24 pictures of a day

>How come I can't find this on the internet
because its a dumb fucking gimmick?

>>3089100
>gimmick
That's not *the* reason. There are things way dumber on the internet.

>>3089100
Then it should have as many versions as a long exposure water shot. The internet is filled with variations on dumb fucking gimmicks

>>3089098
>>3089128
Because it doesn't look all that great and people much prefer a timelapse to this

>>3089100
>Ree don't like things I dislike

>>3089098
Somebody on /p/ did this a couple of years back. I think it may have been every half hour. It was a generic shot looking upward, maybe with the edge of a building or something. At first it seemed like the same shot over and over again, but then you saw the sun setting as the thread went on. it was pretty sweet.

>>3089098
http://www.shortlist.com/news/beautiful-single-frame-time-lapse-images

what did you google? i typed in 'single frame time lapse' and got a bunch of results. there are probably other terms that will bring back even more.

File: WEB 600PX.jpg (257KB, 1400x310px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1400x310px

did this one a while ago. its highly shooped though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:11:17 22:40:10
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1400
Image Height	310

>>3090620
I am looking for each separated picture, not the final composition.

>>3090626
Very cool!

www.ted.com/talks/stephen_wilkes_the_passing_of_time_caught_in_a_single_photo

>>3089098
who really wants to be awake for +24 hours, in an interesting place, to do that?

>>3089098
I'm gonna do it for you OP. I've just bought a intervalometer. The view is gonna be from my favela though.

Sounds cool, but depending on where you are somewhere between 9-15 of those shots are going to be exactly the same: dark and boring, with nearly no change. Just saying.

>>3090674
[thumbsup]