What type of camera takes photos like this? I like the aesthetic.

Its film retard this better not be a bait thread

your average Canon.

>>3088928
400 speed consumer film, stored poorly, maybe expired, and developed at a crappy lab

>>3088928
Canon Prima Zoom Mini (and expired Lomography film). YW.

>>3088928
Also, I know the 4chan generation is illiterate when it comes to attributing work, but please credit other photographers' photos. We're all in the same boat here.

OP's upload is a crop.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mbeano/16528360992/in/datetaken/

>>3088934
It's a 550d at 1600iso

>>3088952
People that don't specify their camera are trash that deserve what they're getting.

>>3088984
>t. an insufferable gearfag

>>3088990
>spooked cuck hiding his shitty camera

>>3088952
That's a whole lot of digital noise. I seriously doubt it's film. No scanner is that shitty.

>>3089204
If the film is mistreated or underexposed and brought up, or if it's shit Lomo 800, I can definitely see that being film grain.

The photographer has a "what's in my bag" feature on Lomography, so it's probably Lomo 800.

>>3089210
That looks like exactly the kind of digital noise at high ISO on my Pentax Q-S1. It looks quite film-like at 1600, in fact. But it's obviously not grain. You can even see chroma noise.

I'm still doubtful. Wouldn't be surprised if this person was just trying to pass off digital images as film for hipster reasons.

>>3088928
Set ISO as high as possible, turn down color vibrance and finally overexpose. You're welcome.

>>3088928
expired film, badly underexposed and scanned on default settings

I have seen this effect on Zenit cameras.