the reddit of photography.

>>3090795
I love this one!

>>3090790
>>3090748
>>3090799

Minimalist fine art. Good as fuck because it's simple

>>3091025
If I was you I'd be ashamed to post this here. Yours should be 'delete in camera'

>>3090731
this is the best one from composition, colours and history so far

>>3090844
Biuriful/10

>>3091091
honestly yeah, it makes me cringe a little bit the more and more that I see it.

>>3091025
But they need to have good comp so why'd you post?

File: 1484282621810.jpg (208KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 750x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3090807
ooh, that's nice

>>3091235
which photographer did this one?

File: 27fe4ffcbf3a73d3ba56f16d1db6df3e[1].jpg (139KB, 908x604px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 908x604px

>>3091235

at least post the full image

Composition is for stupid people.

>>3091328
Do u ever post your pics?

>>3091328
Examples of your work pls

>>3091328

god please die

>>3090833
Upvote

>>3090807
Wow I really love that

>>3091330
>>3091332

Anonymously and have so for years here, even when I had my other trip. Anonymity is the best way to receive honest feedback disassociated with your reputation for being a helpful, high quality shitposter.

>>3091352

I mean, I will eventually. We all will. Are you sure you want "whiny little bitch" on your tombstone my man? Go live your life.

>>3091567
Post you best under your trip and I will give you my honest opinion srs. Just curious to see what somebody who has such beliefs produces themselves.

File: IMG_9001.jpg (204KB, 671x997px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 671x997px

>>3090729

A 'good' photo is mostly just interesting subject + composition.

But personally for something GOOD it has to smack me around the tits like these

>>3090790
>>3090795

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 750D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:08 17:26:22
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	671
Image Height	997
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3091567
>>3091577
Doesn't even have to be your best, I just want to see one fucking photo taken by you

>>3091328
i don't believe you

>>3090795
wow

File: Lonely Tree 1.jpg (2MB, 3318x2212px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3318x2212px

Thoughts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL SL1
Camera Software	Embettered by PicMonkey. http://www.picmonkey.com
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.0
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:19 15:12:11
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/14.0
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/14.0
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Program
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Spot
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Digital Zoom	Unknown
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	2
Sensor ISO Speed	65408
Color Matrix	132

File: 20170607_233510_1496903735157.jpg (199KB, 1094x1944px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1094x1944px

photo of kot always good photo

>>3091328
What exactly did you mean by this? Or are you just farming (you)'s?

File: 1137-6927.jpg (928KB, 1440x892px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 1440x892px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3091865

I mean that the strength of photography comes from its grounding in reality and somewhat objective representation and reproducibility, and by extension your response to all of that, rather than its pictorialism. If you want to fuss over composition, go fucking paint or do sumi-e or draw.

>>3091884
post a photo you've taken

>>3091857
Terribly boring.

>>3091866
Terribly boring.

>>3090844
fantastic

>>3091917
>literally control entire frame
>still can't follow rule of thirds
Paintings are for philistines

File: 144857587467.png (63KB, 625x623px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 625x623px

>>3091940
>rule of turds

>>3091866
>goes for symmetry
>can't even center his subject

classic Sugar

File: 1385230908593.jpg (167KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 600x800px

>>3091884
The beauty of photography is that you can use a camera to do whatever you want. You're allowed to pick any subject you want, frame/compose and expose, and then edit, in any which way you choose. It's 100% up to the person doing it. Though there is value in only documenting reality, I disagree that it's the only thing photography has going for it.

Keep in mind too that composition is not just the way in which you place subjects/objects, it's what you're actually placing in the frame at all. It's not just about having perfect symmetry, finding the optimal angle or following the rule of thirds to a T. If your photo has "bad composition" it could mean it's ability to tell a story is weakened by either having too many distractions or because what should be the subject is being overshadowed by something brighter and larger.

>If you want to fuss over composition, go fucking paint or do sumi-e or draw.

If an incredibly important event is unfolding, only for somebody to just lazily raise a camera to their eye and not care how it looks so long as they "got the shot", then at that point I'd prefer reading about it in the newspaper or online. You can't even argue that veteran photojournalists are not concerned with composition. It's harder for them to get the 'perfect' compositions but they still try to make them engaging and evocative, and that takes skill and practice to do.

I can see why some people don't care that much about composition either and it shouldn't be the only metric we use, but I wouldn't want to go the other way and just throw consideration for composition out the window either. Not in a visual medium anyways.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>3091884
I only see this making sense if you're photographing a fleeting moment, where "meticulous consideration of design senses" needs to be balanced with "getting the shot". If you're shooting landscapes or architecture, or any static subject for that matter, you don't really have an excuse to not even try to get a good composition.

>>3091021
This is so great

>>3091884
If you look at what you're shooting through your lens before taking the photo, you're composing it.

File: 20170606_213644.jpg (3MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x2268px

This

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G930W8
Camera Software	G930W8VLU2BQB6
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:06 21:36:44
Exposure Time	1/838 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	2268
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	C12LLJB18SM C12LLJK01GM_

>>3091021
When are they going to fix that before it falls on people?

>>3091945
>can't even center his subject
What are you even talking about? shit is centered af

File: 2002_39.jpg (37KB, 432x428px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 432x428px

Mapplethorpe taught me what art is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS D30
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2003:11:25 16:16:37
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.90 m
Metering Mode	Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	432
Image Height	428

>>3092052

>landscapes
>architecture

Why bother with "good" (read as: conforms to rules I read about) composition when the photos themselves can never be good? And if you did manage to take the first good, original landscape photo in three decades, it won't be because of the composition.

There are some other (you)'s in this thread I will reply to later, know now that I haven't forgotten you or gotten blown the fuck out, I've just been busy traveling and taking post-composition photos. I'll get to you later.

>>3092783
>photos are only good if they are original and conform to my arbitrary sets of rules regarding "grounded in reality" and having the right subject matter

Wew lad, some spicy ass opinions you got there.

>>3092783
>taking post-composition photos

Yall literally did that exact thing years ago

>>3092794

I was doing it before yall. I was one of his early champions even. What a weird era that was, with tedious and junk and lpb and yall all posting at the same time.

File: You.png (59KB, 700x673px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 700x673px

>>3092808
Why are you even in this thread? If you hate composition so much, then the right thing to do would be to ignore it and get on with your pathetic life.
But no, you can't move on because you're just that much of an insecure retard. You have yet to post a single photo of yours under your trip yet you still critique other photos. I bet you're that guy who's always posting snapshits here.
Post one of your photos under your trip and we can judge it unbiased if it's good enough. I want to see what that god complex of yours thinks is a quality photograph.
You tell others to go and live their life but you're the one trying to bait people on a Mongolian basket weaving forum. Great life you've got there. And I'm so sure that you could never say any of this to our faces in real life. You can't and so that's why you sit on your fat ass telling others that you are hot shit on fucking 4chan. Or you know, if you ever do say these things to people outside of 4chan, I'm sure they would never be able to interpret what your sputtering and spattering manlet ass would be trying to say about photography.
If you aren't one of those worthless idiots who bait others for a fake idea of fun like a 12 year old and you're just this much of an asshole, then know that you are subhuman and will not be remembered by anyone. Oh and I beg you to tell me how wrong I am. Go ahead and keep proving to me how much of a faggot you are.
Pic related. Do you like my picture's composition?

>>3092859

That's pretty good.

Triggered, but good.

>>3092783
post a fucking photo of yours, or shut up cunt

File: IMG_5805.jpg (159KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 600x800px

>>3092981

k

>>3093017
"clap clap clap" truly a master piece anon, I apologize!!! "claping intensifies"

>>3092859

fucking saved

>>3091884
shut the fuck up

>>3093536

Wow, if you liked some snapshit I made with my phone you'll love my real work.

>>3092859
Savage. lmao
saved

>>3093549
Dont do it anon, my unsullied eyes arent prepared for it

>>3091328

>>3092045
>>3092045
>>3092045
>>3092045
this
it's not in the simple fact of representing something, but HOW you represent it
in this sense, composition isn't a set of rules, nor should it be. it's an overall sense of any given scene and what is, or should be, in it

>>3092045
but this photo is shit

>>3093549
>probably posted what he considers his magnum opus, feeling like a magnificent forward-thinking genius who will define the art of photography for years to come
>some anon on 4chan calls it shit
>"h-hhaha, what wasn't my REAL work, no not at all... "

>>3094082

I think you have difficulty with nuance and subtlety my man

>>3090729
>>3090790
>>3090795
>>3090799
>>3090807
>>3091021
>>3092126

These are all amazing.

File: IMG_20170502_221313_287.jpg (180KB, 1500x845px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1500x845px

Does this have any composition? Is not bait, just a newfag

File: sunrise.jpg (309KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1500x1000px

There's no such thing as a good photo.

>>3091857
why does this look like I took this new legal acid

>>3094168
every picture has a composition. Some are good, some are bad.

>>3094168

It has roughly two and a half.

>>3094361
True, is it a good one?

>>3094480
It could be worse

>>3090807
Noob here, this looks like an underexposed random snapshot. I don't see anything interesting about the lighting (the worst), the colors (can they be seen?), the composition(none) or the subject(a typical suburban street).

What am I missing?

>>3094654
it's not my favorite photo in the world, but I can try and tell you what you're missing. the underexposure focuses the photo on the cars and the geometry, and makes the houses blend into the background/reduces them to their essential geometry. you see e.g. the horizontal pattern of the sidewalks highlighted which accents the shape of the road. if you bump it up in photoshop you'll see it become kind of jumbled. the exposure also bumps up the color saturation so you get that rich blue sky against the dark landscape e.g.

>>3090841
I think that's just the natural lighting.
If you look at the clothes in the foreground, or the car under the overhang on the left, those all stand out similarly, but probably don't even have as good of lighting as the cars on the street. I suspect in post the contrast could have been bumped up, as well.

File: Snapchat-1531450332349677700.jpg (464KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1080x1920px

Looking back at this, it could probably use some more foreground.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Shotwell 0.23.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1080

File: Snapchat-1531450332349677700.jpg (516KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1920x1080px

>>3094691
Shit, why's it gone and uploaded it like that?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.20
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1080

>>3094693
Pic be FIRE, bro

File: reverse.jpg (87KB, 580x432px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 580x432px

>>3093017
This can't be real. I almost pity you. It's like a snapshit a tard would take on a museum trip with his grandma. Where's your real work?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2012:11:15 20:58:58

>>3094679
Fair enough. I can see what you're getting at. That said, I think my own personal sense of what looks good is too radically different to accommodate it.

>>3091021
lmao i took a photo exactly like this when i went to pisa. Hated that place.

>>3092128
It has counter weights keeping the tilt from progressing, I guess they're keeping it for the comedy value

File: DSC01840.jpg (985KB, 3351x5329px) Image search: [Google]

985KB, 3351x5329px

Was exploring some abandoned warehouses in my city and i came up behind this dove to snap a pic but it flew away and i just snapped this out of frustration to at least get something it its probably on of the best composed photos I've ever taken.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	500 dpi
Vertical Resolution	500 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:15 21:58:17
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: Edited-4365-2.jpg (416KB, 600x895px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 600x895px

>>3090729

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T10
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:15 21:43:47
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/1.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3096067

wow RUDE

>>3096081
>lmao i took a photo exactly like this when i went to pisa
SUUUUUUUUUUURE PAL YEAH SUPER SURE SUREEE LOLLLLLLL

SURE YOU DID LOSER LOL

>>3096079
>I think my own personal sense of what looks good is too radically different to accommodate it.
of course an a e s t h e t i c millennial autist like you wouldnt comprehend and appreciate the incredible Bill Henson, but that will come with time, when you stop eating every shitty insta fad and develop a taste.

File: IMG_20170529_185325.jpg (2MB, 4048x3036px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4048x3036px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Pixel
Camera Software	HDR+ 1.0.147548766z
Equipment Make	Google
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:29 18:53:25
Image Width	4048
Image Height	3036
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Close View
Focal Length	4.67 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	3036
Rendering	Custom
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Saturation	Normal
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	4048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Subject Distance	1.01 m
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Contrast	Normal
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	2.2 EV
ISO Speed Rating	164
Exposure Time	16667/1000000 sec

>>3096127
ironic of you to call me rude.

>>3096087
Cousin, your work is seriously on FIRE

>>3096118
Now that is what I call FIRE photography

>>3096157
Everyone takes cat pix. Not everyone - barely anyone - makes images that have this kind of FIRE in their souls.

>>3096172
OK snapshit. Now set this motherfucker on FIRE, then come back and post results.

Newfag.

>>3096153
not everything famous artists produce is a masterpiece, friendo

>>3096244
You just don't understand the visual vocabulary of post-post--composition photography.

>>3090790
i walk by this place like once a week.

>>3090833

this

>hurr backs of people's heads

>>3096358
Can you please tell me why it's not shit?

>>3096153
>millennial autist
this reads like something someone would say if they want to imply they're older and more sophisticated than their peers. Millennial generation extends all the way back to the early 80's, so get in here with us, faggot.

>>3096366
>we all the same, bros!
no, you fucking millennial. we didnt have catboys back then. we arent the same, you internet byproduct turd.

>>3096416
I was born in 1983

>>3096427
What, you want a freaking medal?

>>3096416
Please fuck off dude, you're not adding anything to the discussion

>>3096087
for an accident that is pretty good anon

bumping a good thread