ABSOLUT MADMAN! He got a sonygger to test.

>the typical sony fag

This fucking guy is pure comedy.

>>3090584
...says the white flag fetishist snail fucker.

His camera collection is rivaled only by his chin collection.

>>3090584
Is he trying to make fun of JL? I tought it was only me who hated that fedorafag.

i love him so much

>>3090584
He doesn't know shit about photography, yet he knows a lot about gear. He should be president of p.

who's this handsome gentleman?

>>3090684
yes, since Ken is our GOD

>>3090684
I think he is very smart and knowledgeable but I'm waiting to see a single decent photo from him. I think photography is subjective so I'm not expecting a masterpiece but something that looks nice.

>>3090615
I think he only has a couple nikon bodies and a couple of fuji bodies. He has every lens for fuji and every "good" lens for nikon. It's more than anybody on /p/ but not anything more than people with money whose only hobby is photography.

>>3090604
He is entertaining and knowledgeable but very unstable. I only hope is that his behavior in front of the camera is only for show and not a reflection of him off-camera. I guess his wife dying took a toll on him.

>>3090684
>He doesn't know shit about photography
Sauce?

>>3090763
>his 3000 videos

>>3090701
Jason Lanier

>>3090584
Literally the first time I've seen him out of his basement.

Typical fujicuck

>>3090714
I agree, my main digicam is an XT2 and I'm honestly ashamed that Fuji associates themselves with this guy. That said, he's still better than Jason Lanier.

>>3090828
Fuji doesn't associate with him...he associates with Fuji

>>3090829
Really I thought he was paid by Fuji

>>3090714
He has hundres of videos shilling fuji. He has one just talking about adapted lenses to x mount. He has all current production fuji lenses avaible.

>>3090710
> I'm waiting to see a single decent photo from him.
I'm waiting to see a single photo from him.
This guy doesn't even have a portfolio. Why would you listen to anything he says?

>>3090625
They're like the yin and the yang of gearfaggotry.

>>3090625
Taking photos, travelling the country, talking to hot girls, it's no surprise you can't relate to JL, but love this basement dwelling, fat, pathetic bullying victim.

Says a lot about fuji users.

who the fuck is him?!

>>3090834
Why does it matter? When something is true that means it's true.

>>3090584
I mean, hes got style tho.

File: fony.jpg (125KB, 1132x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1132x720px

omg wtf is going on

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Adomas Mockus
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3090863
Looks like theo is jumping ship again, lel

File: vqoNNRq.jpg (248KB, 649x638px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 649x638px

>>3090863
This shouldn't be happening, we must be in the worst timeline.

His lens recommendations are awesome, if you can slog through his long-winded manner of speech and tangents about nothing. He couldn't frame a concise point to save his life though.

>>3090710
>He is entertaining and knowledgeable but very unstable.
It's so much worse than that though. He's a pseudo intellectual who shovels his cognitive dissonance in mass when it suits him. The defining word for the guy who won't shut up about translating ancient Greek is Hubris.

It seems like a minor issue that he could fix if he only tried, but somehow he doesn't. It's weird, really.

File: 1493916231043.jpg (70KB, 627x680px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 627x680px

>>3090863
Is this real?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Greenshot
Image-Specific Properties:

File: sony is not a camera co you.png (309KB, 315x439px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 315x439px

>>3090899
Yes, it's from the comments below the longer conclusion video.

What do you call the opposite of a lemon? Perhaps he lucked out and got a non-broken camera.

But seriously, what's the point of this cam supposed to be now anyway? In his review he categorically ruled out using it for wedding photography, because of the laggy mechanical shutter.

Now what? I'll eat my hat if I see a Pro use it for sports/action with their shitty, overpriced glass. He suggested it for photojournalism but I'm not convinced. 4.5k is just too much (and way too easy to outperform for less.)

It should be dead in the water, but somehow I doubt that this will be the end of it.

>>3090814
>Literally the first time I've seen him out of his basement.

People in Florida don't have basements. You mean his garage?

>>3090906
>too much lag
>2/100's of a second

The only thing with faster reactions is his insulin pump.

>dead in the water
Only silent camera on the market
Fastest burst on the market
Most accurate af on the market

This camera makes a LOT of sense to a lot of photographers.

>>3090863

i don't like this redemption arc

>>3090914
>The only thing with faster reactions is his insulin pump.
Or an XT2 for 3000$ less.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNaVG7j_g2Y

>>3090942
>you NEED mechanical shutter for flash photo
>the electronic shutter is the best on the market though
>but the mechanical shutter is so slow, only 5 fps

Let me get this straight, theo is upset with the a9 because the mechanical shutter, which is only needed for flash, doesn't do over 5 fps.

Just repeat that back to yourself a few times.

>>3090953
>which is only needed for flash
>only
You can try to downplay the issue, but it will shake out to be a deal breaker for lots of people. When you need a flash, you need a flash. When you need more than 5 fps (?) then you need more than 5 fps.

Not sure what your point is supposed to be, tbqh.

>>3090960
lmfao

My point was, a flash takes longer (much, much longer) than a 1/5 of a second to recharge. The burst speed for the mech shutter is a completely moot point.

And the electronic shutter will do 20fps, with zero blackout or 'lag' (freezing).

It's no different to arguing that a fiat panda is better than a Ferrari because it can go faster in reverse.

>>3090964
Lel. This video was made specifically for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KLxw7SxGjQ

>considering an opinion of a macfag
oh yeah, he's so smart he bought an overpriced optiplex

>>3090968
Here's the product page for that product
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/692461-REG/Quantum_Instruments_T3_Turbo_3_Rechargeable_Battery.html

As you can see, they boast of a 1 second average recharge time.

Theo the fatty talks out of his batty.

>>3090976
Have another: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3hgX_XYLKE

If 3k+ videos is worth for something, then its for btfoing people like you.

>>3090981
>Open sb-910 manual
>minimum charging time with eneloops
>2.3s

I actually use a flash with a li-ion battery pack, theo is just doubling down on his stupidity, notice how he failed to demonstrate the flash in action.

What he DID do however, was let it be known that he shot at 1/1000, so in hss, hss is like a burst of flash and massively limits the power output, he's also at f2.8, iso 1600, so the flash power is pointlessly low.

>>3090989
>iso 1600, so the flash power is pointlessly low.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1pj0OyTCUc

You're doing this on purpose, aren't you?

>>3090991
You would think that he would at least show the flash in action...

There's still no proof he even used that flash.

what is he making his money with?

>>3090996
Here's a (You) my pal.
Savour it, it's the last one you'll get from me.

>>3090863
WRONG TIMELINE BOYS WE ARE OFF COURSE

>>3090863
Im not getting it. Can someone explain the context?

>>3090863
>Jason fanboying over Ken only when the latter said something good about a Sony camera

That's pretty pathetic desu

>>3091143
Jason is a genuine Sony shill, and Ken used to do nothing but talk shit about Sony while praising Fujifilm and Nikon. As soon as Ken said something good about a Sony camera, Jason comes out all like "wtf I love the Angry Photographer now".

>>3091143
Angry dude kept hitting on the a9 and Sony in general for a long time. Then JL had a livestream/video where spouted a lot of crap, including that no flash can go past 5fps. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3hgX_XYLKE which was, I think, the first video angry dude directed towards him directly. Some more drama followed.

Now they're buddies, apparently. Not sure how this happened either, angry dude's review of the a9 wasn't that positive. Sony fanbois probably just happy about any straw they can clutch at.

>>3091152
like Ken said, it's not about the specs anyway. Sony still isn't a camera company, they never learn.

>>3090863
>>3090890
>>3091044
WE FLASHPOINT NOW

>>3090911
Uhh, "garage". Hey guys, I think we have a frenchy here.

>>3091166
Why aren't they a camera company?

Is this yet more HURRRRR SONY rhetoric?

I've not seen it backed up at all.

>>3091477
They're a tech company releasing products on a tech company schedule, prioritizing spec bumps over the fundamentals.

>>3091483
Tech company is making it sound decent. It's a consumer electronics company.

Sony doesn't even fix their own cameras… what camera company does this?

>>3091477
remember when another consumer electronics company used to be making cameras? like... samsung? They made the best aps-c camera ever and look where is their photo division now.

File: 200px-Minolta_Logo_1981-2003.svg[1].png (10KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x200px

>>3091483
>>3091485
i thought Sony camera division is just Minolta with a sony badge, no?

>>3091489
Yes, but Samsung never became bigger sellers than Nikon, or became the industry standard in cine. If they did, I'm sure they would still be trading ;)

File: 07.jpg (106KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 960x639px

>>3091490

Pretty much. They are still producing some of the better Minolta lenses.

The guys making Sony cameras aren't the same one making Sony cellphones.

>>3091490
It is also Sony's sensors and general hardware / software experience gained from making smartphones. The last generation starts to approach what's common on that market.

>>3091483
The fundamentals are covered well.

You probably just don't like that in the end, most of your "skills" as a photographer other than pointing the camera in the right direction are slowly getting obsoleted by technology that is available for relatively cheap. So there is the retreat into mystical not so "sterile" lenses and "true" photographic gear...

File: 1383459412733.png (162KB, 284x281px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 284x281px

>>3091143
>Can someone explain the context?
I'll translate the situation for you:

-Jason is trying to bury the feud between them.
-Angry is playing nice to him in front of him.
-Angry goes on /p/ to talk shit about him behind his back.

File: 1024px-Minolta_IMG_2923[1].jpg (73KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1024x1024px

>>3091490
>go to wiki to read abut Minolta
>see this

Has Sony figured out which lenses go on their cameras yet? Or will they introduce a revolutionary new mount next year?

>>3091587
The F2,8 trio is in place.
And they have 5 AF options for portraits.
>100 STF
>90 macro
>85 GM
>85 Batis knock-off
>85 Batis
Each of them are extremely high quality optics.

On the wide end, they have some amazingly compact primes.

>>3091614
>TFW no full frame pancake lens

>>3091632
God I wish. The closest thing you can get is something like a Leica M lens with an adapter and even then it's not exactly small. I guess it has to do with the flange distance when compared to a DSLR or some shit.

>>3090763
he plagiarizes work and doesnt post his own portfolio

GUYS LOOK OUT. THEO IS MEETING UP WITH JASON L RIGHT NOW... WHY DOES KEN ALLOW THIS?? HAVE WE STRAYED TOO FAR FROM THE PATH?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VfMQXU7lzI

Alternate timeline or alternate universe?

>>3091689
>>3091704
Is this real life?

>>3091647
I really wanted the 20mm 2.8 but it was a bit steep even used and since I'm full frame now it seems kind of silly. Hoping sony comes out with some new stuff soon, that 85 1.8 is stellar.

File: 1462467921056.jpg (25KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x374px

>>3091704
I'm scared, anon.

File: uncle terry.jpg (445KB, 1585x612px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1585x612px

>>3090703
>yes, since Ken is our GOD

Ken was dethroned long ago

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:07 20:51:16
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1585
Image Height	612

>>3091704
what the fuck is going on, this cant be real

File: 1479402657031.jpg (420KB, 561x704px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 561x704px

>>3091987
>he thinks he can dethrone /ourgod/ with a couple terry shitposts from a single anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 10.0 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2016-12-19T15:43:47+10:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	561
Image Height	704

>>3091491
>industry standard in cine
Would that it were, my man.

Daytime TV, you might have a point.

File: taKEN.jpg (20KB, 484x311px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 484x311px

>>3091987
the one and only lord is KEN

>>3092036
Cinealta cameras have been used for decades in the motion picture industry. Some of the first big Hollywood digital films were shot on such cameras (Phantom Menace, Once Upon a Time In Mexico...)

>>3090584
Fuck I should not have posted his videos here a few month's ago. Now look has happen.

>>3090584
kek. Ken and Jason are going on a playdate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aul7DLhqeS8

I can't hardly wait for the results. HDR at the zoo with a speedlight? Skanky model with a gator? FLIR of a pizza?

>>3091708
fuck ya', that is quite a disgusting pic mate!

>>3092176
TOP OF KEKEST! KEN IS FATTER IRL.

File: Capture d’écran 2017-06-09 à 22.59.09.png (1MB, 764x612px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 764x612px

>gets a model, a nice place and a MF camera
>takes snapshits

Is Ken(not our god) really a pro?

File: ken screencap.jpg (142KB, 654x545px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 654x545px

>>3092363
Nice
https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/35203572115/in/dateposted/

>can eyebrow your camera anon?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/35039053732/

horrible horrible shots

File: ken model.jpg (286KB, 737x983px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 737x983px

>>3092682
>horrible
Ken is a master of light and composition. If you can't see that you're a mental midget. Do you even magnetism?

He's off to see his gf this weekend, what are you doing?

>>3092689
Them highlights are burning my retina.

He walks around town with that fat ass but can't even bring a diffuser or a ND filter to shoot wide open?

>>3092726
>He walks around town
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEnb2cFWKBs&list=PLsKqdHe_g8pOfzALcg10iZZVCqp_H5Bd7

His goto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvceKeHl0Sg

>>3092933
This was before his wife died of cancer.

>>3091490
I think they would sell better, if they still used the Minolta brand.

>>3093021
>wife
He's a pathological liar.

>>3090584
why do you cunts still promote this münchhausen complex mental headcase piece of shit? did he start posting his shot yet? I bet not

>>3093165
Are you buttmad, sonnyger? He tells only the undeniable truth, it's doesn't even matter if he shoots, he has more lenses and cameras than all /p/ combined.

>>3093310
Hi Ken. Do you still buy and sell gear on ebay pretending to be a girl? kek.

>>3093310
Your priorities are WAY off, my fellow gearfag.

>>3090584
what video is this still from?

>>3093326
pls stop Ken.

>>3093328
Just answer the fucking question.

>>3093342
Ok then, here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeyAfbXyR_c

Donate a couple of bucks or tell me to jump off a cliff.

>>3090960
The only people it would be a deal breaker for are pro sports photogs who strobe events. But then they wouldn't be shooting with a Sony anyway. So yeah.

>>3091657
Isn't this his flickr? https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/

>>3093352
Why yes it is, enjoy. There's some saucy creep shots at the beach if you like that sort of thing.

imb4 They're shit. They're test shots and I was only pretending to be retarded.

>>3093346
I gave you 10 bucks, buy a pizza.

File: Capture d’écran 2017-06-11 à 19.58.59.png (890KB, 1131x617px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 1131x617px

>>3093352
KEK! He looks like those creepy uncles going around with a DSLR and a tele on the beach.

Who the fuck does that???

>>3090968
fully triggered

>>3093392
yfw I spent it all on white bread, cheese food slices and margarine. If I wanted pizza I'd just add ketchup lol.

>>3093361
You're not Ken.

>>3093418
Shut up Ken.

File: 1482798409242.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>3090832
>>3090710

>all available x-mount lenses

Why did he blew all that money on shitty lenses?

>>3090834
He has a flickr with a bunch of shitty photos. There is also always an excuse about why they are shit. Either it's a "test shot" or it's "SOOC" so people can judge the quality of the equipment. I think he is incapable of taking a decent photo.

>>3090863
I am convinced Ken has sold out. He has contradicted himself before but never like this. Whenever someone keeps explaining that they are not sponsored and that they don't get anything for free is because that is exactly what they want. Ken got a Sony to try out for free. Most other things he tests are stuff he actually bought. It's funny he always talks about not getting stuff temporarily to test like everyone else. Now he is doing exactly what he previously criticized.

>>3093509
MADE IN JAPAN senpai.

>>3093529
He got it from a friend, why the would he need a new camera body? He doesn^t even own sony glass.

>>3093534
Thank you ken.

>>3093529
Wouldn't he be more likely to shill something that he put his own money into than something he won't get to keep?

File: Sony-A9.png (129KB, 700x286px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 700x286px

>>3093095

They got the whole camera division from Minolta, they just changed the name. They even continued to produce (literally the exact same lens with the name changed in some cases. Some are still being produced today even.) and update Minolta lenses for years.

I was really hoping we would have seen some awesome Sony/Minolta collaboration project in 2016 for the 10th anniversary of their purchase.

>>3093542
Yeah that's the problem, it's Minolta but with the name Sony which has no history or reputation in the camera world the way other brands have. Sony brand just makes it feel like a plastic consumer electronic.

>>3093547
>Sony brand just makes it feel like a plastic consumer electronic.
You've held post SRT Minolta cameras, right?

>>3093547
>Sony which has no history or reputation in the camera world
How many more years do you believe you can keep parroting this?

There has to come a time when this is no longer true, right?

>>3093534

>MADE IN JAPAN

So are most Sony lenses, doesn't mean they are good.

>>3093567
Most of them are.

Zeiss® pop and microcontrast 3D™

File: minolta-a7-d7-limited.jpg (22KB, 474x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 474x250px

>>3093551

You mean like the Minolta a7? The best film camera ever made?

>>3093346
If all this guy does is make these and batshit insane philosophy videos and doesn't even shoot photos for a living, where does he have the money from to buy all this gear?

File: JL.png (670KB, 739x590px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 739x590px

>>3093596
>the best film camera ever made
>minolta sonnygers fags
TOP KEK!

File: sad.jpg (56KB, 531x712px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 531x712px

>>3093602
He has said he sells cameras and does corporate photography on the side

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3093527
Can you share his Flickr? I will post it to every thread where this fat hack is mentioned

>>3093648
It's funny because he looks more ridiculous in thin than than he does in fat.

>>3093648
HAHAHAHAHAAH what the fuck?

>>3093648
wtf how

>>3093648
i feel sorry for the guy, what happened? magnets?

>>3093648
I don't understand. This is the only person I've ever seen that looks better fat than thin.

What are your thoughts /p/? Is he fake?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOC-VRfCt0Y

>>3094041
I dont think ken realises jason is taking the piss out of him. Its like some passive aggressive shit hes pulling. Jason is childish as fuck.

Test shots, test shots, test shots—has this guy taken a serious image in his life?

File: 1400766477691.gif (2MB, 240x192px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 240x192px

>>3094041
>You should have told him you were Fro-knows and I was Matt granger

>>3094065
Wat... Ken is making too much fun of himself. It's actually not a good thing to do that.

>>3094041
What the fuck ken is doing with that HSS did the magnetic field affected his brain?

This fucker was made a guest moderator on the Rangefinder Forum for like a week, where he little spouted so much shit the whole subforum got nuked when literally everyone called out his bull. He knows shit all about photography but he can spin a yarn really well. Any experienced photographer could see through his double-talk.

His talk about magnets and energy is bat-shit level conspiracy theories too.

>>3094041

gearfags are so disgusting

File: IMG_0502.jpg (1MB, 3232x4310px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3232x4310px

>>3094041
holy shit they're both so bad, we literally make fun of those type of photographers why the fuck do they have such a big following

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Photoshop Express 5.4.1.467
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1077
Image Height	1436
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: DSC_3412.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

I got all that stuff for 300€

-Nikon D80
-Tamron AF 70-300mm (1:4-5.6)
-Nikon AF NIKKOR 50mm 1:1.8 D
-(Flash) amity 932tcz
-BEWETAR 49 ES R1.5 1x (correction filter)
-A tripod
-These 2 bags that you can see in the pic

I'm obv a beginner to phptography and the camera is really fun to use in my Opinion. I'm just
curious if i got ripped or if i could sell it for more

Thanks in advance

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Sony
Camera Model	D6503
Camera Software	23.5.A.1.291_6_f100000f
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:13 12:04:16
Exposure Time	1/32 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
ISO Speed Rating	125
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3840
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3094287
you're fine, d80 is good enough for majority of the """""""photographers""""""" in the world today

>>3094287
Seems like a fair price to me. Be happy, it's a nice set,

>>3094274
Agreed

>>3093980
because he looks like a flamboyant power bottom gayboy when he's thin

>>3094041
that girl has a nice fat ass, the rest I don't care about

>>3094041
@0.45: "here's some high speed sync" most of the image is still blown out and he didn't manage to overpower the sun

>>3094041
also, fucking great idea to go and shoot the photos and both the video in the brightest, harshest sunlight possible

>>3094349
i keked about that most, he brought a flash but still overexposed the highlights hhahahaha fucking kill me

>>3094353
KEK! Some of the pics are at crazy iso like 3200 in daylight.

>>3094274
To be fair though, Jason had his equipment locked away somewhere and didn't have any lighting during the shoot.

File: fgfg.jpg (241KB, 1498x962px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1498x962px

THICC or NOT THICC

>>3094417
stop defending him lmao even with lights, a9 can't do shit in daylight. plus his portfolio is retarded and pretty much the stuff we make fun off unironically

File: 18812442_107365206483238_4368258920041414656_n.jpg (117KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1080x1350px

>>3094442

>>3094489
>even with lights, a9 can't do shit in daylight
this doesn't make any fucking sense. your numb skull can't even grasp that we're making fun of the photographers gearfaggotry and lack of skill here (rightfully) and you come along with a gearfag comment?

>>3094274
ken is only for gearfag technical advice, as much as he would hate to admit it. he's like the only dude with a ton of lenses that he's able to compare them like no one else can. his review on nikon lenses is pretty on point. this is why i don't give a shit about his portfolio, i dont want fucking artistic advice from someone who's only usefulness is owning a ton of lenses, and that photoshoot proves why

>>3094834
the anon i replied to blamed his (JL) lack of skill on lack of gear, your autism is showing moop.

>>3094254
>His talk about magnets and energy is bat-shit level conspiracy theories too.
It makes sense if you're an astronomer since gravity and magnetism can refract light on a scale such as a black hole, but you'd have to be batshit insane to think that the earth's own gravitational and electromagnetic field could warp the light entering your 300mm lens.

>>3094875
>lack of gear
He was shooting portraits without lighting equipment.

Have you seen the portrait videos where he had proper lighting and proper diffusion? That's when the good shit happens.

>>3094885
>thats where the good shit happens
that isn't good photography, we used to make fun of people who took those type of photos because its the most redundant use of external lights.

File: 1490765440447.png (401KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 600x450px

>I'm chess player so I posted predictably 6 blown out shots

This guy is a genius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL_bZcx8Y3s

File: Capture d’écran 2017-06-14 à 03.06.26.png (482KB, 649x420px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 649x420px

>>3095024
Truly a genius, he predicted the shitstorm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL_bZcx8Y3s
>addresses exposure
>doesn't address composition
THIS GUY THINKS HIS EXPOSURE WAS THE ONLY SHIT THING ABOUT THE SHOOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>3095025
he took
>hurrdurr i was only pretending to be a retard
to a realistic level

>>3095027
Isn't it what /p/ does?

>>3095028
sadly now yes, the will to change must cum to us all

i hope 4chan can go 2010 for just one more day and spam all these retarded youtubers with the aim to shut them down

File: a.jpg (1MB, 1342x1862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1342x1862px

>>3095027
This so FUCCING much

i dont think he understands the differnce between recoverable and blownout. He literally just dragged the tone down in highlights regardless of visible detail

>>3095032
>dem tit
Just wait for the 150mb uncompressed raw files.

File: 33060362052_d42e26509c_b.jpg (183KB, 1024x616px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1024x616px

>>3093352
>every photo is a test shot
>way too many photos just of his gear
>this shit

w e w
I bet this guy browses /p/

>>3095079
COPYRIGHT KEN DONUT STEEL